I'm not a newbie on the trans-escort scene though, that's my point. But of course you know this already as you tried to mock me for being an expert.
So what do you want from me? 'Cause from my view I can't win.
1. I have knowledge and experience but that's bad, apparently, even though this site is all about sharing knowledge and experience.
2. I write detailed reports so as to give the best description possible but that's bad because it doesn't follow some unwritten rule about short, vague, bland reviews only.
3. I posted 3 reviews in 24 hours, giving a great shot in the arm to the trans reviews but that's bad as it's apparently a sign of touting or self-reviewing yet had I just posted one review then that would be deemed suspicious.
3. I started with positive reviews and getting grief for it yet had I started with negative reviews then that would be seen as a competing escort trying to sabotage the competition.
So just what do you want? From my end it looks like you just want a closed shop with you and your cronies, very basic reviews, and the ubiquitous non-trans fans bizarrely commenting in every trans thread as to how they disapprove of trans sex.
I came here because HA killed their reviews section and his place was mentioned as an alternative yet you're doing your best to keep the numbers down.
Addressing your numbered points:
1) No one said or implied that. You're talking rubbish.
2) Again, no one said or implied that. Also, most (although not all) reviews on here are detailed and descriptive.
3) That is the only a very small part of it - the main problem is how it's written. You start this review saying "woweee!" - who in their right mind is going to think that someone who writes like that is objective and level-headed. That's just the first word though, there's plenty of other things in the review which are written in an over-the-top manner. You can surely see why some people think it was written by the WG in question.
Having said that, I very much doubt you are and I suspect you're much more likely just to be someone who gets "carried away" and perhaps is easily pleased. However I personally was reserving judgement (i.e. deciding on how much I should rely on your reviews) until you post your neutrals and negatives as that will indicate how true my initial suspicions are. Also, as I've previously said, I find negatives and neutrals to often be the most helpful.
3/4) Yet again, no one said or implied that and it is also quite rare for someone to be accused of being a rival WG/pimp. In the very small number of cases that it does happen, it'll be the contents of the review and how it's written that'll be the main "red flag" (not that's it's someone's first review - although that will be a factor). Now that you have numerous positives for a variety of others it's obviously extremely unlikely that would happen.
What would be the point? The villagers have already made their minds up. They won't accept anything I say. And why should I even bother going to the trouble when all I've had is grief for the past few days? Not a single reply to my 3 reviews has been about the girl or her services - which is unfair on the girls - unless you count the macho 'trans is gay' BS from guys who can't seem to stay away from trans threads. If I post neutral or negative reviews they'll just be seen as attempts to cover my tracks as some Manchester tranny tour.
The point would be the same reason you posted your initial reviews. Only a very small number of people have commented on this thread yet it currently has over 1300 views and counting.
Anyway, I'm gutted that HA no longer allows reviews/discussion of escorts. I presume it's due to that stupid incoming SESTA law in the States (which I also presume is where HA is hosted). Do you know if there's an archive/any way to search for previously posted reviews? I've tried but it seems there isn't.
