Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Angel Sam and Kirsty Blonde - Manchester  (Read 2714 times)


37 review(s) for Angel Sam  (30 positive, 6 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by ]
12 review(s) for KirstyBlonde (7 positive, 3 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by ]

Offline Blue Moon

External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

£200 - One hour incall

Background:
I’d been on a fairly good run with my recent punts and decided to treat myself with a 2-girl session. I’ve had a few of these in my time so know what to look for. I could have repeated a previous pairing but wanted a new experience. I narrowed it down to two: Angel Sam + 1 or XXX-Angela +1. I’ve met both these ladies before and that, combined with the many reports on here, convinced me that I’d be on a winner whichever leading lady I chose. In the end, Angel Sam was my choice, largely for reasons of location.

Comms:
All good. I contacted Sam, told her the date I wanted and asked her to choose an accomplice from her list of fellow SPs. Kirsty was up for it so we settled on a date, time, services and outfits. All comms were carried out efficiently.

Location:
The meeting took place at the same place I’d met Sam previously. A private block of flats just outside Manchester centre (M32) with plenty of free, off-road and discreet parking. Having got the ‘come and get us’ text, I went up to the apartment.

Appearance:
Sam let me in, wearing the outfit I’d requested, involving a miniskirt and high-heels (my favourite combo). Last time I met Sam, I was a touch disappointed in her looks – I’m sure she’d agree that she’s not in the model class – but her body was top-notch with excellent nips. I noticed this time that she appeared to have put on a few pounds…but nothing to put me off, really. Facially, she’s not traditionally pretty – but attractive in a Milf-Next-Door kind of way. I was a bit surprised with Kirsty. She’s quite tall and slim, but when she came close, I could see that she was over her AW-stated age of 43. I don’t know why I was surprised – I usually find that SPs calculate their age in ‘Escort Years’ – each Escort Year being the equivalent of 1.33 Civilian Years. So I reckon Kirsty is well into her 50s. (Apologies if she reads this and I’m wrong.) She looks good for her age (if I’ve calculated it correctly) but has the ‘looseness’ of skin that comes with age. I found myself in the situation of only being mildly aroused by the ladies in front of me. On a positive note, DFK-ing started straightaway and I found myself holding a bra-covered tit in each hand – one Kirsty’s and one of Sam’s – so it wasn’t a bad start.

The Sesh:
This is where is went a bit downhill. Sam decided to push things along and I found that I was on the receiving end of a fairly constant commentary – ‘look at those tits’, ‘feel how wet she is/I am’ ‘I bet you’d like to fuck her/me’, ‘Suck her nipples’… and so on. In fact, the only time she was quiet was when my cock was in her mouth. Now, I understand that this was intended to increase the sexuality of the moment, and that some blokes get off on it – but I like to drive punts myself and Sam’s constant chat put me off. Thinking back, I should have taken over and dicatated the routine myself, but for some reason I just let it wash all over me and found myself becoming less and less aroused. I went through the motions – there was lots of OWO from both girls, loads of DFK-ing and I went down on each of them. I briefly fucked them both, just to be polite, really - although it was entertaining to watch the fuckee licking out the other girl. I watched as they both played with each other (no faking – DFK, nipple-sucking, deep oral, etc). But the damage was done and I felt Blue Moon Minor becoming even more minor. As time drew on, I decided that the only way I was going to cum was to do it myself by hand, which I felt was a wasted opportunity as there were two mouths there, either of which was happy to take my load. We had a bit of a chat and I departed.

Thoughts on the way back to the car:
Disappointment was my predominant thought. I’d been looking forward to the meet…and it didn’t work.

Now, I need to qualify this. These two ladies put every effort they had to try to make sure I had a good time. It was my mental attitude that stopped things from being better - although this was started off with my thoughts about their appearance and age (in previous reports I've freely admitted that I'm very shallow when it comes to looks), then compounded with the over-the-top (and constant) exhortations from Sam. There was too much of the false sexy talk. I know it was done for the right reasons, but I would have thought that Sam is experienced enough to recognise when it’s being counter-productive…and stop it or tone it down.

