sweet_emily X - Derby

[vw]

Its not me trying to have a pop at every review I don't like, my stand is the op is entitled to his review / option / how he spends his hard earnt... if you dont like the review, dont reply its simples really, ragging it 10 pages with zero content about the SP reviewed imo is pointless.

If you don't like the comments take your own advice and don't read them, simple really as its your own advice.   

[splodger69]

Page 10 im suprised the boss ain't got his padlock out yet... (im still shocked he ain't booted VW too haha)

So this Emily is she actually a twenty odd year old or is she 37 as her profile states?

Im still up for a look as those tits are yummy 

Those titties are actually smaller than Cazza's profile suggests..and I have been there lmfao!!

[Iloveoral]

Sorry im not playing your game, it got boring last time.

[Iloveoral]

Those titties are actually smaller than Cazza's profile suggests..and I have been there lmfao!!

Any idea how old this girl is??

[vw]

Sorry im not playing your game, it got boring last time.

you are a hypocrite, why reply to comments, while preaching for others not to reply?   

[Iloveoral]

you are a hypocrite, why reply to comments, while preaching for others not to reply?   

My point is a comment to show an option is what the forum is about
Ragging something over 10 pages is certainly something very different

[mrfishyfoo]

But its not about his review is it. Its about the fact that he'd left a negative warning other punters off but had rebooked to see her. On that basis, its a dishonest review.

FFS how fucking dumb are you.

I put my review up the same day she stood me up.

HOW MANY MORE TIMES DO I HAVE TO STATE THIS ??

[Turtle Z]

FFS how fucking dumb are you.

Far less dumb than you apparently! 

[vw]

My point is a comment to show an option is what the forum is about
Ragging something over 10 pages is certainly something very different

Well sure when the boss wants it locked he will, he is well aware if the thread if you read the post reports (if you can be trusted with them  )  comedy gold from your foresters and pudding.

the review was 20x longer than it needed to be, possibly why the comments ended up that way.     Could be a mathematical answer to how long.   

[cueball]

I put my review up the same day she stood me up.

I've got it... I've got the fix

Never do any review on the day... leave it a few days or at least a week and the giddiness is gone and you can review more objectively.

It's a fix... I feel like that black fella from the UN

[splodger69]

Any idea how old this girl is??

Real age is ......

[Turtle Z]

It's a fix... I feel like that black fella from the UN

Which one, Idi Amin?

[Iloveoral]

Well im up for meeting her based solely on her tits and body, the negative review warning has been acknowledged and appreciated. But...those tits.

You can rag my review to bits if i make it too her 

[splodger69]

Well im up for meeting her based solely on her tits and body, the negative review warning has been acknowledged and appreciated. But...those tits.

You can rag my review to bits if i make it too her 

 

[cueball]

Which one, Idi Amin?

Some would say yes, idi 

[vw]

Well im up for meeting her based solely on her tits and body, the negative review warning has been acknowledged and appreciated. But...those tits.

You can rag my review to bits if i make it too her 

Hope its a good one Asian Dave.  Would not want fishy posting i told you so on a negative if that happened.   

Probably best to have a plan b option ready for this one .   

[mrfishyfoo]

Never do any review on the day... leave it a few days or at least a week and the giddiness is gone and you can review more objectively.

I never review the ones I actually get to stick my cock in on the day.

What I'll do next time I'm fucked around is ask MrTrolls permission first before I issue a red card. Thinking about it should I also ask him if it's ok to spend my money fucking whores as well.

Don't want to upset him do I. 

[Iloveoral]

Hope its a good one Asian Dave.  Would not want fishy posting i told you so on a negative if that happened.   

Probably best to have a plan b option ready for this one .   

He's welcome to say that as the warning was clear from him.
Already got plan b sorted too just incase, the EE Lola

[mrfishyfoo]

....Would not want fishy posting i told you so on a negative if that happened.   

Nah I'll let MrTroll post that instead.

"FFS he was right that Fishy as he did say she'd fuck you around"

 

[cueball]

You can rag my review to bits if i make it too her 

Which profile will do the review sucking?
Ilovesucking or praisey dave?  Or is dave dead now?

[NervousJ]

But its not about his review is it. Its about the fact that he'd left a negative warning other punters off but had rebooked to see her. On that basis, its a dishonest review.

Although the pair of you seem happy to take great joy in the way he writes his reviews... what has that got to do with the actual concern you had about going back on a negative.. absolutely nowt...

Seems to me trolling and trying to provoke many bites...

[cueball]

Seems to me trolling and trying to provoke many bites...

I'm not seeing trolling to be honest... I'm seeing an heated exchange between members. It's not trolling,  it's airing views and opinions.

Whether you agree or not is irrelevant.....

Idi  (from the UN)

[vw]

Seems to me trolling and trying to provoke many bites...

Agree that mikethebike and mrfishyfoo post reports were pure trolling,  trying to get bites looks like they worked. 

