Author Topic: Little Miss Innocent - Ash/Aldershot incall (Read 3139 times)

Darkness · « **on:** April 07, 2018, 09:22:37 am »

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

The Venue: Complex of 80s looking red brick flats on the road out of Ash, towards the A331/Aldershot roundabout on the Surrey/Hants borders. Flat is clean and tidy, buzzer controlled entrance. Plenty of parking which says 'residents only' but in the daytime there are loads of spaces. Top floor flat, so don't go bounding up the stairs in excitement as you'll be knackered at the door!

The girl: Photos are accurate; mid twenties, size 12 English white girl with a very cheeky look/smile about her. Quite short, around 5' 5" or so. Dressed in simple black dress with some nice undies, straight out of the shower. Ticks my 'girl-next-door' brief nicely.

The punt: Really nice. I'd only popped through for a 15 minute quickie on the basis that I was zipping between meetings in different towns and I'd not seen her before, so cautious. Made to feel very welcome, a little light kissing and undressing and wow, there she was! I sprang to attention immediately and asked to lick her pussy. RO was welcomed, as was some gentle fingering with 2 fingers, and she has the ability to spread her legs so very wide you get complete access to a sweet, shaven young pussy!

That frankly got me in the mood immediately so on went the rubber, for a very tight missionary experience followed by a good doggy pounding until I came. For a quickie, perfect.

Lots of other services offered, and I have no doubt that OWO and a facial are definitely on the menu and on my list to do when I go back.

Overall: Very good value for money - £40 for a quickie with a pretty girl like this is definitely something to go back to. I'd be more than keen to have a longer session next time, so when in this neck of the woods would certainly look her up again, if only to enjoy the view as she spreads her legs so very wide apart...!

mh · « **Reply #1 on:** April 07, 2018, 10:02:30 am »

I know beauty is in the eye of the beholder but bloody hell the previous descriptions are quite shocking compared to yours.

Quote from: Pipistrella on April 23, 2017, 08:49:25 pm

I saw she's short and fat for her height,no tits whatsoever despite profile states a C cup bust. Absolutely shapeless whale Shame as she has that young, studenty type of face Pictures on profile would make one believe she's slim but curvy but it was a shapeless sack . No way she's size 12. I'd say 16 and no tits.

Quote from: Billy Buxton on July 16, 2016, 11:25:25 am

she took the ill fitting primark vest dress thing off and oh my god, you wouldn't have shagged it after 5-6 pints. Fat, pale, bad cheap tattoos

James999 · « **Reply #2 on:** April 07, 2018, 10:17:43 am »

The pictures on the profile are very limited and crap, clearly designed to hide what she's really like

sancho.panza · « **Reply #3 on:** April 07, 2018, 11:08:15 am »

I've looked at this profile many times as it's in a convenient location for me but have been put off by the previous reviews. Might be tempted to go for a quickie to see who's right.

DrConners · « **Reply #4 on:** April 07, 2018, 11:12:13 am »

Good luck, reading her other reviews - You'll need it

Darkness · « **Reply #5 on:** April 07, 2018, 03:26:39 pm »

I'm genuinely surprised by those reviews, which I confess not having read before I made the booking. Indeed, on the basis of what was previously written I'd never have gone at all, but I'm holding firm to my review because I found her far from shapeless, definitely pretty, keen and enthusastic, and I have perfect 20:20 vision

Right - which one of you intrepid punters is going next then to cast a deciding vote? Sancho.Panza, you might be the very man for the job

James999 · « **Reply #6 on:** April 07, 2018, 03:29:06 pm »

Quote from: Darkness on April 07, 2018, 03:26:39 pm

deciding vote?

The fact that she has just a couple of crap images on her profile says it all, if she was fit not fat, she'd show it on her profile

smiley9 · « **Reply #7 on:** April 07, 2018, 04:44:01 pm »

Quote from: James999 on April 07, 2018, 10:17:43 am

The pictures on the profile are very limited and crap, clearly designed to hide what she's really like

The 3 Negative Reviews probably give a good idea of what she is really like

sancho.panza · « **Reply #8 on:** April 28, 2018, 08:40:53 pm »

Just to say that I’ve seen Chloe and had a good time with her. She is reasonably attractive however I would have said that she is at least a size 14 and her breasts are smaller IMHO than the size she claims in her AW profile. Her OWO was good - she didn’t use her hands and RO she was fresh and tight. Sex was good in mish and doggy but she wasn’t very reactive.

Zimbaman · « **Reply #9 on:** April 28, 2018, 09:07:29 pm »

Quote from: sancho.panza on April 28, 2018, 08:40:53 pm

Just to say that I’ve seen Chloe and had a good time with her. She is reasonably attractive however I would have said that she is at least a size 14 and her breasts are smaller IMHO than the size she claims in her AW profile. Her OWO was good - she didn’t use her hands and RO she was fresh and tight. Sex was good in mish and doggy but she wasn’t very reactive.

Like shagging a sack of spuds then?

I have to say... you are a braver man than I after the three negatives. Thanks for the effort though

sancho.panza · « **Reply #10 on:** April 28, 2018, 09:21:30 pm »

Quote from: Zimbaman

Like shagging a sack of spuds then?

You could put it like that! I just prefer some positive reactions to my efforts even if they are fake!

Zimbaman · « **Reply #11 on:** April 28, 2018, 09:54:41 pm »

Quote from: sancho.panza on April 28, 2018, 09:21:30 pm

You could put it like that! I just prefer some positive reactions to my efforts even if they are fake!

I know what you mean. There is a fine line between over doing the fake moans and no effort at all to make me think I’m doing a cracking job. The worst I had I’m pretty sure actually went to sleep while I was doing my thing. After that I decided fake was preferable