Sarah Massage Bracknell

[pippunting]

Is he really, nothing to prove it so far ? Tell him to put some reviews on so we can all get the benefit, isn't that the point. Are you his boyfriend Zimba ?

At least veritas gives a more balanced kicking.

Although I like a bit of banter so its all good. lol

You will only fnd my reviews ligit.

[Veritas]

Is he really, nothing to prove it so far ? Tell him to put some reviews on so we can all get the benefit, isn't that the point. Are you his boyfriend Zimba ?

At least veritas gives a more balanced kicking.

Although I like a bit of banter so its all good. lol

You will only fnd my reviews ligit.

Pip, I’m glad you think my kicking was balanced but I suspect you are about to put me in the ‘haters’ camp for further questioning you...

pippunting logs in and almost simultaneously a ‘no reviews, no posts’ member called ppintin is also logged in. 

Pippunting last active currently shows as today at 11.12 and 16 seconds
Ppintin last active currently shows as today at 11.12 and 17 seconds.

Running two accounts is a breach of the site rules so I hope you aren’t lurking on one and touting on the other as that would be a bit of a faux pas to say the least.

[James999]

Do you know James

Yes I do know, and it's exactly that knowledge that sniffs out the trolls the wasters and the fakes, if you have a problem with that then hit the report button, it's
over there ------------------------->>>>

 

[pippunting]

I see you point

It seems when I did a review I was leaving it open. Should only be one now. Thanks for making me aware. New you see !

So where is Paul run of to the loo to cry ?

joking aside it seems the original people that started the thread have gone. It would be as shame if the banter is thought of as bullying.

Maybe catch up later.

[pippunting]

I guess it must be the same Veritas but I don't now why they both would not show as Pippunting

[Veritas]

Should only be one now.


Maybe catch up later.

 

[pippunting]

feel free to report and then someone will check I guess, no idea how it works.

If you really feel there is some poor conduct that's what you should do

[Veritas]

feel free to report and then someone will check I guess, no idea how it works.

If you really feel there is some poor conduct that's what you should do

Already done...you can see reports in the ‘Moderation’ section.  Admin has a pretty keen nose so I think we all trust him to weed out issues.  If he is happy, everyone is happy and then at least you can answer any future queries by saying it’s been looked at.

[pippunting]

Veritas

Does it show like that if you have it running on your phone (walking the Dog) and on a computer from earlier ?

[pippunting]

No probs Veritas

That's no issue at all. No hard feelings my end. Always best to be sure.

[paulj]

Paul has not run off anywhere to cry. He is having a bloody good laugh as in no doubt is Sarah with the increased footfall. Xx

[pippunting]

Sorry Paul

My fault this time I actually meant John. The chap with no reviews ? But a lot of time on his hands it seems.

[DrConners]

Paul has not run off anywhere to cry. He is having a bloody good laugh as in no doubt is Sarah with the increased footfall. Xx

Hi Pauline  , I think you just gave your gender away with the "Xx's" mate - or is it irony - text has no inflection you see, that's what these little guys are for 

[mh]

Sorry Paul

My fault this time I actually meant John. The chap with no reviews ? But a lot of time on his hands it seems.

No, dear, sorry to have to mansplain this to you, but "a John" is a general term for all your customers, we aren't all called John, you silly thing. Now run along and get your makeup on for the next punter, there's a good girl.
  

[houseboot]

No, dear, sorry to have to mansplain this to you, but "a John" is a general term for all your customers, we aren't all called John, you silly thing. Now run along and get your makeup on for the next punter, there's a good girl.
  

He meant James.

We all know he meant James.

[houseboot]

Sorry Paul

My fault this time I actually meant John. The chap with no reviews ? But a lot of time on his hands it seems.

James ... not John or Paul ... what book have you been reading?

[Veritas]

James ... not John or Paul ... what book have you been reading?

I think he gets confused with names - even his own.  He can’t seem to work out whether he is the owner of the Ppintin ID or not, let alone whether James is called John...or Paul

[mh]

He meant James.