[cueball]

Agree that mikethebike and mrfishyfoo post reports were pure trolling,  trying to get bites looks like they worked. 

Aahhh... the post reports... 9 carrot comedy gold... I'd stop with them if I were you lads... the boss will be fully aware of this thread and I've no doubt he'll be keeping an overall eye on it.

[mrfishyfoo]

I'm not seeing trolling to be honest... I'm seeing an heated exchange between members. It's not trolling,  it's airing views and opinions.

Whether you agree or not is irrelevant.....

Idi  (from the UN)

Well MrUN

How come MrTroll REFUSES to take account of the fact that I negged the twat days before she contacted me with an aplology ??

He's full of shite and he knows it. 

If that's not trolling please explain to me why as I'm too fucking dumb to get it   

[NigelF]

the review was 20x longer than it needed to be, possibly why the comments ended up that way.   

If you think this "radio-silence" review was long, you should see mine! Even I think they're bad although I put in the detail to illustrate how much I got messed about but it's still mostly waffle and could easily be condensed.

Anyway, I can't believe anyone (particularly MTB) seriously thinks TZ is actually white knighting this girl. He's got to be the most subltle/playing-the-long-game WK in history!

As for MrFF, I don't particularly like his review style nor do I think we're similar punters but I do think his reviews are useful. While you do have to wade through a fair amount of story, his reviews do include a good amount of detail, particularly about services received and how well they were delivered. When talking about such things, to me, he comes across as balanced and reliable. That doesn't mean he is though and since others have questioned his reliability, I'm wondering where the evidence for this is? Obviously it can't be conclusively proven but for instance it'd be interesting to know if there are many negative reviews to girls he's reviewed positively and/or positive reviews for girls he's given a negative to. To me, that would paint a picture and would encourage me to treat his reviews with scepticism. Are there such reviews out there? Otherwise, it seems a bit crazy to not trust his reviews.

[HailWood]

Fuck me, been on here 5 fucking minutes and already getting delusions of grandeur, a mini Fishpoo in waiting! 

Are you suggesting that because I've been on here for about 7 months that my opinions are any less valid than yours? Think you might like to revise you opinion of who has delusions of grandeur. Must be a loosely view from that very high horse of yours (or should that be "charger"  )

[vw]

Are you suggesting that because I've been on here for about 7 months that my opinions are any less valid than yours? Think you might like to revise you opinion of who has delusions of grandeur. Must be a loosely view from that very high horse of yours (or should that be "charger"  )

You were here 2 years before that as golfnut though.   

[cueball]

Well MrUN

How come MrTroll REFUSES to take account of the fact that I negged the twat days before she contacted me with an aplology ??

He's full of shite and he knows it. 

If that's not trolling please explain to me why as I'm too fucking dumb to get it   

Idi here

He's criticising you fishy, the prossie is only coincidental, TZ's posts are directed at you in general, move away from the prossie and read them again.... that's the way I read it anyway 

Your retorts aren't picking up on the real statements...

That's the view of the security council, we've been wrong before though. 

Much fun though... I've laughed lots on this thread

Idi

[HailWood]

You were here 2 years before that as golfnut though.   

You KNOW that isn't true. And you know there are WGs out there that can verify that. 

[Turtle Z]

Are you suggesting that because I've been on here for about 7 months that my opinions are any less valid than yours?

Absolutely not, your opinions are less valid than most long standing established members on here and yet, you're talking like the head of the East Midlands punting mafia about what we'd all like to see. 

[Turtle Z]

Your retorts aren't picking up on the real statements...

That's the view of the security council, we've been wrong before though. 

Yes, you ain't fucking wrong this time though!

[vw]

You KNOW that isn't true. And you know there are WGs out there that can verify that. 

Not verifiable  at all, they would lie to keep a customer happy.  Your posts IMO are so similar when these longer threads happen, as if your mask is slipping.

Verifying and proof is another common theme your 2 profiles have in common.   

[mrfishyfoo]

.....since others have questioned his reliability, I'm wondering where the evidence for this is? Obviously it can't be conclusively proven but for instance it'd be interesting to know if there are many negative reviews to girls he's reviewed positively and/or positive reviews for girls he's given a negative to. To me, that would paint a picture and would encourage me to treat his reviews with scepticism. Are there such reviews out there? Otherwise, it seems a bit crazy to not trust his reviews.

I think you'll find that those that follow me have a good time.

You'll also find that when I follow others that they have had a good time before me.

 

[vw]

I think you'll find that those that follow me have a good time.

So you are the exception to YMMV then, the messiah of punting. 

What is the point of your YMMV disclaimers then?   

[NigelF]

I think you'll find that those that follow me have a good time.

You'll also find that when I follow others that they have had a good time before me.

 

Yes, that's the impression I've got although I can't say I'm a big follower of these regions but that's partly why I posted.

[Turtle Z]

Well MrUN

How come MrTroll REFUSES to take account of the fact that I negged the twat days before she contacted me with an aplology ??

