Author Topic: Megan J - Manchester/Salford  (Read 3240 times)


1 review(s) for MegannnJamesx (1 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by Sinz]

Offline CoreyTrevor

Link: Link to this Profile Page using External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only+ - Get QR Code

Intro: Well I hope this doesn't re-open an old, raging argument, that is NOT my intention here! However, it will hopefully clear a few things up, including the conclusion that the review of this girl from "Hk" was obviously genuine, from his review of the original profile "Seductive Megan" and the contentious "red one" was obviously a (nasty) fake review, from someone who obviously had some kind of gripe/grudge and used it to try and cause damage. I'm certainly no fluffy white knight, but someone who has actually seen her and given an honest account! At the time of the "red one" I was very tempted to book and then that review rattled my plans and I thought I'd leave it. But something about the profile kept me interested and eventually I just decided to TOFTT and see for myself, so here goes:-

Date: It was around Christmas 2017
Price: £150.00 for 1 hour - incall.
Location: Modern apartment block, just off Chapel Street, near Salford Central train station. Parking is available, but limited near by, I would advise parking on one of the carprks around Blackfriars and taking the few minutes walk. Good location overall.

Comms: Easy and straight forward. Couple of texts to arrange date and time and a quick phone call on arrival, to be guided into the building, good comms.

Looks: IMHO quite stunning, very pretty face with piercing blue eyes and long, dark hair. Profile pictures are pretty accurate, lovely, petite, slim body, but with just the right amount of curves. Good size boobs and a nice ass. She's a bit taller than I expected (could've been the heels) and I don't agree with the stated size 6, but definitely no more than a good size 8 I would guess. Age and other stats I would confirm to be pretty much correct, all in all a very nice package. A young, fit, pretty girl that would turn heads!

Attitude: Excellent. A really nice, cool and down to Earth girl. Very friendly, smiley, bubbly and chatty, really easy to get on with and seemed genuinely engaged and "into it," I felt very relaxed and welcome, no rushing or any of that nonesense.

Services: GFE service including FK, OWO, RO, massage and covered sex in CG, mish and doggy.

Action: Shower and paperwork filed and into the bedroom. Kissing was FK, not full-on DFK with tongues, which was the only disappointment. However, the kissing was still very nice and plenty of it, so it was still good. OWO was very good indeed. Sex was enthusiastic and there was plenty of encouragement. A bit of a massage (on me) and RO in between (nice down there) and finished in mish. Just the one pop, but I've been a bit lacklustre lately and just fancied a slow, relaxed session.

Conclusion: Really glad I trusted my instincts with this punt. The price is top end, but it doesn't bother me if the girl is genuinely good looking and I fancy her, it's well worth the price for me and I left with the "post punt glow." I would add that if the kissing was full-on DFK, this would qualify for the legendary NigelF "holy trinity of punting" ranking system, which is quite a big compliment in my book. However, a 2nd booking would be required before I could stick my neck out that far. As is evident from my reviews, I'm not usually one for the TOFFT, I'm a coward and tend to go off strong intel to avoid disappointment, but in this case it paid off. Also it must be born in mind that I am a GFE/vanilla dude when it comes to services, just to balance the review.

Recommend? YES if you are looking for a GFE service like me. If you are a PSE punter then I couldn't say.

Re-visit? YES I definitely would and I have a feeling a 2nd visit would actually get better.  :thumbsup:

CT
Banned reason: Rule 5 - Creating multiple identities will result in the banning of all accounts
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline CoreyTrevor

Bugger! Just noticed the profile has gone! Hopefully it'll be back  :unknown:
Banned reason: Rule 5 - Creating multiple identities will result in the banning of all accounts
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline NigelF


Offline CoreyTrevor

Great review, cheers  :drinks:

Thanks Nige! That means a lot, coming from a review centurion!  :hi:

I have a hunch you would like this girl  :thumbsup:
Banned reason: Rule 5 - Creating multiple identities will result in the banning of all accounts
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline Hk

Intro: Well I hope this doesn't re-open an old, raging argument, that is NOT my intention here! However, it will hopefully clear a few things up, including the conclusion that the review of this girl from "Hk" was obviously genuine, from his review of the original profile "Seductive Megan" and the contentious "red one" was obviously a (nasty) fake review, from someone who obviously had some kind of gripe/grudge and used it to try and cause damage. I'm certainly no fluffy white knight, but someone who has actually seen her and given an honest account! At the time of the "red one" I was very tempted to book and then that review rattled my plans and I thought I'd leave it. But something about the profile kept me interested and eventually I just decided to TOFTT and see for myself, so here goes:-


She been a regular of my, my first review for her on ukpunting,  I got hammered by other punters, words been exchanged and nasty comments.
Thank you for clear things that up.
Shame she have disappeared, I have WhatsApp her last week, but she not replied, hopefully she be back again soon!