We all know he meant James.

Oh dear. Sense of humour failure? Of course I knew the person referred to in the post. The only question is whether it was a he or she doing the referring.   

[houseboot]

How long have you had to login to reveal the full phone number on Gumtree?

I have rarely used Gumtree but sure you didn't need an account before.

It was around about August last year. Certainly 6+ months ago.

[Veritas]

I guess it must be the same Veritas but I don't now why they both would not show as Pippunting

Admin says he has checked out the other ID mentioned and it doesn’t appear to be connected.  My apologies for implying you may be running multiple IDs.

That said, I stand by my earlier comments concerning why some posts get a lot of people doubting and I still don’t think you are doing yourself many favours 

[pippunting]

Hi Veritas

As I said no hard feelings re this, if you really thought there was an issue you did the right thing. I just thought I had left a few things open as per my messages.

Regarding your other comment this is really the only thread I have added to as I had personal experience with a visit. It was the same with the people who started the thread, the same few people attacking the few who actually had the knowledge. The other review I put on today and one of the same pack from this thread had a go but nothing meaningful a spelling mistake. I didn't bother responding.

As I tend to touch type while I'm multi tasking I occassionally make a mistake and been busy today. Maybe I'm not up to multi tasking but a small issue.

I think there are many hundreds looking at this thread and the real concern must be the same few attacking over and over again and not only on this thread it seems. There seems to be some sort of pack mentallity.

I'm pretty thick skinned but others aren't hence the originators are gone and I thought it was a good review. He had spent time over, not quick ones like mine.

If some of the people here get off on this sort of behaviour good luck to them, I guess. I will watch for a while as I was hoping some of the people who said they were going to visit would write a review. I hope some of the braver ones still do as its a good punt. But why would they really want to, which is a shame as clearly there are many that are interested.

Its good to question things but eventually you have to leave it until evidence comes to light, but to me its obvious they are legit. But even when proved wrong, the wolves here would make no acknowledgment of being wrong. The only thing you can question, and I'm sure you will boys is the looks of Sarah etc and that's a personal thing.

Its also obvious the little team works together like a pack of wolves possibly for some sort of protection.

Dog walking again, have a great day.

[bedrock123]

What a fucking carry on.
Wright, i saw this lady 4-5 months ago and can confirm that Pippunting is more or less spot on.
Age 45-50 size 14 max and nice D cup tits with slight belly (nothing gross or off putting) though.
Looks 5-6 freckly complexion and very chatty and friendly with a bubbly personality.
Very easy coms and directions, about 5 mins to the south of Bracknell centre with easy parking on drive in front of 3 bed semi house, which is all very clean and tidy with massage table set up in front room. This is 100% here home.
£80 hr for full body to body sensual massage where anything goes and no clock watching at all. Proper French kissing, penetration, OWO, (possibly DP but can't remember) and RO which she loves, comes easily and really gets into it.
Nice shower upstairs freely available before and after. At £80hr I doubt you will find better value anywhere.

[mh]

Its also obvious the little team works together like a pack of wolves possibly for some sort of protection.

Well I'm not working with anyone. Your fanatical enthusiasm for this girl is what is suspicious to me and several others - independently.

Your admiration must have been considerable to cause you to post for the first time on the day you met her (for the only time thus far, apparently) but 3 days after joining (which was after this thread had started) and then proceed to post like a whirlwind only about her for days. You only added more reviews (in rapid succession) when questioned about your infatuation, though none of those previous encounters had given you the urge to join and post a review. Then you had the chutzpah to call out another member for having made no reviews. You couldn't make it up.

[pippunting]

Only a quick obvious response

As I have said really new. Did a search on google for Sarah and the site came up never knew about it. Saw the first two good reviews and them getting attacked and thought i would add my thoughts, then as a small group continued to attack the few and the others dropped out, I did not. I had a day off and thought I would put a few reviews on being new. Simple as that to anybody. Also never liked bullies.

