Author Topic: Kelly the milf - Birmingham (Read 24354 times)

Shovelhead · « **on:** July 22, 2017, 05:18:37 pm »

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
I suppose this is positive but only just really, very limited service, no french kissing, no OWO. Kelly is probably early 50's not the 43 on her profile, however she is pretty and has a lovely smile and seems like a nice girl, pleasant company anyway, does have a very good figure. It was just a bit ordinary, I wasn't exactly skipping back to the car afterwards which for £120 I would like to be doing. So OK but not great.

Spurt · « **Reply #1 on:** July 25, 2017, 01:22:12 pm »

Should this be a neutral?

kingkong69 · « **Reply #2 on:** July 25, 2017, 02:00:19 pm »

I can't really see any positive in the review at all :dash:9

samsung1 · « **Reply #3 on:** July 25, 2017, 02:03:49 pm »

Quote from: Shovelhead on July 22, 2017, 05:18:37 pm

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
I suppose this is positive but only just really, very limited service, no french kissing, no OWO. Kelly is probably early 50's not the 43 on her profile, however she is pretty and has a lovely smile and seems like a nice girl, pleasant company anyway, does have a very good figure. It was just a bit ordinary, I wasn't exactly skipping back to the car afterwards which for £120 I would like to be doing. So OK but not great.

Thanks for the review, had been on my watchlist for a long time.

Whats her body like, is she wrinlky/saggy or 'normal'?

Samjos · « **Reply #4 on:** July 25, 2017, 04:09:27 pm »

I am gobsmacked by your review

1) if it was that bad it should be a negative

2) lovely warm young lady and may not be 43 but certainly not over 50 yet despite the years she has been in business

TTFan · « **Reply #5 on:** July 25, 2017, 04:17:45 pm »

I am really surprised by this review.

I have seen her many times and had a great time. Loads of French Kissing, mutual oral (without) and only too willing to please

I agree she's closer to 50 but she does have a good body

Each to their own

Bangers and Gash · « **Reply #6 on:** July 25, 2017, 04:46:43 pm »

Quote from: Frenchbob on July 25, 2017, 04:17:45 pm

Loads of French Kissing...

Why is it not listed in her likes then?

samsung1 · « **Reply #7 on:** July 25, 2017, 04:51:42 pm »

Quote from: Frenchbob on July 25, 2017, 04:17:45 pm

I am really surprised by this review.

I have seen her many times and had a great time. Loads of French Kissing, mutual oral (without) and only too willing to please

I agree she's closer to 50 but she does have a good body

Each to their own

A review would have been nice Frenchy

Sandman2017 · « **Reply #8 on:** July 25, 2017, 05:08:41 pm »

Wow after reading the latest review it's made me think twice about meeting Kelly , I was hoping for a 30 min meet when funds allowed , !!!

TTFan · « **Reply #9 on:** July 26, 2017, 12:09:49 pm »

Quote from: samsung1 on July 25, 2017, 04:51:42 pm

A review would have been nice Frenchy

I did......... https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=111803.msg1300412#msg1300412

Not in any great detail I must confess

samsung1 · « **Reply #10 on:** July 26, 2017, 02:48:16 pm »

Quote from: Shovelhead on July 22, 2017, 05:18:37 pm

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
I suppose this is positive but only just really, very limited service, no french kissing, no OWO. Kelly is probably early 50's not the 43 on her profile, however she is pretty and has a lovely smile and seems like a nice girl, pleasant company anyway, does have a very good figure. It was just a bit ordinary, I wasn't exactly skipping back to the car afterwards which for £120 I would like to be doing. So OK but not great.

Just to clairify... did you ask beforehand about OWO and FK?

sushi · « **Reply #11 on:** July 26, 2017, 03:17:15 pm »

£80/£120 is a rip off for what is now a basic vanilla punt added to that she continues to knock 10 years off her age would make her negative in my book

Shovelhead · « **Reply #12 on:** July 27, 2017, 07:32:20 pm »

I had her in my hot list from way back, don't get to Brum much these days. When one I really fancied went tits up I went for plan B. She used to do OWO otherwise she wouldn't be in the list, as for french kissing couple of times I tried a little tongue it just touched her teeth which were firmly together. Her body is cracking for a woman her age, I have banged enough milfs to have a rough idea of what the difference between 40 and 50 is, I'm 50 odd myself and no aversion to girls my own age, but she ain't 43!