One other important point is that I had a medical problem a couple of days later which necessitated a trip to the doctor, ECG and so on. I found out that I have a minor heart problem – and it is extremely possible that this may have caused some of the problems during this punt. (Btw, I’ve since taken a bit of a break from punting at my previous rate and all seems to be getting better now.)

Many others of the NW Podging Team have reviewed Sam (including me) – and indeed, Sam and Kirsty as a pair – and have reported back favourably so please don’t let my neutral report put you off. I’m sure that it was partly down to me (but not entirely). I feel a bit guilty about my conclusions but couldn’t bring myself to rate the experience as a Positive (I won’t return), but there is no way it’s a Negative – more of a Neutral Plus (but there’s no tick-box for that).

Bm

Offline cueball

Great review bm

You've told it exactly how you saw it and nobody can say fairer than that.

Cheers for the input and effort pal. Sorry you didn't have a stellar time, onwards and upwards pal  :hi:

Offline Blue Moon

Thanks cueball. I've got my punting trousers back on now and I'll be having another 2-girl dabble in a few days; hopefully that will reset the balance.   Bm

Offline allroadboy

Kirsty was one of my first AW punts just over 8 years ago, I was in my early 40's then & thought she was about ten years older than me. Not a good meet.

jeanselam88

  • Guest
I also met kristyou about 4 years ago and was very disappointed with her service (I did wrote a review then,but ahad to change my profile name because one of the prossies knew who I was and was harassing me).

Offline Might Bite

Definitely the best 2 girl I have had was these 2 External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
Yahoobabe & Sammie UK Escort. No faking or anything with these 2. I can remember coming up for air from plating Steph to find her head wedged between Sammie's thighs. Very nearly shit my load there and then.
A pain to travel to if using the M67 but we'll worth it.

goldwing1

  • Guest
Strange one this, individually they have excellent reviews, I have met sam on her own and with kirsty for a thresome and had an excellent time, no complaints at all

Offline cueball

Strange one this, individually they have excellent reviews, I have met sam on her own and with kirsty for a thresome and had an excellent time, no complaints at all

Not really strange at all... it's ymmv with any punts.

What's strange is your white knight post

Offline frankc

Good honest reviewing there BM.....Ive had a few punts like this and always find It difficult to pull the punt back once your initial mindset is one of disappointment....just the way it goes sometimes Pal.....thanks for the review.. :thumbsup:

amanhasnoname

  • Guest
Not really strange at all... it's ymmv with any punts.

What's strange is your white knight post

+1

Offline allroadboy

I remember going back and forth with Kirsty about leaving AW feedback. At the time I had very little feedback but all positive, but she insisted I put the feedback up first. It left with no choice than to not leave feedback, as I got the impression from what she was saying that if I said anything negative, shed do likewise ...

Offline Blue Moon

Yes - that's the problem with AW feedback and it's why it's worthless. If you feel you have to leave feedback, just play along and leave something non-commital. Those of us on UKP won't be fooled by reading it - we get the real info on here.    Bm

goldwing1

  • Guest
Yes - that's the problem with AW feedback and it's why it's worthless. If you feel you have to leave feedback, just play along and leave something non-commital. Those of us on UKP won't be fooled by reading it - we get the real info on here.    Bm

You also get mixed reviews on here as well.

Offline freeze44

Thanks for the review BM. Been looking for a duo and get what you saying about loosing interest.  :thumbsup:

Offline Blue Moon

You also get mixed reviews on here as well.
Agreed - that can happen. But it's possible to identify bona fide reviewers by their regular contributions and, I suppose, by their approach to reviewing. Also, because it's not a reciprocal environment, the SPs can't threaten bad feedback for the customer in reprisal for a bad review. To assist with that, it's up to us to review in a way that means the SP can't link our UKP and AW identities.    Bm

goldwing1

  • Guest
Agreed - that can happen. But it's possible to identify bona fide reviewers by their regular contributions and, I suppose, by their approach to reviewing. Also, because it's not a reciprocal environment, the SPs can't threaten bad feedback for the customer in reprisal for a bad review. To assist with that, it's up to us to review in a way that means the SP can't link our UKP and AW identities.    Bm
.

