This thread started off with a great review. What followed was utterly shocking. I've been a member for over two months, have logged in nearly everyday but am seriously contemplating leaving the forum.
I have gone through every comment on the thread and in my view it is only just that 'Baz Vegas Bob' gets banned as he undeniably breached the rule that clearly states: 'No excessive abuse towards other members'.
As for comments that denounce the high praisal and raving of a wg, let me say the following: at the end of the day us punters seek a service. Therefore, it wouldn't be very helpful nor distinguishable if each review was rated as merely good or bad with a list of the services provided. An avid punter like TP has surely been with his fair share of wgs, so for me to read such good feedback from him regarding this wg is nothing but helpful and would immediately make me consider her.
Regarding Skipper, I have seen nothing on this thread to suggest he is a troll or a tout. So there was no need for the accusations. I do however condemn some of the language he used and particularly his description of the forum as a 'laughing stock'.
Lastly, I have noticed some rather childish behaviour from members; each one trying to back up his comment to come out triumphunt in his argument. This is not a forum for debate. To solve this I would suggest a cap of 3 comments from a member on a thread. Happy punting