Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: Natural v Photoshop  (Read 5964 times)

Offline 4AsianEscorts

Do punters want natural pictures or are they more enticed with professionally retouched pictures?

Do natural pictures make the escort not look as high class as ones who have shelled out for a professional portfolio?


Offline smiths

Do punters want natural pictures or are they more enticed with professionally retouched pictures?

Do natural pictures make the escort not look as high class as ones who have shelled out for a professional portfolio?

I want to see pictures that actually look like the WG i will be meeting as she looks in the present.

I dont know what you mean by high class, in punting high class is just marketing bollocks for expensive and WGs or their pimps who think they are a cut above other WGs in their minds. I just want to punt with WGs with a good attitude who offer me the services i require at a price i am prepared to pay.

Its all very simple, i ALWAYS pay the agreed fee without fail to a good WG, i expect the same courtesy back of ALL WGs offering me what was agreed ALWAYS without fail.

Offline wristjob

Do punters want natural pictures or are they more enticed with professionally retouched pictures?

Do natural pictures make the escort not look as high class as ones who have shelled out for a professional portfolio?

I want her to be attractive. I want to believe she looks like the pics. Professional pictures are good but natural pics are mandatory IMO. The girl in my avvy is a great example - beautiful girl and clearly a posed pic. Was she going to look like that when I got there? I was sold on her because there was a picture of her at a bar in a dress - clearly not posed and still looking stunning.

Offline ianvilla

Why make an Elephant look like a Giraffe? Natural is always best!


Offline Hyborean

Why would a punter be interested in anything other than natural photos?

Professionally Taken photos are fine but NOT professionally retouched (or even unprofessionally  :D)

The most enticing photos for me have always been the most natural.

I've got a thing for girls in pyjamas with no make up on.  Natural wins every time. Then again I pretty much only punt in the mornings. The best for me is a freshly showered girl in a gown. So many  of them get the make up wrong and also the undies.

Offline rpg

Do punters want natural pictures or are they more enticed with professionally retouched pictures?

Do natural pictures make the escort not look as high class as ones who have shelled out for a professional portfolio?

For me there's no such thing as a high class prossie although I'll concede there are some who are better at fooling innocent punters than others.
Professional pics are fine as long as they aren't then photoshopped. Like most though I need to see more natural photos.

Offline CBPaul

I want to see the same person who is going to great me when I walk through the door, that's the whole idea of making a selection using an AW profile.

Offline skittish

Agencies seem to be the worst culprits for deceiving punters with photoshopped images although I concede more and more independents are jumping on the bandwagon.

Natural non sexually explicit photos win the day for me when it comes to selecting a prossie.

Online James999

If an Agency doesn't know the type of pictures clients want then they are clearly inexperienced, lots of "agencies" are little more than a guy / girl with a mobile phone  :hi:

Offline smiths

If an Agency doesn't know the type of pictures clients want then they are clearly inexperienced, lots of "agencies" are little more than a guy / girl with a mobile phone  :hi:

Spot on, with some running the Agency from their parents back bedroom. :yahoo:

Offline 4AsianEscorts

Thanks guys, I couldn't agree more that natural rules, it's weird that most agencies do not take the feedback of customers on board.

Offline smiths

Thanks guys, I couldn't agree more that natural rules, it's weird that most agencies do not take the feedback of customers on board.

Not really, most are owned by low life scumbags in my experiences and observations with the brain power of a village idiot who arent smart enough to make money any other way except leeching off WGs.

Offline wristjob

I've got a thing for girls in pyjamas with no make up on.  Natural wins every time. Then again I pretty much only punt in the mornings. The best for me is a freshly showered girl in a gown. So many  of them get the make up wrong and also the undies.

You should be a gas man or something. If life was like 70s porn you would be happy as Larry.

Offline NightKid

Thanks guys, I couldn't agree more that natural rules, it's weird that most agencies do not take the feedback of customers on board.

