Author Topic: Sweet_Nikki - Central Manchester  (Read 1697 times)


3 review(s) for Petite_Nicki (1 positive, 0 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by NigelF]

Offline NigelF

Link: External Link/Members Only

I was keen to see this girl because, as I've commented on here in another thread, I had briefly seen and spoken to her in person (while visiting another girl). From that very brief encounter I knew she looked good and thought that she sounded like she'd be a good punt. Unfortunately, I was wrong.

Comms: See screenshots below. Quick summary:
- Arranged to meet well in advance but on the day she cancelled on the day with 4 hours notice (so that's perfectly fine in my book).
- Arranged to meet on a later day but half an hour before the meet she asked me if I was still OK and because I didn't reply within just 3 minutes she cancelled my booking! I got it "uncancelled" but she didn't even apologise. She should count herself very lucky that I didn't just tell her to get fucked (and that I'm the kind of guy who would say that - rather than mess her about).

Hidden Image/Members Only


Hidden Image/Members Only


Location: Flat a few mins walk north of Victoria station. Same flat that has been used by kinky vicki, pretty blonde amy, nicki young and lovely susan. The shower head/handle holder thing is broken which is rather annoying but you can balance/slot it behind the vertical rail thing.

Looks: Her pics are accurate. Facially, I actually thought she was very pretty (slightly better in person than her photos). She had a slight "alt look" due to eye shadow and some tattoos, particularly a large dark one on one of her arms. Her tits were small (around B cups) but very pert and they did look very nice (definitely didn't drop a millimetre when she took of her dress/bra). Her profile claims she's a size 6 and this could well be true, she did have a very good body, I'd say around size 6-8.

Service: Despite explicitly agreeing to DFK beforehand, she initially only delivered lip kissing with her lips mostly locked tight (with a very occasional flick of the tongue). I pointed out (in a friendly way) that she'd agreed to DFK but she just smiled and laughed/giggled. The kissing did imporve slightly to light FK for a short while but she then asked if I wanted to move onto sex, I politely declined but then she just started turning her head. As always, my oral hygiene is absolutely impeccable (and I'd just used the mouthwash in the bathroom only moments ago) so this is just a case of her being a bullshitter.

Onto OWO and it was rather poor both in terms of technique and depth. Onto sex and in CG she put in little effort (neither a "good grind" nor vigorous up and down bunny bouncing). It did start of somewhat enthusiastic though but eventually she just started looking bored (literally looking around the room). In missionary she initially positioned her legs awkwardly but I eventually got round round that for the most part but her enthusiasm was low, only about 1 step above a "dead fish".

At one point mid-punt, her phone (in another room) rang and she suddenly got up and went to take it (she excused herself without even asking if it was OK) - I'm pretty sure she said it was probably her boss. Now there's a few issue with that:
1) I've just paid her for half an hour of her time, right now, I'm her boss (just like a client to any other kind of "freelance" service provider). Also, I doubt her other "boss" is paying her £2 per minute.
2) It suggests she has a pimp although, aside from mostly using the same texts (probably templates) as all the other girls that have worked from that flat, there doesn't seem to be any evidence of a pimp (or at least not that I've noticed). I also doubt there's a pimp because
3) When talking about her life outside escorting she referred to a previous boss as "boss" (in a normal job) however she said she's moved over here more long term and is currently looking for normal work over here (so far with no success) - so I don't see how she currently has a boss. Presumably she was just bullshitting.

She was actually rather friendly throughout (just like when I'd spoken to her previously) and her English was fine but that friendliness definitely didn't translate into good service. It did however make the punt seem a lot more pleasant than perhaps the stereotypical "dead fish" Roms who are often in a permanent state of grumpiness. Nonetheless, this punt was a clear negative (unlike Kinky Vicky who had some redeeming features in terms of her service not just looks).

Overall: Rude/worrying comms (at one point), crap kissing, crap OWO and pretty crap shag. Not the worst and still rather friendly but only good for a pump and dump (if you really like the look of her).
« Last Edit: March 10, 2018, 04:13:52 pm by NigelF »

Offline bigthickdick

Sorry you had a crap punt again mate. Cheers for the review  :hi:

Just a quick comment though, her mobile number is visible on the screenshot of the txt message thread. I know that she's displaying it on her profile (I've just checked it) but it still might be a problem  :unknown:

Offline NigelF

Sorry you had a crap punt again mate. Cheers for the review  :hi:

Just a quick comment though, her mobile number is visible on the screenshot of the txt message thread. I know that she's displaying it on her profile (I've just checked it) but it still might be a problem  :unknown:

Because it's published on her profile (and has been for a good while), it's allowed (as per the site rules) and I really can't see it being an issue. If she runs into a problem she'd just change her number anyway.

Offline bigthickdick

Because it's published on her profile (and has been for a good while), it's allowed (as per the site rules) and I really can't see it being an issue. If she runs into a problem she'd just change her number anyway.

Ok, i thought that this might be the case but i wasn't sure.

Offline frankc

One for the bin mate......thanks for reviewing.. :thumbsup:

Offline NigelF

Ok, i thought that this might be the case but i wasn't sure.

Yeah, I did need to check myself - here's the relevant part of the site rules:
- Privacy of service providers
It is not allowed to post personal info of service providers, such as real names and personal social networking profiles. Phone numbers may be posted in full only if they are published in adverts / profiles.

goldwing1

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Didn`t the fact she`s Polish ring any alarm bells considering she`s only 18?
I clocked her advert a while back and just thought it`s a con

Offline jonko

I'd been thinking about this girl for a while but like Nige my booking didn't ever happen due to her having a cold and I have so far not rebooked and after reading this probably won't do. I am fed up of pretty shitty punts from this house of recent dull Polish girls. I will not be adding this one to the list of dissapointments! Thanks for the review Nige.

Offline FLYING BLUE

Seems like her offer of an "unforgettable time" is instantly forgettable :thumbsdown:
Thanks for the review
One to avoid.

Offline Bustydusty

Didn`t the fact she`s Polish ring any alarm bells considering she`s only 18?
I clocked her advert a while back and just thought it`s a con

Why Polish? I haven’t had a bad meet with a Polish girl (yet)

Offline NigelF

Didn`t the fact she`s Polish ring any alarm bells considering she`s only 18?
I clocked her advert a while back and just thought it`s a con

As I said in the review, I'd literally seen her in person and spoken to her (albeit briefly) before I'd booked her. There are plenty of decent Polish girls out there (much more so than Romanians). The main warning sign was the fact that many of the girls that have worked from that flat provide poor or variable service. I wasn't expecting her service to be top notch at all but I was expecting it to be as good as some of the other girls who I've seen there, e.g. sexy cookie and nicki young (who I both reviewed positively).

I'm happy I punted her to see what she's like but it's very unlikely I'll see her again, unless, as I said in the summary, it's for a pump and dump/to rag her round the bedroom.

As for her age, she does look very young, she could well be 18 but I'd probably say late teens/early 20s but some things she said did suggest she may actually have been 18. It wasn't her first time doing this here (she was here at least a few weeks ago and seemingly a bit before that too). Nonetheless, she is fairly inexperienced but that doesn't mean all inexperienced girls provide poor service as that's definitely not the case.

Anyway, why did you think it was con/what did you think the con was?
« Last Edit: March 11, 2018, 02:34:19 pm by NigelF »

Offline Durch69

Thanks for the review , one for the bin I think lack of dfk