Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: LadyLouiseXRated of MK  (Read 3715 times)


3 review(s) for LadyLouiseXRated (1 positive, 0 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by Admin]


Offline Nimrod

Put bluntly, possibly the worst punt I have ever had. I actually faked cumming so I could bail without delay. Nothing whatsoever like the photos...major physical issues (put it this way...there's a reason the chiffon "dressing gown" didn't come off until after I'd paid), not "fresh" (to put it politely)...do you want me to go on? Avoid (and if you don't, best of luck but don't say you weren't warned).

Offline csmith

Put bluntly, possibly the worst punt I have ever had. I actually faked cumming so I could bail without delay. Nothing whatsoever like the photos...major physical issues (put it this way...there's a reason the chiffon "dressing gown" didn't come off until after I'd paid), not "fresh" (to put it politely)...do you want me to go on? Avoid (and if you don't, best of luck but don't say you weren't warned).

I actually would like it if you went on, it's been hilarious so far.


Offline toon972

loving this,a client faking instead of a wg.Classic.

Offline Nimrod

Apologies: https://www.adultwork.com/ViewProfile.asp?UserID=2009156

I wish I was exaggerating. I wasn't. I imagine her photographer didn't so much use an airbrush as a crop duster.


3 review(s) found for LadyLouiseXRated linked to in above post (1 positive, 0 neutral, 2 negative)

Offline vt

Nimrod, you need to use the web addresses AW provide near the bottom of the girl's profile page, it says...

Link to this Profile Page using...

Then copy and paste the URLs...

https://www.adultwork.com/2009156 or https://www.adultwork.com/LadyLouiseXRated

The forum software automatically converts them into clickable links.



3 review(s) found for LadyLouiseXRated linked to in above post (1 positive, 0 neutral, 2 negative)

Offline csmith

Apologies: https://www.adultwork.com/ViewProfile.asp?UserID=2009156

I wish I was exaggerating. I wasn't. I imagine her photographer didn't so much use an airbrush as a crop duster.


Hah, well she doesn't look too bad from the photos apart from maybe having had a kid.


3 review(s) found for LadyLouiseXRated linked to in above post (1 positive, 0 neutral, 2 negative)

Offline what-a man

Nimrod, you need to use the web addresses AW provide near the bottom of the girl's profile page, it says...

Link to this Profile Page using...

Then copy and paste the URLs...

https://www.adultwork.com/2009156 or https://www.adultwork.com/LadyLouiseXRated

The forum software automatically converts them into clickable links.

Is this the same louise whose profile caused quite a storm on auto-censored ?


3 review(s) found for LadyLouiseXRated linked to in above post (1 positive, 0 neutral, 2 negative)

Offline 8a8ylon

Yes this is the same lady (the first pic was one that TMK posted on twitter) but I don't agree with the bashing she got on there myself.  Personally if only one party didn't reply to the other I don't think it would have been so bad.  Let hope it doesn't come over here.

Offline 8a8ylon

Forgot to add even thou its a bad punt review (and I don't get bashed myself) I glad she working again.... :music:

Offline Nimrod

Forgot to add even thou its a bad punt review (and I don't get bashed myself) I glad she working again.... :music:

Have you seen her? Or was "glad she's working again" tongue-in-cheek? If you have seen her in the past six months and enjoyed it, then I am well and truly gobsmacked.

Offline berksboy

  So please tell wot are the "major physical issues" ?


Offline 8a8ylon

I haven't seen her myself just that from TMK debate she has good FB, as I don't think TMK would hire someone with bad FB and from the debate I assumed TMK would see a good return as she had a following?

Plus just feel bad about the debate which in my mind was rather bad regarding a mark? You may have court her on the re-bound as she stop working at TMK...wasn't needed in my view..stand by my last post thou :cool:

Offline Nimrod

I haven't seen her myself just that from TMK debate she has good FB, as I don't think TMK would hire someone with bad FB and from the debate I assumed TMK would see a good return as she had a following?

Plus just feel bad about the debate which in my mind was rather bad regarding a mark? You may have court her on the re-bound as she stop working at TMK...wasn't needed in my view..stand by my last post thou :cool:

Sorry to be thick (again)...what is TMK? Also, what is FB?

A couple of points. First, I saw Louise three years ago and reviewed her (elsewhere) favourably. She was a good girl-next-door experience AT THE TIME. But the fact is, that is no longer the case. Like many people in many jobs, she has run her course -- in fact, fallen off a cliff would be more like it -- and she ought to get out before what's left of her reputation is well and truly destroyed (as it sounds like is happening now, on more than one site). The experience I had a couple of weeks ago was quite horrible for multiple reasons; part of it is that physically she is nothing like her photos (and furthermore, has a disfiguration that in my view will put 99% of punters off -- it is NOT a mild one), second, her vagina smelled (something I was aware of without my head leaving the pillow) and thirdly, in doggy, I could smell her arse. You want to go punt with a girl like that, be my guest. I suspect most won't. To be blunt, she is now a tired, grubby, run-down pro$$ie working, when I saw her, from a tired, grubby, run-down flat. Nasty, skanky, dirty, miserable experience. Isn't the purpose of this board to alert people to that?

