Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Common prossy tactic to get negative stuff removed.  (Read 14947 times)

SirFrank

  • Guest
Yep, had a dose of the old emotional blackmail over on Pnet recently.

A punter pointed out that a girl had a stretch-marked, flaccid tummy due to pregnancy/childbirth, all of which was neatly disguised in her pics. This was what one of her prossie mates posted...

External Link/Members Only

So now it's the punter's fault her kids are gonna starve!  :wackogirl:

I had a similar review (not on discussion board but escort review) on %%% removed a few years back. I met a girl twice in old mystiques in Bridgend. First time she was as fit as and dirty as. Second time she'd had a kid and had stretch marks and a gunt. Rank for me and I said as much. The review was up for 3 days before it was removed. It was factual but that apparently counts for fuck all. I also got berated on a thread on there by two prossies simply for having the nerve to complain about some WG who lied on the phone to me beforehand (well before AW) and wanted an extra £30 for RO.

%%% can go fuck itself

Offline hockogrockle

In fairness to P*****N*t, I think they have an "all or nothing"  policy.  A girl or an establishment cannot ask for a bad review to be removed without all reviews, whether good or bad, being deleted at the same time. Of course, this doesn't work if somebody only has one review. On one occasion, about six years ago, a massage parlour (which I had always regarded as pretty mediocre) suddenly started getting rave reviews on PN. Or rather, its staff did. I thought it a bit fishy, but gave it the benefit of the doubt, thinking it might have changed. So I paid it a "trial visit". And had an atrocious service, which I seem to recall I summed up in a subsequent PN review as "a dire experience". Surprise, surprise, the establishment "requested all its posts deleted". And they were: the (obviously fake) rave reviews and my damning one. End of the use of PN for a bit of free publicity by the establishment concerned. So let's not be too beastly to PN on this issue. Personally, I think the site still has some value. Although why they haven't sussed out that GFE in Sheffield isn't posting fake reviews is beyond my comprehension. Sheffield has at least 15 massage parlours, and numerous independents yet 90% of the reviews are for GFE. If the reviews were proportional to the custom, there would be a queue of punters about 50 yards long down Attercliffe Road. If there is, I haven't noticed it.

vorian

  • Guest
In fairness to P*****N*t, I think they have an "all or nothing"  policy.  A girl or an establishment cannot ask for a bad review to be removed without all reviews, whether good or bad, being deleted at the same time. Of course, this doesn't work if somebody only has one review. On one occasion, about six years ago, a massage parlour (which I had always regarded as pretty mediocre) suddenly started getting rave reviews on PN. Or rather, its staff did. I thought it a bit fishy, but gave it the benefit of the doubt, thinking it might have changed. So I paid it a "trial visit". And had an atrocious service, which I seem to recall I summed up in a subsequent PN review as "a dire experience". Surprise, surprise, the establishment "requested all its posts deleted". And they were: the (obviously fake) rave reviews and my damning one. End of the use of PN for a bit of free publicity by the establishment concerned. So let's not be too beastly to PN on this issue. Personally, I think the site still has some value. Although why they haven't sussed out that GFE in Sheffield isn't posting fake reviews is beyond my comprehension. Sheffield has at least 15 massage parlours, and numerous independents yet 90% of the reviews are for GFE. If the reviews were proportional to the custom, there would be a queue of punters about 50 yards long down Attercliffe Road. If there is, I haven't noticed it.

OK I have read your post and am interested in why I shouldn't be too beastly to %%%. With all due respect I cannot find anything in your post which shows %%% doing anything right. Fake reviews on here are often spotted quickly and dealt with. I read the post about the WG retiring due to a single valid review on PN and was shocked at the reaction of the prossies mods. The problem with PN is it is run by WG's for the benefit off WG's quite sad as they have SAAFE already, it has very little to do with punters or protecting their position within the market place.

James999

  • Guest
In fairness to P*****N*t, I think they have an "all or nothing"  policy.

