New_Melania - sweet girl who wants to please and is generous with her time

[TheLorax]

AW Link:  External Link/Members Only
Name:  New_Melania
Duration:  2.5 hours
Price:  170 GBP (outcall rate based on a promotion of 2.5 hours for 1h price)

Extras:  None; all was included that i was looking for

Coms:  Communications were great prior to the meeting.  She accommodated my lack of a local phone as i was travelling to UK on business.  All comm through AW emails

Services:  OWO, DFK, Sex (multiple positions, multiple pops), CIM (no swallow)

Like many of her reviews suggest, New_Melania is a wonderful escort.  She is sweet, intelligent and a great conversationalist.  She made me feel 100% like she was having a good time, was interested in me, and was very interested in my enjoyment.

She is certainly attractive with an incredibly body.  Hygiene was perfect.  Slender with great firm boobs, smooth / soft skin, and a nice tight ass. 
I highly recommend Mel to anyone who wants a girl for a great GFE and wants to spend more time than a quick punt and dash - i 100% felt like she was into me.

[Liverpool]

AW Link:  External Link/Members Only
Name:  New_Melania
Duration:  2.5 hours
Price:  170 GBP (outcall rate based on a promotion of 2.5 hours for 1h price)

Extras:  None; all was included that i was looking for

Coms:  Communications were great prior to the meeting.  She accommodated my lack of a local phone as i was travelling to UK on business.  All comm through AW emails

Services:  OWO, DFK, Sex (multiple positions, multiple pops), CIM (no swallow)

Like many of her reviews suggest, New_Melania is a wonderful escort.  She is sweet, intelligent and a great conversationalist.  She made me feel 100% like she was having a good time, was interested in me, and was very interested in my enjoyment.

She is certainly attractive with an incredibly body.  Hygiene was perfect.  Slender with great firm boobs, smooth / soft skin, and a nice tight ass. 
I highly recommend Mel to anyone who wants a girl for a great GFE and wants to spend more time than a quick punt and dash - i 100% felt like she was into me.

Glad you had a good time.

Although her interest in you no doubt ended the moment you parted ways. Yeah she was probably 100% into you as a) you'd paid her to be and b) she wants return business.

[edmay]

Glad you had a good time.

Although her interest in you no doubt ended the moment you parted ways. Yeah she was probably 100% into you as a) you'd paid her to be and b) she wants return business.

Yeah but some are much better than others at showing it! And I definitely prefer the illusion of it.

[driver]

Is there any other way to get in touch with her without going through AW?
Had an account before which was suspended due to inactivity

[Lone-punter]

Is there any other way to get in touch with her without going through AW?

I contacted her through UKE External Link/Members Only and she is quite responsive there as well 

[maybe]

Hey buddy, whats the location. Cheers

[DipsyDoodle]

Nearest tube station is Edgeware Road.

[Meursault]

Glad you had a good time.

Although her interest in you no doubt ended the moment you parted ways. Yeah she was probably 100% into you as a) you'd paid her to be and b) she wants return business.

Why be so cynical and patronising?
The OP had a good time, that's what matters.

[Liverpool]

Why be so cynical and patronising?
The OP had a good time, that's what matters.

Not patronising in any way. As I stated I was glad he had a good time.

[bestbefore]

Why be so cynical and patronising?
The OP had a good time, that's what matters.

Yes, I agree. The remark was cynical and patronising and unnecessary. We are all perfectly aware that punting is a commercial transaction in exchange for a service, but then so is going to the hairdresser, doctor or dentist or shop assistant, and we build up a relationship with these individuals taking a two-way interest in each other, even if it is fleeting. I have seen Melania for a 2 1/2 hour discounted session and she does have an interesting back story and clearly enjoys taking an interest in her clients. If she didn’t she wouldn’t offer that deal.

[Happyjose]

Yes, I agree. The remark was cynical and patronising and unnecessary. We are all perfectly aware that punting is a commercial transaction in exchange for a service, but then so is going to the hairdresser, doctor or dentist or shop assistant, and we build up a relationship with these individuals taking a two-way interest in each other, even if it is fleeting. I have seen Melania for a 2 1/2 hour discounted session and she does have an interesting back story and clearly enjoys taking an interest in her clients. If she didn’t she wouldn’t offer that deal.

Perfectly valid comment from Liverpool, justified alone given the ridiculous, fluffy title the OP gave this review

and if the parts I've highlighted are a true representation of how you view your relationship with prossies, it would suggest you have more profound issues than anything mentioned so far

.

