Sugar Baby?
Masaj
Shemales

Author Topic: Littlemissrachx Wakefield/Leeds  (Read 1465 times)


10 review(s) for Littlemissrachx (8 positive, 2 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by Brazilian Martian]

redbillygibson

  • Guest
External Link/Members Only

£110 1 hour incall

I have been looking to book this girl for quite some time and finally our paths crossed so a meet was arranged. Comms were a bit hit and miss and I found myself doing most of the running like trying to get a location, and didn't get the final confirmation until 30 minutes before meet. Just enough time for me to make it.

So with a rush to get there at the allotted time I sped off. Managed to get to post code with 5 minutes to go and text her for final instructions. nothing. left it 2 minutes and text again....nothing. rang on the arranged meeting time no answer. rang after another 5 minutes still no answer, So I sent a text to Plan B. After 10 minutes past the booking time and 15 minutes after I first arrived, I got a text saying 'sorry delayed by my previous client'. Now seeing as I had requested her first booking of the day over a 3 day period. This was the 2nd black mark against MissRach. But onwards and upwards waited another couple of minutes for details and I was told to park in exactly the place I was parked and enter a gate no more than 5 yards infront of me. Lucky that but where the f@@k did the 'last client' go ?. No one came or went while I was there.
Anyway went to the door and entered 20 mintes late.

Venue was is an annex off of the main house in a quiet safe suburban area with easy access from M62 or M1, no issues with that. Clean and fit for purpose. Although stank of fags. (ex smoker me I hate it.)

Rachel was wearing what I requested, and after doing the paperwork we went to the bedroom. Where we both disrobed, I was a little underwhelmed by her then nice enough face, but quite a dumpy figure. proper baby belly with stretch marks and an orange peel arse and thighs, mmmmmm not what I was expecting.

Onto the action. In all honesty I can't really recall that much from this instantly forgettable meeting, apart from pretty average kissing went down for a taste of the NOT too sweet smelling or tasting, but wet pussy, an excellent blow job TBF(if it hadn't been this would be a negative). and onto Mish for the first pop.

A little chat but Little RBG wasn't in the slight bit interested, and where as other girls in the area would take this as a personal affront and work on the little member for all they were worth, but Rachel gave the obligatory minimum and was the quite content, to sit and chat. In all honesty I wasn't in the slightest into her so Whatever she did it wouldn't have worked.

Left  1 hour 5 minutes after I got there feeling distinctively underwhelmed.

Would I go back? Have a guess.

And something that was bugging me a little was the picture on her profile in the school girl out fit with face scribbled out.? I cant post the original for some reason, but here is a link

External Link/Members Only.

That is not Rachel ...lol

   

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline john.punter

External Link/Members Only

Rachel was wearing what I requested, and after doing the paperwork we went to the bedroom. Where we both disrobed, I was a little underwhelmed by her then nice enough face, but quite a dumpy figure. proper baby belly with stretch marks and an orange peel arse and thighs, mmmmmm not what I was expecting.

Onto the action. In all honesty I can't really recall that much from this instantly forgettable meeting, apart from pretty average kissing went down for a taste of the NOT too sweet smelling or tasting, but wet pussy, an excellent blow job TBF(if it hadn't been this would be a negative). and onto Mish for the first pop.

And something that was bugging me a little was the picture on her profile in the school girl out fit with face scribbled out.? I cant post the original for some reason, but here is a link

External Link/Members Only.

That is not Rachel ...lol
 or
   

Hidden Image/Members Only

Well RBG, you've just stopped my booking plans right in their tracks. Rachel had received 8 positive reviews, and no Neutral or Negatives, up until today!

After reading the very recent reviews by Stickman and Stevedave, two of my favourite reviewers, Rachel had been bumped up to the top of my to do hotlist! I'm confused, as previous reviewers (Cas Man, James Brown, Mr FF, etc) also gave her glowing reports, and her description on AW has not been seriously contradicted up to press.

I am aware that YMMV, and appreciate the fact that you've highlighted the fact that the schoolgirl pic on her profile is not her, but your comments 'dumpy figure. proper baby belly with stretch marks and an orange peel arse and thighs.... average kissing went down for a taste of the NOT too sweet smelling or tasting, but wet pussy' have quite put me off!

Any comments from previous reviewers?

