The Amazing Amy - Earls Court

[Spencer Fobby]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Well reviewed already, so I will keep it brief.
Good comms, initially by email, then by txt.
Amy is probably not the girl in the pics – she’s older, but in good shape.  She’s probably between 28-30 and has dyed blonde hair. Tits are a little larger and a little lower set than those in the pics.  Some tattoos.  She’s very enthusiastic, welcoming and gives her all.
Flat was a very nice place in Earls Court, offered a shower, a glass of wine or water (I stuck with water) and did the paperwork.  Then down to business.  Stood her against the wall and explored her body, fingering all three holes including ass to mouth.  Slapped her face and spat in her mouth, then told her to strip as I got my cock out.  Let me take control of her without a fuss.
Took her to the shower and had her kneel before me so I could piss in her mouth.  Had been hydrating well all day in readiness and drenched her thoroughly.  She didn’t swallow piss though.  We chatted as I showered, her waiting - soaked in my piss while I cleaned my ass ready for a good rimming.
She showered after then it was time for some face fucking, more slapping and spitting on her.  Blowjob was very good – but couldn’t get past her throat, though I enjoyed making her gag and choking her with my cock.  Her rimming skills are top notch – getting her tongue right up my arse.
Time for anal. She prepared herself and asked me to go slow at first.  Until she got used to me and then I buggered her for a good 20 mins, eventually pumping her like a piston as she told me to rape her ass.  Nice touch. 
Finished with more rimming, ball sucking and a bit of tit and face slapping until it was time to unload. She told me she wanted me to grip her head and force my cock in her throat when I cum – so I obliged.  She came up for air having swallowed the lot, eyes streaming and mascara running as she sucked the last few drops of cum from me.
Chatted a while.  Had a laugh.  Enjoyed her company and I enjoyed that she enjoyed herself too.

[mrhappypants]

Bait and switch at £350 per hour and your review is positive?

Fuck off you touting twat.

[xxjtobxx]

This is a tad surprising. I'm planning on booking her this weekend as she seems to have excellent services, but not sure about the inaccurate pictures though Is she good-looking in real life?

[Spencer Fobby]

Well I found her attractive enough.  I know that's not much help, but tastes vary.  In my book no prettier than a 6.5  I can't say whether the photos are her but a while ago or not - it's possible, but maybe 4 or 5 year ago. And photoshopped.
I'm not suggesting B&S at all, just that the photos aren't a fair representation of her today.  Gave her a positive because her services were excellent.   

[pepsicolaboy]

Good services or not, if shes not a 10/10 stunner (and pictures are implying 'model' type), then shes even more a piss taking rip off

£350.00 with inaccurate photos 

[Sinz]

Hidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members Only

[xxjtobxx]

Well, 6.5/10 isn't exactly close to model is it...  Now wondering if I should cancel. Services seem totally legit though. Hmmm.

[mrhappypants]

I'm not suggesting B&S at all

Amy is probably not the girl in the pics...

In my book no prettier than a 6.5 

Gave her a positive because her services were excellent.

Regardless of the fact that that you think she is using someone else’s pictures and is charging three times market rate?  Your review is suspect and your positive rating is bullshit.

[Link7]

£350/hr??
Who honestly books this bird.
Her profile gives you no reason to. There's just a couple of shit photos which show fuck all and apparently aren't even her.
So the service is dirty - OK - but how does she justify parity with the most expensive in London. 6/10 looks and charging a kings ransom, you bantering me?
You can hire elite Jessica, Ashley of Maxes, Chessie Kay in this price bracket. Girls with stellar reputations. Who the fuck is amazing amy

[BillGoldberg]

Only thing amazing about her is that anyone would pay £350 for an hour with her

[Spencer Fobby]

Regardless of the fact that that you think she is using someone else’s pictures and is charging three times market rate?  Your review is suspect and your positive rating is bullshit.

There’s no need to get so annoyed. I don’t know whether the picture are her or not, I flagged that as a warning as other reviews of her here had been excellent and encouraging and didn’t suggest the pictures were misleading. I suggest they are - and thereby hopefully add balance. When I saw her in the flesh her looks didn’t meet my expectations. But I can’t fault her service. The positive rating is for her service - not her value for money.

[hw189]

At £350 per hour I would expect perfection (looks / personality / services and delivery). If any one of these fall short then she is not worth that high price tag.

