Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: Avoiding negative feedback on Adultwork  (Read 4137 times)

Offline Daffodil

Seen this fear of negative feedback mentioned again. Essentially it stops punters leaving legit negative feedback for a prossie on Adultwork in case she leaves unjust feedback for the punter.

Well here are a couple of tips that were posted by phillboi, but deep in a regional thread. I haven't tried them out, but certainly something to consider and I thought worthy of receiving a larger audience:

A tip: if you leave bad FB and/or fear a WG will leave you unjustified negative FB, deactivate your AW account for a month and reactivate just before the max time the account is gone forever.
After that time the booking request will be gone and she can't leave FB. Sorted  :thumbsup:

Another tip for punters:
If a punter is afraid to leave negative FB, don't leave any until the booking request vanishes - the WG can't leave FB then either.
Then leave a FR and 'negative' FB at the same time - the ability to make a FR's with FB at the same time remain always.
No reprisals from the WG and everyone who searches her FR's will see the negative review!

 :hi:

Online Jimmyredcab

Sounds a bit long winded to me ---------------------- why not just book girls who display their number, problem solved.  :hi:

Offline Daffodil

Sounds a bit long winded to me ---------------------- why not just book girls who display their number, problem solved.  :hi:

For those of us outside of London we sometimes have to bow to the demands of a prossie (within reason of course).

These tips are intended for those who have made a booking request through the adultwork system and would like to leave negative, but are worried about being negged themselves.

Offline James999

Seen this fear of negative feedback mentioned again. Essentially it stops punters leaving legit negative feedback for a prossie on Adultwork in case she leaves unjust feedback for the punter.

An interesting tip there, worth repeating  :hi:

Another tip for punters:
If a punter is afraid to leave negative FB, don't leave any until the booking request vanishes - the WG can't leave FB then either.
Then leave a FR and 'negative' FB at the same time - the ability to make a FR's with FB at the same time remain always.
No reprisals from the WG and everyone who searches her FR's will see the negative review!

Offline blue

Why do some of you gents even care about your AW feedback; it's the pro$$ie who's going to lose business from poor feedback not you.

Offline rpg

Why do some of you gents even care about your AW feedback; it's the pro$$ie who's going to lose business from poor feedback not you.

Lots will agree with you, however if having some decent AW feedback helps to see someone I want to see then for me it's a good thing.
There are a few (not too many granted) who will only see guys with feedback. You might say "fuck them I'll get someone else" whereas I might say "I want to fuck her" so the feedback comes in handy.

Offline Cactus

I was on aw a short while ago & searched through all the field reports in Edinburgh, not one was negative, which is strange to say the least.

I've left negative, yet what I thought was constructive, feedback (but never a field report, too much hassle & the girl would never link a bad field report to their profile) on occasion when it's been justified in my opinion & it has usually resulted in a negative back. The above tips could be a good way to get round the tit for tat nature of negative feedback, when ultimately the negative feedback was earned by the girl for providing sub standard service rather than the punter who turned up clean, was respectful & handed over the cash without any hassle. Why does the punter, who acts like that deserve a negative?

Offline rpg

I was on aw a short while ago & searched through all the field reports in Edinburgh, not one was negative, which is strange to say the least.

I've left negative, yet what I thought was constructive, feedback (but never a field report, too much hassle & the girl would never link a bad field report to their profile) on occasion when it's been justified in my opinion & it has usually resulted in a negative back. The above tips could be a good way to get round the tit for tat nature of negative feedback, when ultimately the negative feedback was earned by the girl for providing sub standard service rather than the punter who turned up clean, was respectful & handed over the cash without any hassle. Why does the punter, who acts like that deserve a negative?

He doesn't. It's not a fair system.

Case in point, my latest review:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=18786.msg289561#msg289561

The one bit of negative feedback she had (all the rest were along the lines of "very sexy girl", from people with numerous other feedback i.e. not just an obvious instant, fake feedback profile) was the only truthful one there. In return for pointing out that it was a wee old lady, he was shouted down by the profile and called a scammer or whatever it was. That was the only feedback he had, and he deleted his profile. I thought that was maybe just another WG trying to attack the competition (as you see sometimes, since it was a one booking, temporary profile), but as it turns out his was the only truthful one out there. Unfortunately I wasn't able to make a booking through AW and therefore can't leave feedback on it or I'd have happily given her a negative (I get so few responses to messages anyway I'm sure I already have some hidden warning about me somewhere from a bitter WG).