Unless of course a Pr$$ie pays for advertising  :sarcastic:

This site doesn't have adverts,  and as such doesn't have to appease pro$$ies to get their money  :music:

MidlandsEscortxo

  • Guest
if you suck up to the owners of both %%% and auto-censored it is VERY easy to get reports deleted etc ... which kinda defeats the point of both sites really

Gigabyte

  • Guest
There is little point from a punters point of view to use a site which tries to hide bad reviews or where other punters don't write honest reviews aka AW. As long as they have that policy its easy to see why punters head here. It is also self defeating for the escorts as well even the bad ones. Why be on a website that punters don't use or are using less and less?

The moderators have only themselves to blame. If they stifle negative reviews but punts continue to be poor, punters will vote by going to a site where they feel they will be able to find out who the quality girls are so they can have better punts after all that's the name of the game. Keep the punters happy!

Offline Daffodil

if you suck up to the owners of both %%% and auto-censored it is VERY easy to get reports deleted etc ... which kinda defeats the point of both sites really

Interesting information.

But how do you know this? By sucking up to prossienet mods and geting negative reviews about yourself removed no doubt  :rolleyes:

Offline Mr Farkyhars

If a negative is about your looks then there is nothing you can do or say as your photos should have made it clear to the punter exactly how you look before he booked you

Of course CK is a prize cretin, but on here a lot of the criticism of looks is not in the context of a review, it's just 'oh look at this pig-ugly munter, she should be paying us'. That behaviour is just as cretinous.

Offline Daffodil

Of course CK is a prize cretin, but on here a lot of the criticism of looks is not in the context of a review, it's just 'oh look at this pig-ugly munter, she should be paying us'. That behaviour is just as cretinous.

Why?

Are we so sensitive we can't take any criticism? If I fuck somebody who is 'pig-ugly' and the forum says so then I just laugh it off and accept it.

Exactly the same happens if I do just that with mates, and pull a minger in a club.

vorian

  • Guest
Of course CK is a prize cretin, but on here a lot of the criticism of looks is not in the context of a review, it's just 'oh look at this pig-ugly munter, she should be paying us'. That behaviour is just as cretinous.

In a free and open forum environment,  that is just how it is with some people, I might not personally agree but I would much rather they have the right to say it as opposed to a heavily moderated one like %%%. The price of freedom sometimes is disagreement.

Offline Mr Farkyhars

Why?

Because it's pointless. We all have eyes in our heads and we all have different standards of what we find attractive.
Now, if one of us wanted to warn others about the ugliness (in his eyes) of a SP who wasn't on the net or didn't have a face photo posted, that would be different and a good thing.

Offline Daffodil

Because it's pointless. We all have eyes in our heads and we all have different standards of what we find attractive.
Now, if one of us wanted to warn others about the ugliness (in his eyes) of a SP who wasn't on the net or didn't have a face photo posted, that would be different and a good thing.

This is a forum. We discuss things. We are allowed to discuss the merits of a prossie, be it her looks or whatever else.

vorian

  • Guest
Because it's pointless. We all have eyes in our heads and we all have different standards of what we find attractive.
Now, if one of us wanted to warn others about the ugliness (in his eyes) of a SP who wasn't on the net or didn't have a face photo posted, that would be different and a good thing.

Even if the statement is pointless,  for me the point is they have the right to say it, if anyone doesn't like what they see they can just ignore it and move on.

Offline Mr Farkyhars

Fair enough. I just prefer to read stuff with a point to it :)

Offline Daffodil

Fair enough. I just prefer to read stuff with a point to it :)

So why limit your post only to  those members who say a prossie is a minger? By your logic, if I say, 'nice one, she looks hot' then that is also pointless. True?

vorian

  • Guest
So why limit your post only to  those members who say a prossie is a minger? By your logic, if I say, 'nice one, she looks hot' then that is also pointless. True?

That seems logical to me,  if a statement saying a prossie has great tits is a valid point , then surely a post saying a prossie has ugly tits is equally valid.

Offline Mr Farkyhars

Yes. Remember that I said 'out of the context of a review'. If you're reviewing, it's useful information. Also if it's otherwise unavailable information on looks, it's useful information.
« Last Edit: February 06, 2014, 01:34:27 am by Mr Farkyhars »

Offline Daffodil

Yes.

