Marvellous Mel

[Paulc127]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
[Link extended by admin]

Has anyone ever seen marvellous Mel can't find any reviews on her she is verified on aw jst wondering is it worth my while taking a punt with her 

[Matrix]

try typing 3709226 into the search engine up the top right. 

External Link/Members Only

[Jock D]

She knocked me back...said I was tooo auld ...worst of it is I'd already knocked 2 years off my age to fit in with her late 40's cut off point

[perfect 10]

She knocked me back...said I was tooo auld ...worst of it is I'd already knocked 2 years off my age to fit in with her late 40's cut off point

Ooft thats a bit of a kick in the baws. Dont think I'll bother asking her in case of rejection 

[Paulc127]

Think I'm going to give this one a miss guys all one thing I noticed was no public gallery or no private gallery either ?

[DF69]

Think I'm going to give this one a miss guys all one thing I noticed was no public gallery or no private gallery either ?

That's what I thought but I went ahead with it and had a great time with her. Tidy wee body nice face and eager to please. Just a typical Glasgow girl, easy to get along with. Only negative was cum on tits only but I'd go back and see her again.

[Poopster]

She knocked me back...said I was tooo auld ...worst of it is I'd already knocked 2 years off my age to fit in with her late 40's cut off point

A prostitute with a declared age of 35 knocking back a guy in his 40s???

She must be in demand... that won't last forever.

[MarvelousMel]

Good evening gents, hope you are all well. I don't tend to bother with this site since one of you kindly pointed me in the direction of UKE.
This is your site, not for us girls, I would however like to jump on this thread since one of my clients this week mentioned it to me.
I'm not here to rant, neither am I touting but merely to clarify a few points.

The age limit isn't there as a negative but actually for your benefit.
I don't want to be intimate with someone old enough to be my father or grandfather, I wouldn't enjoy the booking so it's 99%certain you wouldn't either.
I am NOT disrespecting the older gent by setting this limit and i'm not setting down a challenge either to prove to me you can still perform etc.
It puzzles me why someone would lie about their age to get a booking with someone that specifies they don't want to see them

Whilst on the subject of age, I am too honest for my own good and only recently turned 36 (by recent I mean in the past month!) I went on AW & it had updated my age to 36 on my birthday. I had to then alter my birth date on it to prevent anyone that already suspects it's me but it definitely will update to 36 this year as that IS my actual age.

Which brings me onto the subject of pictures. I value my privacy & the less pics of me that's online the better.
I have , believe it or not, been recognised from the pic of my eyes by two different folk who know me in my personal life (not even close friends). Face pics aren't an option and due to the fact I have large distinguishing tattoo's on my body neither are they.
I'm no supermodel but i'm not a munter either. I don't have a perfect body but I have body confidence

I am not 'in demand', I am genuinely a low volume WG as I have a very good full time regular job.
As long as I can make back the rent money for my work flat each month that satisfies me as my full time salary pays my mortgage and bills.

Apologies for the lengthy post, thankyou for taking the time to read 

[perfect 10]

Good evening gents, hope you are all well. I don't tend to bother with this site since one of you kindly pointed me in the direction of UKE.
This is your site, not for us girls, I would however like to jump on this thread since one of my clients this week mentioned it to me.
I'm not here to rant, neither am I touting but merely to clarify a few points.

The age limit isn't there as a negative but actually for your benefit.
I don't want to be intimate with someone old enough to be my father or grandfather, I wouldn't enjoy the booking so it's 99%certain you wouldn't either.
I am NOT disrespecting the older gent by setting this limit and i'm not setting down a challenge either to prove to me you can still perform etc.
It puzzles me why someone would lie about their age to get a booking with someone that specifies they don't want to see them

Whilst on the subject of age, I am too honest for my own good and only recently turned 36 (by recent I mean in the past month!) I went on AW & it had updated my age to 36 on my birthday. I had to then alter my birth date on it to prevent anyone that already suspects it's me but it definitely will update to 36 this year as that IS my actual age.