Offline markwe

I usually have a negative or two about quite a few punts of the punts I have done such as either a dirty house, or lack of personal hygiene from the working girl, so it'll be useful to try a few of these tactics in future. The worst by far is confirming a meet the night before, driving all the way over and then finding out she's suddenly out of contact and I've wasted a journey!  :dash:

Offline philboi

Quote by philboi
Quote
Another tip for punters:
If a punter is afraid to leave negative FB, don't leave any until the booking request vanishes - the WG can't leave FB then either.
Then leave a FR and 'negative' FB at the same time - the ability to make a FR with FB at the same time remain always.
No reprisals from the WG and everyone who searches her FR's will see the negative review!


I should really have said:
.... and everyone who searches her FR's will see the negative review plus the negative feedback will show on the WGs profile on the date the FR is submitted!

A punter could even write on the negative FB 'see FR' The FR obviously won't show on the WGs profile - unless she's crazy - but it will let punters know there's more to read if they search for it.

Offline philboi

why not just book girls who display their number, problem solved.  :hi:

If everyone used this method there would be no FB - good or bad - on AW.
At least how it stands at the moment there is some FB for punters to go on!

Offline Festisio

If everyone used this method there would be no FB - good or bad - on AW.
At least how it stands at the moment there is some FB for punters to go on!

Exactly.  I have great respect for people who leave negative AW feedback when it is deserved.  Many people don't and consider their AW feedback like eBay feedback and guard its 100% rate very preciously.  The much revered Panel999 is an example of this.  He was notoriously proud of his feedback rating and gave positives to everyone in the hope of +ve in return.  He then left a negative on here about a girl who he had given a positive to on AW and was subsequently called out on it.

KentAde has done similar very recently.

Quote by philboi
I should really have said:
.... and everyone who searches her FR's will see the negative review plus the negative feedback will show on the WGs profile on the date the FR is submitted!

A punter could even write on the negative FB 'see FR' The FR obviously won't show on the WGs profile - unless she's crazy - but it will let punters know there's more to read if they search for it.
How do FRs work? I always just assumed they were just an extended version of the feedback comments made longer for fluffies, but it sounds like there's more to them regarding hiding etc.

Offline philboi

How do FRs work? I always just assumed they were just an extended version of the feedback comments made longer for fluffies, but it sounds like there's more to them regarding hiding etc.

It is possible to leave a FR and FB at the same time. However AW allow the FB to be left separately and the FR can be left at a later date - and there doesn't appear to be a time limit!

The problem thats been highlighted is that some punters are possibly afraid to leave 'negative' FB in fear of unfounded reprisals by the WG.

By using the system I mentioned it's possible to leave both negative FB and FR at the same time after the booking request has vanished, therefore no reprisals from the WG.

In the FR the punter can say pretty much what he wants, similar to negative reports on UKP. It's basically an account of the truth and the opinion by the punter about his experience with the WG.

To search for reports the WG chooses not to show on AW
Go to the search tab, click 'View field reports' click the far right tab 'Search field reports' Enter the WGs nickname and hit search.
All of her field reports showing on her profile or not showing will be displayed.
« Last Edit: October 27, 2013, 10:54:49 PM by philboi »

Offline philboi

Lots will agree with you, however if having some decent AW feedback helps to see someone I want to see then for me it's a good thing.
There are a few (not too many granted) who will only see guys with feedback. You might say "fuck them I'll get someone else" whereas I might say "I want to fuck her" so the feedback comes in handy.

Couldn't agree more rpg. I always think these guys who only book WGs with a phone number could be missing out big time.
The punter who has good FB on AW is in a better position to books WGs who require some FB before they will accept a booking request also it can show a WG he's a trusted punter.

Online Jimmyredcab

Couldn't agree more rpg. I always think these guys who only book WGs with a phone number could be missing out big time.
The punter who has good FB on AW is in a better position to books WGs who require some FB before they will accept a booking request also it can show a WG he's a trusted punter.

