Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: AdultWork field reports  (Read 2797 times)

Offline Marmalade

Quote from: ellwoodpdowd
An example of another good reason to have different profile names for each forum and have a separate persona for punting - false name and occupation etc.,  also leaving reports a few weeks after seeing the girl.

I agree. Even if it's a positive review.

Quote
. . . has hidden the Field Reports from those that she doesn't want shown on AW. They have a choice to review a field report that has been submitted and not show them if they don't want to. They can't do that with normal feedback.

Not quite. They can choose to hide them on their profile, that's all. You can read any hidden FR by going to https://www.adultwork.com/FieldReportSearch.asp and typing in the name. Not that it makes much difference if they are all glowingly 10/10 . . .

I agree. Even if it's a positive review.

Not quite. They can choose to hide them on their profile, that's all. You can read any hidden FR by going to https://www.adultwork.com/FieldReportSearch.asp and typing in the name. Not that it makes much difference if they are all glowingly 10/10 . . .

I never knew that. I assumed that they were always shown on the WGs page.  Thanks, I've been able to see feedback for a couple of girls I'm interested in.

Offline CoolTiger

Not quite. They can choose to hide them on their profile, that's all. You can read any hidden FR by going to https://www.adultwork.com/FieldReportSearch.asp and typing in the name. Not that it makes much difference if they are all glowingly 10/10 . . .

Thanks for that tip. Have now been able to read up a few FRs on those girls who had hidden their FBs. Surprise, surprise...
Mainly 9s or 10s.

Offline skittish

I already thought most people knew this but apparently not so I'll add to Marmalade's post.

You don't have to enter a name if you're not looking for a particular girl, you can also search by area alone it sometimes throws up a few surprises.

Good tip, I wasn't aware either.  But in terms of the feedback on AW given that most of us on here, if not all of us, use AW why don't we all agree to write negatives on AW when it's appropropriate to do so and 'out' the crap prossies? So what if the prossie leaves a negative note that we can't see or gives us shit comments in return!  I've apparently got a negative note but the prossie that told me about it reckons I'm one of the nicest guys she sees - and I agree  :sarcastic:  She's put a positive note on my profile to conteract the bullshit.  But seriously, I've got loads of positive feedback and one adverse note saying that I'm dangerous (I'm not, I'm a reall pussycat) so what difference does it make if a crap service provider gives us adverse comments because we've written a negative on them?  Come on guys, let's grow some balls and shake up AW up by writing honest negative reports on that site as well as this one.  It's doing my head in finding what appears to be a good prossie on AW only to find that on here she's not rated.

Just a thought  :drinks:
« Last Edit: September 09, 2013, 03:51:29 PM by Bracknell 67 »

Offline ianvilla

Is it just me, but I think we should review punts on here only? Otherwise we are giving AW more credibility than it deserves. I have no desire to make it a credible site. :unknown:

Offline rpg

Is it just me, but I think we should review punts on here only? Otherwise we are giving AW more credibility than it deserves. I have no desire to make it a credible site. :unknown:

Yes you have a credible idea there. I've already said for those who can't make the break from AW FB and those who don't want to incur the wrath of a deranged prossie, do your review here. Phone for a booking and if your review is negative you won't get likewise on AW. If you're of a mind to build up your own feedback on AW, then, if the experience was good you can always book again through the AW booking system and feedback to your hearts content.

Offline Marmalade

Much as UKP is now the biggest punting site, it is still only a fraction of the total number of punters. Give bad reviews at your own risk on AW and only if you have strong street cred (with lots of good feedback for yourself). Vicious prossies can and do inflict serious damage if you are not well protected.

On here, give honest reviews only. Keep it real. (If not, you will probably be torn to shreds, and rightly so). Discerning punters look here for honest feedback on prossies. The others really need to learn to save themselves rather than rely on AW. And if you are thinking of joining UKP, seriously consider a different name for UKP to the one you use on AW.

A third (if convoluted) AW approach might be to give zero or minimal AW feedback but then, after she has returned you some pleasantly meaningless feedback, give her an honest (bummer if need be) field report. She can't delete the field report and (unlike feedbacks) can't reply to them as far as I know. She can avoid having them on her profile but not on the FR database which any punter can search. However, she may still take a vicious dislike to you and try to do you some harm. So I still think the place to give totally honest reviews is UKP.

I mostly ignore the feedback option on AW. Occasionally, after a first class punt with a non-whacko prossie, I will leave something nice so she tops up my own glowingly wonderful feedback, which can be useful for those prossies that only see people with feedback) other punters prefer to ignore this category - I beg to differ - but the choice may be area dependent - in London for instance, many different strategies apply! Likewise up here in beautiful Caledonia!)

