Author Topic: Emma Sexy Escort - Cambridge  (Read 3897 times)


11 review(s) for emmasexyescort (10 positive, 0 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by ]

Offline wintermen

Emma's AW link External Link/Members Only

Please go easy as long time browser first time poster.

Place  ~ Nice flat in a residential area with plenty of on road parking.

Duration ~ 2 Hours £240

As I have seen Emma before I knew what to expect, As soon as the door was closed the kissing started straight away and hardly stopped until the door closed when I left. The meet was a GFE par excellance that I certainly hope Emma enjoyed, as I made her squirt I must have done something correct. Within the time, we had we had sex in different postions, nothing is too mush for your pleasure and if I would have been cappable I am sure a fourth time was on the cards.

Would I go back definitly.

Would I recomend, yes if you are not looking for an out and out PSE. :wackogirl:

Offline itk

How are you this evening Emma?

Offline Badvicar


Offline Watts.E.Dunn

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,614
  • Likes: 65
  •  
  • Reviews: 47
Humm .. dunno seems shes had a some positive reviews in the past. Might get around to seeing her myself sometime!

Offline wintermen

Smell a rat itk?
I can asure you no rat is involved, I am sorry you feel that way.

Davido0007

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I can asure you no rat is involved, I am sorry you feel that way.

Some people just get jealous. :)

Offline Sinz

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 10,543
  • Likes: 13
  •  
  • Reviews: 59
If you have seen the WG before, why haven't you bothered to review before ? Why now, I am just curious.  :unknown:

Offline Watts.E.Dunn

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,614
  • Likes: 65
  •  
  • Reviews: 47
It seems to me sometimes its a bit like your first shag getting the first review published and just as awkward;!.

And no bugger believes you either way!

Offline wintermen

It seems to me sometimes its a bit like your first shag getting the first review published and just as awkward;!.

And no bugger believes you either way!
I couldn't have put it better myself. I don't punt often and last time I saw her I wasn't aware of this site.

Offline WASA38

It seems to me sometimes its a bit like your first shag getting the first review published and just as awkward;!.

And no bugger believes you either way!

With all due respect and sorry to contradict, W.E.D.,but OP's review matches my three times experiences completely. Other than no CIM  she is top class. I know A/W feedback is notoriously unreliable but Emma's frequency and sheer number of positive reviews would, I submit, say it all.

Offline Watts.E.Dunn

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,614
  • Likes: 65
  •  
  • Reviews: 47
Ahem.. that was more a comment of first reviewers who always have a bit of belief skepticism here, course some are crap and obvious but it takes a little while to get the hang of writing decent reviews and leaving out the crap like "treat her well".

Course we treat them well, usually giving them a bigger wedge of cash than our dicks!

Offline Badvicar

I can asure you no rat is involved, I am sorry you feel that way.

I asked itk the question.

Offline Badvicar

"Im in the very lucky position of playing for fun now not necessity, so no more conveyer belt, rushed, lots of men in a day!"

That's reassuring quality assurance from her AW profile. And the more I read the review, the more I see why itk made his comment.

Offline socks

"Im in the very lucky position of playing for fun now not necessity, so no more conveyer belt, rushed, lots of men in a day!"

That's reassuring quality assurance from her AW profile. And the more I read the review, the more I see why itk made his comment.
Ditto, there's something about the review's writing style that chimes with her profile's blurb.That and it fits the mould of dusty phone cure attempts that we see frequently on here.

Offline Badvicar

She's apparently no1 in her age range on AW. She doesn't need fake news!

Offline itk

Ditto, there's something about the review's writing style that chimes with her profile's blurb.That and it fits the mould of dusty phone cure attempts that we see frequently on here.

Exactly what I was thinking, and all the OP has contributed on this forum is about Emma.

Offline Badvicar

Previous reviews look a bit flufftastic also

Offline wizzo9

While the O.P. may be suspect, I don't know, it doesn't detract from the point that Emma is already well reviewed, positively, on this site.

I have sampled Emma some years ago, and rate her Premier League. I have commented on previous posts. In view of her many reviews on A.W. from many different posters, most of whom have posted many reviews themselves, I have no reason to suspect that her A.W reviews are to be doubted. [30 reviews this month, nearly all different reviewers]

She seems to be a busy lady, at risk of being White Knight, definitely recommended, and I cannot see why she would need to drum up business.

W

Offline Badvicar

Going to be a stampede of white knights soon. And fake profiles.

Offline Hertsgent

With the caveat that I haven't seen her (toyed with the idea and had some comms a while ago, but reasoned she was a bit old for my tastes.....particularly after a harrowing experience with juicy Jordan's jugs  :scare:), I'd be surprised if she was poor to be honest - but I haven't studied her UKP or AW feedback closely enough (and don't plan to!) - seems like the sort of WG that has mainly regulars I would think?

Her comms were good by the way.....of course this matters, but given I haven't seen or sampled the goods then doesn't add much