Sandman2017 · « **Reply #13 on:** July 30, 2017, 09:15:56 pm »

Seems like a few guys are not best pleased with Kelly , promising and not delivering on what's advertised on her profile , naughty naughty

Nothere269 · « **Reply #14 on:** May 14, 2019, 09:16:29 am »

Very late to the party myself here, but this isn’t the Kelly that I recognise from my meets - she kisses passionately, has a great body (yes, she’s an older woman but why would you book someone named ‘Kelly the MILF’ if you didn’t want that?), offers everything I’ve ever wanted from her profile and overall offers an exceptional experience. Can not find a bad word to say about her

Knobrot · « **Reply #15 on:** May 14, 2019, 02:54:30 pm »

Quote from: Nothere269 on May 14, 2019, 09:16:29 am

Very late to the party myself here, but this isn’t the Kelly that I recognise from my meets - she kisses passionately, has a great body (yes, she’s an older woman but why would you book someone named ‘Kelly the MILF’ if you didn’t want that?), offers everything I’ve ever wanted from her profile and overall offers an exceptional experience. Can not find a bad word to say about her

Sounds like an advert...!!!

CoolTiger · « **Reply #16 on:** May 14, 2019, 02:58:33 pm »

Quote from: Nothere269 on May 14, 2019, 09:16:29 am

Very late to the party myself here, but this isn’t the Kelly that I recognise from my meets - she kisses passionately, has a great body (yes, she’s an older woman but why would you book someone named ‘Kelly the MILF’ if you didn’t want that?), offers everything I’ve ever wanted from her profile and overall offers an exceptional experience. Can not find a bad word to say about her

I would agree with the previous poster, in that your post appears to be touting her or WK'ing her.

Is Kelly the only WG you have visited? Why not post reviews of other girls whom you have seen, and also post on here about your punting experiences.

Until then, a tout is what you will be seen as, not to be taken seriously.

Samjos · « **Reply #17 on:** May 14, 2019, 04:39:54 pm »

Suprised kelly the milf would have to advertise

Suprised if she had someone touting for business for her

But then again supposed we should never be suprised ....

I agree with the post above this does not sound like the Kelly the milf I have visited

I have fine a review previously so will not elaborate any more here about her excellent service I reveievd

CoolTiger · « **Reply #18 on:** May 14, 2019, 05:51:03 pm »

Quote from: Samjos on May 14, 2019, 04:39:54 pm

Suprised kelly the milf would have to advertise

Suprised if she had someone touting for business for her

But then again supposed we should never be suprised ....

I agree with the post above this does not sound like the Kelly the milf I have visited

I have fine a review previously so will not elaborate any more here about her excellent service I reveievd

As you say whilst this may be true, half of his posts are on Kelly, including a review on her. You can see where the other members are coming from.

Nothere269 · « **Reply #19 on:** March 06, 2020, 07:56:12 am »

Getting just a teeny bit fed up with people on this place jumping down my throat and deciding all sorts of things about me on the basis that I don’t post on here often and have tried to help both you lot and Kelly herself by actually daring to say something nice.

I won’t bother going forwards.

petermisc · « **Reply #20 on:** March 06, 2020, 09:13:49 am »

Quote from: Nothere269 on March 06, 2020, 07:56:12 am

Getting just a teeny bit fed up with people on this place jumping down my throat and deciding all sorts of things about me on the basis that I don’t post on here often and have tried to help both you lot and Kelly herself by actually daring to say something nice.

I won’t bother going forwards.

So its taken you TEN MONTHS to reply? Looks suspiciously like review-bumping to me.

Nothere269 · « **Reply #21 on:** March 09, 2020, 07:28:22 am »

Quote from: petermisc on March 06, 2020, 09:13:49 am

So its taken you TEN MONTHS to reply? Looks suspiciously like review-bumping to me.

And to me it looks like you enjoy attacking people and have latched on to a nice justification. I’ve done exactly nothing which approaches being against any rules, so perhaps taking me at my word isn’t a million miles out of line? Instead of launching into accusations of this and that

daviemac · « **Reply #22 on:** March 09, 2020, 07:46:09 am »

Quote from: Nothere269 on March 09, 2020, 07:28:22 am

And to me it looks like you enjoy attacking people and have latched on to a nice justification. I’ve done exactly nothing which approaches being against any rules, so perhaps taking me at my word isn’t a million miles out of line? Instead of launching into accusations of this and that

I'm not sure what you expect really, you first bumped the review after 2 years then you bumped it again after another year, all this despite logging on on a regular basis. Why did you wait so long to reply.

Nothere269 · « **Reply #23 on:** March 09, 2020, 07:48:58 am »

Quote from: daviemac on March 09, 2020, 07:46:09 am

I'm not sure what you expect really, you first bumped the review after 2 years then you bumped it again after another year, all this despite logging on on a regular basis. Why did you wait so long to reply.

