Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: Are indies better?  (Read 5506 times)

Offline James999

Depends, some girls couldn't organise a piss up in a brewery or even credit on their phone and thus need a pimp to help them, but in reality after you've met a girl once any repeat visits they should be able to arange direct, after all why pay money to a pimp  :crazy:

Offline punk

There was a time when indies were better, but now extras seem standard in most cases, certainly most profiles I click on. Having said that my worst experiences were with indie, but so were my best.

yes I would agree about extras bit.

Offline philboi

Are indies better? From what I've been reading lately on the London boards it appears that indies seem to be favoured over agencies.

I don't think it's so much the WG herself, both agency and indie can be good but imo an indie WG is more relaxed about time and services as apposed to an agency WG so therefore a better punt!

I've no experience of using Agencies, but, as with many other things in life, I don't think you can generalise about Indies.

Of the 7 Indies I've seen so far this year, there are:
two I'll never see again [one of them has since retired but I wouldn't have been going back there again, anyway :rolleyes:];
one who I doubt I'll bother going back to [she was okay, but nothing special];
two who I'll see from time to time [maybe as a Plan "B", if Plan "A" falls through for any reason];  and
two Regulars.

Incidentally, I'm writing here about British MILFs [aged 39 and upwards in Pro$$ie-years] and I'm not sure if there are many Agencies providing the species. 

Offline punk

I've no experience of using Agencies, but, as with many other things in life, I don't think you can generalise about Indies.

Of the 7 Indies I've seen so far this year, there are:
two I'll never see again [one of them has since retired but I wouldn't have been going back there again, anyway :rolleyes:];
one who I doubt I'll bother going back to [she was okay, but nothing special];
two who I'll see from time to time [maybe as a Plan "B", if Plan "A" falls through for any reason];  and
two Regulars.

Incidentally, I'm writing here about British MILFs [aged 39 and upwards in Pro$$ie-years] and I'm not sure if there are many Agencies providing the species.

never been to parlour.in parlour as we talking saunas here 

Offline rpg

I've never used an agency although I've made telephone enquiries 4 or 5 times. On each occasion the girl I wanted wasn't available, even though the site said she was, or the services listed weren't actually on offer. Booking an Indie has it's own trials but I find them easier and more reliable to deal with.

Offline smiths

I've never used an agency although I've made telephone enquiries 4 or 5 times. On each occasion the girl I wanted wasn't available, even though the site said she was, or the services listed weren't actually on offer. Booking an Indie has it's own trials but I find them easier and more reliable to deal with.

At least they told you she wasnt available or the services advertised werent actually on offer, thats more than they did with me a number of times. Their game was just lying to get me to the punt and hope i stayed anyway thinking with my dick. :hi:

Offline Hyborean

I find agencies much easier to book with as they will generally send someone any time of the day I want and at quite short notice too. The problem is that they are more expensive and the service is more likely to suck.

Agencies are naturally coy about the services their girls provide and therefore even just trying to get one who does DFK can be trying!

Not much experience of parlours though..

Offline manc36

I would say much better, cheaper and I like to actually talk to the woman on the phone to give yourself a feel for her. I hate all types of Agencies though.

Offline rpg

I find agencies much easier to book with as they will generally send someone ANYONE? any time of the day I want and at quite short notice too. The problem is that they are more expensive and the service is more likely to suck.

Agencies are naturally coy about the services their girls provide and therefore even just trying to get one who does DFK can be trying!

Not much experience of parlours though..

Not much of a recommendation for agencies really.

Offline Jimmyredcab

Depends, some girls couldn't organise a piss up in a brewery or even credit on their phone and thus need a pimp to help them, but in reality after you've met a girl once any repeat visits they should be able to arange direct, after all why pay money to a pimp  :crazy:

I think you underestimate how ruthless some of these pimps can be, if they caught their "chick" freelancing she might get her face rearranged.    :scare:

Offline Jimmyredcab

Not much of a recommendation for agencies really.

Some agencies blur all the faces, why do you think that is, pretty obvious really, you book Michelle but only Carly is available ------ so they send her.  :hi:

Offline rpg

Some agencies blur all the faces, why do you think that is, pretty obvious really, you book Michelle but only Carly is available ------ so they send her.  :hi:

Yes as Smiths has already said in reply #31 and why I don't use them.

