I have asked for a legal eagle to tell me i am wrong for posting that a punter can do a review of any WG that advertises in the public arena without her permission, just as a person can review a Hotel or Restaurant without seeking their permission first. If that were the case it would apply to ANY post about a WG on ANY punting forum, you would have to seek her permission first which she obviously wouldnt give if it were something negative.
I would assume it would follow all present guidelines regarding the printed word, whether on paper or the net. As long as what is written is not libelous, and/or breaks current laws, (eg extreme offensive posting, hate crimes etc), then there is nothing in the Current Law that prevents reviews. Saying a prossie is a thief can be seen as libel, (if no proof), but saying she gave a poor service is not, (as that is subjective).
Whilst prostitution is not illegal, the practice is not perceived by the court to be within standard morals. How can a prossie sue for defamation of character over a review, when her character would not be seen by the courts as "good"? If the services are listed on her profile, then to review them can not be libelous.
I remember when someone wanted to sue for defamation for being called a grass. He was advised that as offering information to the police was a moral obligation, there was no grounds for libel.