He's full of shite and he knows it. 

We've gone through all this you knob, and you keep conveniently excluding relevant parts of the story. Like you'd rebooked to see her without amending your review to say she'd contacted you to apologise. No doubt you'd have left the neg run unaltered had she not dropped you in it. Your claim that you couldn't do that was shite because you didn't have to tell anyone when or even if you were re-visiting. In the meantime your message to other punters is that you're 'Mr Zero Tolerance', a tough talking punter who wouldn't consider re-booking a girl who'd fucked you about in this way. 

I noted that when you posted your text message, you conveniently omitted your response to her. I wonder why??? 

[HailWood]

Not verifiable  at all, they would lie to keep a customer happy.  Your posts IMO are so similar when these longer threads happen, as if your mask is slipping.

Verifying and proof is another common theme your 2 profiles have in common.   

True and you can neither verify nor prove your statement.
Whereas if you picked a girl that I reviewed who had a well documented issue with Golfie then a) she wouldn't be meeting me if I was the same person and leaving feedback and b) you could always ask her.
You are slipping in the quality of your unfounded accusation VW. I expected more of you 

[mrfishyfoo]

What is the point of your YMMV disclaimers then?   

Because every punter is different as you well know. 

[vw]

True and you can neither verify nor prove your statement.
Whereas if you picked a girl that I reviewed who had a well documented issue with Golfie then a) she wouldn't be meeting me if I was the same person and leaving feedback and b) you could always ask her.
You are slipping in the quality of your unfounded accusation VW. I expected more of you 

My accusations are that you post like him, that is clear for ll to see, you have been shady suspicious since day 1 and continue to be.   

Well that well documented girl ?  Care to point to this documented stuff ? 

[mrfishyfoo]

...No doubt you'd have left the neg run unaltered had she not dropped you in it....

Actually I would have updated this string.

As it was her act of indiscretion sank that boat long before it ever left the harbour.

[mrfishyfoo]

I noted that when you posted your text message, you conveniently omitted your response to her. I wonder why??? 

Because you claimed she never apoligised you twat. 

No point posting my response is there as you'll claim I faked it. 

[PepeMAGA]

Dunno, but Pete is well known in Derby, in certain circles that is...enough said

Not really man, what's the deal?

[HailWood]

My accusations are that you post like him, that is clear for ll to see, you have been shady suspicious since day 1 and continue to be.   

Well that well documented girl ?  Care to point to this documented stuff ?

Is it against the rules to post the girl in question? Are you trying to trick me into doing so?
Golfie's issue with a well known EM girl is well documented (I know you know where). All you need to do is look at my review and and interaction I have had with her to know what you say is bollocks. I know also that you aren't stupid so stop coming across as such.

[mrfishyfoo]

Yes, that's the impression I've got although I can't say I'm a big follower of these regions but that's partly why I posted.

Yeah well if anyone can be arsed to actually look they'll note that the "hit rate" on my TOFTT's is on the whole green.

Olivia Monroe in Leeds being a very good example who now has a number of greens with no grey or red.

[vw]

Is it against the rules to post the girl in question? Are you trying to trick me into doing so?

i post links to uke all the time, there is not well documented issues with him from a girl you have reviewed. You have not reviewed ameera who had a well documented problem.   

Would not be unusual for returning punters to post back dated reviews if that was the case, look at fishyfoo's old mate tallboy2

[Turtle Z]

Because you claimed she never apoligised you twat. 

No point posting my response is there as you'll claim I faked it. 

You really do struggle to follow the logic and are making it up as you go along aren't you. Look at this post...

So you're argument for not announcing it is that someone might be staking out Emily's Des Res in the hope of catching a glimpse of you in your silk scarf? You really think you're that important

What about, "actually boys, I've been a bit unfair, the girl actually contacted me and apologised, offering to make good on her mistake, maybe I'll take her up on the offer at some point."

You're right about one thing, the smell of bullshit stalking this thread, but it's coming from your direction. 

Is this me claiming that she did of didn't apologise??  So now you've made a bigger prick of yourself all in the process of trying to deflect from the real issue, which is that you're tough talking zero tolerance policy is obviously not to be trusted.

[Turtle Z]

Actually I would have updated this string.

As it was her act of indiscretion sank that boat long before it ever left the harbour.

What, even at the expense of sinking your zero tolerance boat after it had left the harbour!   

[HailWood]

i post links to uke all the time, there is not well documented issues with him from a girl you have reviewed. You have not reviewed ameera who had a well documented problem.   

Would not be unusual for returning punters to post back dated reviews if that was the case, look at fishyfoo's old mate tallboy2

The other girl on Ameera's link. Are you The only One who doesn't know?

[vw]

The other girl on Ameera's link. Are you The only One who doesn't know?

there is nothing well documented there. Maybe a tiny insignificant mention, only golfnut would think that is well documented, proving my point.