Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: Porn Stars and limited services  (Read 5122 times)

Offline akauya

Do you find it annoying when a "porn star" offers limited services on their profiles and still charge premium just because they are "porn stars"?

A porn star for me would really give a proper porn star experience (all safe of course), anal, dp, fisting, OWO, CIM, cock worshipping, rimming (both ways), basically the lot.  Otherwise they are just a glorified GFEs aren't they?


Offline hendrix

Yes. I refuse to see any girl that charges "extras" porn star or not. I don't mind paying higher "all included" amounts if I know that I can do what I feel like doing at any time in the meeting without wondering about whether I need to pay extra for it.

I think porn stars are entitled to provide or restrict whatever services they like, just because you have seen a film where they performed rimming does not mean they have to provide it with a punter.

HOWEVER, if they are charging a premium rate just because they are/were a 'porn star' then I would not book them simply for that 'title'.

I refuse to see any girl that charges "extras" porn star or not. I don't mind paying higher "all included" amounts if I know that I can do what I feel like doing at any time in the meeting without wondering about whether I need to pay extra for it.

I meant to include this quote with the above post because this is my stance too (with the exception of extra for anal, which was discussed at time of booking).

Offline smiths

Do you find it annoying when a "porn star" offers limited services on their profiles and still charge premium just because they are "porn stars"?

A porn star for me would really give a proper porn star experience (all safe of course), anal, dp, fisting, OWO, CIM, cock worshipping, rimming (both ways), basically the lot.  Otherwise they are just a glorified GFEs aren't they?

I wouldnt bother to punt with them 121 if they didnt offer the services i require so no i dont find it annoying, i just look elsewhere.

What I DO find annoying is when a pornstar like the horrific Katie Weale SAYS she offers certain services but doesnt AND has the very most dreadful attitude imaginable as i know from punting with her at GP Parties in 2008, her then being sacked by Cloud9 escorts after 3 days and various other reports on her by punters since. In her case she is so bad she cant advertise under her own porn name so uses various others and moves from area to area. Panel had her down as a possible a couple of months ago until i gave him my experiences of her. A disgusting creature like her sure does annoy me. :vomit: :hi:

Offline smiths

Yes. I refuse to see any girl that charges "extras" porn star or not. I don't mind paying higher "all included" amounts if I know that I can do what I feel like doing at any time in the meeting without wondering about whether I need to pay extra for it.

A smart WG willl simply build the extra/s into her overall rate though of course, the way i look at it is any WG charging over £200 an hour is taking the absolute piss, the fact she might not charge a specific amount for extras is neither here nor there to me. Obviously any WG can charge what they like and punters will decide whether to pay their rates or not. :hi:

Offline hendrix

A smart WG willl simply build the extra/s into her overall rate though of course, the way i look at it is any WG charging over £200 an hour is taking the absolute piss, the fact she might not charge a specific amount for extras is neither here nor there to me. Obviously any WG can charge what they like and punters will decide whether to pay their rates or not. :hi:

Undoubtedly, the smart girls do this, and I only really like the smart girls! :D When I see a profile for, say, £130 who wants £50 for anal, my automatic reaction is "she doesn't really like it, but will do it for more money". That is a complete turn off for me personally. Of course, it could be that she does like it, but not in every booking and would rather ration it out so to speak!..but that "extra" word is guaranteed to stop me from booking, regardless of the basic price.

There are £200/£250 girls that look great, have great (trusted) feedback but charge extra for anal or swallow and I won't book them. Even if it is marketing/good acting on behalf of the smarter girls to say "I include all services because I enjoy them"..my experience has been that they genuinely do, simply because they've either initiated (demanded in many cases lol!) the service or never refused me.   :hi:

Offline Stiltskin

It is annoying when you consider a lot of blokes go out punting inspired by porn. They soon realise that very few girls will let them do any of the hardcore stuff they see in porn films. They then book a pornstar, pay a premium and still get a vanilla GFE.

I hardly know the names of any UK pornstars. If I booked one, I'd be paying for the pornstar service not their name.

Offline andrei

i think madlin did it in a clever way, differentiating beween a pse and a gfe
Banning reason: Multiple accounts (andrei, london_lad_2)

Offline BeesKnees

When I see a profile for, say, £130 who wants £50 for anal, my automatic reaction is "she doesn't really like it, but will do it for more money".

Just to be devil's advocate, how about this.

She does like it, but wouldn't want every single punter to fuck her ass. While I haven't had it done to me, doing anal maybe 8 times a day, 7 days a week must be painful.

