Frankie Scott - Cheltenham

[Tallchris]

This is an amalgamation of 3 punts in 2017 with Frankie Scott.  2 in Cheltenham and 1 in Leamington.

For some strange reason Frankie is on the ukpunting blacklist.  I asked her about this and the reasons given from her point of view  sounded plausible to me.

All bookings were done by text backed up with AW bookings.  Comms were excellent.  All locations were clean discret and classy.

I think Frankie is a stunning young lady with a cheeky sense of humour and very warm and puts you at ease. All  natural body and a great sexy tasting pussy which gets very wet.

She was 120 for an hour but this has increased to my orderline budget of 140/hr.  She is clearly popular and her tours quickly fill up.  I expect the price to go up more.  I think she's spent time building up her client base and now testing the market.

She reminds me of the flirty young girl at work who has a laugh with the blokes. And knows they all want to fuck her. She says she has a regular job and this is a sideline and location depends largely on her work schedule.

I requessted a GFE service and she did it really well.  Perhaps the best GFE I've experienced we seemed to have a good chemistey.  All services advertised were on offer including the rare DFK.  and she enjoys herself too which is a real turn on.  She dresses as requested in the booking and gives her all within the limits of her like a list on AW.  A great SP.

So guys.  Highly recommended despite the price increase particularly if like me, GFE is your thing.

Just a little gutted about the price increase and how that will limit my future visits. 

[vw]

You forgot the link

External Link/Members Only

Seems the punter who got her blacklisted was in more than a professional relationship.

Interesting posts from here

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=171367.msg1824321#msg1824321

[Tallchris]

Thanks for the link, I hadn't read up on it since the summer.  Murky stuff.

[mrdiamond77]

Thanks for the review.  Planning on getting to see her myself at some point.

[Hectorshouse]

Thanks for the info. Got a booking planned for later in the month, interestingly her profile is down at the moment.

[SeekingtheTruth]

Thanks for the info. Got a booking planned for later in the month, interestingly her profile is down at the moment.

She’s away on holiday, it will be back up when she is back.

[Hectorshouse]

Thanks StT - I've booked a long way in advance, so will review probably in March.

[Tallchris]

I also have a booking.  Maybe pass you in the corridor!

[STAR-LORD]

I also have a booking.  Maybe pass you in the corridor!

  Thanks for the review.
As good a review as it is, I'd just like to indicate that an amalgamation was probably not appropriate, as it is stated in the rules on reviews as follows:-

- Reviews
A new review thread can only be created once a service provider has agreed to a booking (e.g. verbally or by textual messaging). A meet does not need to take place, money does not need change hands, the only requirement is that the she had accepted the initial booking. Only one review thread is permissible per punt. Do not combine multiple punts in the same review thread, neither should a single punt be split into multiple review threads.

Besides that, I appreciate your style with your reviews, and keep up the good work. 

[Tallchris]

Thanks for the review.
As good a review as it is, I'd just like to indicate that an amalgamation was probably not appropriate, as it is stated in the rules on reviews as follows:-

- Reviews
A new review thread can only be created once a service provider has agreed to a booking (e.g. verbally or by textual messaging). A meet does not need to take place, money does not need change hands, the only requirement is that the she had accepted the initial booking. Only one review thread is permissible per punt. Do not combine multiple punts in the same review thread, neither should a single punt be split into multiple review threads.

Besides that, I appreciate your style with your reviews, and keep up the good work. 

Sorry sir. A schoolboy mistake. As I dig back in the memory banks I'll post more individually.  I Was going to do a review today on another girl from 2017 and 2016.  Out all Manchester agency.  But seems she is of the books.  Saved me making same mistake.

[STAR-LORD]

Sorry sir. A schoolboy mistake. As I dig back in the memory banks I'll post more individually.  I Was going to do a review today on another girl from 2017 and 2016.  Out all Manchester agency.  But seems she is of the books.  Saved me making same mistake.

Dude no need to apologise (and trust me I'm no sir). You've done well so far.  There's a lot of rules to remember on this site, and like I said, keep up the good work. Glad to hear you've had 3 good bookings with the SP.  . Thanks again for your review.

[WelshElise]

You forgot the link

External Link/Members Only

Seems the punter who got her blacklisted was in more than a professional relationship.

Interesting posts from here

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=171367.msg1824321#msg1824321

stalker more like she refused to see him so he got his knickers in a twist and made up a story she also moved home more than once because of him his story has changed 3 times now meaning he can't keep his lies straight and likes to name call  at any given opportunitie 

[Cunning Punt]

As good a review as it is, I'd just like to indicate that an amalgamation was probably not appropriate, as it is stated in the rules on reviews as follows:-

The most important thing is a punter sticks to a report of one girl (girls if duo) rather than doing mini reports of different girls, in the same stable for example, in one review.

So yes it may technically be against the rules but, frankly, the reality is that most of us have done a review drawing from our experience of more than one meeting with a WG.  It means one gets a more rounded experience of her service and its quality. Adding a post to the thread by way of update after subsequent meetings could be a bit disjointed and harder to follow.

I found the review very useful - it shows again that she is a consistently good performer. Thanks, OP.