Secondly, I checked the thread on PN and I note that neither here nor there has a single person among two boards' worth of regular mongerers come to her defence in the sense of "I have seen her and the reviews are wrong". So either all those chivalrous posters on the other site are fluffies spouting off to impress their pro$$ie friends (PN is a bad joke of a bulletin board) but are actually following the advice of the reviews both here (mine) and there to give her a wide berth, or they have seen her and realise what's been posted is true, but lack the balls to say so on the website. For a girl with a supposedly big following (or at least that's what you imply), odd that not one of her regulars appears to be springing to her defence.  Also, I note she has only two reviews from the past year, and one of those says he would not go back (even though he lacks the chutzpah to give her a negative. What does that mean? "I think she's crap but you should see her"? Thanks for that.)

Third, parlours are a numbers game and pro$$ies, as any pro$$ie will tell you, can neither tell the time nor turn up for an appointment with any regularity (I suspect this is because pro$$ies aren't very bright; one reason they're pro$$ies in the first place. They like to spout the line that they're cleverer than us as proved because they're the ones who end up with the money. The fact that it's earned at a cost appears entirely lost on the fools). Louise will get hired because parlours need reliable staff, and she'll get fired when, and only when, she becomes unreliable (or the parlour is so over-staffed there isn't a spare seat in the waiting room). Otherwise, it costs nothing to have her sitting in the kitchen, even if she doesn't get a single booking all day. You're paid for work, not time. Interestingly, though, Louise is no longer working for the parlour which all the kerfuffle was about YET in spite of WW3 breaking out and lots of self righteous crap about how she'd been run out of the business by a single punter's comments (....as if), she IS still working independently (well, she's listed on AW with a phone number anyway). Odd, that. It rather suggests that upon reflection the parlour decided they didn't want her so she's had to go out entirely on her own. Hmmmmm.

I don't really give a fuck what people make of my reviews here...I'm certainly not going to defend them. I have an experience and I tell you what it was. I hope it helps others make good decisions. Louise is car-crash sex but don't let me stop you seeing her. I've done the best I can to provide a warning so others don't waste their presumably hard earned money. BTW if you are going to see her, Speedo does a good line in nose-plugs. They work well, last indefinitely, and can be ordered at a discount on the wiggle.co.uk site.

All reminds me of the old "Mike Hunt" joke ("has anyone seen Mike Hunt?"). In Louise's case, the right answer is "no, but I've smelt it." Yuck.
« Last Edit: October 29, 2013, 09:52:33 AM by Nimrod »

Offline 8a8ylon

Hi Nimrod

I'm reading ur reviews and enjoyed them and valve ur insight.  I can understand you don't want others to waste hard cash on a bad punt, as myself my only thought afterwards was about the wasted cash from my bad punt.

I just didn't want the bashing from auto-censored coming over here as that could have been avoided in my view by one of them just not egging the other on.  Just felt bad as WG figures are her bread/butter, and from the posts on auto-censored she is bring up a child (maybe b true or not).

Hopefully a break is needed, ur views taken down and improved upon.  I hope u didnt take offend and ..... :drinks:

FB - feedback
Tmk - name of the parlour

Offline Nimrod

Hi...you raise one point that I think merits discussion and that is "she has a kid and therefore implicitly her career should be ruined" (sorry if I mis-quote you; that is what I surmised from your response).  So, she has a kid? Who cares? It's totally irrelevant in the context of noting that she is a crap service provider. If you ate in a terrible restaurant, you wouldn't give it a good review because the chef had children, would you? The fact is, Louise offered an appalling experience...one of the worst punts I've ever had. In the very unlikely event that she now can't early a living as a pro$$ie due to the reviews here and elsewhere, well, that's her fault and if she wants to feed her kid (which has nothing to do with anything), well, McDonalds is hiring. Either way, why should I feel any guilt?

As for the thread on PN, which I have now read, it seems to me the entire "issue" was caused by an extremely mouthy and aggressive parlour owner who was too stupid to quit while she was ahead. Had she simply left the initial, reasonable comments well enough alone, there never would have been so much as a conversation but her gobbiness and arrogance (standard Brit Pro$$ie behaviour) damn near started WW3. What a complete fool; she's done Louise more damage than the reviews have (which wouldn't have been written anyway had she not interfered). There's nothing worse than someone who thinks they're intelligent but isn't, and who then goes on to demonstrate just how stupid they are in full public view.




Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)