Offline stevedave

Any comments from previous reviewers?

Good, honest review that, hats off OP.

For what it's worth, my review could have easily gone down as a neutral, but I decided to make it a pos... it was a very, very light green though if you get my drift.

From the review above, I do recognise a few elements... slightly sporadic comms, cigarette smell, and an excellent blowjob all ring right. I personally didn't find her dumpy or anything, but it's a wee while since I saw her, she may have been on the Greggs diet since then.

I think she probably is a good punt if you take the lead and tell her what you want, I get the impression she's quite submissive.

Offline mrfishyfoo

Cheers for sharing MrRBG. Reads to me like she was late out of bed and didn't want to be there.  :thumbsdown: :thumbsdown:

I had to read my review of her again to check if I'd in any way got giddy with my description of her and I stand by it. I'm going with SD's notion that she's been on the pies since I last saw her which is now sometime ago.

Well spotted that one of her profile pictures is a fake.  :hi: :hi: That's well fucking naughty on her part and TBH I never clocked it.  :dash: :dash: :dash:



« Last Edit: February 18, 2018, 05:44:18 pm by mrfishyfoo »

stickman1980

  • Guest
Any comments from previous reviewers?
Well that's a turn up for the books isn't it?? It's your review RBG, and you can only write it as you see it.

I've seen the lass in 2018 so pretty recent.  Assuming you were quite recent too RBG??

Can't see how she could be described as dumpy tbh but beauty is in the eye of the beholder maybe??  :unknown:

I hate smoke and, although you could smell it slightly in the place, i couldn't detect it on her at all.

An unclean pussy is unforgivable in her line of work but again i didn't encounter that either.

I do recognise her comms being sporadic and the delayed start to your meet, her excuse and then the lack of a previous punter dashing out was a carbon copy of mine (i suspect we parked in the same place too!!).

She did mention previous health issues linked to her stomach scaring (rather than stretch marks) but you'd have thought that if that was an issue on the day you saw her she'd have mentionned she wasn't feeling 100% and be apologetic??

Great spot on the fake picture as well - very naughty one that.

Goes to show the Law of the Fish (YMMV) always applies in thid game!!

Offline oarsman

I saw Rachel last month and , although not  blonde, I would say the picture was almost certainly her albeit taken a while ago.

Bodily she was nothing like the girl in the review here so , while not exactly a gym bunny she was slim without being skinny, no trace of cellulite as far as I could see, flat enough stomach, beautiful small but firm boobs and the softest pussy I've encountered in a long time, neat and very clean. She wears glasses but did ask if I'd like her to remove them and I would describe her as attractive in the cliched girl next door vein. The marks on her stomach are due to an operation at an early age and she does suffer from a recurring  illness that means she can't always work . She's originally from Northamptonshire and I found her very friendly and chatty ( as you'll have gathered ), very keen to please so I'd agree with the submissive description, ditto great head and kissing and very enthusiastic mover !

It was the same venue, same parking, same gate. Didn't notice any smoking but the bedroom had very bright ceiling lights . I arrived ten minutes early and got in ten minutes late !  but it was the first slot of the day and she'd travelled from home . I think other girls use the same place on a rota basis .

I would certainly recommend her ; the only downside for me was that there was no reference to tattoos and she has a lot. Nicely done if you like tattoos - unfortunately I don't .

Offline john.punter

Well thanks for all the feedback guys, much appreciated!

Sounds like she may still be worth a punt, and at £60 for 30 minutes I'm still very interested.

Cheers, JP

Offline mrfishyfoo

I saw Rachel last month and , although not  blonde, I would say the picture was almost certainly her albeit taken a while ago.

Bodily she was nothing like the girl in the review here so , while not exactly a gym bunny she was slim without being skinny, no trace of cellulite as far as I could see, flat enough stomach, beautiful small but firm boobs and the softest pussy I've encountered in a long time, neat and very clean. She wears glasses but did ask if I'd like her to remove them and I would describe her as attractive in the cliched girl next door vein. The marks on her stomach are due to an operation at an early age and she does suffer from a recurring  illness that means she can't always work . She's originally from Northamptonshire and I found her very friendly and chatty ( as you'll have gathered ), very keen to please so I'd agree with the submissive description, ditto great head and kissing and very enthusiastic mover !

