Mikayla (TS review) - Ashton

[Duel]

What a way to start!

I saw Mikayla 2 years ago and she was my first ever TS escort punt. I still remember her profile photos from back then - so womanly and angelic.....except for the massive slab of meat that stretched tom her groin to over her belly button!

Now Mikayla doesn't have boobs but don't let that deter you - she is effortlessly beautiful and you will soon forget that she isn't fully developed yet. She is totally professional and clearly cares about doing good by her clients.

I arrived at her apartment and was greeted by a 6ft stunner in basque and stockings, my heart was pounding in my ears! I didn't know if I could go through with it but she soon had me at ease. Her body, face and 8" cock were just mesmerising.

I was too apprehensive to take her huge cock and she was known for being a top so we engaged in mutual O and hand relief. She had me rim her (my first time ever and oh so erotic) before going back to giving me a wondrous BJ. I shot my load and asked Mikayla to cum on me and she did. Bucket loads. Her infamous cumshot lived up to the hype! I now regret not wrapping my lips around her dick as she orgasmed, I would love to taste and swallow her cum.

After we finished I grabbed my clothes and made a hasty retreat but longing for more ever since.

One of the most highly-rated trans on the scene and a must for anyone.

External Link/Members Only



Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

[Real John Doe]

Are you a tout?

[frankc]

What a load of fluffy bollocks...

One of the most highly-rated trans on the scene and a must for anyone.

Well not for me, I've seen this TS and wont be returning anytime soon...

[Duel]

What a load of fluffy bollocks...

Well not for me, I've seen this TS and wont be returning anytime soon...

You may have had a bad time but she's rated highly along with Kimber Kelly, Tamzin and Fritzie.

[frankc]

but she's rated highly along with Kimber Kelly, Tamzin and Fritzie.

Highly rated by who ?

[chrishornx]

Highly rated by who ?

Keep up Frank. By our brande new TS/TV expert reviewer 

[dude86]

Really do think the board needs a separate TS section. Reading that, all I think is that OP fucked a guy in a dress. Call 'her' underdeveloped or whatever you like but when you acknowledge it has a 'big slab of meat' between its legs and no tits, biologically it's a man by any other name. Sorry. Been wanting to say this for a while.

A separate room keeps those of us who can't get our heads around this away from posting these sort of potentially offensive comments.

[klaus88]

Really do think the board needs a separate TS section. Reading that, all I think is that OP fucked a guy in a dress. Call 'her' underdeveloped or whatever you like but when you acknowledge it has a 'big slab of meat' between its legs and no tits, biologically it's a man by any other name. Sorry. Been wanting to say this for a while.

A separate room keeps those of us who can't get our heads around this away from posting these sort of potentially offensive comments.

We really need a section for people like you who are scared of others sexual preferences and feel uncomfortable because they would like to try it also but cant because they are too far up their own ass in macho bullshit. Bet you watch lesbians? What the fuck is the difference? Grow up.

[Bustydusty]

Big difference - would love to join in with 2 women...

[frankc]

Really do think the board needs a separate TS section. Reading that, all I think is that OP fucked a guy in a dress. Call 'her' underdeveloped or whatever you like but when you acknowledge it has a 'big slab of meat' between its legs and no tits, biologically it's a man by any other name. Sorry. Been wanting to say this for a while.

A separate room keeps those of us who can't get our heads around this away from posting these sort of potentially offensive comments.

Can we have a separate forum for narrow minded people like you ?

[OakTree]

Really do think the board needs a separate TS section. Reading that, all I think is that OP fucked a guy in a dress. Call 'her' underdeveloped or whatever you like but when you acknowledge it has a 'big slab of meat' between its legs and no tits, biologically it's a man by any other name. Sorry. Been wanting to say this for a while.

A separate room keeps those of us who can't get our heads around this away from posting these sort of potentially offensive comments.

It’s in the forum rules, it’s allowed.

I can’t see the attraction of this part of punting myself, although from the initial look many of them seem far more attractive than most female working girls. It’s once you get past the knickers I’m afraid isn’t for me. I just accept that’s what some people like. If it bothers you that much avoid reading reviews or threads on them.

[markmark13]

Really do think the board needs a separate TS section. Reading that, all I think is that OP fucked a guy in a dress. Call 'her' underdeveloped or whatever you like but when you acknowledge it has a 'big slab of meat' between its legs and no tits, biologically it's a man by any other name. Sorry. Been wanting to say this for a while.

A separate room keeps those of us who can't get our heads around this away from posting these sort of potentially offensive comments.

You see those initials "TS" in the thread title? That's kind of a clue. Move on, don't come in.