Offline NigelF

Intro: Well I hope this doesn't re-open an old, raging argument, that is NOT my intention here! However, it will hopefully clear a few things up, including the conclusion that the review of this girl from "Hk" was obviously genuine, from his review of the original profile "Seductive Megan" and the contentious "red one" was obviously a (nasty) fake review, from someone who obviously had some kind of gripe/grudge and used it to try and cause damage. I'm certainly no fluffy white knight, but someone who has actually seen her and given an honest account! At the time of the "red one" I was very tempted to book and then that review rattled my plans and I thought I'd leave it. But something about the profile kept me interested and eventually I just decided to TOFTT and see for myself, so here goes:-


She been a regular of my, my first review for her on ukpunting,  I got hammered by other punters, words been exchanged and nasty comments.
Thank you for clear things that up.
Shame she have disappeared, I have WhatsApp her last week, but she not replied, hopefully she be back again soon!

Just had a look now. To be honest, I barely remember! I think the criticism you got at the time was mostly fair because you had very few posts and reviews (with a high proportion about Megan). Now though, you've proven yourself through lots of contributions. Interestingly (but not surprisingly) the negative reviewer most certainly hasn't - despite promising he would. You have to understand that we get a lot of pimps, prossies posing as punters, white knights and fluffies on here (as I'm sure you've seen by now) so those defending WGs (especially in other people's reviews) will naturally be met with scepticism, if only because it's much safer to assume the WG is crap.

On this site, it's the bad things/negatives that get more of the benefit of the doubt. It's not perfect but it's surely better than the other way around. If anyone wants it the other way round - AW and every other punting forum will cater for them. Also bear in mind that Megan did prove herself to be deceptive and manipulative with her various accounts and posts so she's not to be trusted. Of course that doesn't mean she provides a crap service but it really doesn't help her case. There was also the member kingM who posted and wasn't very impressed with Megan although didn't think she was bad (and more recently he's started making contributions so seems somewhat reliable). Also bear in mind that the negative reviewer did get plenty of healthy scepticism right from the start as well.

Basically, even though the scepticism and criticism of you has turned out to be wrong (as far as anyone can reasonably tell), it was mostly fair (at the time). Of course it's hard when you know you're in the right but others have no way of knowing that, especially when you've not yet "proven" yourself. Even then, no member should be beyond reproach. Scepticism is generally healthy. It's better to be too cynical (about WGs being good) than too trusting. I think this site gets the balance right as much as is possible (of course it's never going to be correct all the time). Nonetheless, I do apologise for being wrong.

Thanks Nige! That means a lot, coming from a review centurion!  :hi:

I have a hunch you would like this girl  :thumbsup:

I think you could well be right. It's good that she seems to have lowered her rate (from £170) as well (albeit it's still above that of what most others charge). Do you (or anyone else) know what her half hour rate is/was?

Offline CoreyTrevor


She been a regular of my, my first review for her on ukpunting,  I got hammered by other punters, words been exchanged and nasty comments.
Thank you for clear things that up.
Shame she have disappeared, I have WhatsApp her last week, but she not replied, hopefully she be back again soon!

As "Mr F" rightly states, you were a new poster at that time, so people (including myself) were rightly sceptical. However, you have since proven to be a valuable reviewer and I must add, you seem to cut your own path and do plenty of TOFTT bookings, which I think is admirable. So it is only right, having seen Megan myself, to give you some vindication here. Like I said, I don't want to re-open an old argument, but to straighten that point out.

I hope she returns too  :unknown:
Banned reason: Rule 5 - Creating multiple identities will result in the banning of all accounts
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline CoreyTrevor


I think you could well be right. It's good that she seems to have lowered her rate (from £170) as well (albeit it's still above that of what most others charge). Do you (or anyone else) know what her half hour rate is/was?

Unfortunately I have a feeling her half hour rate is/was £100 and I can't see you being too happy at paying that with the lack of DFK. I could well be wrong about the rate as I don't tend to go for half hours myself, not that I'm wealthy lol, just with travel and everything else, I prefer fewer but longer punts, resulting in a balanced budget for my requirements  :hi:

Maybe Hk can verify the rate? But £100/half and £150/hour sticks in my mind.
Banned reason: Rule 5 - Creating multiple identities will result in the banning of all accounts
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline Hk

Just had a look now. To be honest, I barely remember! I think the criticism you got at the time was mostly fair because you had very few posts and reviews (with a high proportion about Megan). Now though, you've proven yourself through lots of contributions. Interestingly (but not surprisingly) the negative reviewer most certainly hasn't - despite promising he would. You have to understand that we get a lot of pimps, prossies posing as punters, white knights and fluffies on here (as I'm sure you've seen by now) so those defending WGs (especially in other people's reviews) will naturally be met with scepticism, if only because it's much safer to assume the WG is crap.