Which brings me onto the subject of pictures. I value my privacy & the less pics of me that's online the better.
I have , believe it or not, been recognised from the pic of my eyes by two different folk who know me in my personal life (not even close friends). Face pics aren't an option and due to the fact I have large distinguishing tattoo's on my body neither are they.
I'm no supermodel but i'm not a munter either. I don't have a perfect body but I have body confidence

I am not 'in demand', I am genuinely a low volume WG as I have a very good full time regular job.
As long as I can make back the rent money for my work flat each month that satisfies me as my full time salary pays my mortgage and bills.

Apologies for the lengthy post, thankyou for taking the time to read 

Thanks for replying Mel. Of course its your choice to make re age and anything else for that matter. However  someone of 50 would hardly be old enough to be yer da , albeit possible! I'm 49 by the way 

[Cityfan1880]

Think Mel has to come to grips with reality. You're pushing 40, not a young escort in her early 20's starting out. A guy in his late 40's isn't "old enough to be your father", and I seriously doubt there's anyone actively punting old enough to be your grandfather. Delusional. Ironically, I've never considered your profile (pics giving absolutely no indication of what you look like aside) because you're too old for my cut off.

[mavgoose]

I think Mel puts her point well.

Would you want to see a girl who wasn't at least half enjoying it ?
We all have our favourite criteria. Age / size / blonde / brunette. We'll enjoy punts better if we are more attracted to the girl. Obviously.

All she is saying is her criteria. You can't discriminate against her for that. She likes guys her own age or younger. She enjoys her part time escorting more that way. Hardly a hanging offence.

[Redbull4]

Good evening gents, hope you are all well. I don't tend to bother with this site since one of you kindly pointed me in the direction of UKE.
This is your site, not for us girls, I would however like to jump on this thread since one of my clients this week mentioned it to me.
I'm not here to rant, neither am I touting but merely to clarify a few points.

The age limit isn't there as a negative but actually for your benefit.
I don't want to be intimate with someone old enough to be my father or grandfather, I wouldn't enjoy the booking so it's 99%certain you wouldn't either.
I am NOT disrespecting the older gent by setting this limit and i'm not setting down a challenge either to prove to me you can still perform etc.
It puzzles me why someone would lie about their age to get a booking with someone that specifies they don't want to see them

Whilst on the subject of age, I am too honest for my own good and only recently turned 36 (by recent I mean in the past month!) I went on AW & it had updated my age to 36 on my birthday. I had to then alter my birth date on it to prevent anyone that already suspects it's me but it definitely will update to 36 this year as that IS my actual age.

Which brings me onto the subject of pictures. I value my privacy & the less pics of me that's online the better.
I have , believe it or not, been recognised from the pic of my eyes by two different folk who know me in my personal life (not even close friends). Face pics aren't an option and due to the fact I have large distinguishing tattoo's on my body neither are they.
I'm no supermodel but i'm not a munter either. I don't have a perfect body but I have body confidence

I am not 'in demand', I am genuinely a low volume WG as I have a very good full time regular job.
As long as I can make back the rent money for my work flat each month that satisfies me as my full time salary pays my mortgage and bills.

Apologies for the lengthy post, thankyou for taking the time to read 

That is a fairly honest and useful post. Personally I don't think people should be questioning your boundaries. You've stated them clearly and giving your defining reasons which should be respected without question from others. Your obviously happy with your current situation which is all that really matters.

[auldie63]

and I seriously doubt there's anyone actively punting old enough to be your grandfather.

At just what age do you suggest we give this up then, and climb into a hole in the ground to be less bother when we croak you fucking twat?!!!!

[seeker]

I wouldn't pay to bang a 35+ wg ...
I wouldn't bang a 35+ for free 
Wheres the fun in that ?
23 to 30 is the sweet spot for me . 

[Cityfan1880]

At just what age do you suggest we give this up then, and climb into a hole in the ground to be less bother when we croak you fucking twat?!!!!

