Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Camila hottie - Stepney Green  (Read 5415 times)


20 review(s) for camila__hottie_ (8 positive, 2 neutral, 10 negative) [Indexed by Goldfinch]

Offline davidgood

It was a couple years ago when I last saw Camila. I have tried to see her since but could not get an appointment which fitted in with what I was doing.

Now she has broken away from the Polish group she was with and is working in an easy to get to flat I decided to get in touch and a meeting was arranged.

Once out of her dress and undies I got her to lie back on the bed for some licking and sucking. Next she gave me some oral which got me rock hard. Then she covered me up, lubed us both, knelt at the edge of bed and guided me into her tight bum. I only lasted a couple of minutes before I shot my load.

For the break she offered me a massage but as I had not seen her for some time I opted for a chat about her new location and how she was enjoying being more independent.

As I started to stiffen up again there was more intense sucking. Not deep throat but sensual with plenty of spiting. Once hard and covered up, Camila came up on top for some vigorous cow girl then on to some deep mish which brought me off before I could have another go at her bum. I most pace myself better when I next see her so I can get in two rounds of anal.

As usual some words of warning.

Firstly, her profile pics were taken a few years ago. She does not have hair extensions now and is not as slim but she still has a good figure IMO with a nice pair of natural tits and a pleasant face.

Secondly, while her base price is still £80 per hour she now charges an extra £20 for anal.

Thirdly, coms are good but they are by text through her receptionist. So you can’t get to speak to her before you meet.

If you are interested in seeing her, this is the link;-

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Regards,
davidgood


Offline Notpastit

Would you say she looks more like pic in white lingerie kneeling on bed as opposed to ones where she's in in black/other?

ie looks older, filled out a bit, 30-35 as opposed to 27 stated on profile

I've been interested in her for a while, esp as offers A/location right side of town, even with extra £20 still seems comp cheap if she looks anything like pics?

Offline Sinz

Would you say she looks more like pic in white lingerie kneeling on bed as opposed to ones where she's in in black/other?

ie looks older, filled out a bit, 30-35 as opposed to 27 stated on profile

I've been interested in her for a while, esp as offers A/location right side of town, even with extra £20 still seems comp cheap if she looks anything like pics?

The pics are at least 15 years old, IMO she looks like she is in her early 40s

The pics are heavily photoshopped and taken when she was young, definitely bulky than her pics

I have reviewed her here

Offline lewishamguy

The pics are at least 15 years old, IMO she looks like she is in her early 40s

The pics are heavily photoshopped and taken when she was young, definitely bulky than her pics

I have reviewed her here

I think her pimp or ex. boyfriend
urjames1
tried to post her real face pic. It looks like a granny in her 50's???.  :scare: :scare:

Offline punk

I think her pimp or ex. boyfriend
urjames1
tried to post her real face pic. It looks like a granny in her 50's???.  :scare: :scare:

That picture for him,does look like her.

Offline Notpastit

OK, thanks all

Seems to be too much conflicting info/photos abt Camila so will give her a miss.

Stick with HSG who altho obv more £ is the genuine article and delights in being fucked up the arse!

Offline aanimator

I have seen her before, I wouldn't say she is worth it because of the extra £20 for a-levels.

Online cunningman

It looks like a granny in her 50's???.
At risk of white-knighting - that was not my experience.
The pictures are crazy, if she posted real recent ones, then she'd still get custom.  Plenty of us like 'girl next door'.
For me, if she was waiting at table or running a bar, I'd be flirting with her.  But she is absolutely not a model or porn star look, and the misleading pictures are a mistake IMO.
Not sure why the £20 extra is a big deal - I'm not sure how many girls actually offer it at £100/hr without it being a further extra.
You'd have to find a willing hungarian that's inclusive *and actually delivers* to say she's expensive, wouldn't you?
Its not really my thing, so I tend not to ask anyway: I won't be taking that option.


Offline MajorPayne

I think her pimp or ex. boyfriend
urjames1
tried to post her real face pic. It looks like a granny in her 50's???.  :scare: :scare:

Amazing what rubbish some people write.  Yes she is a little older than stated in her profile; she was born in February 1988 so 30 next month.

She paid for professional photographs around the time she set up her AW profile (12/01/2016) but she is absolutely the same person.

She is one of the best value for money working girls in London presently at £80ph and at this price I see no problem in her adding £20 extra for anal.  It's her choice and easy enough to go somewhere else if you don't like it.


holland

  • Guest
Amazing what rubbish some people write.  Yes she is a little older than stated in her profile; she was born in February 1988 so 30 next month.

She paid for professional photographs around the time she set up her AW profile (12/01/2016) but she is absolutely the same person.

She is one of the best value for money working girls in London presently at £80ph and at this price I see no problem in her adding £20 extra for anal.  It's her choice and easy enough to go somewhere else if you don't like it.

We don't write rubbish in here.
The only rubbish thing in here is your attitude to defend this prossie. :thumbsdown: :angry:
How do you know all this stuff about her anyway? Are you connected with her or what else? :diablo:
« Last Edit: January 19, 2018, 01:49:39 pm by holland »

Offline punk

Amazing what rubbish some people write.  Yes she is a little older than stated in her profile; she was born in February 1988 so 30 next month.