Girls who insist on feedback can go fuck themselves, I am sure smiths will agree with me on this one, I am the client, that makes me the boss.  :hi:

Offline Tailpipe

Girls who insist on feedback can go fuck themselves, I am sure smiths will agree with me on this one, I am the client, that makes me the boss.  :hi:

I am with you two on this one I have never used the AW system its has caused some problems
With English WGs I have tried to book due to the lack of fb on my profile . The EE girls
Do not seem to care one way or another.

I could and may do some with some WGs I have punted over the last 6 months just to stop the problem.
Think you can just agree a booking and then do the fb.

Offline philboi

Girls who insist on feedback can go fuck themselves, I am sure smiths will agree with me on this one, I am the client, that makes me the boss.  :hi:

You're absolutely correct, you are the boss when it comes to booking WGs.
If you only want to book WGs who display a number that's your choice.

As rpg mentions though, punters with good feedback get more opportunities and may meet up with a very decent WG, where you wouldn't stand a chance!

As I said, your choice though  :hi:

Offline smiths

Girls who insist on feedback can go fuck themselves, I am sure smiths will agree with me on this one, I am the client, that makes me the boss.  :hi:

Yes, you know my view, punters are letting WGs including bad ones set the agenda by getting involved in the A/W FB system.

The fact is some punters are too afraid to leave negative FB for the reason given by Daff so its got zero credibility in my eyes, bad WGs are no doubt laughing their heads off at this. Obviously how a punter punts is up to him, in London i have never needed FB and the day i do to get a punt is the day i will take up wanking instead. Its an utterly ridiculous scenario to me, no one else i do business with asks for FB on me, all they want is my cash.

I do appreciate punters in punting deserts havent the choice i have though. For me the best way forward is to leave FB and reviews on here and stuff A/W. This is a point that always goes round in circles though as punters have differening opinions. :hi:

As rpg mentions though, punters with good feedback get more opportunities and may meet up with a very decent WG, where you wouldn't stand a chance!

How's that? I always avoid the AW booking system, opting for private email or phone numbers, and it's never stopped me from meeting a ''very decent WG.''

Maybe it's the prostitutes who are missing out by excluding punters who deliberately avoid FB. 

Online Jimmyredcab

How's that? I always avoid the AW booking system, opting for private email or phone numbers, and it's never stopped me from meeting a ''very decent WG.''

Maybe it's the prostitutes who are missing out by excluding punters who deliberately avoid FB.

An excellent point.     :thumbsup: :thumbsup:

I blame the punters who allow pro$$ies to make the rules.    :crazy:

Offline Strawberry

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 1,251
In the same way some SP feedback can be false or misleading, so SS feedback can also be false or heavily influenced. There are punters who have made SPs feel they must leave positive feedback in order to 'keep the peace' and prevent negatives on their own profile. Also some guys can change or flip from one booking or SP to another. Basically the system is abused on both sides.

For these reasons whilst I do bear feedback in mind, I base my perception on how the guy is with me and I treat every booking from a new client whether it be by telephone, direct email or via AW in a similar manner.

Anyone who relies solely on feedback could be not only limiting their business, but also lulling themselves into a false sense of security.

Anyone who relies solely on feedback could be not only limiting their business, but also lulling themselves into a false sense of security.
Definitely agree with this; while I never solely relied on feedback, it did form a very large part of any decision; after recent experiences though I think I'll just be ignoring it completely.
On the other hand of positives all being fake, one of the best punts I ever had was with a girl who had only 3 reviews, one of which was pretty negative. There shouldn't be anything wrong with having the odd negative in principal, but with the way the AW system works, you're forced to track down any negatives because in all likelihood that's the one guy telling the truth.

Offline rpg

How's that? I always avoid the AW booking system, opting for private email or phone numbers, and it's never stopped me from meeting a ''very decent WG.''

Maybe it's the prostitutes who are missing out by excluding punters who deliberately avoid FB.

Nobody is saying you won't continue to meet decent girls either. Predictably this thread has come down to those who won't entertain feedback and those who do. I'm sure there's room for both!  :drinks:


Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)