Feedback - How Important?

[liamnorth]

Hi All,

I was wondering how highly you value the feedback on Adultwork when looking for a lady?

I usually tend to use WG's when working away from home, but occasionally use ones local to myself. I've found in recent years the number of good WG's has declined locally to me.

A quick search on AW suggests 102 within a 5 mile radius of my postcode. That seems like a good number to go at, but I tend to immediately rule anyone out with very low feedback. Of those 102 local to me - 32 have either 0 or 1 feedback.

So my question is this - Do you guys also rule anyone out with low feedback? Some of them look good in the images, but having heard horror stories of people being robbed or difficulties when dealing with Eastern European girls, am I right in automatically ruling them out? I do also look on here for reviews, but ones with no feedback on AW invariably have no reviews on here.

I guess someone has to take a chance on them. I do guess half the excitement is walking into the unknown, but I do try and limit my risk of a bad punt, or something potentially a lot worse.

[Drayki]

I tend to avoid any without feedback, as their usually eastern Europeans or fake profiles, I know they've got to get some feedback from someone someday but usually use ukp now to check them up, as much as the feedback on aw is usually shite it gives us guys a rough guide as to how busy the sp is, 

[liamnorth]

I definitely have learned to value the feedback on here more than AW. People seem much more prepared to leave a neutral/bad review on here - I guess people are concerned about picking up bad feedback on AW if they leave bad feedback.

There are a few recently I've thought looked tempting, but having read reviews on here decided to save my cash.

[goldwing1]

I`ll look at the reviews on Adultwork, and on here providing there are any, then make my mind up.
You get mixed reviews on here as well just to add to the confusion.

[Beamer]

I definitely have learned to value the feedback on here more than AW. People seem much more prepared to leave a neutral/bad review on here - I guess people are concerned about picking up bad feedback on AW if they leave bad feedback.

There are a few recently I've thought looked tempting, but having read reviews on here decided to save my cash.

So your happy to read the reviews posted by others and use the information....but not a single review from  you??? 

[Blackpool Rock]

Hi All,

I was wondering how highly you value the feedback on Adultwork when looking for a lady?

I usually tend to use WG's when working away from home, but occasionally use ones local to myself. I've found in recent years the number of good WG's has declined locally to me.

A quick search on AW suggests 102 within a 5 mile radius of my postcode. That seems like a good number to go at, but I tend to immediately rule anyone out with very low feedback. Of those 102 local to me - 32 have either 0 or 1 feedback.

So my question is this - Do you guys also rule anyone out with low feedback? Some of them look good in the images, but having heard horror stories of people being robbed or difficulties when dealing with Eastern European girls, am I right in automatically ruling them out? I do also look on here for reviews, but ones with no feedback on AW invariably have no reviews on here.

I guess someone has to take a chance on them. I do guess half the excitement is walking into the unknown, but I do try and limit my risk of a bad punt, or something potentially a lot worse.

Not sure how you work out that no AW reviews means no UKP reviews, often girls have 100's of positive AW feedback yet shit reviews on here which shows AW feedback can be taken with a pinch of salt.
I punted recently and made a booking on AW and it will be a neutral when I review on UKP, now the conundrum is that unusually the girl has left me positive feedback by the time I got home, so do I leave her feedback which is an honest Neutral or a polite Positive as this is the "AW normal protocol"    I've actually decided not to return any feedback which is basically a fudge on my part but not as much as leaving positive

Having said the above I do use AW feedback as a rough guide whether the girl is a con artist or similar, feedback only comments are often more use than actual feedback.
Obviously a new girl won't have any or much feedback so this needs to be taken into consideration and EE girls / Thais often don't bother using the booking system but for British girls I have found that lack of feedback almost always results in a disappointing punt for me.
Finally hidden feedback = Avoid

[Al Reet]

A lot of the wg’s I’ve seen had little feedback and no reviews on here. If a profile looks good and comms are decent then I’ll book and find out for myself. If it turns out shit I’ll write a negative on here. 

[Gordon Bennett]

You have to look at the whole profile. Things like nationality, date first registered, last log in as well as feedback all add to the story. She might be a cracker who has returned after a break or set up a fresh profile.

[Tony4447]

I don’t generally bother with th3 reviews on AW, if I see someone I fancy I look on here at the reviews

[OakTree]

I tend to look who’s given them feedback. If a girl has only a few but has a couple of names I recognise then it helps my decision making. There’s certain punters who seem to go for the same type of girl I go for, if I see them as having given feedback I might well take the plunge.

[chrishornx]

I`ll look at the reviews on Adultwork, and on here providing there are any, then make my mind up.
You get mixed reviews on here as well just to add to the confusion.

reality is that you can get mixed reviews as the escorts have no control on reports on here whereas on AW they control what reviews get accepted so the bias is way too much in favour of them

much more balanced honest reviews on UKP

[chrishornx]

I tend to look who’s given them feedback. If a girl has only a few but has a couple of names I recognise then it helps my decision making. There’s certain punters who seem to go for the same type of girl I go for, if I see them as having given feedback I might well take the plunge.

Agree entirely with that approach 

[lewisjones23]

I tend to look who’s given them feedback. If a girl has only a few but has a couple of names I recognise then it helps my decision making. There’s certain punters who seem to go for the same type of girl I go for, if I see them as having given feedback I might well take the plunge.

similar approach but also if i see names of punters that i dont value their feedback then a girl can go on the backburner

the ones who score every girl 10/10 or have them up on a pedestal cant be trusted to give proper reviews IMO

[BFG.]

I personally go off reviews rather than AW feedback.