[ClubbingDJ]

You can get a duo for that price....

[Candyman]

Something very fishy about this. Why would someone who is savvy enough to use UKP book such an expensive girl with suspect photos, little info on her profile? Especially given what you can get for that much money. It doesnt add up and looks like touting

[hendrix]

To be fair to the OP, can we list out all the prossies in London that would definitely do ALL those services at ANY price?

It's a very short list.

If you want a gfe fuck and suck, £350 is ridiculous, but this is far from that. I wouldn't pay £60 for a vanilla fuck as it does nothing for me.

[Beanhead]

So is the review for the lady in the AW profile and pics? I'm confused.

[Spencer Fobby]

guys, please have a look at the other three reviews of her. All glowing and one of them state that she is the girl in the photos and is facially very attractive.
I have brought it to the forum’s attention that I have reservations that the photos are her. I have said I didn’t find her especially attractive. I am not suggesting she is value for money.
But there are very few English girls that will take the treatment that I and other punters have dished out. How many girls are happy for you to spit in their mouths, slap the face and shove your cock mercilessly down her throat? Not many. Add in water sports and arse to mouth and the list of willing girls dwindles further.
£350 is a lot. No argument. That’s the price she sets - I chose to pay it. Most wont.
I concur with the other reviews here that she is a very enthusiastic and willing sp.
I flagged that she is not as attractive as I was led to believe - both by her profile and by three other reviews. I add my comments about her attractiveness as balance because I didn’t find her as attractive as others did. And her tits are not as pert as the pictures.
It remains a positive review for me because I enjoyed my time with her. Value for money was less of a concern than the services I availed myself of.
 

[pepsicolaboy]

guys, please have a look at the other three reviews of her. All glowing and one of them state that she is the girl in the photos and is facially very attractive.
I have brought it to the forum’s attention that I have reservations that the photos are her. I have said I didn’t find her especially attractive. I am not suggesting she is value for money.
But there are very few English girls that will take the treatment that I and other punters have dished out. How many girls are happy for you to spit in their mouths, slap the face and shove your cock mercilessly down her throat? Not many. Add in water sports and arse to mouth and the list of willing girls dwindles further.
£350 is a lot. No argument. That’s the price she sets - I chose to pay it. Most wont.
I concur with the other reviews here that she is a very enthusiastic and willing sp.
I flagged that she is not as attractive as I was led to believe - both by her profile and by three other reviews. I add my comments about her attractiveness as balance because I didn’t find her as attractive as others did. And her tits are not as pert as the pictures.
It remains a positive review for me because I enjoyed my time with her. Value for money was less of a concern than the services I availed myself of.

Thanks for your explanation, I appreciate it.

Keep reviewing these kinkier girls  and I may very well book one off the back of your reviews 

Just not these £350 per hour not jobs obviously.

 

[Laney08]

At the risk of kicking off more drama - Catching up on posts here and feel I should contribute as I'm one of the earlier reviewers of Amy.

RE: Bod - If you notice in my review I've mentioned she's "usually svelte and gym fit" etc. This was not to mislead but an indicator that her size does vary from experience. I've seen here at times last year essentially bootcap/tough mudder toned - higher tits, most likely because of tighter pec muscles and reduced body fat. But at others times heavier. However, still smoking hot gorgeous body-wise in my opinion.

RE: Face - I honestly dont know what to say. Amy is one of the best looking WGs I've met. Appreciate the OP must genuinely fuck Victoria Secret models or similar and fair play to him. Is she pure catwalk? Probably not. But definitely catalogue or commercial hot in my opinion. Again, appreciate the OPs perspective and differing experience levels.

RE: Pics - I agree here. Those are her for sure but from a while back I feel. She's had the same set since she joined AW 3 years back and I think they were taken a year or 2 beforehand.

I stand by my earlier review - From my perspective Amy is a standout London WG for PSE filth with combined looks and attitude to match. But definitely feel any punter on here should take every perspective into account before parting with a large wedge.

[jabbawokez]

Thanks for the review. It interesting to see how a £350 WG is reviewed ...

[Heph]

Thank you to the OP for the review and patient clarifications.

I don't get the aggravated suspicion from some fellow punters: a tout wouldn't write in this fashion, and although much cheaper whoring is to be had, most girls simply would not provide, let alone happily accept, this kind of punishing treatment.