Because I don’t go back and read my own reviews on a regular basis? Believe me, wish I hadn’t now.

daviemac · « **Reply #24 on:** March 09, 2020, 07:57:21 am »

Quote from: Nothere269 on March 09, 2020, 07:48:58 am

Because I don’t go back and read my own reviews on a regular basis? Believe me, wish I hadn’t now.

It isn't your review, it's by Shovelhead, you waited for 2 years to reply to this, when you did that you would've seen the big red warning suggesting you start a new thread instead of reviving an old one, a warning you chose to ignore. Then after another year you bump it again, now you wonder why that looks suspicious.

Littlefoot · « **Reply #25 on:** March 09, 2020, 07:58:22 am »

Quote from: Nothere269 on March 09, 2020, 07:48:58 am

Because I don’t go back and read my own reviews on a regular basis? Believe me, wish I hadn’t now.

But this review is not from you.

Nothere269 · « **Reply #26 on:** March 09, 2020, 08:00:52 am »

I made a mistake, mixing up this thread with another one where someone else is making similar comments. Mea culpa

daviemac · « **Reply #27 on:** March 09, 2020, 08:02:56 am »

Quote from: Nothere269 on March 09, 2020, 08:00:52 am

I made a mistake, mixing up this thread with another one where someone else is making similar comments. Mea culpa

So which one are you complaining about, this or the other one.

Nothere269 · « **Reply #28 on:** March 09, 2020, 08:09:12 am »

Both, because people are being assholes to me in both of them

It sometimes gets a little tricky to separate out one from the other

daviemac · « **Reply #29 on:** March 09, 2020, 08:12:53 am »

Quote from: Nothere269 on March 09, 2020, 08:09:12 am

Both, because people are being assholes to me in both of them It sometimes gets a little tricky to separate out one from the other

You've only quoted one in your report, who is the other you are complaining about.

Littlefoot · « **Reply #30 on:** March 09, 2020, 08:15:39 am »

Quote from: Nothere269 on March 06, 2020, 07:56:12 am

Getting just a teeny bit fed up with people on this place jumping down my throat and deciding all sorts of things about me on the basis that I don’t post on here often and have tried to help both you lot and Kelly herself by actually daring to say something nice.

I won’t bother going forwards.

This isn’t the place to be doing favors for WGs

KingUser2017 · « **Reply #31 on:** March 09, 2020, 02:24:36 pm »

This review should be a NEGATIVE one.

freddiej · « **Reply #32 on:** March 09, 2020, 09:20:04 pm »

I just looked at my review of Kelly from 2015, it was as I remember. Actually I wonder about that "I want more foe £120", I can only think it was the light FK. A good passionate kisser is what gets me back.

Zeusthedoc · « **Reply #33 on:** March 09, 2020, 10:54:56 pm »

Quote from: KingUser2017 on March 09, 2020, 02:24:36 pm

This review should be a NEGATIVE one.

at least a neutral....definitely can't what makes this a positive

talked about bumping an out of date as fuck thread/review though

daviemac · « **Reply #34 on:** March 10, 2020, 11:50:12 pm »

Quote from: KingUser2017 on March 09, 2020, 02:24:36 pm

This review should be a NEGATIVE one.

Quote from: Zeusthedoc on March 09, 2020, 10:54:56 pm

at least a neutral....definitely can't what makes this a positive

talked about bumping an out of date as fuck thread/review though

Have you noticed this review is from 2017 and the OP is no longer active so can't ask to change it. Mods or helpers can't change ratings without the poster's say so.

Zeusthedoc · « **Reply #35 on:** March 11, 2020, 07:30:44 am »

Quote from: daviemac on March 10, 2020, 11:50:12 pm

Have you noticed this review is from 2017 and the OP is no longer active so can't ask to change it. Mods or helpers can't change ratings without the poster's say so.

didn't spot that - wasn't paying attention
i've noticed a lot of threads from a number of months/years ago have been bumped recently

Littlefoot · « **Reply #36 on:** March 11, 2020, 07:34:06 am »

Quote from: daviemac on March 10, 2020, 11:50:12 pm

Have you noticed this review is from 2017 and the OP is no longer active so can't ask to change it. Mods or helpers can't change ratings without the poster's say so.

So there’s no time limit when changing the rating of reviews?

daviemac · « **Reply #37 on:** March 11, 2020, 08:40:52 am »

Quote from: Littlefoot on March 11, 2020, 07:34:06 am

So there’s no time limit when changing the rating of reviews?

Common sense is expected from members, what would be the point of changing the rating of a 2 year old review. My comment was pointing out that the reviewer's permission has to be sought in order to change ratings and in this case the reviewer is not active on the site, it is therefore pointless people posting what they think the rating should or shouldn't be.

If people had read the thread properly especially from reply #14 it would've been clear why it was revived and why I'm posting on it.