[Clitheroelad]

I dont trust AW feedback one bit. The problem is that AW allows feedback both ways meaning a negative comment from a punter invariably leads to a backlash from the WG. In reality this means other WGs are less likely to see soneone with negative feedback even if its unfair retaliation for a fair assessment of a WGs service. In effect the whole system is broken. Ive seen WGs with 70+ poditive reviews who were absolute horrors.

[opal]

Feedback is useful if you know it is reliable for example if the reviewer has seen other girls you have seen and concur.

In general I am looking for experienced reviewers on AW and repeat visits but the profile itself is the main decider.

[kingM]

I was wondering how highly you value the feedback on Adultwork when looking for a lady?

So my question is this - Do you guys also rule anyone out with low feedback? Some of them look good in the images, but having heard horror stories of people being robbed or difficulties when dealing with Eastern European girls, am I right in automatically ruling them out? I do also look on here for reviews, but ones with no feedback on AW invariably have no reviews on here.

Personally I think sometimes the AW feedback is helpful but I don't really trust the feedback. There have been times I have seen a WG that has plenty, even hundreds of feedback then find the service to be absolutely terrible. Then some girls with no feedback and they have been really good.
So this leads me to believe a lot of the feedback is fake or can be manipulated. Almost seems like there is a network of people providing or selling feedback.
Profiles that gain a lot of feedback quickly or have very regular constant feedback, I find dubious as generally a lot of people don't leave feedback.
It would be more helpful if people actually left negative AW feedback. Hidden feedback is a no go. Even if they have no feedback count, click on the zero, as this will show the feedback only feedback.

EE girls are always a risk. But I wouldn't rule them out completely. You have to meet them and judge their attitude. If it's off then just walk. Never book more than half an hr for a first meet. Romanians have the worst reputation but the Polish tend to be more reliable.
UKP is a good site for filtering out the bad SP's. Use the reviews as long as the review is balanced but reviews can be over hyped. Best thing is to make your own judgement.

[McSwell]

I tend to look who’s given them feedback. If a girl has only a few but has a couple of names I recognise then it helps my decision making. There’s certain punters who seem to go for the same type of girl I go for, if I see them as having given feedback I might well take the plunge.

That only works if punters use the same name on Adultwork as they do on here.

Not everyone does.

[OakTree]

That only works if punters use the same name on Adultwork as they do on here.

Not everyone does.

No I’m not linking punters on AW and here. It’s purely by experience. If I see punter “A” visit a girl a couple of times and I’ve previously visited other girls he’s seen and had a good experience then I start to have some trust in his choice. It’s a bit hit and miss but it’s more reliable than taking AW feedback at face value.

[NigelF]

I personally go off reviews rather than AW feedback.

So isn't it about time you contributed some of your own?

No I’m not linking punters on AW and here. It’s purely by experience. If I see punter “A” visit a girl a couple of times and I’ve previously visited other girls he’s seen and had a good experience then I start to have some trust in his choice. It’s a bit hit and miss but it’s more reliable than taking AW feedback at face value.

I know what you mean but I only really use that to judge if a girl is "real" or not. I've found it to be too unreliable otherwise. But yes, it is better and more reliable than just taking AW feedback at face value, especially when there's nothing else to go on.

Nonetheless, if someone figured out my AW username I'd still be pretty unhappy if they were just to go off my AW feedback - even though I only ever leave accurate (albeit often fluffy) comments. I'm also not afraid to leave negative feedback (just before the deadline to almost eliminate risk of retaliation) but I often forget or am unable to do it at the necessary time. Basically, I just never give the full picture on AW so I'd hate for punters to rely on just that (but I appreciate that isn't what you're saying).

Perhaps we could start a thread on who gives reliable feedback on AW? I don't actually think that's a particularly good idea though and I'm sure the punters in question wouldn't like the publicity and it might unfairly put off some WGs from them too.

similar approach but also if i see names of punters that i dont value their feedback then a girl can go on the backburner

the ones who score every girl 10/10 or have them up on a pedestal cant be trusted to give proper reviews IMO

+1 although I lump those types in with everyone else on AW - i.e. not to be trusted. Unless you're referring to the "10/10 types" on here - of which unfortunately there are a few!

[lewisjones23]

So isn't it about time you contributed some of your own?

I know what you mean but I only really use that to judge if a girl is "real" or not. I've found it to be too unreliable otherwise. But yes, it is better and more reliable than just taking AW feedback at face value, especially when there's nothing else to go on.

Nonetheless, if someone figured out my AW username I'd still be pretty unhappy if they were just to go off my AW feedback - even though I only ever leave accurate (albeit often fluffy) comments. I'm also not afraid to leave negative feedback (just before the deadline to almost eliminate risk of retaliation) but I often forget or am unable to do it at the necessary time. Basically, I just never give the full picture on AW so I'd hate for punters to rely on just that (but I appreciate that isn't what you're saying).

Perhaps we could start a thread on who gives reliable feedback on AW? I don't actually think that's a particularly good idea though and I'm sure the punters in question wouldn't like the publicity and it might unfairly put off some WGs from them too.

+1 although I lump those types in with everyone else on AW - i.e. not to be trusted. Unless you're referring to the "10/10 types" on here - of which unfortunately there are a few!

aye there are a few on here but i keep track of others on other forums as well, amuses me greatly how
wet behind the ears they are - they put WG up on a pedestal and say stuff like they are lucky that they get to spend time with such women

shock news - anyone with the right finances can 

[Marquis]

I take almost no notice of A/W feedback. I've found UKP and the other forums to be better sources of information.

I don't get the opportunity to see WGs very often, and I know that, if I make a bad choice, it might be a month or more before I get another chance. I use the acronym CRAPPPP  - Careful Research Absolutely Prevents Piss Poor Punts.

If I end up with a bad one after going through a load of CRAPPPP I can at least tell myself that I tried, and will win more than I lose.