Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: My first walk out  (Read 12109 times)

Offline CoolTiger

Apologies to MC.

In the run-in, following on comments by other posters about the non-disclosure, i did rub it in.

Offline NIK

It's the unwritten rule that all must obey.

You don't tell another member to go fuck themselves regardless of whether it's Jimmy.

Offline ianvilla

As I have said to Nik in a PM, Michael Corleone is a genuine punter and has invaluable information in South Wales. He has received numerous digs here for making a mistake (which he has acknowledged and apologised for) and has responded, until now, in a very reasoned manner.

It is a loss to the forum when such members are banned, especially after receiving such provocation  :thumbsdown:

I have amended it to a temporary ban as it's claimed he's a genuine punter, but if he does it again after the ban expires he will go permanently.
 We can't have people making a mockery of the rules.

+1 I agree with Daf he has had the balls to man up and make his apologies. He has given some useful information to this forum as a genuine punter. I don't see in the rules any requirement for the type and quality of information we have to provide in our posts. Or do some people just make up additional criteria or just use provocation to make others feel inferior?

Offline aardvark

You don't tell another member to go fuck themselves regardless of whether it's Jimmy.
But if it is Jimbo, the ban is only temporary????????

Offline rpg

But if it is Jimbo, the ban is only temporary????????

Think you've got the wrong end of the stick here. The ban was permanent but thanks to an appeal from another member it was reduced to three days.

Online Marmalade

Not all genuine punters are suited to UKP. Some are genuinely happier on a prossie site.

Offline Jimmyredcab

+1 I agree with Daf he has had the balls to man up and make his apologies. He has given some useful information to this forum as a genuine punter. I don't see in the rules any requirement for the type and quality of information we have to provide in our posts. Or do some people just make up additional criteria or just use provocation to make others feel inferior?

I find it interesting that you feel the need to express an opinion on this ------- you have managed to make just 16 posts in 9 months.    :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Offline Daffodil

I find it interesting that you feel the need to express an opinion on this ------- you have managed to make just 16 posts in 9 months.    :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Quality not quantity. Ianvilla has provided me with some excellent information, via pm, and is now posting more frequently. I, for one, am glad he is  :hi:

Offline ianvilla

I find it interesting that you feel the need to express an opinion on this ------- you have managed to make just 16 posts in 9 months.    :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

I met boys like you when I was five in the school playground they didn't frighten me then either!!!!  :drinks:
 

Offline ianvilla

I find it interesting that you feel the need to express an opinion on this ------- you have managed to make just 16 posts in 9 months.    :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

I suppose you can only contribute when you have something of value to say.

Offline Michael-Corleone

I suppose you can only contribute when you have something of value to say.

+1
 :D

Offline dj3k

 :timeout

Maybe better writing about punting than each other ?

To try to change the path, anyone else had a walk out ? If so who ? I have wasted about £200 this month on bad punts based on stupid AW positive reviews!

Offline ianvilla

I find it interesting that you feel the need to express an opinion on this ------- you have managed to make just 16 posts in 9 months.    :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

I could just blast!!!!!! each contributor who does not do things in a way which suits me?

There are many lurkers who would probably contribute more to this forum if some people encouraged them instead of the complete opposite???

Offline James999

There are many lurkers who would probably contribute more to this forum if some people encouraged them instead of the complete opposite???

Oh Fuck off with that boring old line, many only come here because the place has some life as opposed to the Sterile Atmosphere on Pro$$ienet, no one is forcing anyone to lurk or post, the choice is yours  :hi:

Offline Daffodil

:timeout

Maybe better writing about punting than each other ?

To try to change the path, anyone else had a walk out ? If so who ? I have wasted about £200 this month on bad punts based on stupid AW positive reviews!

I have more experience of occasions I should have walked than of actually walking  :(

Offline Michael-Corleone

I would rather walk and then roll over the money onto the next one.

Offline ianvilla

Oh Fuck off with that boring old line, many only come here because the place has some life as opposed to the Sterile Atmosphere on Pro$$ienet, no one is forcing anyone to lurk or post, the choice is yours  :hi:

My point exactly  :hi:

Offline Daffodil

Not all genuine punters are suited to UKP. Some are genuinely happier on a prossie site.

True, but as you often say, I think those that post genuine info that helps other punters are an asset overall  :drinks:

Offline dj3k

I have more experience of occasions I should have walked than of actually walking  :(

Yes, mainly at parlours once the money has been given.

I have more experience of occasions I should have walked than of actually walking  :(
Yeah, theres a few I should have walked from but didn't. Bait and switched on one, and owo/swallow service agreed on the phone with another, and then told she did covered oral only when I walked in the door. Had a bad feeling on another and should have walked, didn't and got scammed. :(
 
After I had wised up a bit, I walked from one where the girl answering the door bore no resemblance to the pics on the profile. She claimed they were from a few years ago, but if that was true, she had really let herself go! She got quite abusive when I politely declined, so I think I dodged a bullet there!
 
Id gladly provide AW links, but they were all EE girls and none of their profiles are still active.

Online Marmalade

I met boys like you when I was five in the school playground they didn't frighten me then either

Why the FUCK to people join this board just to slag it off, slag off the people like Jimmy and James, complain about writing styles and contribute fuck all of any use to punters.

If they don't like UKP why do they join???????? After five minutes they want to change it and rewrite it!  :diablo:
News: there's half a dozen wankers each week that do the same. The board was created to get away from them. Do you really think the owner is going to bend over and say hey, just fuck my forum up the ass?????

I don't fucking think so!

Online Marmalade

Quality not quantity. Ianvilla has provided me with some excellent information, via pm, and is now posting more frequently. I, for one, am glad he is  :hi:

Then let's hope he provides the board with some excellent information Daff - for those that are too shy there's always PMs.

Offline Daffodil

Then let's hope he provides the board with some excellent information Daff - for those that are too shy there's always PMs.

In his first 35 posts I spot two recommendations of prossies in South Wales. If only every member managed a review/ok every fifteen or so posts.

In addition, he has contributed to discussion in South Wales and criticised HOD, including the following post where he mentions problems with auto-censored:

Sorry to disappoint squeeze but HOD is full of photo shopped images. The reason I now use this site is because I got a warning on pro$$ienet for trying to tell the truth and wanting to let other punters know. So just be careful and see it for what it is.

So he's a positive contributor who is here because of excessive moderation of what might be useful information to punters on prossienet. Which is the reason I thought this forum was created.

Let's not hound new posters off the site and/or incite them to post something silly that might result in a ban. Especially those that are clearly contributing.

Online Marmalade

Fair enough comment, and I've just seen and praised one of ianvilla's posts on another thread. I think it hits a raw nerve with many long time members though when someone else - who hasn't posted that much - starts criticising people who have been the backbone of the board and how it's run. You and I can have different opinions about the moderation - and neither of our opinions have any say in things anyway. But when a newbie starts saying you should run the board differently and slagging people off then my eyebrows twitch.

Anyway, welcome, ianvilla. But try to lay off slagging other members when you're just in the door ffs. There are so many plonkers join up that it's par for the course to view people carefully until they've been posting reviews for a while, and most punters can handle it. So I make no apologies.

Online Marmalade

As pointless as tits on a fish then.  :wacko:
+1

And apart from loveydoveys all round, still just about sums up this thread . . .

 :vomit:


Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)