[Kev40ish]

Perfectly valid comment from Liverpool, justified alone given the ridiculous, fluffy title the OP gave this review

and if the parts I've highlighted are a true representation of how you view your relationship with prossies, it would suggest you have more profound issues than anything mentioned so far

.

Everyone’s wants from a meet is different, be it a quick fuck and dump to a more Fluffy style. That’s why we have these disagreements all the time..

[bestbefore]

Perfectly valid comment from Liverpool, justified alone given the ridiculous, fluffy title the OP gave this review

and if the parts I've highlighted are a true representation of how you view your relationship with prossies, it would suggest you have more profound issues than anything mentioned so far

.

Ah, the amateur psychologist. No don’t worry about me, I do not have any profound issues, you can rest assured. I am not the one wasting time by putting sections of someone else’s views in bold and commenting on them. You think I have issues!

[Happyjose]

Ah, the amateur psychologist. No don’t worry about me, I do not have any profound issues, you can rest assured. I am not the one wasting time by putting sections of someone else’s views in bold and commenting on them. You think I have issues!

Yup

Building a relationship with prostitutes, and she does it because she’s interested in her clients. Classic

You poor sap

.

[Meursault]

Yes, I agree. The remark was cynical and patronising and unnecessary. We are all perfectly aware that punting is a commercial transaction in exchange for a service, but then so is going to the hairdresser, doctor or dentist or shop assistant, and we build up a relationship with these individuals taking a two-way interest in each other, even if it is fleeting. I have seen Melania for a 2 1/2 hour discounted session and she does have an interesting back story and clearly enjoys taking an interest in her clients. If she didn’t she wouldn’t offer that deal.

Thanks 

[Meursault]

Perfectly valid comment from Liverpool, justified alone given the ridiculous, fluffy title the OP gave this review

and if the parts I've highlighted are a true representation of how you view your relationship with prossies, it would suggest you have more profound issues than anything mentioned so far

.

"profound issues"
Haha
No, the man is just saying that this service provider takes her clients seriously and treats her job seriously. As was I, implicitly.

[Happyjose]

"profound issues"
Haha
No, the man is just saying that this service provider takes her clients seriously and treats her job seriously. As was I, implicitly.

No, actually what happened was 2 white knights, yourself included, took offence at a comment bringing some much needed objectivity to a review. A comment that was entirely consistent with the ethos of this forum.

Why you chose to do this is unclear, but it’s not the first time you’ve felt the need to intercede on behalf of a prostitute, however vicariously. You also took recent offence at members wishing to share a prossies previously advertised phone number.

[pumps]

I can see the elements of obvious fluffiness in the way some parts of OP'S review was written... But I have no doubts in my mind that he knows it's a clever act on her part and its exactly what op needed for an enjoyable punt.


1st rule of punting don't defend your fav prossie, just know that she still sucks your dick good when you visit her and leave a relevant review in our review section  .

Just remember that she won't have any genuine interest in you if your wallets empty and you've been her regular for a while.

[Meursault]

No, actually what happened was 2 white knights, yourself included, took offence at a comment bringing some much needed objectivity to a review. A comment that was entirely consistent with the ethos of this forum.

Why you chose to do this is unclear, but it’s not the first time you’ve felt the need to intercede on behalf of a prostitute, however vicariously. You also took recent offence at members wishing to share a prossies previously advertised phone number.

Haha. For the record, I took no "offence". I simply stated my own opinion about a privacy issue (which I might add, I later accepted might be flawed). Why I chose to do it, was crystal clear. I'm not a "white knight" - simply someone who is part of this forum and might have a different opinion now and again. For example, I have occasionally spoken out about some of the misogyny and casual racism that gets banded around by a minority on here. That doesn't make me deluded or lacking objectivity about sex workers (which I'm assuming are the character traits associated with white knighthood).
Additionally, can I say again that the "much needed objectivity" was pointless and patronising imo.
Finally, why the second someone disagrees with you, are they labelled as having "profound issues"? Very odd.

[Happyjose]

Haha. For the record, I took no "offence". I simply stated my own opinion about a privacy issue (which I might add, I later accepted might be flawed). Why I chose to do it, was crystal clear. I'm not a "white knight" - simply someone who is part of this forum and might have a different opinion now and again. For example, I have occasionally spoken out about some of the misogyny and casual racism that gets banded around by a minority on here. That doesn't make me deluded or lacking objectivity about sex workers (which I'm assuming are the character traits associated with white knighthood).
Additionally, can I say again that the "much needed objectivity" was pointless and patronising imo.
Finally, why the second someone disagrees with you, are they labelled as having "profound issues"? Very odd.

