Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: New Girls In Cambridge  (Read 7041 times)

Offline xxshadxx

Anyone ever seen the girls who advertise on vivastreet? Saw Louise once and it was horrible experience!

any link?




1 review(s) found for 91louise linked to in above post (1 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative)

Offline CBPaul

And also discussed here on the thread 91Louise.

I have been keeping track of the girls who listing as in Cambridge on AW during 2013. All together there were 817 entries listing 2013 as their member since date only 222 (27%) still have AW profiles (although now only a small fraction still list Cambridge as their current location). For comparison in 2012 only 14% of profiles are still listed. I enter every girl on a Cambridge hot list (now standing at 629) but when I do a search for those profiles listing Cambridge I get 124-so  less that 20% of the girls who mentioned Cambridge as their work location still have profiles  as Cambridge based. This implies that about 80% girls  tour to some extent. What is more striking is the removal (“death”) of AW profiles.
The “death” of profiles from AW can be very rapid so less than a quarter who joined in December were still up at the end of the month. Of the 817; 595 (72%) ever listed a phone number, the comparable figure for 2012 is 68% (a few of those insisted on email contact first) but one can assume that the remainder were not genuine-possibly picture scammers. Of the 595 with phone numbers 190 (32%) still have profiles up at the end of 2013 of the 222 without phone numbers  57 (26%) still have profiles up (the comparable figures for 2012 are 12% and 20% respectively) -so the presence of a phone number is not a good guide of profile longevity. Some of the phone numbers were used on multiple profiles as I have noted before.
None of this helps choose a reliable working girl-I would suggest those with older “member since dates” and some genuine feedback are the bst bets-but you knew that already.

Offline Rock123

Thanks for the information.

The way I pick the girls on AW is by the method you stated i.e. when they joined but also if they had a lot of feedback.

I'd hardly ever bother with a girl on AW if they are zero feedback or only had 2 or 3. Unless they are british and at least a 9/10 looks wise I'd discard them as choices if that had say less than 10 feedback.

If a girl on AW in the cambridge region had more than 40 feedback then I'd be inclined to read the profile and see if I should take a punt - excuse the pun haha.

Offline maxim

i know some have reservations re. agencys but can guaranteed zoe from agency cens  will gIve u an unforgettable experience... she clearly genuinely loves her job...enthusiastic, enegetic and incredibly highly sexed but also capable of intelligent conversation...this girl...there is most definetly more to her than meets the eye...and on the eye...wow!!!

Zoe now with Stansted Escorts. Saw her a couple of weeks ago. Sensational! Sadly, SE are so inefficient with website updates that she doesn't yet appear on it. She's very tall, slim and very willing! Cross between PSE and GFE. I didn't find any limits and doubt she has any.

Offline Gavin

Stansted not good at updating website . Anyone seen Isabella from stansted escorts. Was thinking of trying to book her .

Offline maxim

Just confirmed what you say re updates on your other thread!

Offline Rock123

There isn't much about really atm.

Offline vt

I have been keeping track of the girls who listing as in Cambridge on AW during 2013. All together there were 817 entries listing 2013 as their member since date only 222 (27%) still have AW profiles (although now only a small fraction still list Cambridge as their current location). For comparison in 2012 only 14% of profiles are still listed. I enter every girl on a Cambridge hot list (now standing at 629) but when I do a search for those profiles listing Cambridge I get 124-so  less that 20% of the girls who mentioned Cambridge as their work location still have profiles  as Cambridge based. This implies that about 80% girls  tour to some extent. What is more striking is the removal (“death”) of AW profiles.
The “death” of profiles from AW can be very rapid so less than a quarter who joined in December were still up at the end of the month. Of the 817; 595 (72%) ever listed a phone number, the comparable figure for 2012 is 68% (a few of those insisted on email contact first) but one can assume that the remainder were not genuine-possibly picture scammers. Of the 595 with phone numbers 190 (32%) still have profiles up at the end of 2013 of the 222 without phone numbers  57 (26%) still have profiles up (the comparable figures for 2012 are 12% and 20% respectively) -so the presence of a phone number is not a good guide of profile longevity. Some of the phone numbers were used on multiple profiles as I have noted before.
None of this helps choose a reliable working girl-I would suggest those with older “member since dates” and some genuine feedback are the bst bets-but you knew that already.

Interesting stuff...just shows how shockingly full of scams and unreliable AW really is! It's why we need UKP so we can sort the wheat from the chaff.

Offline vt

Zoe now with Stansted Escorts. Saw her a couple of weeks ago. Sensational! Sadly, SE are so inefficient with website updates that she doesn't yet appear on it. She's very tall, slim and very willing! Cross between PSE and GFE. I didn't find any limits and doubt she has any.

I'm sure the one-post-wonder you quoted is the girl touting herself...z_o396...Zoe96.  I hope you're not doing the same!!  :unknown:

Good girls don't need to tout themselves on forums.


Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)