But if you put a premium on it, only people who really really want it would go for it, therefore possibly reducing the chances of times it has to be done.

akauya, are you gonna name and shame then?

Totally agree with you agauya. To me, if you're paying extra for a porn star, you're doing so on the basis of effectively having a certain "guaranteed" experience; if you like a certain girl's work, the things she does or the way she does things, you may be willing to pay a premium for that, vs the girls who you don't really know how they'll be, so they have lower prices to compensate for that unknown risk that it's not quite what you're looking for. If you're then paying extra for a porn star, on the basis of that premium being because of their porn work, then for her to not actually do the stuff she does in porn seems a bit odd. Only exception would be for one of the more famous porn stars; then the premium is for the idea of banging a celebrity as much as anything. I don't see the appeal of banging some UK porn star in a way she's not known for, and why that should attract a premium.

Offline Madlin Moon

Just to be devil's advocate, how about this.

She does like it, but wouldn't want every single punter to fuck her ass. While I haven't had it done to me, doing anal maybe 8 times a day, 7 days a week must be painful.

But if you put a premium on it, only people who really really want it would go for it, therefore possibly reducing the chances of times it has to be done.


Totally agree!
I truely like it (I can cum that way), but I have limits, I can't do it whole day...

Offline akauya


akauya, are you gonna name and shame then?

I wasn't thinking of a particular porn star, certainly  not Madlin Moon, who as andrei said, she has it right by giving punters the option of getting a GFE or a PSE service.

Just doing a search on here for "porn stars" I found these:

https://www.adultwork.com/2011539 or https://www.adultwork.com/KatieQueen
https://www.adultwork.com/962366 or https://www.adultwork.com/Lexi%2DPorn
https://www.adultwork.com/1668708 or https://www.adultwork.com/DelilahDash
https://www.adultwork.com/1870050 or https://www.adultwork.com/Jennaxxx1

Look at their services they are just GFEs as far as I can see. I wouldn't book any of them as anal is not on their likes. For me, anal is essential if I want to get a porn star service.



1 review(s) found for LucyLawX linked to in above post (1 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative)
4 review(s) found for Lexi__Lou linked to in above post (1 positive, 1 neutral, 2 negative)
3 review(s) found for MissReeganRiely_xoxx linked to in above post (2 positive, 0 neutral, 1 negative)
1 review(s) found for the service provider linked to in above post (1 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative)

Offline potata72

Do you find it annoying when a "porn star" offers limited services on their profiles and still charge premium just because they are "porn stars"?

A porn star for me would really give a proper porn star experience (all safe of course), anal, dp, fisting, OWO, CIM, cock worshipping, rimming (both ways), basically the lot.  Otherwise they are just a glorified GFEs aren't they?

Not considering the price aspect but purely the services aspect, a lot of mainstream porn scenes could be described as "glorified GFEs" pretty much, just with Kissing and general fondling kept to a minimum.  Some Pornstars don't do Anal at all or don't do it until so long into their career.

I'd also be willing to bet a good majority of Punters, if they see or consider seeing Pornstars, would pretty much just want a GFE experience with them and I'd put myself in that category.  Anal, Fisting and Rimming do not interest me.  OWO and sex can be delivered/done with Pornstar like enthusiasm and quality regardless of whether the WG has done porn or not.

Essentially, my requirements for a punt in terms of services I want, quality and enthusiasm that I require for a punt to be worthwhile, are the same regardless of whether the WG in question has done porn or not.

I've seen profiles where the WG charges differently dependant on whether you want a GFE or PSE (nothing necessarily wrong with that of course), but one of the differences listed is that with PSE you get "dirty talk".  I mean really?  Since when can a GFE not include dirty talk?


Offline BeesKnees

Ah I see what you mean.

My opinion would be that punters should see pornstars because they're fans or because the girl work has a good reputation/recommendation, rather than see a "pornstar" just because of the notoriety that she's done porn.

If that makes sense.

I prefer a normal girl to a porn star anyday

Offline hendrix

Just to be devil's advocate, how about this.

She does like it, but wouldn't want every single punter to fuck her ass. While I haven't had it done to me, doing anal maybe 8 times a day, 7 days a week must be painful.

But if you put a premium on it, only people who really really want it would go for it, therefore possibly reducing the chances of times it has to be done.

akauya, are you gonna name and shame then?

Yeah, that's an entirely possible and valid reason. If I really, really liked the look of the girl and there no other extras, I'd consider it I guess. If however, CIM, Swallow etc were also extras (which is often the case), then...if she can't swallow 8 loads a day, she's not my type of girl :D


Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)