Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: Gripes with reporting profiles  (Read 4285 times)

Offline forme

The above is a communiction received a while back from an ex-member(x4) boasting how he was easily able to scam people. His claims are rather inflated btw and as for the amount found that was an underestimate as he now knows. The name has been removed to protect the not so innocent.
yes you have said before about someone having 400 plus profiles
« Last Edit: February 08, 2011, 09:30:17 PM by Marmalade »

Offline Marmalade

It's nothing new. There are many similar examples from unconnected sources. It's rife. Even Adultwork has set up what it says on its pages are business advisors for certain countries to vet applications - Romania being a prime example. There's a point at which they obviously feel credibility is threatened to the point of profitability.  A common moan on Internet forums is that they should do more. UK Punting is trying to help detect frauds - but replicating what Jacob does here across tens of thousands of profiles and then incorporating it into automated systems . . . my guess is there would still be errors one way or the other. Don't forget there are also thousands of genuine, law-abiding WGs on Adultwork who take their job seriously and give good service (and judging by their forums, many enjoy what is for them a lifestyle choice). But you'd think more forums, punters and escorts would at least take their hat off to what UKP and Jacob especially are trying to do here. If you have a problem with Adultwork that's genuine and not solved by attention to their rules and regulations, do email them and keep plugging away till you get a response - they're in Belize, have no forum where you can post, and nowhere in the UK that you can complain to (certainly not here!) - but we've heard of many cases of WGs getting responses eventually, errors corrected and so on, but just make sure it was their fault and not an oversight on your part. They are not set up for punters or WGs: they are purely a business concern, so approach them accordingly is my advice.
« Last Edit: February 08, 2011, 09:53:29 PM by Marmalade »

Offline forme

It's nothing new. There are many similar examples from unconnected sources. It's rife. Even Adultwork has set up what it says on its pages are business advisors for certain countries to vet applications - Romania being a prime example. There's a point at which they obviously feel credibility is threatened to the point of profitability.  A common moan on Internet forums is that they should do more. UK Punting is trying to help detect frauds - but replicating what Jacob does here across tens of thousands of profiles and then incorporating it into automated systems . . . my guess is there would still be errors one way or the other. Don't forget there are also thousands of genuine, law-abiding WGs on Adultwork who take their job seriously and give good service (and judging by their forums, many enjoy what is for them a lifestyle choice). But you'd think more forums, punters and escorts would at least take their hat off to what UKP and Jacob especially are trying to do here. If you have a problem with Adultwork that's genuine and not solved by attention to their rules and regulations, do email them and keep plugging away till you get a response - they're in Belize, have no forum where you can post, and nowhere in the UK that you can complain to (certainly not here!) - but we've heard of many cases of WGs getting responses eventually, errors corrected and so on, but just make sure it was their fault and not an oversight on your part. They are not set up for punters or WGs: they are purely a business concern, so approach them accordingly is my advice.

A very logical post indeed and you are right.  I think to have a punters forum, you also need the ladies and without them, there could be no forum. Whilst I will commend what Jacob is trying to achieve, what was said by another poster is also true, that is, never assume that someone is fake unless it can be proven and just seeing profiles removed adlib on the strength of a picture being found elsewhere not only is it very off putting for punters it also loses credibility for AW.    If AW is "not set up for punters or WGs" then they should be, it is these people they make money from.
I do not think it is your job to "seek and find",  let punters make their own comments about ladies and then others can make up their own mind, that could be far more destructive

Offline James999

to have a punters forum, you also need the ladies and without them, there could be no forum.

never assume that someone is fake unless it can be proven

it also loses credibility for AW.

Nik told you the other day

stop talking bollocks

1. A punter forum does not beed Prostitutes as members, they can add to the forum and make a different slant on things but your statement does not make sense.

2. As for proving something is Fake, it is very hard to prove a negative and in reality anyone who is sensible will assume all AW profiles are potential fakes and proceed on that basis, till they are proven to be genuine.

3. As for AW losing credibility, That went years ago.


Offline Mellow

I think to have a punters forum, you also need the ladies and without them, there could be no forum.

Please explain why, in your opinion, a forum can't survive without it's ration of grubby cuntholes? As far as i'm concerned, this place is great and doesn't suffer from the usual "I agree with everything you say and I do so 'cause you have great nipples" The regular female posters here could just as easily be males and their opinions are therefore equally appreciated. Unfortunately, there aren't many wgs out there that understand that UKP is not a shop-window for pimps and prozzies.

Offline NIK

It has been duly noted that you removed my last post.  Individuals who do this clearly have something to hide.   There are very serious implications about your conduct and of your site and therefore, I have now passed the information gathered thus far to UK authorites and in particular, your involvement WITH prostitution in the UK.

