Author Topic: Katiewantsu - Swansea  (Read 2194 times)


2 review(s) for katiewantsu (2 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by ]

Offline Swansealad

Katiewantsu (around two years ago)

External Link/Members Only

or

External Link/Members Only

Incall - £50

Venue – Flat in Morriston, above a shop; clean and tidy, but Morriston is as Morriston does, so not exactly the Ritz!

Only Negative – Access via fire escape to the rear.  Normally a good thing, but there was a ‘Landlord’ with a foreign accent I couldn’t place, (maybe South African/antipodean) waiting to show you in.  He wasn’t in the least bit intimidating – in fact quite helpful and friendly – but one likes these things to be done as discretely as possible, with no witnesses to the crime, so to speak.

Many Plus Sides – Very friendly, eager to put you at ease.  We did the exchange, and she went off to trouser the cash while I got undressed.  It was a very hot day, and Katie returned with a glass of Coke out of the Fridge.  That would have been considerate in itself,  But when she took a swig herself, held it in her mouth,  and went down on me, I knew I was in for a good punt.

The Business – She blows the second best of anyone I’ve ever met.  The Coke bubbles were just the start.  I don’t like gals who suck too hard, and Katie is just the right balance of dry vacuum against loose, moist tongue action.  Was in danger of blowing too soon, so had her on all-fours while I licked out her arse and – by now – very wet pussy.  I had gone with the intention of anal (Katie wasn’t keen on the phone, but was prepared to try), but as it went the oral was so frigging good that I was reluctant to stop.  So I got in the same all-fours position on the bed with her lying underneath me, while she licked my shaft,  balls and arse, and I finished deep down her throat.

Conclusion – Like I say, I tend to put quality of service way above superficial appearance, and go for  a taste of things I can’t get at home.  On this basis I’d have to give Katie a 9/10, though her looks won’t appeal to the Barbie-hunters.  If I had to pick any issue, it would be that she could have dressed up a little more for the occasion, but overall a brilliant time. 

Offline Punting_Mad

I'm extremely confused.. Am I reading this right? This review is from a visit two years ago?

Soggybiscuit

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest

Offline Swansealad

Sorry, I did say in my first post that I’ve been reading for yonks but only just got around to signing up.  If this isn’t contemporaneous enough, what’s the general rule of thumb for how recent a visit has to be?  I had other reviews I was going to do for girls I don’t think have been covered on here, but if they’re too out-of-date I’ll leave it?

Sorry, don’t mean to sound arsie, just newbie ignorance.   

Offline Punting_Mad

In my view 2 years old is pretty useless as a guide to the lady now.. But that's my opinion..

Offline Steelworker

Strange as her profile popped up as available today? I may have not noticed her before but hell of a coincidence.

SeekingtheTruth

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
If the girl is still working then the review is valid in my opinion. Just preface like you have that the visit is from x amount of time ago if over say 6 months.

That way people can take into consideration that the service may have changed over time.

Offline OMellors

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 1,679
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 12
If the girl is still working then the review is valid in my opinion. Just preface like you have that the visit is from x amount of time ago if over say 6 months.

That way people can take into consideration that the service may have changed over time.

Saints preserve us!  Something on which I actually agree with STT    :drinks:

Better a late report than no report.

I've anecdotally heard good reports about the girl, but I have hesitated  :unknown: as she looks bigger than the type to which I am normally attracted.

I can see SW's point of caution, but one can hardly say it was an overly gushing piece of prose.  Seemed fairly balanced to me

OM
Banned reason: White knighting escorts on here to get discounts.
Banned by: daviemac

SeekingtheTruth

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Saints preserve us!  Something on which I actually agree with STT    :drinks:

Better a late report than no report.

I've anecdotally heard good reports about the girl, but I have hesitated  :unknown: as she looks bigger than the type to which I am normally attracted.

I can see SW's point of caution, but one can hardly say it was an overly gushing piece of prose.  Seemed fairly balanced to me

OM

You'd be surprised how often we actually agree.

It's just the username issue that we have vastly different opinions on really.

And choice of girls of course but then again everyone has their own preference on that.

Offline mxc32

If this was a report on a punt from two years ago and the girl in question has been reviewed many times then that's pointless. But if the girl hasnt been reviewed much/not at all then i think those reviews should stand. It might urge one of us to have a go and and supply an updated review. I was in the same boat, I was on AW a lot longer than on here. I chose not to do reviews as most of the girls I've seen have either quit/moved on or have already had extensive reviews here.