I have been keeping track of the girls who listing as in Cambridge on AW during 2013. All together there were 817 entries listing 2013 as their member since date only 222 (27%) still have AW profiles (although now only a small fraction still list Cambridge as their current location). For comparison in 2012 only 14% of profiles are still listed. I enter every girl on a Cambridge hot list (now standing at 629) but when I do a search for those profiles listing Cambridge I get 124-so less that 20% of the girls who mentioned Cambridge as their work location still have profiles as Cambridge based. This implies that about 80% girls tour to some extent. What is more striking is the removal (“death”) of AW profiles.
The “death” of profiles from AW can be very rapid so less than a quarter who joined in December were still up at the end of the month. Of the 817; 595 (72%) ever listed a phone number, the comparable figure for 2012 is 68% (a few of those insisted on email contact first) but one can assume that the remainder were not genuine-possibly picture scammers. Of the 595 with phone numbers 190 (32%) still have profiles up at the end of 2013 of the 222 without phone numbers 57 (26%) still have profiles up (the comparable figures for 2012 are 12% and 20% respectively) -so the presence of a phone number is not a good guide of profile longevity. Some of the phone numbers were used on multiple profiles as I have noted before.
None of this helps choose a reliable working girl-I would suggest those with older “member since dates” and some genuine feedback are the bst bets-but you knew that already.