So we shouldn't comment on any prossie profile if we've not actually seen the prossie?

Offline Mr Farkyhars

So we shouldn't comment on any prossie profile if we've not actually seen the prossie?

Comments on pictures we can all see are, let's face it, lacking in point. But other aspects of the profile are less obvious, as the various discussions on price, like lists etc. have shown.

MidlandsEscortxo

  • Guest
Interesting information.

But how do you know this? By sucking up to prossienet mods and geting negative reviews about yourself removed no doubt  :rolleyes:

If that were the case then why would I be sat here saying it... not really a fan of reverse phycology. As far as I'm aware their is only one report on %%% of me and it's positive. I have no reason to 'suck up' to anyone as tbqh it comes across as rather desperate.
The reason for knowing is that a few parlours I have worked for have informed me by them palling up with owners of sites means that they can have certain reports removed about girls. Not sure what the owners get out of it, I'm sure your little imagination can work that one out

James999

  • Guest
a few parlours I have worked for have informed me by them palling up with owners of sites means that they can have certain reports removed about girls.

Of course a pimp would never lie  :lol:

Not sure what the owners get out of it,

They get the stupid pro$$ies to continue to work for them and take half (appx) of their money

MidlandsEscortxo

  • Guest
Of course a pimp would never lie  :lol:

They get the stupid pro$$ies to continue to work for them and take half (appx) of their money

I've seen it happen. Also parlours/agencies very very rarely take half your earnings. Could probably think of one where they take half. Even the worst of the worst don't take half

James999

  • Guest
Also parlours/agencies very very rarely take half your earnings. Could probably think of one where they take half. Even the worst of the worst don't take half

Really, so numerous different pro$$ies must have told me lies then  :scare:

Offline Steve2

I've seen it happen. Also parlours/agencies very very rarely take half your earnings. Could probably think of one where they take half. Even the worst of the worst don't take half

Not my experience from talking to girls over the years

 :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi:

MidlandsEscortxo

  • Guest
Really, so numerous different pro$$ies must have told me lies then  :scare:

Different areas vary I'm guessing but of all the parlours/agencies I've worked for and know of in Leicester, Northamptonshire, Milton Keynes and Bedford it if 1/3. V strange for a girl to work for 50% unless the rate was considerably higher than average, but hey I'm sure you as a punter know better than the girl who works for various places


MidlandsEscortxo

  • Guest
That would explain it  :sarcastic:

By saying guessing I didn't wanna say misinformed/lied to

Offline Daffodil

If that were the case then why would I be sat here saying it... not really a fan of reverse phycology. As far as I'm aware their is only one report on %%% of me and it's positive. I have no reason to 'suck up' to anyone as tbqh it comes across as rather desperate.
The reason for knowing is that a few parlours I have worked for have informed me by them palling up with owners of sites means that they can have certain reports removed about girls. Not sure what the owners get out of it, I'm sure your little imagination can work that one out

Yes, of course I believe that you know this information because 'somebody you know' told you  :rolleyes:

MidlandsEscortxo

  • Guest
Yes, of course I believe that you know this information because 'somebody you know' told you  :rolleyes:

Okay darlin, gosh I keep forgetting that you as a punter know absolutely everything about the sex industry and me as an actual worker in the industry know nothing, il just sit in the corner avoiding the tax man and on the crack pipe like I'm sure is how you view all prossies. Be sure to have a nice day :)

Sailormack

  • Guest
Okay darlin, gosh I keep forgetting that you as a punter know absolutely everything about the sex industry and me as an actual worker in the industry know nothing, il just sit in the corner avoiding the tax man and on the crack pipe like I'm sure is how you view all prossies. Be sure to have a nice day :)

At last, we have an honest pro$$ie :cool:

MidlandsEscortxo

  • Guest
At last, we have an honest pro$$ie :cool:

Well the first being correct, the latter more in jest

Sailormack

  • Guest
Well the first being correct, the latter more in jest

Jest?

