Normally, I would agree with the Punting Wiki guidance, Davey, but where the WG has essentially used fraud (using fake or very old/altered photos, for instance) to induce a punter into seeking a contract for commercial affection, then I think even those basic protections can be justifiably binned. This would at least mean that the loss of business for the offending WGs might deter them or their Sergeis from doing it again, especially if the landlord chucks them out.
This forum is for punters, not WGs, dodgy or otherwise, and punters should expect honesty and facts about where and with whom they might want to punt. While it is always nice to enjoy good sex with gorgeous, young, curvy women, I have also enjoyed some of the best sex of my life with plainer, less skinny or older women as well, so don’t write them all off.
The OP should now be more aware of the risks of using ES and VS to find good WGs. These sites don’t give a flying fuck if you get ripped off. I have sent them notices over the years when WGs or pimps have used photos of different women, sometimes supermodels, to advertise their girls and nine times out of ten (maybe more) they do nothing. Even pictures of Wifey, Aria Giovanni and Faith Nelson get left up, and you are certainly not going to find them opening the door into the dark flat! AW is far from perfect, but at least they do respond to tip offs and dump fake profiles if they are given evidence of it. Stick with that!