It was the same venue, same parking, same gate. Didn't notice any smoking but the bedroom had very bright ceiling lights . I arrived ten minutes early and got in ten minutes late !  but it was the first slot of the day and she'd travelled from home . I think other girls use the same place on a rota basis .

I would certainly recommend her ; the only downside for me was that there was no reference to tattoos and she has a lot. Nicely done if you like tattoos - unfortunately I don't .

Reads like your second review MrO.  :hi: :hi:

Offline puntlover1

I have seen Rachel regularly and the description of her being 'dumpy' just doesn't hold for me. I'd describe her as really petite. Quite slim, with really nice tattoos, small boobs, pretty face and a really friendly attitude. She gives an amazing BJ, although I do appreciate she's not really into DFK. The annex you're referring to is non-smoking and I have seen her step outside to have a smoke on a few occasions, so I am not quite sure why there was smoke inside.

I guess this is a case of YMMV.

The porn photo is a bit naughty, but to be honest, it does look a hell of a lot like her. I would never have guessed it was someone else, given the striking similarity in body-type, clothes, etc.

Offline holeymoley

So pleased to see that red billy gibson experience similar to mine After all the positive reviews.
Slow on comms to start with took about 3 days to respond. Arrived at same venue 7 minutes early outside the gate as mentioned only to find previous punters car in place. Texted and told to return in 10 minutes. She was sat outside on the steps waiting for me. Virtually same experience and thoughts as red billy. Noisiest BJ ever but did nothing for me. Perfunctory sex in a couple of positions, tried to finish by BJ or HR but couldn't, just didn't do it for me reasonably pretty and fit lots of tattoo work to cover surgery. Apparently from Northampton. Showered at the end, did not see her shower and as I walked out the next punter waiting in car parked next to mine. Btw I am a mature guy maybe she saves her best efforts for the younger guys or is that paranoia. Disappointing I thought.




Offline mrfishyfoo

So pleased to see that red billy gibson experience similar to mine After all the positive reviews.
Slow on comms to start with took about 3 days to respond. Arrived at same venue 7 minutes early outside the gate as mentioned only to find previous punters car in place. Texted and told to return in 10 minutes. She was sat outside on the steps waiting for me. Virtually same experience and thoughts as red billy. Noisiest BJ ever but did nothing for me. Perfunctory sex in a couple of positions, tried to finish by BJ or HR but couldn't, just didn't do it for me reasonably pretty and fit lots of tattoo work to cover surgery. Apparently from Northampton. Showered at the end, did not see her shower and as I walked out the next punter waiting in car parked next to mine. Btw I am a mature guy maybe she saves her best efforts for the younger guys or is that paranoia. Disappointing I thought.

Reads like a borderline grey/red to me that does. You going to post it as a review MrHM ??

Offline holeymoley

Yes I will mr fishy - just brushing up on my literary skills

Offline mrfishyfoo


Offline HudzLad

Hmmm. Was seriously thinking about seeing this girl (£60 for 30min is great value), but now reconsidering.

Fake profile picture is absolutely unforgivable for anyone serious about the profession. Why does she need to both if she's pretty hot anyway?

Offline holeymoley

Hi Jacob,

TBH I thought she was fit body wise and pretty too. Also I am aware that if I had departed without the next punter being outside then I would not have made the assumption regarding showering. Also as far I as could tell, and I was pretty close , she was clean, I had no problems going down on her. Maybe it's my age ( in my late sixties ) but I would have loved to have been able to give her a good, long pounding, but it wasn't to be. Sometimes as well I find I don't just gel with a girl, I assume others may experience too. NB I still think it's a neutral, I am not changing my mind. How about you give it a go then we have another opinion for everyone to consider.

Offline HudzLad

Hi Jacob,

TBH I thought she was fit body wise and pretty too. Also I am aware that if I had departed without the next punter being outside then I would not have made the assumption regarding showering. Also as far I as could tell, and I was pretty close , she was clean, I had no problems going down on her. Maybe it's my age ( in my late sixties ) but I would have loved to have been able to give her a good, long pounding, but it wasn't to be. Sometimes as well I find I don't just gel with a girl, I assume others may experience too. NB I still think it's a neutral, I am not changing my mind. How about you give it a go then we have another opinion for everyone to consider.

Cheers. May very well do that!