She paid for professional photographs around the time she set up her AW profile (12/01/2016) but she is absolutely the same person.

She is one of the best value for money working girls in London presently at £80ph and at this price I see no problem in her adding £20 extra for anal.  It's her choice and easy enough to go somewhere else if you don't like it.

Sounds like White knighting.

Offline Sinz

Amazing what rubbish some people write.  Yes she is a little older than stated in her profile; she was born in February 1988 so 30 next month.

She paid for professional photographs around the time she set up her AW profile (12/01/2016) but she is absolutely the same person.

She is one of the best value for money working girls in London presently at £80ph and at this price I see no problem in her adding £20 extra for anal.  It's her choice and easy enough to go somewhere else if you don't like it.

You must be deluded, if you believe she was born in 1988. She is definitely in her mid 40s. How the hell do you know the exact birth date and year anyways ?

No one is disputing the pics are not hers, it’s just that it has been taken 15 years ago and has been photoshopped the hell out of it.

Better go to Specsavers you blind bat.

Offline GeorgeForeman


The SP has as many negative reviews as positive, so obviously her service is variable.

If she is bigger and older than her current photos suggest, then she need to update them pronto.
Otherwise her negative review quota will increase rapidly from disappointed punters.
And I'm sure her white knights don't want that.

Offline MajorPayne

You must be deluded, if you believe she was born in 1988. She is definitely in her mid 40s. How the hell do you know the exact birth date and year anyways ?

No one is disputing the pics are not hers, it’s just that it has been taken 15 years ago and has been photoshopped the hell out of it.

Better go to Specsavers you blind bat.

Just quoting the facts rather than getting overly emotional and unnecessarily derogatory.  At the end of the session [earlier this month] we discussed her photographs and she showed me her identification which showed her birth date.

I've only been punting a short while [2014] compared to many and seen some very dodgy looking photographs on some AW profiles with a decent number of girls who don't even show their face at all.   Camila at least provides professional photographs with her face.  A woman wearing full makeup will always look different when the makeup is removed.

Punting is a very subjective activity and you should allow members to speak freely without the need for abuse.   Particularly when you do not know all the facts.

The reality is Camila provides a good range of services at a good price.   Punters will read the reviews here and make their own mind up, for me, I've seen the girl half a dozen times since 2016 and never had a problem with her.

Personally I feel posts should be as objectively written as possible and not include any emotional tirades.




Offline Sinz

Just quoting the facts rather than getting overly emotional and unnecessarily derogatory.  At the end of the session [earlier this month] we discussed her photographs and she showed me her identification which showed her birth date.

I've only been punting a short while [2014] compared to many and seen some very dodgy looking photographs on some AW profiles with a decent number of girls who don't even show their face at all.   Camila at least provides professional photographs with her face. A woman wearing full makeup will always look different when the makeup is removed.

Punting is a very subjective activity and you should allow members to speak freely without the need for abuse.   Particularly when you do not know all the facts.

The reality is Camila provides a good range of services at a good price.   Punters will read the reviews here and make their own mind up, for me, I've seen the girl half a dozen times since 2016 and never had a problem with her.

Personally I feel posts should be as objectively written as possible and not include any emotional tirades.

Its just not the makeup, its her tits body everything. There is no point of putting pics that barely resembles what she actually looks like.

Her tits are floppy and not firm as the pics indicate. That goes for the rest of the body too, which is flabby.

If anyone is going to punt her with the assumption of a young WG, they will be disappointed. However if they prefer older average looking MILFs she would be ok.

Now that is my honest opinion, if you are emotionally invested in her, which definitely sounds like you are, I can't help it.


 
« Last Edit: January 24, 2018, 08:57:52 am by Sinz »

Offline MajorPayne

Sinz,  you are obviously very experienced punter but I can honestly say I have no emotional attachment to any prostitute.  I pay my money, fuck them and then leave and get on with life.


Offline MisterMr

I might hold them and kiss them but as soon as that semen goes flying, i want to run away

Offline punk

I might hold them and kiss them but as soon as that semen goes flying, i want to run away

You should clean up before running away.

Offline punk

Just quoting the facts rather than getting overly emotional and unnecessarily derogatory.  At the end of the session [earlier this month] we discussed her photographs and she showed me her identification which showed her birth date.

  Camila at least provides professional photographs with her face.  A woman wearing full makeup will always look different when the makeup is removed.

Punting is a very subjective activity and you should allow members to speak freely without the need for abuse.   Particularly when you do not know all the facts.

The reality is Camila provides a good range of services at a good price.   Punters will read the reviews here and make their own mind up, for me, I've seen the girl half a dozen times since 2016 and never had a problem with her.

Personally I feel posts should be as objectively written as possible and not include any emotional tirades.


Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline pepsicolaboy

The pics are at least 15 years old, IMO she looks like she is in her early 40s

The pics are heavily photoshopped and taken when she was young, definitely bulky than her pics

I have reviewed her here

Removed from my Hot list on the back of this opinion in November (thank you.)

Not sure the point of these super photoshops - just post real pictures FFS. I just don't get it, unless they don't care punters will walk or simply visit once - they see the reality and stay anyway (punt once), thinking with their little head. Surely better to create a loyal customer base - most these Polish women offer a decent 'human' experience :)

Her service list does look amazing though  :cry: