The artist formerly known as Naughty&Nice Eva - sold profile

[Picti]

I've just returned from a punting break to find that my AW feedback has been contaminated. Feedback from a meeting with Eva is now attributed to infamous BBer AnalyaNice, who I have never met. I assume that this results from a sold profile and that AnalyaNice was using Eva's feedback to draw in punters. She also appears to have retired but has left the profile open to distribute content.

I'm far from being the only one as Eva has 281 feedbacks, and consequently there are 281 feedbacks now with the BBer's name attached. Given that most decent WGs would be skittish about meeting someone with feedback from a BBer, I'm keen to purge my feedback of this one. I'm inclined to contact AW and report this as a sold profile but thought I'd ask whether anyone else has tried to report this? If so, what response did you receive?

[Courtney]

I've just returned from a punting break to find that my AW feedback has been contaminated.

....that's a good way of putting it. I wouldn't worry about it, it will probably soon be "member not active" anyway.

[LodgerP]

Analya Angel took over Eva's profile after Eva quit and Analya had issues with her profile.

Basically AW wanted some form of ID verification on the AA profile, but AA just took over the Eva profile.

[Happyjose]

You're over-thinking this OP. CSI Adultwank isn't all that

I doubt whether any prossie is going to forensically examine your feedback, make a BB link to a profile with services no longer listed, and reject you on that basis.

Besides, follow the feedback trail from any busy WG and you'll likely find a connection to someone who's met someone who BB's. Where would it end?

Despite what many say to the contrary on their profiles, AW feedback is rarely necessary to get a booking. A polite text or phone call will usually suffice. If it doesn't, move on and find another.

You'll find many of the most prolific reviewers on this site gave up using AW to book years ago

[Picti]

You're over-thinking this OP. CSI Adultwank isn't all that

I doubt whether any prossie is going to forensically examine your feedback, make a BB link to a profile with services no longer listed, and reject you on that basis.

Besides, follow the feedback trail from any busy WG and you'll likely find a connection to someone who's met someone who BB's. Where would it end?

In a general sense I think you're right and I doubt it would be a problem in the EM where I live and punt most. However, local knowledge doesn't require forensic inquiry it just needs recognition of the name and memory of what she offered. I'm a Glaswegian and sometimes like to punt on visits home, and would rather that this didn't make things more difficult. I'll contact AW and see what they say.

[geezer_breezer]

From memory Analya only used Eva's profile for a few weeks before doing a bunk too.

[Happyjose]

In a general sense I think you're right and I doubt it would be a problem in the EM where I live and punt most. However, local knowledge doesn't require forensic inquiry it just needs recognition of the name and memory of what she offered. I'm a Glaswegian and sometimes like to punt on visits home, and would rather that this didn't make things more difficult. I'll contact AW and see what they say.

Fair enough, your choice

If memory serves me well, she removed the BB offer towards the end of her stay, possibly after comments on here

[Picti]

If memory serves me well, she removed the BB offer towards the end of her stay, possibly after comments on here

She may have removed the offer but I doubt she removed the stain.

Thanks for your replies. I'm not sat here fretting as I imagine it'll have very little, if any impact on my punting, but it doesn't sit well with me.

[JustHilts]

From memory Analya only used Eva's profile for a few weeks before doing a bunk too.

+1 exactly right and a lame attempt by the OP to resurrect an issue flogged to death in the past.

[Picti]

...a lame attempt by the OP to resurrect an issue flogged to death in the past.

Lame? I returned from a year plus long break from punting and everything to do with it, and on my return found that I had a known barebacker (who I'd never met) in my feedback. Furthermore, I'm Glaswegian and occasionally punt there on visits, but I haven't lived in Scotland for years and don't follow the Scottish forum in great detail.

I asked a legitimate question, received sensible answers from a couple of local lads, and this thread was headed to oblivion. Well it was before you bumped it of course.

[Scottish_Kara]

To be fair to the OP, many of us girls do check feedback and are less likely to see people who have known BBers on their feedback - even if they did stop it eventually.

[Picti]

To be fair to the OP, many of us girls do check feedback and are less likely to see people who have known BBers on their feedback - even if they did stop it eventually.

Thanks for that. I've more than enough feedback from more reputable WGs to indicate my punting habits, and like I said previously I'm not hugely concerned by this. However, it's annoying, especially as it was the reason I never met her.

Also, ironically when she jumped profiles all the BB punters on her actual feedback got a free pardon, while those of us who'd met Eva got saddled with this crap.

[Cityfan1880]

Thanks for that. I've more than enough feedback from more reputable WGs to indicate my punting habits, and like I said previously I'm not hugely concerned by this. However, it's annoying, especially as it was the reason I never met her.

Also, ironically when she jumped profiles all the BB punters on her actual feedback got a free pardon, while those of us who'd met Eva got saddled with this crap.

Newsflash mate your precious Eva has had unprotected sex with guys in her private life.

[Courtney]

Newsflash mate your precious Eva has had unprotected sex with guys in her private life.

I think I preferred your previous username.

[Picti]

Newsflash mate your precious Eva has had unprotected sex with guys in her private life.

Work on your reading comprehension, try not to make unfounded assumptions, and try not to state the obvious.

The post had nothing to do with whether prostitutes have unprotected sex in their personal lives, and that's not exactly a revelation. Read the thread and the issue properly.

As for your "precious Eva" comment - I saw her once, enjoyed it, left a UKP review - nothing more, so spare me the fanboy insinuations. If anything I'm critical of her for disregarding every punter who left her feedback by giving a bareback skank her password. My question was about having potentially off-putting feedback removed.

If you want to take the view that unprotected sex in someone's private life is the same as a BB prostitute seeing multiple punters all stirring each others' porridge inside her day after day, then I'm afraid that we'll need to disagree.