Lets hope a few more chaps put on reviews

[pippunting]

Also mate it up to him of he does not do reviews but with 12000 posts and no reviews that is odd to me and I new. But I don't really care, just pointed out the obvious.

[finn5555]

Also mate it up to him of he does not do reviews but with 12000 posts and no reviews that is odd to me and I new. But I don't really care, just pointed out the obvious.

Hidden Image/Members Only

[pippunting]

Charming Lol

[mh]

Hidden Image/Members Only

That's outrageous! Surely this is the quote that deserved it?

Also never liked bullies.

Lets hope a few more chaps put on reviews

[pippunting]

And with behaviour like that maybe they will ?

[pippunting]

But Finnn I'm sure you probably know more about the court room than most of us. So I bow to your experience.

[Zimbaman]

Hi Veritas

As I said no hard feelings re this, if you really thought there was an issue you did the right thing. I just thought I had left a few things open as per my messages.

Regarding your other comment this is really the only thread I have added to as I had personal experience with a visit. It was the same with the people who started the thread, the same few people attacking the few who actually had the knowledge. The other review I put on today and one of the same pack from this thread had a go but nothing meaningful a spelling mistake. I didn't bother responding.

As I tend to touch type while I'm multi tasking I occassionally make a mistake and been busy today. Maybe I'm not up to multi tasking but a small issue.

I think there are many hundreds looking at this thread and the real concern must be the same few attacking over and over again and not only on this thread it seems. There seems to be some sort of pack mentallity.

I'm pretty thick skinned but others aren't hence the originators are gone and I thought it was a good review. He had spent time over, not quick ones like mine.

If some of the people here get off on this sort of behaviour good luck to them, I guess. I will watch for a while as I was hoping some of the people who said they were going to visit would write a review. I hope some of the braver ones still do as its a good punt. But why would they really want to, which is a shame as clearly there are many that are interested.

Its good to question things but eventually you have to leave it until evidence comes to light, but to me its obvious they are legit. But even when proved wrong, the wolves here would make no acknowledgment of being wrong. The only thing you can question, and I'm sure you will boys is the looks of Sarah etc and that's a personal thing.

Its also obvious the little team works together like a pack of wolves possibly for some sort of protection.

Dog walking again, have a great day.

You really have missed the point. No one works together, and no one is bullying anyone. Established members will however defend the ethos of the site. That is that this is a punters forum for punters. It’s not a case of a ‘pack of wolves’ attacking the newbies. It’s a case of weeding out those that have an agenda. If you look closely you will see that there are many thousands of reviews posted. Some are challenged, most are not. It sometimes turns out that the challenge was not warranted, however, it is more common that there is some substance to the suspicions. Perhaps Sarah is a fantastic punt. The point is the OP became aggressive when asked reasonable questions. The WGs social media pictures show her to be anything but slim. I’ve seen them too and agree. Further ‘reviews’ appeared shortly after by people that had also just seen her. The circumstances are suspicious. Coupled with the fact that one of you fluffy twats has been keeping the WG apprised of the situation, it’s very hard to believe that any of this is for the benefit of the punter.

Take you for example. You said in an earlier post that she had told you about reading this forum and another punter had told her about it. You even said she told you she found it hilarious. You then said you found this site after you googled her name, and you had no previous knowledge of it. Can you see why you have no credibility whatsoever? Either you are here at the WGs request or you are the WG. Whichever of these is true, we cannot trust a word you say. I’m not working with anyone to reach that conclusion. It’s pretty fucking obvious 

[pippunting]

We now have four with the same opinion mate that have been. So really anybody looking however long you have been here, will think your a fool. Which of course you are. I have spelled out very clearly why I responded reasonably politely all the way through. I have no link to the lady in question.

There may well be a few more. Who don't like the behaviour.

Every word you have said is twisted from the truth. The three others who gave a honest reviews have been snuffed out seemingly. So really I'm surprised if you carry on anybody will listen to you, a part from the few. Had a few private message you might be interested.

Come on a few more brave chaps put your heads over the parapet with some honest reviews.

[pippunting]

what is thing with swearing !