Don't know why you've taken that personally as to be old enough to be MarvelousMel's grandfather you'd realistically have to be about 90. And I don't get the impression you're that auld. 

[Game on]

You tell them Mel 

[Juilius_Sneezer]

Think Mel has to come to grips with reality. You're pushing 40, not a young escort in her early 20's starting out. A guy in his late 40's isn't "old enough to be your father", and I seriously doubt there's anyone actively punting old enough to be your grandfather. Delusional. Ironically, I've never considered your profile (pics giving absolutely no indication of what you look like aside) because you're too old for my cut off.

Is the 1880 in your profile a suggestion as to age? Otherwise just don't book her as you obviously don't like her.

As stated before, we all have our preferences. As a mid 20's guy I hesitate around the 30 mark and wouldn't likely go above the 40 mark. The most enjoyable punts I have had have been in the (advertised) 24-28 range with a few exceptions. I won't rule out women in thier teens or 30's especially as there is a balance to appearance and experience. A teen with a banging body is actually rather likely to give a crap punt compared to a 30 something with a good figure and experience behind her even if things aren't as pert as a graduate of the Disney channel.

Let's just be grateful there is a decent SP in our midst even if she doesn't cater to you.

[Cityfan1880]

I'm in my 20s

[Poopster]

You tell them Mel 

Tell us what, exactly? You fucking blow smoke up her arse all you like but the fact remains she sells her fanny for money.   Being picky about who gets to give you the money is incredibly arrogant for people in any service industry, particularly when the goods on sale is your fanny.  Prostitution isn't an industry known for attracting lasses who can afford to be picky.   Good luck to her though.

[Jock D]

You fucking blow smoke up her arse all you like but the fact remains she sells her fanny for money.

Ohh Poopster...you can't say that on here...she's not a Hoor or Prostitute...she's a SP and she's on UKE therefore...she will always have a loyal band of supporters to jump to her defence on here

[Clattypats]

Ohh Poopster...you can't say that on here...she's not a Hoor or Prostitute...she's a SP and she's on UKE therefore...she will always have a loyal band of supporters to jump to her defence on here

Probably not a good idea to inadvertently slag UKE or any punters that are on both sites...Two different entities run by the same site owner..

Aslong as the punter can differentiate between the two sites then I don't see the problem.. ..They both serve their own purposes...

[mavgoose]

Poopster. I think you're being a Dick just for the sake of it.

What is wrong with a girl saying ;

I won't see anyone over 40
I won't see anyone over 50
I won't see anyone under 25
I won't see a particular race ( loads of girls do )

What gives you the right to say a girl "selling her fanny" can't make conditions ?
She's clearly stated she has a job and escorts part time only.

[Game on]

Tell us what, exactly? You fucking blow smoke up her arse all you like but the fact remains she sells her fanny for money.   Being picky about who gets to give you the money is incredibly arrogant for people in any service industry, particularly when the goods on sale is your fanny.  Prostitution isn't an industry known for attracting lasses who can afford to be picky.   Good luck to her though.

I would love to blow smoke up her arse, but it's out of bounds. On the other hand, she is very responsive to RO, and she gives good OWO and a good ride.If punter aren't in her age criteria, that's their fault. Yes, Mel is selling a service that punter's want to pay for. You can't have one , without the other. Think you must be one of those passive aggressive punter's, your finding fault with Mel, then you are saying good luck to her. So what's the difference between age criteria, and an escort who tells punter's not to write reviews on Ukp , it's both their choices. 

[Game on]

Ohh Poopster...you can't say that on here...she's not a Hoor or Prostitute...she's a SP and she's on UKE therefore...she will always have a loyal band of supporters to jump to her defence on here

You tell him Jock 

[Poopster]

Poopster. I think you're being a Dick just for the sake of it.