[Donbe]

Another "TS" should have their own section BS 

I've seen Mikayla a few times, she's nice and I felt I got good service. The review is touty/fluffy I will admit.

[Duel]

Keep up Frank. By our brande new TS/TV expert reviewer 

Yeah, because heaven forbid you have enthusiastic people joining and taking part.

Be a man FFS, this pack mentality approach is very beta.

[Duel]

Highly rated by who ?

By the guys on HA for a start. 100% trans-centric and which has more trans-loving members and (had) more reviews than this place.

[Carpy]

By the guys on HA for a start. 100% trans-centric and which has more trans-loving members and (had) more reviews than this place.

Send us the links to your reviews on there mate?

[Duel]

Send us the links to your reviews on there mate?

1. All reviews and escort discussions have been removed as has all discussion of escorts. It's the only reason I joined here.

2.  The 'high regard' came from the overwhelming number of very satisfied customers, not my reviews.

3. I don't need to prove a damn thing to you.

[chrishornx]

3. I don't need to prove a damn thing to you.

you sure know how to alienate folk on here .I was giving you some benefit of the doubt on another thread but no need for such grumpy a attitude

[NigelF]

3. I don't need to prove a damn thing to you.

Well you have been trying quite hard with your responses. And rightly so, as presumably you want to help others and in order to do that your reviews need to be taken seriously and considered reliable.

Anyway, I've seen this girl as well (also a couple of years ago). Overall I did find her to be good, however I did feel a little let down by her somewhat misleading photos at the time as they made her look a bit better facially than she actually was. I was also slightly disappointed with her height as she was rather tall (as you helpfully point out in this review) and it didn't help that there wasn't any mention of her height on her profile (and it seems there still isn't). As I said though, I was still happy enough with her appearance overall and the service was good so I probably would see her again.

[Carpy]

1. All reviews and escort discussions have been removed as has all discussion of escorts. It's the only reason I joined here.

2.  The 'high regard' came from the overwhelming number of very satisfied customers, not my reviews.

3. I don't need to prove a damn thing to you.

So the girl had a lot of glowing reviews on a website that can no longer be seen?

A high regard came from a ‘overwhelming’ amount of satisfied customers on a website that again cannot be seen.

And you think it out of order that you are questioned about it? Thats overlooking the fact that these 3 TS are all friends on the scene.

You seem to come across as some one who doesn’t like to be judged but are happy to judge other at the drop of a hat!

Hence why you and your reviews currently have no credit on here!!

[Tony4447]

I’m still trying to work out which of the 3 TS’s that have been reviewed are Duel

[mexicola]

Really do think the board needs a separate TS section. Reading that, all I think is that OP fucked a guy in a dress. Call 'her' underdeveloped or whatever you like but when you acknowledge it has a 'big slab of meat' between its legs and no tits, biologically it's a man by any other name. Sorry. Been wanting to say this for a while.

A separate room keeps those of us who can't get our heads around this away from posting these sort of potentially offensive comments.

If you don't like it then don't click on it.

Simple.

[od13218]

It’s in the forum rules, it’s allowed.

I can’t see the attraction of this part of punting myself, although from the initial look many of them seem far more attractive than most female working girls. It’s once you get past the knickers I’m afraid isn’t for me. I just accept that’s what some people like. If it bothers you that much avoid reading reviews or threads on them.

+1
I never understand why people with hang-ups about TS punting swarm around TS related threads and effectively tell everyone all about their hang ups. There's plenty on this forum about types of punt I have zero interest in and I just scroll past.

[od13218]

So the girl had a lot of glowing reviews on a website that can no longer be seen?

A high regard came from a ‘overwhelming’ amount of satisfied customers on a website that again cannot be seen.

And you think it out of order that you are questioned about it? Thats overlooking the fact that these 3 TS are all friends on the scene.

You seem to come across as some one who doesn’t like to be judged but are happy to judge other at the drop of a hat!

Hence why you and your reviews currently have no credit on here!!

+1
Something fishy about this guy. He can't help the fact that HA ditched their review boards, but that's all the more reason to accept greater scrutiny when he comes on here posting glowing reviews which are on the fluffy side. Another one I saw started with "wowee" FFS.

[NigelF]

If you don't like it then don't click on it.

Simple.

+1

Considering TS reviews are clearly titled as such, I don't see how making this review 2 clicks away as opposed to 1 will make any difference. It also sounds like an unnecessary amount of work for admin.

So the girl had a lot of glowing reviews on a website that can no longer be seen?

A high regard came from a ‘overwhelming’ amount of satisfied customers on a website that again cannot be seen.

