Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: Is this worth a punt or am I just hoping ?  (Read 9997 times)

Offline NightKid

At least I'll be happy to admit I'm wrong, if and when I've made a mistake. This, on the other hand, is just sticking your head in the sand:

Just because you have a genuine punting account on AW, doesn't mean you're not also operating a private gallery scam.

We don't even know that both milkys are the same. You may have just picked an AW profile and used it as your nick here.

Also, I wasn't suspicious or unsuspicious ... I'd just saw the profile before his post on his AW feedback.  :hi:


Offline Daffodil

At least I'll be happy to admit I'm wrong, if and when I've made a mistake. This, on the other hand, is just sticking your head in the sand:

Also, I wasn't suspicious or unsuspicious ... I'd just saw the profile before his post on his AW feedback.  :hi:

If I'm wrong, I'm wrong. I accept he might be genuine and this was all a coincidence. However, nothing proven yet as it might come as a surprise to you to know that people with genuine punting accounts on adultwork may also produce private gallery scams.

Joining here the same day as a likely private gallery scam and posting its link on the main page is suspicious.

It's easy for you to come online after he posts his AW feedback (that doesn't really prove a lot) and then take a pop. We're all so wonderful with hindsight, eh nightkid?

If I see people getting a hard time for behaviour I don't think is particularly suspicious I will say so and give my reasons why. If I see suspicious behaviour I will also say so and give my reasons.

What I won't do is wait until the thread plays out and then come take cheap shots  :hi:

Offline NightKid

Well, when you play judge & jury ... it goes without saying that you're liable for erred rulings, in light of present evidence. I don't think it's low to point that out but I suspect we have a different set of morals altogether in the first place.
Anyway, should you wish to continue to the 'burying' phase, I have nothing further to add ... enjoy the sun.  :hi:

Offline Daffodil

Well, when you play judge & jury ... it goes without saying that you're liable for erred rulings, in light of present evidence. I don't think it's low to point that out but I suspect we have a different set of morals altogether in the first place.
Anyway, should you wish to continue to the 'burying' phase, I have nothing further to add ... enjoy the sun.  :hi:

I think you might have to do one of your beloved edits on this post as it makes little sense.

Offline Daffodil

Well, when you play judge & jury ... it goes without saying that you're liable for erred rulings, in light of present evidence. I don't think it's low to point that out but I suspect we have a different set of morals altogether in the first place.
Anyway, should you wish to continue to the 'burying' phase, I have nothing further to add ... enjoy the sun.  :hi:

Looks like your editing time is up, so might be safe for me to comment.

Everybody knows this is a line people trot out on internet forums when they've been bested and realise it. It's akin to popping your fingers in your ears and saying, 'la la la, I can't hear you'. And I would suggest you didn't really have anything to add in the first place, other than a cheap shot.

The suspicious nature of the adultwork profile and this member's contribution to UKP is a given. He has gone some way to alleviate the suspicion, and I very well might be wrong. Time might tell. However, to point it out as suspicious behaviour was not wrong.

You are also a fool if you think having adultwork feedback means you cannot be responsible for an adultwork scam.

I genuinely have no idea what you're talking about in terms of morals. You probably don't yourself.



Offline skittish

Sadly she was a fake.

:(

FFS and I bought her that dress on her Amazon wishlist, she was going to wear it on our overnighter  :cry:

Offline Tailpipe

Looks like a marching power figure to me .  :cool:

Offline Festisio

I hope AG bans the lot.  I expect their automated routines will have put a hidden lock on to prevent the owner of all those profiles from cashing out their credits.

But I suspect AW's view is to allow these profiles to run for a while in order to get people using up credits.  That is until enough people report it.

Thing is with that particular profile none of the free images can be found by google.  Maybe the PG ones can but obviously I'm not buying that just to find out since it is 100% a scam.

Another one of those fake profiles from that group has images lifted off other sites so have reported that and asked AW to look at all those profiles for suspicious behaviour.  Whether they will or not is anyone's guess.

Offline Tailpipe

AW earn so much on the purchase price of there credits , sure they are happy to let
It run for a time .

Offline skittish

I hope AG bans the lot.  I expect their automated routines will have put a hidden lock on to prevent the owner of all those profiles from cashing out their credits.

But I suspect AW's view is to allow these profiles to run for a while in order to get people using up credits.  That is until enough people report it.

Thing is with that particular profile none of the free images can be found by google.  Maybe the PG ones can but obviously I'm not buying that just to find out since it is 100% a scam.

Another one of those fake profiles from that group has images lifted off other sites so have reported that and asked AW to look at all those profiles for suspicious behaviour.  Whether they will or not is anyone's guess.

The weird thing is that the amazon wishlist has the same profile photo and the items on that list are the sort of stuff a girl like her would use or wear. I agree it's a scam but the originator might be genuine if that makes sense.

Offline NightKid

How did you find out?

That was my thought that it was just a scam.

She still looks fucking hot !

