Statistically Who's Best In the NW

[marlboro20]

Question for statisticians... if it's possible?
Who's the best punt in the NW according to the ratio of UKP Positive Reviews compared to AW Feedbacks (Which can generally be disregarded as bulshit)
As a starter Alana Amor has 19 UKP Positives to 283 AW Feedbacks... so she'sd score 6.7%
Naughty Aimy has 13 UKP Positive to 188 AW Feedbacks... so she'd score 6.9%
Just wondering if there's any statistical correlation to finding the best punt

[Goldfinch]

SiennaKink with 27 positives:

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

MollySwedish with 30 positives:

 External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

[marlboro20]

Great... So Sienna scores 12.3% and Molly 11.3%

[threechilliman]

Totally irrelevant thread.

Some girls use AW for most bookings, some don't. Then try and define 'best' punt. One mans meat is another mans poison....

[marlboro20]

You might be right tcm... but statistics based on available info is all we've got to go on

[NigelF]

You might be right tcm... but statistics based on available info is all we've got to go on

I don't know why you're working out a percentage. AW reviews are almost meaningless and as tcm has said there can be many reasons for their varying numbers of feedback.

Pretty much the only stat I'd be interested in would be who has the highest total number of positive UKP reviews. After that perhaps their % positives compared to neutrals and negatives.

You could also work out "average positive reviews per month they've been on AW" to help highlight the new girls who haven't been working long but are seemingly doing very well but obviously there's limitations to the reliability of that (e.g. only been working a month and 1 positive review).

Still, it's the total raw numbers on here that give you the best indication (and of course it's still not a guarantee).

[Kriss]

MollySwedish with 30 positives:

 External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

I think we would all love to take Molly home with us. 

How she ever got Neutral FRs is quite beyond my comprehension. 

[Kriss]

I wonder if Hannah is worth a mention:

External Link/Members Only

I thought she would have more FRs though

[threechilliman]

I think we would all love to take Molly home with us. 

How she ever got Neutral FRs is quite beyond my comprehension. 

Funnily enough it were her reviews that put me off. My conclusion? Pretty girl, vanilla GFE. I decided she might be a bit tame for me, so didn't bother.

[Kriss]

Funnily enough it were her reviews that put me off. My conclusion? Pretty girl, vanilla GFE. I decided she might be a bit tame for me, so didn't bother.

Sure, and why not? I'm mostly into the more passive WG experience and I do love a pretty face. Sometimes, though, I get an urge for something different like a bit of femdom or a filthy MILF. 

[Dean801]

I think we would all love to take Molly home with us. 

How she ever got Neutral FRs is quite beyond my comprehension. 

She got a neutral because she’s fit and quite a pleasant girl...if
It was solely down to service it woulda been a negative.

[NigelF]

I think we would all love to take Molly home with us. 

How she ever got Neutral FRs is quite beyond my comprehension. 

She got a neutral because she’s fit and quite a pleasant girl...if
It was solely down to service it woulda been a negative.

Your review was totally fair and understandable. I've reviewed her positively and indeed seen her multiple times and I've always enjoyed myself but it is definitely well within my comprehension to understand how and why she could get a neutral.  Of course that's the case for every girl but even of those who I would deem "least likely" I wouldn't say Molly is top of the list.

[vw]

I think we would all love to take Molly home with us. 

How she ever got Neutral FRs is quite beyond my comprehension. 

Well you were not there so how would you know?   

All green reviews by you, not shocked at that.   

[Kriss]

Well you were not there so how would you know?   

All green reviews by you, not shocked at that.   

Well, here's you being a knob head again, not shocked at that either 

[NigelF]

Well, here's you being a knob head again, not shocked at that either 

It is a good point though. You've been a member (and indeed contributed) since September 2013 but in all that time you've never had any neutral or negative punts? Unless you've only had a few punts, it's fairly hard to believe or at least it's disappointing that you've not bothered to review them.

[Beamer]

It is a good point though. You've been a member (and indeed contributed) since September 2013 but in all that time you've never had any neutral or negative punts? Unless you've only had a few punts, it's fairly hard to believe or at least it's disappointing that you've not bothered to review them.

But only five reviews since 2013 - hardly credible?

[vw]

But only five reviews since 2013 - hardly credible?

One of those lucky punters.   

[mrfishyfoo]

Funnily enough it were her reviews that put me off. My conclusion? Pretty girl, vanilla GFE. I decided she might be a bit tame for me, so didn't bother.

PMSL