And you think it out of order that you are questioned about it? Thats overlooking the fact that these 3 TS are all friends on the scene.

You seem to come across as some one who doesn’t like to be judged but are happy to judge other at the drop of a hat!

Hence why you and your reviews currently have no credit on here!!

Some excellent points there which illustrate very well why there is understandable scepticism. I hope Duel recognises the value of scrutiny and why things shouldn't just be taken as gospel if they seem suspicious. Being a new member definitely doesn't help but actually the the vast majority of new reviewers don't get any scepticism or criticism so he should consider why that is and hopefully realise that it is indeed his style of writing/reviewing. Perhaps that's just natural to him but if that's the case then some neutral and negatives will definitely help him seem more reasonable and balanced (although he should still try to improve his objectivity in future positive reviews).

Having said that, I think his comments about Mikayla being well regarded are actually accurate. He was perhaps over-egging it a bit but from what I recall (although I'm not totally sure) she did have a fairly high number of positive reviews and comments on HA. I think anything negative was just related to reliability but I could be wrong (I also didn't personally experience any issues with that/her comms).

[Duel]

you sure know how to alienate folk on here .I was giving you some benefit of the doubt on another thread but no need for such grumpy a attitude

Yeah but look at it from my end. Every time I log in there's more and more criticism to the point where I'm being expected to prove my credentials via previous reviews so when I read you taking the piss you can see why I decided to hell with this place. Anyway, all's cool now.

So the girl had a lot of glowing reviews on a website that can no longer be seen?

A high regard came from a ‘overwhelming’ amount of satisfied customers on a website that again cannot be seen.

And you think it out of order that you are questioned about it? Thats overlooking the fact that these 3 TS are all friends on the scene.

You seem to come across as some one who doesn’t like to be judged but are happy to judge other at the drop of a hat!

Yeah, it is out of order to expect me to prove links to my previous reviews, especially as high regard comes from multiple people not just one. If you don't know HA, which was the biggest trans escort review site, and are oblivious to the esteem some of the girls are held in then that's your problem, not mine.

Some excellent points there which illustrate very well why there is understandable scepticism. I hope Duel recognises the value of scrutiny and why things shouldn't just be taken as gospel if they seem suspicious. Being a new member definitely doesn't help but actually the the vast majority of new reviewers don't get any scepticism or criticism so he should consider why that is and hopefully realise that it is indeed his style of writing/reviewing. Perhaps that's just natural to him but if that's the case then some neutral and negatives will definitely help him seem more reasonable and balanced (although he should still try to improve his objectivity in future positive reviews).

Thanks for taking reasonably and non-snarkily. I can't help it if people find my positive reviews fluffy. I just had great service although, admittedly, I did oversell Shaffire's review and I think that is due in part to having written one positive review already (and in the zone) and in part because she is so well known. It was still a positive experience just not as glorious as my review made out.

Having said that, I think his comments about Mikayla being well regarded are actually accurate.

Cheers.

[od13218]

Something worth mentioning to the OP: I used to visit HA regularly and made extensive use of the review boards. There’s no doubt that the “fluffy” style- excessive praise, written while still high after a good experience- was much more common and accepted there. I have to say that the way of things here, which is much more punter-oriented, is much, much more helpful to fellow punters in choosing who to visit. A neutral tone which mentions any positives or negatives  without either gushing or slating gives the rest of us who weren’t there a clearer picture, especially given that not everyone considers the same things as positive or negative.
So it may be Duel that you’re trying to write in a HA style here where we are expecting something more neutral, and gushing first reviews have often turned out to be by prossies or touts, so the suspicion is understandable.

[Duel]

Something worth mentioning to the OP: I used to visit HA regularly and made extensive use of the review boards. There’s no doubt that the “fluffy” style- excessive praise, written while still high after a good experience- was much more common and accepted there. I have to say that the way of things here, which is much more punter-oriented, is much, much more helpful to fellow punters in choosing who to visit. A neutral tone which mentions any positives or negatives  without either gushing or slating gives the rest of us who weren’t there a clearer picture, especially given that not everyone considers the same things as positive or negative.
So it may be Duel that you’re trying to write in a HA style here where we are expecting something more neutral, and gushing first reviews have often turned out to be by prossies or touts, so the suspicion is understandable.

Fair point. Thanks.

[Carpy]

See you just judge straight away 

You assume I didn’t know what HA was (alas I was actually a member), you assume I know nothing of the wg, and the fact that not all reports on her were glowing on that website.

[bartholomew]

Big difference - would love to join in with 2 women...

