I'm not clear in some posts if WGs are being recomnended from 1st hand experience (if so, why no proper review?), or just looking through AW, or from reputation. All might be valid but it helps to know which is which. I don't want to make a thing of it - just saying. A request/suggestion.
If I were to leave a review for every girl I had see over the last 15 years this site would be out of web space pretty quick!!!!
Holly is a great girl although does seem hard to pin down just now.
Katy seen several times. Always performed great for me.
Kendra have never seen. But has been positively reviewed numerous times on a site for Glasgow by trusted punters.
Jessica Hot. Wouldn't go there again, nothing wrong with service. Bit bizarre when another punter arrived and she asked if he could watch. Told her to fuck off. Looks like an ex junkie that's chewed too many eccies too.
A1 no experience at all, not heard much either.
Seductive Sara. Was recommended to me by the best escort Glasgow has ever seen " Jessica" now very much retired. Not yet met her though.
Raceylacey on Aw just now. Has been on and off for a few years. Has amazing fake boobs. Cracking tatoos if you like them and gives great oral, unfortunately with
External Link/Members Only