Join Oxfam for a good punt

[Horizontal pleasures]

Join Oxfam for a good punt

   From The Times newspaper

The Oxfam sex scandal has led to calls for the charity's funding to be cut after it was revealed bosses failed to warn other aid agencies about staff caught using prostitutes in Haiti and gave positive references to subsequent employers

[Titti Tatti]

Already a th red in Off Topic

[Chooser]

That's fine but most of us don't seem to have access to off topic page! 

[S.X. MacHine]

In today's papers Priti Patel and other self righteous folk are fulminating against the guys who hired local prossies for 'Caligula style orgies' (do the journalists know this, or is it hyperbole and invention?). As I see it, in giving the prossies good money in exchange for sex, the Oxfam guys were fulfilling their brief of helping the hungry while, at the same time, helping themselves.
Nothing wrong in that, surely?

[Jimmyredcab]

In today's papers Priti Patel and other self righteous folk are fulminating against the guys who hired local prossies for 'Caligula style orgies' (do the journalists know this, or is it hyperbole and invention?). As I see it, in giving the prossies good money in exchange for sex, the Oxfam guys were fulfilling their brief of helping the hungry while, at the same time, helping themselves.
Nothing wrong in that, surely?

Plenty wrong in my opinion.
First of all prostitution is illegal in Haiti ----------------- also they have a duty to protect the reputation of Oxfam, if the government cut off their funding it will cost them millions and the public may be reluctant to carry on supporting them.   

[Horizontal pleasures]

Plenty wrong in my opinion.
First of all prostitution is illegal in Haiti ----------------- also they have a duty to protect the reputation of Oxfam, if the government cut off their funding it will cost them millions and the public may be reluctant to carry on supporting them.   

but was it the gents' own money or Oxfam's money they spent on their fun?

[Horizontal pleasures]

Already a th red in Off Topic

I hardly ever look at off topic as I am interested in punting fun.

[Jimmyredcab]

but was it the gents' own money or Oxfam's money they spent on their fun?

Totally irrelevant.
They were representatives of Oxfam and have brought that organization into disrepute which could lose them millions in donations.

[peter purves]

A classic example that shows one can get sack for using prostitutes while in employment ie even if it is outside work hours.

Can't be too careful!!

[Horizontal pleasures]

Totally irrelevant.
They were representatives of Oxfam and have brought that organization into disrepute which could lose them millions in donations.

How about the LRTA then?

[Brokenshed]

Everywhere UN "peacekeepers" are stationed experiences an increase in trafficking.

Nothing wrong in paying for sex, I did it this morning.
But with a well established whore, who.has been whoring for donkeys years.
But aid workers or peacekeepers have conflicts of interest. Specially if aid and sex get confused.
I dont want to give donations to aid workers, to spend on getting their leg over, some impoverished girl.
At least i know the women, i fuck for money have the choice of working in Asda, or catering, or care, or getting a few quid more for whoring..
Aid workers paying women with no food, or welfare state, is wrong.
Getting off my high horse now.
Future posts will be about fucking whores.

[Horizontal pleasures]

External Link/Members Only

[S.X. MacHine]

Plenty wrong in my opinion.
First of all prostitution is illegal in Haiti ----------------- also they have a duty to protect the reputation of Oxfam, if the government cut off their funding it will cost them millions and the public may be reluctant to carry on supporting them.   

Look, there's nothing intrinsically wrong in the action of these punters. Condemn them and you condemn us all.
Their only crime was that of being indiscreet. Remember the 11th commandment? 'Thou shalt not get found out'.

[peter purves]

Totally irrelevant.
They were representatives of Oxfam and have brought that organization into disrepute which could lose them millions in donations.

Oxfam Haiti sex claims: Charity 'failed in moral leadership'

Ministers could cut off funding for Oxfam if it cannot account for the way it handled claims of sexual misconduct by aid workers, the international development secretary has warned.

External Link/Members Only

[Marmalade]

Cunts living the high life on donated cash from others is hardly new.

External Link/Members Only

Nearly Half A Billion Dollars raised by the Red Cross to build homes in Haiti. Total of SIX homes built. 

[Fredbone]

Look, there's nothing intrinsically wrong in the action of these punters. Condemn them and you condemn us all.
Their only crime was that of being indiscreet. Remember the 11th commandment? 'Thou shalt not get found out'.

Agree nothing wrong with punting - BUT some of the actions are abuse of power - drivers told to collect the girls and if not - contract will end.  Plus did the girls have a true choice - as working in ASDA is not and option. And this group was issuing out the food, medicine, shelter..........

[Roadster]

Totally irrelevant.
They were representatives of Oxfam and have brought that organization into disrepute which could lose them millions in donations.

Surely the same could be said of any punter with a job.  Are we in your view to not punt because it might not reflect well on our employers?  Or are you suggesting Oxfam is different to any other emplyer, and if so in what way?