Are you sure you're a real pro$$ie  :cool:

James999

  • Guest
You could have a point there Sailor, after all "Midlands" despite claiming to be a pro$$ie didn't even know the typical parlour take  :sarcastic:

MidlandsEscortxo

  • Guest
You could have a point there Sailor, after all "Midlands" despite claiming to be a pro$$ie didn't even know the typical parlour take  :sarcastic:

All 7 parlours I have worked on with the exception of one has always been a third, why you seem to think banging a few wg makes you so knowledgable is beyond me. Just because I visit a doctor does not mean I know his salary..


MidlandsEscortxo

  • Guest


Members on this site know I'm a real prossie having contacted me through AW

James999

  • Guest
What's your AW profile name then ?

MidlandsEscortxo

  • Guest
What's your AW profile name then ?

Message me and i'l happily send the link/user name, altough probably on the 'fat' side for your liking so try not to be too disappointed darling. Quick question; is it okay for me to send my username in a private message as dont want to be seen as 'touting' and banned

James999

  • Guest
As I have asked you can message your name to me without problems  :hi:

MidlandsEscortxo

  • Guest
As I have asked you can message your name to me without problems  :hi:

sent


Offline mattylondon

Your mate looks like

Hidden Image/Members Only
A couple more to add to your ever increasing wanking collection then James?! :sarcastic:



OldAdmin

  • Guest
Yet another one - Wants me to delete a negative review because she's getting grief from her agency owner (aka pimp) :rolleyes:

Offline Daffodil

Yet another one - Wants me to delete a negative review because she's getting grief from her agency owner (aka pimp) :rolleyes:

If genuine, if she'd have given a good service in the first place then she wouldn't have received a negative and wouldn't now be getting grief off her agency  :hi:

Perhaps she'll now learn to give a better service!

vorian

  • Guest
If genuine, if she'd have given a good service in the first place then she wouldn't have received a negative and wouldn't now be getting grief off her agency  :hi:

Perhaps she'll now learn to give a better service!

Quite right plenty of prossies on here who put the effort in give a good service and get great reviews.  If they can't stand the heat they should get of of the kitchen.

OldAdmin

  • Guest
The review in question: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=24400.0

I might as well delete this whole site if a negative review is deleted just because a prostitute doesn't want it.

Offline Dani

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 2,603
  • Likes: 1
Its a joke.  If you don't want a bad review then give a good service.  If you are having an off day, Do what I do and don't work.  After all your off day can led to disappointed clients and bad reviews.

When it comes to paying out 3figure sums of money for an hour of fun and not a necessity men have the right to expect you to be at your very best and have a right to complain if you are not.  Its a hell of a lot of money to throw away on someone who couldn't be bothered that day as it was an off day.  That's one of the bonuses of this job.  You only have to work when you are in the right frame of mind for it.

As for saying the Agency were mithering her to do another booking whilst she was with this guy, how would she know as her phone should have been either off or on silent (everyone prossie knows to do this and not check her phone while with a client) so she would not have seen it until after the booking so would have had no need to con him out of 30minutes as would not have known she had another one straight after

Offline Taggart

Its a joke.  If you don't want a bad review then give a good service.  If you are having an off day, Do what I do and don't work.  After all your off day can led to disappointed clients and bad reviews.

When it comes to paying out 3figure sums of money for an hour of fun and not a necessity men have the right to expect you to be at your very best and have a right to complain if you are not.  Its a hell of a lot of money to throw away on someone who couldn't be bothered that day as it was an off day.  That's one of the bonuses of this job.  You only have to work when you are in the right frame of mind for it.

As for saying the Agency were mithering her to do another booking whilst she was with this guy, how would she know as her phone should have been either off or on silent (everyone prossie knows to do this and not check her phone while with a client) so she would not have seen it until after the booking so would have had no need to con him out of 30minutes as would not have known she had another one straight after

Hey Dani, ever thought of setting up a finishing school for WGs?

There's a lot of sense in that post, and yes if we are paying a good three figure sum, we expect service, a smile and some personality too. I'm still a bit shocked however, to hear words like that from a WG.

Are things changing for the better?