UKP is here so punters can help each other. AW is not.


A third (if convoluted) AW approach might be to give zero or minimal AW feedback but then, after she has returned you some pleasantly meaningless feedback, give her an honest (bummer if need be) field report. She can't delete the field report and (unlike feedbacks) can't reply to them as far as I know. She can avoid having them on her profile but not on the FR database which any punter can search. However, she may still take a vicious dislike to you and try to do you some harm. So I still think the place to give totally honest reviews is UKP.

I mostly ignore the feedback option on AW. Occasionally, after a first class punt with a non-whacko prossie, I will leave something nice so she tops up my own glowingly wonderful feedback, which can be useful for those prossies that only see people with feedback) other punters prefer to ignore this category - I beg to differ - but the choice may be area dependent - in London for instance, many different strategies apply! Likewise up here in beautiful Caledonia!)

UKP is here so punters can help each other. AW is not.

That's really helpful, Marmalade. 

I remember visiting a WG earlier this year and expressing surprise that she hadn't any FRs.  She was one of those WGs who [said she] only had a couple of appointments a day so I stayed behind to help her find the several FRs others had left for her on AW.  That makes me wonder whether she has the "nous" to separate out the negative FRs.

Glad to see since coming on here that other people are aware of the flaws in AW feedback system and sort of what put me onto looking at this forum; for the unbiased reviews. Had a pretty shit one myself the other night, but as I'm on a new profile (took a break from punting for a long time as I got into a relationship) and have no feedback at all, it's too risky for me to leave negative feedback for the girl on AW; if I did, I would have just one bit of feedback completely slating me, and would likely not get a booking with anyone on there again.

Don't know how many people know this, but a girl on there can see any other profiles you have from that IP (presume it's your IP, maybe MAC too, dunno), so if I were to get this first bit of shit feedback from the prossie ire, not only would my AW profile be fucked from getting any future bookings on there, but so would all future profiles. Probably shouldn't have deleted the old profile but you live and learn.

All in all, not worth me risking it, so just won't leave any feedback for her at all on AW. Too risky for me to get negative feedback, but I don't want to add to the problem.
You can expect my 100% honest, genuine review here on UKPunting™ once a couple of days have passed and it's not so obvious it's me. I will take my endorsement money by cheque please mister admin.

Oh, one thing to add, I've learned my lesson not to get 1 hour bookings with new girls. Think I'll stick to 30 mins and save the 1 hours for the good ones.

Offline Michael-Corleone

Much as UKP is now the biggest punting site, it is still only a fraction of the total number of punters. Give bad reviews at your own risk on AW and only if you have strong street cred (with lots of good feedback for yourself). Vicious prossies can and do inflict serious damage if you are not well protected.

On here, give honest reviews only. Keep it real. (If not, you will probably be torn to shreds, and rightly so). Discerning punters look here for honest feedback on prossies. The others really need to learn to save themselves rather than rely on AW. And if you are thinking of joining UKP, seriously consider a different name for UKP to the one you use on AW.

A third (if convoluted) AW approach might be to give zero or minimal AW feedback but then, after she has returned you some pleasantly meaningless feedback, give her an honest (bummer if need be) field report. She can't delete the field report and (unlike feedbacks) can't reply to them as far as I know. She can avoid having them on her profile but not on the FR database which any punter can search. However, she may still take a vicious dislike to you and try to do you some harm. So I still think the place to give totally honest reviews is UKP.

I mostly ignore the feedback option on AW. Occasionally, after a first class punt with a non-whacko prossie, I will leave something nice so she tops up my own glowingly wonderful feedback, which can be useful for those prossies that only see people with feedback) other punters prefer to ignore this category - I beg to differ - but the choice may be area dependent - in London for instance, many different strategies apply! Likewise up here in beautiful Caledonia!)

UKP is here so punters can help each other. AW is not.

+1

Offline 8a8ylon

Hi

Thanks for the tip.  Just wondering which profile should be changed for AW or ukp.  Just looked here and I can't change my UserN.  I still want my AW hot list but I don't really use AW for my punts.

Should I open a new account etc in case I ever do.

Hi

Thanks for the tip.  Just wondering which profile should be changed for AW or ukp.  Just looked here and I can't change my UserN.  I still want my AW hot list but I don't really use AW for my punts.

Should I open a new account etc in case I ever do.

PM one of the moderators and I'm pretty sure they will change your name on UKP and you get to keep all your posts.

Offline 8a8ylon

PM one of the moderators and I'm pretty sure they will change your name on UKP and you get to keep all your posts.

Thxs for the tip, will do. 


Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)