Ha ha ha. I think we've all had that thought....

So I had several 'four hand massages', not lesbian action but two girls making sure I was looked after.
But I can appreciate a TS too and I've been thinking about a two ts meeting sometime soon.

[Duel]

See you just judge straight away 

You assume I didn’t know what HA was (alas I was actually a member), you assume I know nothing of the wg, and the fact that not all reports on her were glowing on that website.

Come on man, you asked for review links to 'a website that cannot be seen' despite the reviews being binned and questioned me saying she's highly rated, implying no knowledge of HA.

On HA the Manchester girls that were consistently recommended were Fritzie, Tamzin, Kimber Kelly, Shaffire and Mikayla  to the point where answers were advised not to bother looking elsewhere. Tthat equates to highly rated so of course I'm going to think you don't know HA when you say what you did.

Yes not every review was positive, I never said otherwise, but the overwhelming majority were.

You don't have to rate Mikayla and you can dismiss my reviews but let's move on.

[Odd Job]

Something isn’t right. You say you saw this one 2 years ago and it was your first TS punt, yet on your other review you say you saw her several years ago

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=191601.0

[Odd Job]

This one as well was many years ago.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=191597.0

[OakTree]

This one as well was many years ago.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=191597.0

As is this subject matter so is this reviewer, nothing appears as it seems.

[Duel]

Something isn’t right. You say you saw this one 2 years ago and it was your first TS punt, yet on your other review you say you saw her several years ago

The others were TVs. Mikayla is TS.

[Duel]

However at this point I am tired of logging into this site only to fight suspicion and accusations no matter what I say or do so I'm happy for admin to delete every single one of my reviews, I'll only leave positives in future, and I'll post no more than one a month. That should be enough to keep the doubters at bay.

[OakTree]

However at this point I am tired of logging into this site only to fight suspicion and accusations no matter what I say or do so I'm happy for admin to delete every single one of my reviews, I'll only leave positives in future, and I'll post no more than one a month. That should be enough to keep the doubters at bay.

It does beg the question if your particular niche should have its own section but that’s for admin to decide.

It would at least have only like minded people getting involved. As it is at the moment because it spills into mainstream punting it attracts people who are fervently against this niche to comment.

[Duel]

It does beg the question if your particular niche should have its own section but that’s for admin to decide.

It would at least have only like minded people getting involved. As it is at the moment because it spills into mainstream punting it attracts people who are fervently against this niche to comment.

But the threads are clearly marked as being about trans yet the mainstream still join in so a separate section would solve nothing, they'd still comment. Usually with 'it's not for me' despite everyone knowing this as they've made the same comment 100 times before.

What I find bemusing is that the same people avoid other threads in niches they are strongly against - Asian, BBW, dom, or who are in a different region to where they live. They happily bypass those niche threads that don't interest them yet feel strangely compelled to comment on this niche that also doesn't interest them.

[NigelF]

However at this point I am tired of logging into this site only to fight suspicion and accusations no matter what I say or do

You probably should take things a bit less personally. I think most of things that have been said to you/about you have been fair but I also think you've mostly responded well. Generally, I think suspicion is healthy as it helps root out the many undesirables who try to influence this place (there are many, many hundreds of examples of such members who are now banned). If some members have to face unfair suspicion and criticism as the price to be paid then so be it as it's hardly the end of the world and it's much better in the long-run and helps explain why this is the most popular punting forum in the UK (as the reviews are generally high quality and reliable).

so I'm happy for admin to delete every single one of my reviews

Why should he do that?

I'll only leave positives in future, and I'll post no more than one a month. That should be enough to keep the doubters at bay.

I presume you're joking, as that clearly wouldn't "appease" the doubters. You still want to post, so clearly you still want to help other punters so you should just post everything you want to (positive, negative and everything in between). Also, as I've said previously, negative and neutral reviews are often the most helpful.

I think you should just carry on posting and you'll probably soon find that you've earned the trust that you desire. It's been a similar case with some other members, over time they simply prove themselves.   

It does beg the question if your particular niche should have its own section but that’s for admin to decide.

It would at least have only like minded people getting involved. As it is at the moment because it spills into mainstream punting it attracts people who are fervently against this niche to comment.

If the TS reviews weren't clearly titled then I'd agree. As I've said before, I'm not convinced that making these reviews 2 clicks away as opposed to 1 will do much.

However, if the number of TS reviews were to increase significantly then I probably would agree because it means most people would have to be scrolling through lots of reviews that they're not interested in.

[Duel]

Fair enough, Nigel. It just gets wearisome hence my previous post. Glad to know others have endured the same scrutiny.