We can agree to disagree. I'm not posting a public review. However, that is not the same as withholding a review, so I disagree completely with that characterisation. Plenty of members on this forum see WG's, have negative experiences, and don't say shit. Other members then waste their time and money on seeing said WG's, post a review, and only then do we hear that someone else has already seen the WG and could have saved others time and money but chose to keep silent. At least I am alerting interested members that I have seen the WG and would not recommend. Interested members can then PM me for a ready-made review and get the benefit of my experience. Some have done so already and I have provided the review. That is not withholding a review.
I would have thought that it was clear that the very nature of the WG's business model is personal. She offers outcalls. For me, it is not a stretch of the imagination to suppose that those members who are free to do so will see her in their homes (whatever one's view of them choosing to do so). It is also not a stretch of the imagination to me to conclude that someone may want to delay a review by many weeks or months, or keep it private, if it's a negative experience and one wants to avoid a potentially adverse reaction from a WG who (a) clearly has a history of struggling to manage her emotions; (b) may still be struggling to manage her emotions, or lapses on occasion; (c) knows where the author of the review resides.
Delay costs other members time and money, particularly in the case of negative experiences. The compromise, whilst keeping with the spirit of the forum, is a PM policy, which can't be accessed by the WG. If others see it different that's their prerogative, but that's my position and I'm sticking with it.
