Now I know a positive FR is good for sharing with fellow punters about good WG but on a open forum with so many lurkers that said WG then becomes EXTREMELY POPULAR and consequently rises her prices maybe as a result of the positive FR..
So my question is - was that Positive FR beneficial in the long run for punters for future punts??
Does anyone have any thought how we can counteract this chain reaction?
Thought1 - was to have a positive section viewable only to ESTABLISHED UKP members who contribute - but this maybe too much work for administrators.
Thought2 - More UKP member controlled, where members write a positive FR as normal with price/location/service/looks etc..BUT WITHOUT the WG details
And instead the full FR with WG details is PM'd via a friend list and they can then comment on open forum (hopefully) not disclosing the WG details and if any other UKP member who is not on the friend list can put in a request on the open forum for WG details and those who know can share WG details at their discretion if they feel that UKP member is worthy
Hopefully this would help counteract this POSITIVE CHAIN REACTION of WG's UPPING their prices which in the end is not favouring any punters overall.
Anyway these are just thoughts on how to tackle this dilemma which I am recently seeing is becoming a trend with WGs with Positive FR on UKP..
Anyway I would love to know other member thoughts of agreement, disagreement or any other solutions etc..
NOTE ~ this is an open discussion no need to request permission to contribute