Are you asking on behalf of the interest of the punter or a business? I ask that in reference to the way your username is written.

Mind you, the question is rather rhetorical anyway as you'll serve the interests of both by going with natural photos.

Wristjob I reckon there was far too much bush in the 70's. 

Offline pilgrim

With agencies you expect to see professional sets and 90% will have been Photoshopped.  Its part of the "pimps contract". These are normal procedures for EE agencies.  And they tend to use the pics for a good 4-5 years later.  You phone up, make a booking and say, can she wear the blue lingerie in the third pic, of course the agency say yes yes and when you turn up shes dressed in a scabby terry toweling dressing gown trying to keep warm as theres no heating and not wearing what was requested and confirmed.  She explains that the requested set got worn out 4 years ago.

With AW the majority of pics are taken on a phone and uploaded.  The ones that have a professional set done have something to hide in my opinion, trying to dress mutton as lamb.  Always cautious of concealed stomachs, using arms or always wearing a basque ect to conceal the overflowing belly.  If shes got a good enough body and provides a good enough service then she wont have to go to the expense of a professional photoshopped set.

Offline 4AsianEscorts

Are you asking on behalf of the interest of the punter or a business? I ask that in reference to the way your username is written.

Mind you, the question is rather rhetorical anyway as you'll serve the interests of both by going with natural photos.

I'm asking as a business, We are new and want to start the very first agency were the service of the agency matches that of excellent Thai WGs, We are one of the first agencies that will have a mixture of professional pictures that have been re-touched, semi professional that havent been retouched and completely natural i.e uploaded by a phone, with the idea being giving the punter a more accurate choice when booking the Escort.


Offline rpg

I'm asking as a business, We are new and want to start the very first agency were the service of the agency matches that of excellent Thai WGs, We are one of the first agencies that will have a mixture of professional pictures that have been re-touched, semi professional that havent been retouched and completely natural i.e uploaded by a phone, with the idea being giving the punter a more accurate choice when booking the Escort.

Why? are your girls going to be munters? Here's an idea...just be honest!

Offline rpg

I'm asking as a business, We are new and want to start the very first agency were the service of the agency matches that of excellent Thai WGs, We are one of the first agencies that will have a mixture of professional pictures that have been re-touched, semi professional that havent been retouched and completely natural i.e uploaded by a phone, with the idea being giving the punter a more accurate choice when booking the Escort.

There's nothing accurate about retouched photos. What are you talking about??

Offline NightKid

I'm asking as a business, We are new and want to start the very first agency were the service of the agency matches that of excellent Thai WGs, We are one of the first agencies that will have a mixture of professional pictures that have been re-touched, semi professional that havent been retouched and completely natural i.e uploaded by a phone, with the idea being giving the punter a more accurate choice when booking the Escort.

Yeah, I thought as much.
Anyway, all you need to know has already has already been said by others ... who are effectively your clients.

Offline tightfoot69

Do punters want natural pictures or are they more enticed with professionally retouched pictures?

Do natural pictures make the escort not look as high class as ones who have shelled out for a professional portfolio?

Professional photos don't make an escort high class, wet wipes do.

Offline Hyborean

I'm asking as a business, We are new and want to start the very first agency were the service of the agency matches that of excellent Thai WGs, We are one of the first agencies that will have a mixture of professional pictures that have been re-touched, semi professional that havent been retouched and completely natural i.e uploaded by a phone, with the idea being giving the punter a more accurate choice when booking the Escort.

Ummm. I am confused! How will you get any punters when you have a professional retouched photo next to untouched ones. They will look like two different girls!

Online James999

Ummm. I am confused! How will you get any punters when you have a professional retouched photo next to untouched ones. They will look like two different girls!

Simple, call one set of pics "Ting tong" and the other set "Ping Pong", and whichever girl the guy books they get the same girl, they appear to have more choice on the website and hopefully appeal to all, its' only an issue if the guy wants a threesome with Ting tong & Ping pong  :wacko:


Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)