It doesn't make what you say fact LOl

[finn5555]

But Finnn I'm sure you probably know more about the court room than most of us. So I bow to your experience.

What the fuck you talking about now  speak in English

[James999]

Take you for example. You said in an earlier post that she had told you about reading this forum and another punter had told her about it. You even said she told you she found it hilarious. You then said you found this site after you googled her name, and you had no previous knowledge of it. Can you see why you have no credibility whatsoever?

Despite Spamming the thread Pip seems very quiet on that question 

[pippunting]

Zimbaman

I will try and make it clear for you one last time. As I like to help the less fortunate.

I found the punt on Gumtree. But couldn't go immediately as she was busy so I spent a little time, not much time doing a google search and saw the site and review. I then went to see her. I then went back to the site found out I had to join to review of course and did. I saw what was going on and put in my review. I could see his review was truthful. I would react as he did but that another matter. But then neither would I send abusive pictures or abusive comments.

When I was there she mentioned the site as she thought it was funny and this was after about 20 mins in and she said in that whisper "its all true". You know the whisper that seems to keep coming up.

Are you now clear. I don't really care what you think as you don't read clearly the facts or you chose to put them in whatever order.

I dont think I would mention the site, but whoever did between the date of the original review and my review did.  I expect some ladies would respond badly but she seemed to just almost take it as a compliment.

So what I'm saying is I don't care what you think as you are clearly not very bright.

[pippunting]

And as for you Finnn if you can't get the joke then you are also not very bright

Do you have any more  pictures from you days in Wandsworth

[pippunting]

got any new reviews coming up soon James 12000 posts and no reviews. Don't get out much ?

[finn5555]

And as for you Finnn if you can't get the joke then you are also not very bright

Do you have any more  pictures from you days in Wandsworth

You been on here before 

[pippunting]

Finnn

Read the thread you idiot then you would know how long I have been here.

I thought they did courses in Wandsworth to improve in mates.

[pippunting]

or was it Broadmoor !!!

[mh]

Zimbaman

I will try and make it clear for you one last time. As I like to help the less fortunate.
...
So what I'm saying is I don't care what you think as you are clearly not very bright.

And as for you Finnn if you can't get the joke then you are also not very bright

got any new reviews coming up soon James 12000 posts and no reviews. Don't get out much ?

Finnn

Read the thread you idiot then you would know how long I have been here.

The evidence before the court is incontrovertible, there's no need for the jury to retire.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Though it should be CONVICTED of course.

[pippunting]

Again

I'm sure you've heard that a few times...berk. Lol

[James999]

You been on here before

Looks like it 

[finn5555]

Finnn

Read the thread you idiot then you would know how long I have been here.

I thought they did courses in Wandsworth to improve in mates.

You won’t be here long so fill your boots while you can   

[pippunting]

Well its been fun and there is certainly an interest just need a few more reviews, and your fate is sealed.

Anyway its been amusing but the reviews say it all and nothing to prove. Anybody looking in read the thread and they will understand.

Drop a few more reviews in though.

[finn5555]

Something tells me pip could be Sarah pretending to have a cock 

[pippunting]

Frankly Finnn they should throw you off with your behaviour. I'm all for a bit of banter. But you have gone too far really. I'm not even sure you read the thread, seems to be a common trait.

I'm not going to report you but maybe someone will. Being knew I dont know what sort of behaviour is acceptable.

[mh]

Well its been fun and there is certainly an interest just need a few more reviews, and your fate is sealed.

Anyway its been amusing but the reviews say it all and nothing to prove. Anybody looking in read the thread and they will understand.

Drop a few more reviews in though.

WTF?

Something tells me pip could be Sarah pretending to have a cock 

I do get the image of an immense cock, but not in the genital (nor fowl) sense.

[mh]

Frankly Finnn they should throw you off with your behaviour. I'm all for a bit of banter. But you have gone too far really. I'm not even sure you read the thread, seems to be a common trait.

I'm not going to report you but maybe someone will. Being knew I dont know what sort of behaviour is acceptable.