Not only are you a sanctimonious white knight, but you also struggle with facts.

You didn’t simply state your own opinion about a privacy issue, you made 5 separate posts on that other thread to try and suppress exchange of punting info between members, just like you tried to prevent objective comments about the prossie in question on this thread.

And where is the disagreement you allude to, when it is clear the comment you quote was made before any exchange between the three of us.

The fact is, the only disagreement is between the two of you and the ethos of the forum. Pointing out a prostitute is not really into you, and is only giving the impression she is for money, is the reality of the situation and consistent with the culture of the forum. Jumping on a member for posting such (and in doing so defending the prossies honour/reputation), and describing his post as cynical, patronising and unnecessary is clearly at odds with the ethos of Admins forum.

You are deluded, you do lack objectivity, and you are a white knight. None of these things require your agreement, they are determined by your posts, which are a matter of record.

[James999]

Not only are you a sanctimonious white knight, .

Oh, Fuck off with the white knight line, it's fast becoming the go to phrase, a bit like racist, if you don't agree with him fine, but just because he's arguing with you running to admin and trying the white knight line, seriously do you need Admin to help you 

[Happyjose]

Oh, Fuck off with the white knight line, it's fast becoming the go to phrase, a bit like racist, if you don't agree with him fine, but just because he's arguing with you running to admin and trying the white knight line, seriously do you need Admin to help you 

I don’t need help off anyone to state the obvious, and I stand by all my posts here.

White knight is often a banning reason, racism not so much, and both are dealt with within the rules.

[Kev40ish]

Oh, Fuck off with the white knight line, it's fast becoming the go to phrase, a bit like racist, if you don't agree with him fine, but just because he's arguing with you running to admin and trying the white knight line, seriously do you need Admin to help you 

Like you I am getting bored of just calling everyone a white knight. Just have a fucking argument and deal with it amongst yourselves.
Admin has enough to deal with, without having to pander to childish reports.

[James999]

I don’t need help off anyone
White knight is often a banning reason

You clearly do need help, running to Admin just because someone doesn't agree with you is pathetic, and trying to use the white knight reason to get him banned , seriously grow up 

How the fuck is the post you reported (below) White knighting

Why be so cynical and patronising?
The OP had a good time, that's what matters.

[James999]

Like you I am getting bored of just calling everyone a white knight. Just have a fucking argument and deal with it amongst yourselves.
Admin has enough to deal with, without having to pander to childish reports.

The idiots have seen white knights called out, and have jumped on the bandwagon, the problem is they've got carried away and the white knight term is now overused (usually by fucking clueless idiots)

[Liverpool]

Just so we're clear I wasn't accusing anyone of white knighting. If the OP or anyone else found my comment patronising and unnecessary then my apologies.

OP, as originally stated, glad you had a good time.

[Meursault]

Not only are you a sanctimonious white knight, but you also struggle with facts.

You didn’t simply state your own opinion about a privacy issue, you made 5 separate posts on that other thread to try and suppress exchange of punting info between members, just like you tried to prevent objective comments about the prossie in question on this thread.

And where is the disagreement you allude to, when it is clear the comment you quote was made before any exchange between the three of us.

The fact is, the only disagreement is between the two of you and the ethos of the forum. Pointing out a prostitute is not really into you, and is only giving the impression she is for money, is the reality of the situation and consistent with the culture of the forum. Jumping on a member for posting such (and in doing so defending the prossies honour/reputation), and describing his post as cynical, patronising and unnecessary is clearly at odds with the ethos of Admins forum.

You are deluded, you do lack objectivity, and you are a white knight. None of these things require your agreement, they are determined by your posts, which are a matter of record.

lol

[treetops]

Y'all need to find something more useful to do 

Thanks for the review. Whatever her motivation is, her WG style is much more personal then any other I've visited which makes it a nice GFE experience. Only thing I didnt like very much is her lips, think she had them done and I'm not a fan.

She currently dropped her prices to 150/2.5h..

[nigel4498]

 Only thing I didnt like very much is her lips,

Which pair of lips are we talking about here? 

[treetops]

Which pair of lips are we talking about here? 

LOL   the ones on her face