OP-- yes, granted. We can spew out all of the STD risk clichés and reasoning we like. While it is true I may marry a civvy who has only had sex once before me, and could catch HIV from her...that's not the point is it. Here is a reply made to you in 2013 which I think sums up the rationale very well:
I thought the whole point of this forum was to discuss the service of escorts? So if a wg states on her profile she doesn't do BB, then goes ahead and does it with a punter, surely it would be good for the punting community to know? I see a massive issue is made when a girl lies about her age, or if her photos are not a genuine representation of her, surely the same thought process should apply with BB.
Regardless, it is indeed your prerogative if you want to share or not. I will simply agree to disagree, wish you a happy new year in return, etc
. As opposed to attempt to talk down to you, as some like to do.
You’ve just contradicted yourself there. Ellie is a great example of how price and service level don’t equate in this business. There are plenty of negative reviews on here for girls charging £200 p/h or above. The only way you get to find out about their professionalism is through booking or trusting a review but, as we’re Seeing on this thread, you don’t know shit about who s secretly barebacking who and that applies up and down the price ranges. If anything I think you’re more likely to get off the menu bareback at the most expensive echelons of the game as they have lower client turnover and probably make the same boneheaded assumptions that a rich punter is less likely to have a wretched cock than Bob the barman paying £40 for a handjibber.
No contradiction. I've found more of the higher end "companion" types (especially British) follow said practices. Ellie, a European WG priced at just over a ton is an anomaly. Just used her as an example as people could find her comments explaining her practices, and could also get their head around STD prevention (as you can see, some people clearly don't comprehend).
So yes, of course anomalies do exist. I am by no means saying ALL of x do y, or otherwise. Just the majority. So as you say neg reviews for high end girls...but most of them are deservedly high end as I previously mentioned.
Ultimately I am simply playing a numbers game, and as people love to say...there's no guarantee blah blah. Of course not. But you'd rather put your life savings in Berkshire Hathaway stock than someone's financial recruitment agency start-up, wouldn't you? Numbers games aren't frivolous.
Now for you,
virtualwaster. Seems
virtualtimewaster would be more fitting. Clearly the type who gets kicks out of having a random go.
Have you just looked this up as a retort once you realised what a teat you looked.
Will you quote the part where you asked what she had ? Yet more backtracking by a formerly banned member. 
1) Clearly did not just look up in retort, as I already mentioned STD
prevention here:
Also note that most SPs around Chloe's price range are well checked, regular attendees of the clinics, use STD prevention methods (vacs, meds) etc, so are genuinely clean.
2) You can't read or you're plain stupid?
she caught an/(some) STD(s). Can anyone shed some light on this in more detail?
Perhaps I should be more explicit when I pose questions in the future...then again most people aren't that dim.
3) No never been banned but you can tell yourself that if you're one of those where such talk makes you feel good.
As for backtracking, maybe you need to add it below
prevention and
treatment in your "list for words to look up the explanation for", ya teat!
Won't give you any more time of day now. Rather just put you on ignore, as I prefer to use this forum for talking about prossies and angling the accusations at them if needed...not other contributors. Pip pip.