On this site, it's the bad things/negatives that get more of the benefit of the doubt. It's not perfect but it's surely better than the other way around. If anyone wants it the other way round - AW and every other punting forum will cater for them. Also bear in mind that Megan did prove herself to be deceptive and manipulative with her various accounts and posts so she's not to be trusted. Of course that doesn't mean she provides a crap service but it really doesn't help her case. There was also the member kingM who posted and wasn't very impressed with Megan although didn't think she was bad (and more recently he's started making contributions so seems somewhat reliable). Also bear in mind that the negative reviewer did get plenty of healthy scepticism right from the start as well.

Basically, even though the scepticism and criticism of you has turned out to be wrong (as far as anyone can reasonably tell), it was mostly fair (at the time). Of course it's hard when you know you're in the right but others have no way of knowing that, especially when you've not yet "proven" yourself. Even then, no member should be beyond reproach. Scepticism is generally healthy. It's better to be too cynical (about WGs being good) than too trusting. I think this site gets the balance right as much as is possible (of course it's never going to be correct all the time). Nonetheless, I do apologise for being wrong.

I think you could well be right. It's good that she seems to have lowered her rate (from £170) as well (albeit it's still above that of what most others charge). Do you (or anyone else) know what her half hour rate is/was?

Fair comments NigelF, I do take your comments on board, cause you do speak a lot of common sense.
It didn’t help she (Magan) defence herself at the time.
It all in the past, let move forward and on wards, so that we can all share information on ukpunting forum from our reviews

As to the rate, I think 90 for half hour and 150 for the hour

Offline Hk

As "Mr F" rightly states, you were a new poster at that time, so people (including myself) were rightly sceptical. However, you have since proven to be a valuable reviewer and I must add, you seem to cut your own path and do plenty of TOFTT bookings, which I think is admirable. So it is only right, having seen Megan myself, to give you some vindication here. Like I said, I don't want to re-open an old argument, but to straighten that point out.

I hope she returns too  :unknown:

Yes I do like the adventure of seeking new and unknown review WGS, it excite me needing to the punt.
It a expensive hobby, nearly all my punt is an hour upwards to 4 hours

As I have said, I have WhatsApp Megan, she have replied and quotes: Yes either a long break or stop completely! Haven't decided yet

Offline NigelF

Fair comments NigelF, I do take your comments on board, cause you do speak a lot of common sense.
It didn’t help she (Magan) defence herself at the time.
It all in the past, let move forward and on wards, so that we can all share information on ukpunting forum from our reviews

As to the rate, I think 90 for half hour and 150 for the hour

Indeed. Cheers for the info and cheers for your reviews, particularly your TOFFTs. At £90 I could be tempted.

Megan - I understand you have reported the above comment[Removed by admin]

Don't quite get it, how exactly ?

It seems to be explained in this post report:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=182144.0

Also, do remember that it's against the rules to copy & paste post reports either in part or full.

Offline Sinz

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 10,543
  • Likes: 13
  •  
  • Reviews: 59
Indeed. Cheers for the info and cheers for your reviews, particularly your TOFFTs. At £90 I could be tempted.

It seems to be explained in this post report:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=182144.0

Also, do remember that it's against the rules to copy & paste post reports either in part or full.

Cheers, did not know it was against forum rules.

Learnt something new.

Offline NigelF

Cheers, did not know it was against forum rules.

Learnt something new.

Yeah, I'm not sure if it's mentioned in the site rules but it is clearly stated underneath every post report. I have seen members for banned for it e.g.: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=180076.0

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Also, do remember that it's against the rules to copy & paste post reports either in part or full.

Sheriff Sinz knows that as he's pulled others on that point before, but believes rules don't apply to the Sheriff as he cleans the place up and rewrites the forum  :crazy:

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline Sinz

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 10,543
  • Likes: 13
  •  
  • Reviews: 59
Sheriff Sinz knows that as he's pulled others on that point before, but believes rules don't apply to the Sheriff as he cleans the place up and rewrites the forum  :crazy:

Hidden Image/Members Only

Your desperation to prove everyone wrong is getting quite tiring.

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Your desperation to prove everyone wrong is getting quite tiring.

Uou fucked up (AGAIN) and got caught out (AGAIN)  :wacko:

Offline Hk

Sorry it was I (hk) ask admin to delete my quotes message from Magan, as the message was sent to me private in good faith, and I have put it on the forum, which I shouldn’t have.
Don’t want to cause any problems for her with her family members

Much appreciated if admin can deleted my comment with the ( quotes )
Thanks
Hk

Offline HighlyMotivated

Cheers, did not know it was against forum rules.

Learnt something new.

Sheriff Sinz breaking the rules and cocking up again  :thumbsdown:

Offline Sinz

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 10,543
  • Likes: 13
  •  
  • Reviews: 59
Sheriff Sinz breaking the rules and cocking up again  :thumbsdown:

Troll back at it again