External Link/Members OnlyThis is going back a few months.
Conveniance booking due to location and her profile has good pics and good information.
This isn't a negative because WA was very attentive and conscientious.
WA has a really good body and I found her facially attractive but ymmv.
Comms were very good by email, txt and phone (I got lost a bit).
The phone call was because I got a bit lost going to her premises.
Location was basic but comfortable enough with bathroom and tidy bedroom/place. Low ceiling beam as mentioned in previous reviews so watch out at top of stairs. This is the first bit though, the place is on a busy road so quite discreet but there were a couple of guys chatting nearby and the door isn't easy to find. WA was very helpful and talked me in on the phone, so listen carefully!
The meet had everything I wanted physically, RO, OWO and CG sex. However, it was just a bit stilted and I found WA to be quite passive. For some reason I was a bit nervous and could have done with someone taking the lead. Nothing I asked for was turned down, but the whole thing was done in an awkward silence. One thing which was a positive was WA's oral - very teasing and lots of unusual tongue action whic I actually quite liked. If you like DT or sloppy stuff probably not going to please. There was definitely no attitude or anyhing like that, it just missed something. In any other area I wouldn't bother leaving a review, would just move on but £130 for the hour (if memory serves, might have been £120) is a lot of money for most people.
Overall I think the booking would have been much better if I had taken the bull by the horns but there will be many punters who don't or can't do that. WA has a good number of positives against her name so maybe check out others before making a decision. But for me I would be tempted to go back at some point to see if I was just having a bad day, but ultimately this time I came away a bit underwhelmed and for the first time wondered if I had spent my money wisely.
A negative would be too harsh on WA but it wasn't a positive either so a neutral is a fair rating I feel.