angeldiary - outcall in Central London (EC3)

[Mr_Shins]

External Link/Members Only

It is rather sad that I have to mark this girl as neutral as she is mostly perfect - at least for what I like.

She was my 2nd meet from my reverse booking that led me to initially have a disastrous time with Yummymummy. Our communications started on Adultwork, and then moved to WhatsApp and I agreed to up the price a bit from £55 to £60 for the half hour, but that is still a lot less than her posted rate. Still it was a meet in a cafe with no sex and she was up to it.

She dressed in very normal clothing, in fact she had been working as a tutor just before so was wearing the same clothes. On her feet she wore blacki Adidas canvas trainers, and they matched her Adidas jogging bottoms. She had beautiful long hair and lovely eyes. She is aged 29 in reality (she told me) and is intelligent - went to university and tutors GCSEs.

Unlike the previous experience, she folded her legs under the table and rested her shoe in my private parts whilst we were chatting, and the conversation was really enjoyable.

So when I got back I had another look at her profile, and that is when I saw that she has bareback and unprotected sex listed. I messaged her to query her about it - maybe it was there by mistake, but I got back a message saying it was not my business what she did with her body... Well it is if she is going to put me at risk, so unfortunately we won't be meeting again, and that is why I have had to rate her only neutral. I have also added her profile to the BB avoidance topic.

If you like what I like and are happy for her to just put her trainers into your private parts then I guess she may be a match. However I guess most of you want sex and I would have too if we'd progressed which is why we can't progress.

She doesn't get negative because she delivered. And of course she got paid. In fact as she stretched her legs under the table, I put my hand under the table and touched her thigh and told her to meet my hand there, and passed it across.

[Dicky]

This has to be the weirdest review ever. Please can you elaborate on what service you needed for 30 min in a cafe? Did you cum in your pants with her feet in your lap?    and she gets neutral because you werent arsed to read her profile? 

[Mr_Shins]

I didn't cum in the cafe, we spent 30 minutes getting to know each other whilst she rested her foot in my balls and I can still feel it now. With the type of trainers she was wearing, they weren't overly hard and it was quite sensational.

You are right in a sense, I should have fully read her profile, but she had replied to a reverse booking and I didn't bother to read her list of preferences / likes until yesterday and that was mainly to look for BDSM activities.

I wasn't booking her for sex on the date itself so looking for BB wasn't an issue.

The neutral rather than positive is more based on the fact that I can't take it forward. Positive means I do want to do that...

[PilotMan]

@Mr_Shins - I do love reading your reviews  - They always put a smile on my face

[PLeisure]

@Mr_Shins - I do love reading your reviews  - They always put a smile on my face

Me, too 

I'm sure I've said it before, but Shins for President ! 

[backofthenet]

thanks for the review Shinsy - always worth explaining to the unaware that you are a masochistic fetish punter. You can sort of understand Dicky's confusion.

As for the girl herself, I emailed asking her about bareback and her dress size, as I was also concerned about the former, and confused about the latter as her pictures do not show a size 14 girl. She ignored the bareback question, and simply told me I knew nothing about women's dress sizes! Is she a 14? Not that it matters if she does bareback, more to satisfy my curiosity.

[Mr_Shins]

She could be 14, I know 16 usually means fat. She wasn't thin but I didn't see her as fat either. I'd have guessed 12 but possibly she is 14.

I'm extremely sad she blocked me on whatsapp after the conversation as she truly is gorgeous and lovely company and reminds me of my former favourite (the one in my photo who called me Mr Shins).

If she'd be willing I might continue to see her without sex. That depends on her dropping her rate for me a bit. £120 an hour for that is acceptable, even up to £150 an hour. £200 an hour isn't, and her rate doesn't go down after the first hour like some do. I don't know if she'd be up to giving me serious kicking. Potentially. I'll wait a short while for her to defuse then try to email but I may be blocked on AW too or she may delete it without reading it.

I just felt mad on Tuesday evening as I felt I'd found the perfect woman on here only to see that she does BB.

[Mr_Shins]

She has appeared on ukp as angel marie.

Her post advertising services there didn't go down too well.

[nervyfooker]

If she'd be willing I might continue to see her without sex... I don't know if she'd be up to giving me serious kicking. Potentially. I'll wait a short while for her to defuse then try to email but I may be blocked on AW too or she may delete it without reading it.

I wouldn't advise booking an escort you criticised on a punting forum to give you a kicking!
She will either tell you to fuck off,put a warning about you on Saafe
or give you a real kicking...

[mrhappypants]

I consider myself garden-variety kinky.  It is nice to see we have some real exotica on show. 

[Mr_Shins]

a warning about me on saafe going "this punter mr shins had a go at me on a website because I offer bareback".

I wonder how well that would go down there.

I like the sound of the real kicking, although the woman I met came across as quite soft and fluffy and doesn't seem the type. She may possibly be looking for a partner in doing this, and so hopes to get "serious" with a guy and then go unprotected with him. The type of escort that gets too close and doesn't set the boundaries right are always going to be the ones to get into trouble in the long run. I really think it isn't worth it.