[Corus Boy]

Hidden Image/Members Only

[Horizontal pleasures]

Hidden Image/Members Only

Brilliant, where did you see that?

[mrsheepish]

I'm going to start giving more money to charity, I work for oxfam and charity is my favourite prostitute

[Horizontal pleasures]

I'm going to start giving more money to charity, I work for oxfam and charity is my favourite prostitute

great, please post a review right away.

[misterali]

Surely the same could be said of any punter with a job.  Are we in your view to not punt because it might not reflect well on our employers?  Or are you suggesting Oxfam is different to any other emplyer, and if so in what way?

Maybe it's just my personal view but paying for sex is a lot more common than we like to admit especially in the UK. Is it really right to say anyone who has paid for sex has committed a terrible act and brought their employers into disrepute? Chances are the individuals handing out the sacking has paid for sex themselves in the past!

In Oxfam's case, there was a misuse of funds and concern about underage girls being present in these sex parties. Can understand why that has blown up. I personally wouldn't have trusted them if they said they went to a casino in Haiti with their own money...yeah right 

JRC- prostitution is also illegal in Thailand. I think illegality isn't really the main issue here...

[Jimmyredcab]

JRC- prostitution is also illegal in Thailand. I think illegality isn't really the main issue here...

I gave an explanation on the other thread ------------ however, yes you are correct it is technically illegal in Thailand but to the best of my knowledge no foreigner has ever been prosecuted for using the services of prostitutes, you must be careful to make sure they are not underage.
It suits the police and the military to keep it illegal because they can then do the rounds of the bars and clubs to collect their "tea money".   

[nodrah]

Surely the same could be said of any punter with a job.  Are we in your view to not punt because it might not reflect well on our employers?  Or are you suggesting Oxfam is different to any other emplyer, and if so in what way?

If you work as a bricklayer on a building site whether you shag or not has no relevance to your job and has no reflection on your employer .... the same cannot be said for an aid worker in a disaster zone ... the girls he is shagging are most likely to be those that he is there to give assistance to, and the impression of ' taking advantage of ', whether it is true or not, are unavoidable.
So yes ... Oxfam, Red Cross, Save the Children etc are different and require much higher standards in morality.
I think that there is an awful lot of double standards on UKP at times with, for example, posters accusing all prostitutes of being liars whilst ignoring their lying to their OHs, but in this case ... no, aid workers have to have higher standards.

[Marmalade]

Anyone wanting to send me a cheque for airfare to Haiti and expenses so I can charitably shag some prossies there is welcome (unmarked notes even better).

Oxfam isn’t the only one to blame
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Onlyéle_Haiti
External Link/Members Only
Hidden Image/Members Only

[Students Notebook]

I'm going to start giving more money to charity, I work for oxfam and charity is my favourite prostitute

Hello Mr Sheepish. As I write I see you are online, hopefully writing your first review.

You've been a member since July 2018 so "better late than never".

Hope you agree.

S.N.

P.S. Give my love to Charity.

[Bogof60]

Hello Mr Sheepish. As I write I see you are online, hopefully writing your first review.

You've been a member since July 2018 so "better late than never".

Hope you agree.

S.N.

P.S. Give my love to Charity.

Been in that Tardis again SN 

Give my love to charity as well
Top Punt who I will review later in the year when I have seen her

[Students Notebook]

Been in that Tardis again SN 

Give my love to charity as well
Top Punt who I will review later in the year when I have seen her

Tardis ??

Is she a prozzie ??

S.N.

[Bogof60]

Tardis ??

Is she a prozzie ??

S.N.

No but it could describe a part of a prozzies anatomy.
You know
Bigger on the inside than it looks from the outside.

[Roadster]

If you work as a bricklayer on a building site whether you shag or not has no relevance to your job and has no reflection on your employer .... the same cannot be said for an aid worker in a disaster zone ... the girls he is shagging are most likely to be those that he is there to give assistance to, and the impression of ' taking advantage of ', whether it is true or not, are unavoidable.

So does that extend to buying any goods or services locally or just to prostitution?  I guess you're singling out prostitution because its "wrong", (or more acurately singling out punting as being "wrong").  That is of course a valid position but one that I disagree with.  I think that it begins and ends in sex negativity.

Sex is a human need and a pleasure.  I don't buy "sex is sin".

If there was some quid pro quo for assistance, that would be wrong.  If there was coercion, again wrong.  Buying services from a willing and consenting provider?  Not so much.

 Just because people are poor doesn't mean the daily mail readership can make their choices for them. 

As such I think that position wrong headed.

So yes ... Oxfam, Red Cross, Save the Children etc are different and require much higher standards in morality.
I think that there is an awful lot of double standards on UKP at times with, for example, posters accusing all prostitutes of being liars whilst ignoring their lying to their OHs, but in this case ... no, aid workers have to have higher standards.

and no sex.