Offline Hyborean

Not much of a recommendation for agencies really.

No it's not but it also explains why so many people eat at fast food chains rather than make their own food which is much better for them..

Offline Jimmyredcab

Yes as Smiths has already said in reply #31 and why I don't use them.

I have not used a visiting agency since I got sent a Dutch girl with a cockney accent.   :dash:

Offline rpg

No it's not but it also explains why so many people eat at fast food chains rather than make their own food which is much better for them..

I understand, but as I need to know exactly who I'm going to see and what we're going to do, agencies will never be an option.

Offline NightKid

No it's not but it also explains why so many people eat at fast food chains rather than make their own food which is much better for them..

Bit of an inapt comparison/analogy.

Offline Hyborean

Bit of an inapt comparison/analogy.

Really? Food /sex being closely related just me then?  :D

Offline NightKid

Really? Food /sex being closely related just me then?  :D

Well, as one is bad for you in large amounts and the other isn't ... I'd have to say no.  ;)

Seriously though, the key difference is that you're likening fast food (which is objectively bad) to punting in agencies (which can be subjectively bad.)
Despite my disdain for terrible agency practices ... I do acknowledge that they have a place in the punting scene if they're well executed/operated.

Offline akauya

I truly despair at some of the positive reports on here, some of our members are only focused on price, the fact that she doesn't kiss or only speaks 6 words of English seems to be irrelevant.   :thumbsdown:

What I despair at is the positive reviews for agency photoshopped girls stating that "they look just like their picture". I can't stand photoshopped pictures. They are so obviously blatantly fake I wonder what makes some punters say they look exactly the same in real life.

Offline rpg

What I despair at is the positive reviews for agency photoshopped girls stating that "they look just like their picture". I can't stand photoshopped pictures. They are so obviously blatantly fake I wonder what makes some punters say they look exactly the same in real life.

Or worse, punters who are happy with the photos even though the girl in the picture is some pornstar and the pics are lifted from her website. One guy even said in his review "she didn't look the same as her photos but that's only to be expected without all the make up" What kind of pussy whipped denial is going on there?

Offline NIK

Or worse, punters who are happy with the photos even though the girl in the picture is some pornstar and the pics are lifted from her website. One guy even said in his review "she didn't look the same as her photos but that's only to be expected without all the make up" What kind of pussy whipped denial is going on there?

Whilst I agree to some extent with what you're saying I have long past  the stage where I expect them to look anywhere near as good as their photos.
Helen who I saw at London Retreat on Sunday does actually look better than her photos but they aren't photo shopped and the faces are blurred. The only other one I can think of was Louise at Arabesque Bury years ago, again the Arabesque photos aren't photo shopped.
The girl I saw from Annas Angels yesterday wasn't too far removed from her pics, but as ever not as attractive.

Offline Tailpipe

Whilst I agree to some extent with what you're saying I have long past  the stage where I expect them to look anywhere near as good as their photos.
Helen who I saw at London Retreat on Sunday does actually look better than her photos but they aren't photo shopped and the faces are blurred. The only other one I can think of was Louise at Arabesque Bury years ago, again the Arabesque photos aren't photo shopped.
The girl I saw from Annas Angels yesterday wasn't too far removed from her pics, but as ever not as attractive.


If there was one thing that could be changed this photoshop thing makes booking a lottery. I have had one girl that stands out that looked better than her pictures.
When I ask her she said she had paid the £900 so that no one who new her would no she was an escort.

The other interesting point she told me was, there are people making a living trying to fine photos of any girl on the internet that looks the same or near the same
as many girls will just not allow there real pictures on the internet.  :scare:

The secound thing is age but we all know about that.




Offline smiths

What I despair at is the positive reviews for agency photoshopped girls stating that "they look just like their picture". I can't stand photoshopped pictures. They are so obviously blatantly fake I wonder what makes some punters say they look exactly the same in real life.

Indeed i agree and what i also despair about are punters prepared to punt with the switch of a bait and switch AND even continue to punt through a pimp they know from previous experience practises bait and switch. When i did  a thread about this subject i was dismayed to see some punters including very experienced punters not having a problem with bait and switch. According to them it wont be stopping as a practice so why was i complaining about it. A very disappointing view from some in my opinion. :hi:


Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)