Author Topic: Katie Summers Massage  (Read 5816 times)

SickBoy40

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
External Link/Members Only

Managed to book a half hour sensual massage with Katie today. £50 for half hour. All comms fine, no major delays in getting replies to texts. Katie works from an office type building just next to Central Station (it's well known to FBSM punters in Glasgow).

Let Katie know I'd arrived and was quickly buzzed upstairs, no hanging around outside. Katie met me at the top of the stairs in leggings and a top and led me to her massage room which was very tranquil. Fully equipped with hot towels and hot oil etc and uses an expensive looking massage table. We'd previously agreed a body to body massage with 2 pops through hand relief. Leggings and top quickly discarded to reveal a fantastic set of tits. Katie is very pretty facially. I'd say size 14-16 although I'm crap with sizes. That suits me and I found her very attractive. Katie applied some hot oil to my back and shoulders and you can tell she does actually know how to do a massage. After a few cheeky CC swipes I asked her to turn me over and she gave me a fantastic HR to completion, using a variety of techniques, alternating the pace and getting her tits involved too. She'd be excellent at an edging session I think, knows what spots to hit. Happy with fondling and a fingering and suggested she remove her thong to allow me easier access. More teasing with her tits and nails to another climax before I was offered hot wet towels to dry myself clean of the oil. No clockwatching and after I'd left I realised the session ran on for around 40 minutes. I'd certainly recommend as she's very good at what she does and is chatty and friendly with it.

Offline Steveni86

« Last Edit: December 04, 2017, 05:49:32 pm by Steveni86 »

Offline Boinky

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,578
  • Likes: 5
  •  
  • Reviews: 23
Hmmm...


Two reviews of this girl, both by new members who've never reviewed before.

The other one got pelters for being a fluffy twat and it was blatant touting/probably written by a cuntruck fanboy/Katie herself. This one is better but it's still a bit on the fishy side.

Offline David1970

Hmmm...


Two reviews of this girl, both by new members who've never reviewed before.

The other one got pelters for being a fluffy twat and it was blatant touting/probably written by a cuntruck fanboy/Katie herself. This one is better but it's still a bit on the fishy side.

Having read both reviews, I would not believe a word about this touting whore.
She must think all punters are as thick as her.

SickBoy40

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
It's this type of really cynical response that puts us new guys off submitting reviews. I saw Katie, had a good time and I'd see her again. For what it's worth I thought I'd share those views on here fur the benefit of anyone who may be interested in seeing her also. I respect you may have an opinion on that. Would you be jumping all over my post with the same fervour if I had a shit time? I think this site is invaluable at times but I sometimes feel as though it's not really designed to let us less established guys make meaningful posts without being vilified for it.

pulsebot

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Having read both reviews, I would not believe a word about this touting whore.
She must think all punters are as thick as her.

Which is completely daft of her because as I remember longstanding members gave her decent comments on the massage thread.

Offline Greg05

It's this type of really cynical response that puts us new guys off submitting reviews. I saw Katie, had a good time and I'd see her again. For what it's worth I thought I'd share those views on here fur the benefit of anyone who may be interested in seeing her also. I respect you may have an opinion on that. Would you be jumping all over my post with the same fervour if I had a shit time? I think this site is invaluable at times but I sometimes feel as though it's not really designed to let us less established guys make meaningful posts without being vilified for it.

You have to admit it is a bit suspicious though

SickBoy40

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
So everyone who is new to the site and thinks they are doing honest guys a favour by submitting their first review are treated with suspicion? If this is a forum whereby new guys aren't supposed to get involved then no problem, I'll continue seeing the WGs I like but I'll keep my reviews to myself from now on. Sorry I'm not a punting superstar like some of the "established" lads on here but we all gotta start somewhere. I won't post any more reviews from now on.

Offline OGS20

So everyone who is new to the site and thinks they are doing honest guys a favour by submitting their first review are treated with suspicion? If this is a forum whereby new guys aren't supposed to get involved then no problem, I'll continue seeing the WGs I like but I'll keep my reviews to myself from now on. Sorry I'm not a punting superstar like some of the "established" lads on here but we all gotta start somewhere. I won't post any more reviews from now on.

It's your first ever post never mind review mate so yes you will be treated with suspicion no way around it. Keep contributing and the suspicion will drain away; doesn't have to be a big deal.
Banned reason: Shit stirring walloper.
Banned by: Ali Katt

SickBoy40

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Nah yer alright bud. I'll just keep my mouth shut from now on. My punting is confidential from now on.  Cheers

Offline OGS20

Nah yer alright bud. I'll just keep my mouth shut from now on. My punting is confidential from now on.  Cheers

Suit yourself bud.
Banned reason: Shit stirring walloper.
Banned by: Ali Katt

Offline HelloThere


Offline Steveni86

That review is similar to a mate of mine who went.