What is wrong with a girl saying ;

I won't see anyone over 40
I won't see anyone over 50
I won't see anyone under 25
I won't see a particular race ( loads of girls do )

What gives you the right to say a girl "selling her fanny" can't make conditions ?
She's clearly stated she has a job and escorts part time only.

Well if we want to get into the rights and wrongs, it'd be an interesting test case in court to see if prostitutes are exempt from the Equality Act 2010.

[Poopster]

You tell him Jock 

You don't really get sarcasm, do you?

[Cityfan1880]

She can set any conditions she wants I just thought it was hypocritical and laughable that an escort pushing 40 who appears to be rather dumpy is "grossed out" by guys in their late 40's, as though she views herself as some wee toned 21 year old lol.

[Matrix]

I think she has a right to decide whoever she chooses. Just as people have a right to discuss her on this forum.

Far too old for me anyway.

[Courtney]

What gives you the right to say a girl "selling her fanny" can't make conditions ?
She's clearly stated she has a job and escorts part time only.

WTF
He has a "right" to his opinion ....

[Boinky]

All opinions are equally valid*









* - Apart from the really stupid ones and ones I don't agree with.

[Clattypats]

* - Apart from the really stupid ones and ones I don't agree with.

*care to elaborate?...

[Jock D]

Probably not a good idea to inadvertently slag UKE or any punters that are on both sites...Two different entities run by the same site owner..

WTF?...are you actually that deluded that you now think your a moderator of this board? Instead of handing out patronising passive/aggressive advice...why don't you concentrate your efforts into making your first ever credible contribution/post to UKP...your nearly 2000 posts in and you've yet to achieve that...must be a record in itself???

[Clattypats]

WTF?...are you actually that deluded that you now think your a moderator of this board? Instead of handing out patronising passive/aggressive advice...why don't you concentrate your efforts into making your first ever credible contribution/post to UKP...your nearly 2000 posts in and you've yet to achieve that...must be a record in itself???

Aye your good..Have I missed something you've done constructive on here!...And no,I by no means think I'm a moderator (by a long shot)...But try n get it through that head of yours,who runs both sites..and the reasoning behind it...

[Jock D]

Aye, fair play Clatty... you might just be on the road to redemption... that's a more mature response than I would have expected...it's never too late to start... keep up the good work.

[Boinky]

*care to elaborate?...

Humour.

[weebawbag]

Marvellous debate this is

[Clattypats]

Aye, fair play Clatty... you might just be on the road to redemption... that's a more mature response than I would have expected...it's never too late to start... keep up the good work.

For a guy that you've  said has contributed nothing...Thanks for agreeing with one of my post's  a few month ago (you better go back,  refresh your memory )....Much appreciated.... Happy "punting" ...

[Clattypats]

Humour.

no.. question?

[Boinky]

All opinions are equally valid*



* - Apart from the really stupid ones and ones I don't agree with.

This was intended to be humour......

[Clattypats]

This was intended to be humour......

Good try....

[Juilius_Sneezer]

Well if we want to get into the rights and wrongs, it'd be an interesting test case in court to see if prostitutes are exempt from the Equality Act 2010.

That would only come into question if the verbal contract that we work on did not include the terms upon age.

Regardless of industry then the provider is allowed to exclude clients on virtually any basis as long as it can be justified and, frankly as far as I am concerned, "not shagging 50+" because she cannot provide the enthusiasm expected is reasonable.

I admit, I went to see a only "30+" provider but that was on a recommendation/advice from another SP. She later admitted that it was only to weed out the immature crowd.

Obviously (you only need to read this forum for proof) this wasn't fool proof but it went a long way and I had a fantastic punt weeks before she left the scene.

Don't be smarter than you have to be in this hobby. Her fanny is a commodity, it is also her personal space, she is in full control. As the "grey area" dictates it is time between adults. Anything outside her stipulation is not only breach of verbal contract (illegal in itself) but could be brought to more serious charges of rape. I am not saying that this is the case here but these are the risks you run by reaching beyond where things need to be taken...