Clearly you will delete this but only after you have read it

What total bollocks.
What fucking 'information' have you passed on to the 'UK authorities?'

UKP does not welcome pimps and scamsters.
Goodbye.

Offline Fannytastico

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 508
....I think to have a punters forum, you also need the ladies and without them, there could be no forum.....
I got the impression he was saying  without prossies, you couldn't have a punters forum.  Not   without prossie members, you couldn't have a punters forum.

Offline Jacob

A very logical post indeed and you are right.  I think to have a punters forum, you also need the ladies and without them, there could be no forum. Whilst I will commend what Jacob is trying to achieve, what was said by another poster is also true, that is, never assume that someone is fake unless it can be proven and just seeing profiles removed adlib on the strength of a picture being found elsewhere not only is it very off putting for punters it also loses credibility for AW.    If AW is "not set up for punters or WGs" then they should be, it is these people they make money from.
I do not think it is your job to "seek and find",  let punters make their own comments about ladies and then others can make up their own mind, that could be far more destructive

I cannot follow what you are trying to say at all and your posts in this thread and another one the other day are contradictory and not very logical to say the least. You are saying that a profile that is using 'stolen' pictures should not be treated with suspicion yet in your first post on UK Punting listed several profiles that you said were examples that stood out as a scam based on, what exactly.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=1693.msg23290#msg23290

I mentioned at the time that a few of these profiles are IMO most definitely genuine but you disagreed and were happy to have posted the details without any explanation whatsoever other than they were examples of scams.

Well this example, once again, from your post is certainly genuine and does not even have a tineye hit.

https://www.adultwork.com/ViewProfile.asp?UserID=1139148

You also seemed intent of saying that amandasussex was a scam selling porn pix cos you recognised her 'craggy bum' and were off to find pictures that matched. Why would that be if a matching picture is meaningless?

You then went on to suggest that UK Punting is part of Adultwork somehow and here to protect their interests by targeting profiles without 'Porn Pix', the suggestion being that fakes without pay to view is fine by you and the more I can eliminate the better because it will increase profits., Is this why you asked if I, or another Moderator, are Nigerian??

I could go on but TBH I can't really haven't got the energy play your stupid games anymore and have a batch of likely fakes to analyse in meticulous fashion  and so will bring this to a close from my POV. If you are a Punter then why not have a look around the other forums rather than fixating on the one thread. However, if you are not which I think is more likely given what you have posted I think you'd be better off elsewhere as I reckon you are still talking bollocks as you don't seem to have a clue what actually goes on and seem to be speaking as if you were personally affected in someway by these time-wasting fakes being exposed and coming up with utter nonsense to justify what you are saying.

Onwards and Upwards.  :drinks:






Offline Mellow

I got the impression he was saying  without prossies, you couldn't have a punters forum.  Not   without prossie members, you couldn't have a punters forum.
LOL
I'm sure "we'd" find something to entertain "us"  if prozzies got taken up by aliens :)

Offline Fannytastico

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 508
LOL
I'm sure "we'd" find something to entertain "us"  if prozzies got taken up by aliens :)

Yes, and then it would be a former punters forum whose prozzies had got taken up by aliens.  Not a punters forum. 

Offline Jacob

---------------------

This is an example of moving pictures around profiles that ARE clearly not the same person but have both been posted on the SAME PROFILE within a day or so and this since the Pimp started posting bollocks here at UK Punting and having the cheek to complain about Adultwork removing their profiles because they don't have 'porn pix' so that's alright then.

https://www.adultwork.com/1141441 or https://www.adultwork.com/hornylove
Barking.


http://www.putalocura.com/imgBanners_npl/articulos/ART-F895-482-169-534.jpg
http://www.galleryarea.com/thumbs/2009-11-14/39937_01.jpg

If both these pictures are all of the actual Prossie then I am a 'monkeys uncle'.

It is strange that the webcammer who is involved in these profiles has also had multiple Prossie profiles under names like belleme and London based. belleme = bellmay just in case anyone doesn't get it, another slip up, eh? bell(e) is one of the favourite names like pippa and jodie employed by this lot of cheating *****. Maybe it is time to open the secret diary of a certain call girl? What is the chance that a supposed 'independent' Prostitute that denies all knowledge of fake pictures on her previous profiles would register on UK Punting with the same name as her Pimp as used many times? One problem about creating 400+ profiles is that you need some imagination which has been lacking somewhat.



Check out screencaps of the following profiles for the same person. Same Person, I think not and these are just a few of the ones to have recently bitten the dust though all accessed on 07/02/2011.








PS. Please don't quote this whole post!
« Last Edit: February 10, 2011, 08:31:27 AM by Jacob »


Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)