Never got fingering and the review above sounds better than as just his experience

But broadly similar

fly fifer

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
LOL fishy fishy
Are we still talking about Sickboy's review, or are we describing Katie's fanny now?
 :P

Offline Steveni86


Walkthewalk

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
 :dash:
It's your first ever post never mind review mate so yes you will be treated with suspicion no way around it. Keep contributing and the suspicion will drain away; doesn't have to be a big deal.
Quite right Sickboy. I feel the same hence the reason I only add to exisiting reviews rather than post my own. Too much slagging off new members even though I'm sure I've been punting in Edinburgh saunas for longer than most.
WTW

Walkthewalk

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
That's the wrong post I've quoted.

Offline Courtney

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,166
  • Likes: 15
  •  
  • Reviews: 18
:dash:Quite right Sickboy. I feel the same hence the reason I only add to exisiting reviews rather than post my own. Too much slagging off new members

 :cry: :cry: :cry:
....another over-sensitive individual. :music: :blush:

Offline TommyMoundfrigger

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=171665.0

Reads similar to my review. I was definitely there!

Or am I touting? #confused

Offline Keema

That review is similar to a mate of mine who went.

My mates don't talk about paying girls for a wank in polite society.

Offline Boinky

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,578
  • Likes: 5
  •  
  • Reviews: 23
Everyone on here was new at some point. I lurked and dipped in and out for a long while, not really using the forum much until I found it invaluable and started contributing. I'm far from prolific but only posted my first review in Feb. this year.

Before I posted my first review I'd read a lot in the forum and realised what the score on here was. I didn't just blurt out some random crap from my head, and I'd contributed a bit before that in other ways.
New members with first post, first reviews of girls that have barely been reviewed, have recently been touted by another "new member" or give a glowing review on the back of some shit ones are always going to be suspect and questioned.

If you can't handle a little criticism this isn't the place for you. If you can't backup a few claims this isn't the place for you. If you just want to leech and not share anything, that's your decision, don't make a song and dance about it, just keep doing it rather than announcing to all we're missing your pearls of wisdom from decades of experience you've been keeping to yourself for the previous 2 years of you being here and posting fuck all.



Or am I touting? #confused

You have a history of posting good reviews on here so I sincerely doubt anyone would believe that. However, as above, it wasn't your first post, first review of a girl that had been touted just a few days previously.
« Last Edit: December 06, 2017, 09:39:24 am by Boinky »

Offline chinafan

I've seen Katie too, my experience matches with this guy's review.

Offline Jock D

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,702
  • Likes: 34
  •  
  • Reviews: 115
Everyone on here was new at some point. I lurked and dipped in and out for a long while, not really using the forum much until I found it invaluable and started contributing. I'm far from prolific but only posted my first review in Feb. this year.

Before I posted my first review I'd read a lot in the forum and realised what the score on here was. I didn't just blurt out some random crap from my head, and I'd contributed a bit before that in other ways.
New members with first post, first reviews of girls that have barely been reviewed, have recently been touted by another "new member" or give a glowing review on the back of some shit ones are always going to be suspect and questioned.

If you can't handle a little criticism this isn't the place for you. If you can't backup a few claims this isn't the place for you. If you just want to leech and not share anything, that's your decision, don't make a song and dance about it, just keep doing it rather than announcing to all we're missing your pearls of wisdom from decades of experience you've been keeping to yourself for the previous 2 years of you being here and posting fuck all.

Great Post. :thumbsup:

SickBoy40

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Hey peeps. Yeah fair enough, first review will always be treated with a bit of scepticism I guess. Bottom line, booked to see Katie tomorrow again if anyone would be interested in an honest review tomorrow night after my booking?

Offline Steveni86

As I am off to see her next week yes please

Offline Boinky

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,578
  • Likes: 5
  •  
  • Reviews: 23
You've already reviewed her. No point in doing it again unless something has changed and she's only worth a neutral or negative or there's been a long time between you seeing her and your review is really just to confirm she's still good at what she does.

Offline lewisjones23

Are we still talking about Sickboy's review, or are we describing Katie's fanny now?
 :P

she has reported it as disgusting

not sure if she means this thread or her fanny

can anyone confirm?

Offline Marmalade

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 12,778
  • Likes: 37
  •  
  • Reviews: 58
Are we still talking about Sickboy's review, or are we describing Katie's fanny now?[/]
 :P

She’s reported it as ‘disgusting’  :cool:

Offline scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,623
  • Likes: 530
  •  
  • Reviews: 125
You have to admit it is a bit suspicious though

Spoken by a zero-review virgin?
You have to admit you sound like you're talking bollocks.
Get a few reviews under your belt and maybe you can usefully comment, until then you'd do better to keep your gob shut and learn.
I don't know the girl, but to me there seems little wrong with this review

Offline Steveni86

she has reported it as disgusting

not sure if she means this thread or her fanny

can anyone confirm?

She has reported this thread.

How silly. It's generally a good thread with positive reviews

Offline scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,623
  • Likes: 530
  •  
  • Reviews: 125
So everyone who is new to the site and thinks they are doing honest guys a favour by submitting their first review are treated with suspicion? If this is a forum whereby new guys aren't supposed to get involved then no problem, I'll continue seeing the WGs I like but I'll keep my reviews to myself from now on. Sorry I'm not a punting superstar like some of the "established" lads on here but we all gotta start somewhere. I won't post any more reviews from now on.

Well I see little wrong with this report, everyone has to start somewhere.
Ignore this lot and keep reviewing

Offline scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,623
  • Likes: 530
  •  
  • Reviews: 125

Offline Greg05

Spoken by a zero-review virgin?
You have to admit you sound like you're talking bollocks.
Get a few reviews under your belt and maybe you can usefully comment, until then you'd do better to keep your gob shut and learn.
I don't know the girl, but to me there seems little wrong with this review

Sorry didn’t realise I needed your permission to comment.

It’s bollocks to state the obvious? Fair enough  :lol:

SickBoy40

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I'm booked with Katie today. Something a little different planned. Will post my review this evening. Have a good day guys.

Offline TommyMoundfrigger

As I am off to see her next week yes please

Every review seems to be very similar which suggests she follows a pattern for her massages. Nothing seems spontaneous.
One reason I won't be returning.
It will be interesting to hear how his 2nd visit goes.
« Last Edit: December 07, 2017, 09:12:53 am by pete-piper »

Offline Steveni86

Every review seems to be very similar which suggests she follows a pattern for her massages. Nothing seems spontaneous.
One reason I won't be returning.
It will be interesting to hear how his 2nd visit goes.

A hot big breasted naked young lady giving an oily massage with fingering and a hj sounds great and whilst variety is the spice of life it would be a nice weekly treat

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Are we still talking about Sickboy's review, or are we describing Katie's fanny now?
 :P

She's replied she's said "it's discusting" I wonder if she means her fanny  :unknown:

Offline HelloThere

S.Brown ....I do my reviews differently as I only go for massage punts!
If you click on my actual posts I review my experiences thru comments on certain threads...
I give a lot of insight and knowledge thru replying on the sexual/Tantra massage thread and via PM to all the regs.
Just because it says ZERO reviews doesn't mean I don't share my experiences and review the girls I see(it can also be done in different way) .... ie replying on here like this!
« Last Edit: December 07, 2017, 03:43:20 pm by HelloThere »

Offline scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,623
  • Likes: 530
  •  
  • Reviews: 125
S.Brown ....I do my reviews differently as I only go for massage punts!
If you click on my actual posts I review my experiences thru comments on certain threads...
I give a lot of insight and knowledge thru replying on the sexual/Tantra massage thread and via PM to all the regs.
Just because it says ZERO reviews doesn't mean I don't share my experiences and review the girls I see(it can also be done in different way) .... ie replying on here like this!

so you're actually a non-contributing leech with nothing original to contribute.
Nothing to stop you reviewing massage punts - except your desire not to share

Offline cigano8

so you're actually a non-contributing leech with nothing original to contribute.
Nothing to stop you reviewing massage punts - except your desire not to share

There's a big massage thread in the Scotland pages and to be fair to Hellothere he's definitely one of the main contributors - he posts tons of  reviews on that.

Offline scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,623
  • Likes: 530
  •  
  • Reviews: 125
There's a big massage thread in the Scotland pages and to be fair to Hellothere he's definitely one of the main contributors - he posts tons of  reviews on that.
but whats the point of that?
reviews need to be in a review! otherwise they're just verbal confetti.

Offline Marmalade

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 12,778
  • Likes: 37
  •  
  • Reviews: 58
but whats the point of that?
reviews need to be in a review! otherwise they're just verbal confetti.

Ideally yes, and I don’t read the Scottish section enough to confirm or deny the usefulness of anyone’s contribution there just now. But I’ve noticed local sections have a certain life of their own (some seem fluffier than others). If he has solid support from other posters there, that probably goes for something. I don’t know cigano but a quick look suggests a balance of reviews in the relatively short time he’s been a forum member so I wouldn’t dismiss his comment out of hand.

It’s up to Admin of course. My feeling though is that if someone genuinely contributes usefully but doesn’t post reviews they are also long enough in the tooth to take any stick.

James for instance, a long-standing member, hasn’t posted a review in his puff — not exactly a great role model there — but in spite of several threads dedicated to getting rid of James he’s still here. He can take the stick and some people find many of his comments insightful or useful.

If someone doesn’t review, they’d better be good at holding their own (as well as appearing worth the bandwidth to Admin I guess.) So good luck to the guy. But he will doubtless get a kicking every now and then and you’re right to challenge him IMO. Maybe he’ll amaze us all yet.