That`s the only problem with leaving bad feedback, can turn into a slanging match but it`s only fair they have a right of reply because some punters are idiots as well.

The thing that bugs me is when I leave a good field report and they don`t publish it.

Offline Blue Moon

I only do FRs on UKP now.

Incidentally, AW FRs can be located through the FR Search facility - doesn't matter whether or not the SP has published it/them.   Bm

Offline cueball


The thing that bugs me is when I leave a good field report and they don`t publish it.

Interesting when you say it bugs you when they don't publish your field report...

Do you write them....

1) to compliment the prossie to gain future favour/express your love/continue the delusion that you're the special one.

2) to relive the experience in written form so you can look back glowingly

3) to share with other punters your experience

Not a piss take, I'm genuinely intrigued

amanhasnoname

  • Guest
Can I ask why you don't review on here if you're prepared to do FR's on AW Goldwing?

Offline freeze44

.

That`s the only problem with leaving bad feedback, can turn into a slanging match but it`s only fair they have a right of reply because some punters are idiots as well.

The thing that bugs me is when I leave a good field report and they don`t publish it.

That's the thing with AW though. It's weighted heavily towards the WG's. This site is for punters and would much rather rely upon a punters view here than the rubbish on AW which is full of crap and made up shit. Any crap coming through on here is normally quickly sniffed out  :thumbsup:

goldwing1

  • Guest
I only do FRs on UKP now.

Incidentally, AW FRs can be located through the FR Search facility - doesn't matter whether or not the SP has published it/them.   Bm

Learn something everyday, just tested it out using you scenario, and it`s there.

goldwing1

  • Guest
Interesting when you say it bugs you when they don't publish your field report...

Do you write them....

1) to compliment the prossie to gain future favour/express your love/continue the delusion that you're the special one.

2) to relive the experience in written form so you can look back glowingly

3) to share with other punters your experience

Not a piss take, I'm genuinely intrigued

To  share with other punters, that`s the whole idea, just in the same way people leave reviews on here.

vw

  • Guest
Strange one this, individually they have excellent reviews, I have met sam on her own and with kirsty for a thresome and had an excellent time, no complaints at all

You have not had this pairing, how would you know?

Not really strange at all... it's ymmv with any punts.

What's strange is your white knight post

+1


Offline cueball

To  share with other punters, that`s the whole idea, just in the same way people leave reviews on here.

If that really is the case then you'd put a review up on here, this is the place to really share with punters.


goldwing1

  • Guest
If that really is the case then you'd put a review up on here, this is the place to really share with punters.

I did when I first joined this site, and you just took the piss, it was a copy and paste job of what I put on adultwork.
« Last Edit: July 29, 2017, 10:53:41 am by goldwing1 »

Offline Blue Moon

The link doesn't work, goldwing.    Bm

Offline cueball

I did when I first joined this site, and you just took the piss, it was a copy and paste job of what I put on adultwork.

Yes, it were rubbish. The owner of the site agreed too, that's why he moved into a discussion thread.

Have another go at it, you've learnt by now what's what on here.

vw

  • Guest
I did when I first joined this site, and you just took the piss, it was a copy and paste job of what I put on adultwork.

This ?

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=124773.msg1414308#msg1414308

Offline Blue Moon

I did when I first joined this site, and you just took the piss, it was a copy and paste job of what I put on adultwork.
It was probably the 'Not really going to go into detail here' bit that caused the problem.

'Not Going Into Detail' = Not A Review

Bm

goldwing1

  • Guest
It was probably the 'Not really going to go into detail here' bit that caused the problem.

'Not Going Into Detail' = Not A Review

Bm

Ok, might have been a shit review, i`d only been on this site for a short time and wasn`t sure what constituted a good review as it was my first.

Apart from everyone taking the piss, at least someone replied explaining what was going on and offered lots of advice to a newbie on the site and how to write the sort of review that members like to read and contains the information they need to know.