I've made a booking and see if she confirms or not. (only wasted an email.)

Offline kong

crap i was really hoping to fornicate with her

Offline Daffodil



Perhaps you can let milky answer what happened after he submitted his request? Thanks  :hi:

Offline NightKid

Perhaps you can let milky answer what happened after he submitted his request? Thanks  :hi:

Because he's dying to respond to you, of all people, who has been bitching and moaning about his posts, right?  :hi:

Offline Daffodil

Because he's dying to respond to you, of all people, who has been bitching and moaning about his posts, right?  :hi:

I thought you had nothing further to add to this thread?  :rolleyes:

If you think it's bitchy to point out that a member joins the exact same day as a private gallery scam is produced on adultwork and then link straight to it is suspicious then maybe you'd be happier on auto-censored?  :hi:

Offline Jimmyredcab



If you think it's bitchy to point out that a member joins the exact same day as a private gallery scam is produced on adultwork and then link straight to it is suspicious then maybe you'd be happier on auto-censored?  :hi:

I find it highly suspicious at the very least.  :thumbsdown:

Coincidence ?

 "A striking occurrence of two or more events at one time apparently by mere chance"

Or perhaps a direct relationship?

Like Jim, I'd put my money on the latter. Fuck coincidence!

Offline NightKid

I thought you had nothing further to add to this thread?  :rolleyes:

If you think it's bitchy to point out that a member joins the exact same day as a private gallery scam is produced on adultwork and then link straight to it is suspicious then maybe you'd be happier on auto-censored?  :hi:

Apparently, while you're not burying your head in the sand, I did. Who knew?  :rolleyes:

Another further addition: I prefer the amusement of watching keyboard jesters continuing to mudsling so I'm fine where I am, thanks.  :hi:
Edit: Also, you were still having a whinge way after the bloke posted his AW credentials.  :rolleyes:
« Last Edit: September 05, 2013, 12:39:41 PM by NightKid »

Offline Daffodil

Apparently, while you're not burying your head in the sand, I did. Who knew?  :rolleyes:

Another further addition: I prefer the amusement of watching keyboard jesters continuing to mudsling so I'm fine where I am, thanks.  :hi:

So now Jim, sumofallparts, and I are in the wrong and the all-knowing nightkid is right?

Or perhaps you only came on this thread to try and take cheap shots. I think you're becoming my personal yappy dog. I note skipper had a problem with you doing that to him a little while ago. You do like to drag on your personal grievances, don't you?  :rolleyes:

Offline Daffodil

Coincidence ?

 "A striking occurrence of two or more events at one time apparently by mere chance"

Or perhaps a direct relationship?

Like Jim, I'd put my money on the latter. Fuck coincidence!

My thoughts exactly. And Jim has ben doing this a long time, if he's suspicious then I suggest it's with good cause.

Offline NightKid

So now Jim, sumofallparts, and I are in the wrong and the all-knowing nightkid is right?

Since you clearly can't read, I shall be gracious enough to help you understand the term 'mudslinging' - http://www.thefreedictionary.com/mudslinging
Psst, do you also need me to explain the concept of 'instigator' and 'responsibility' or d'you reckon you can cope? Guess I'm not the one living in la-la land, after all.  :rolleyes:

Or perhaps you only came on this thread to try and take cheap shots. I think you're becoming my personal yappy dog. I note skipper had a problem with you doing that to him a little while ago. You do like to drag on your personal grievances, don't you?  :rolleyes:

So much for your obsession over original thoughts, what with the broken record 'cheap shot' claim. If you consider it cheap, aren't you admitting you're in the wrong then?  :sarcastic:
Call it whatever you want, but I'm happy to put a spotlight on shite wherever it may come from, and I'll continue to do so while it keeps my conscience clear. Have a good day now.  :hi:

Offline Jimmyredcab



So much for your obsession over original thoughts, what with the broken record 'cheap shot' claim. If you consider it cheap, aren't you admitting you're in the wrong then?  :sarcastic:
Call it whatever you want, but I'm happy to put a spotlight on shite wherever it may come from, and I'll continue to do so while it keeps my conscience clear. Have a good day now.  :hi:

Take a bit of friendly advice from an ex-moderator --------------------- give it a rest.  :hi:

Offline Daffodil

Since you clearly can't read, I shall be gracious enough to help you understand the term 'mudslinging' - http://www.thefreedictionary.com/mudslinging
Psst, do you also need me to explain the concept of 'instigator' and 'responsibility' or d'you reckon you can cope? Guess I'm not the one living in la-la land, after all.  :rolleyes:

So much for your obsession over original thoughts, what with the broken record 'cheap shot' claim. If you consider it cheap, aren't you admitting you're in the wrong then?  :sarcastic:
Call it whatever you want, but I'm happy to put a spotlight on shite wherever it may come from, and I'll continue to do so while it keeps my conscience clear. Have a good day now.  :hi:

Yap yap yap  :rolleyes:


Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)