Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: Diana of playful escorts  (Read 5612 times)

This review has not been indexed yet.

Offline bryanval

I thought I would give outcall a go for the first time on Thursday night / Friday early hours and in absence of adult work at the time I ended up looking at playful escorts.

Some here have said the agency receptionist there is rubbish but she seemed fine. Helped me out with the who is actually available now from those available today. She was vague on the cost of any extras but I thought I would give Diana a try.

Wow! She's not the girl in the pictures at http://www.playful-escorts.co.uk/portfolio/diana/ but that's no bad thing. 25 in real life and far more natural. Diana was similar in her figure to the current photo 3/4 but not a lot like the first couple of pictures.

Diana was shy in a cute way. We shared a shower together and without her heels and leopard skin bra and panties is a tiny little unit.

Once in bed and Diana having dealt discretely with a call and a text to her phone we chatted for a few minutes before getting down to a really gfe experience. Ro given first, proper dfk (apparently the agency tell her to charge another 40 for that and owo) followed by covered oral (I didn't want to take the piss having had a nice minty kiss). Great sex, kiss and a cuddle then a good rub down in the shower.

Diana was lovely. Very genuine. We spoke about life outside work and it's obvious she's worked hard here. Agency sent a text just after she arrived to say "extend yourself, he's a regular" which is total bollocks. Was also really surprised to find out how little she makes for her hour, the agency take nearly two thirds! All her reviews on their site date from before Diana arrived in the UK, i guess her near doppelganger moved on. Past reviews also indicated A was on the cards, not so. A tooth pick would be a tight fit I should think!

Kept Diana's number and would love to see her again independently. Agency didn't play a straight game but if their other girls are in Diana's league I'd consider them again.

The honest (mostly positive review) I left hasn't been published, perhaps because I pointed out the photo switch?

Offline Jimmyredcab

"She's not the girl in the pictures  but that's no bad thing."

YES, IT IS A BAD THING.    :dash: :dash:

We don't encourage bait and switch on here.    :mad:

Offline akauya

I thought I would give outcall a go for the first time on Thursday night / Friday early hours and in absence of adult work at the time I ended up looking at playful escorts.

Some here have said the agency receptionist there is rubbish but she seemed fine. Helped me out with the who is actually available now from those available today. She was vague on the cost of any extras but I thought I would give Diana a try.

Wow! She's not the girl in the pictures at http://www.playful-escorts.co.uk/portfolio/diana/ but that's no bad thing. 25 in real life and far more natural. Diana was similar in her figure to the current photo 3/4 but not a lot like the first couple of pictures.

Diana was shy in a cute way. We shared a shower together and without her heels and leopard skin bra and panties is a tiny little unit.

Once in bed and Diana having dealt discretely with a call and a text to her phone we chatted for a few minutes before getting down to a really gfe experience. Ro given first, proper dfk (apparently the agency tell her to charge another 40 for that and owo) followed by covered oral (I didn't want to take the piss having had a nice minty kiss). Great sex, kiss and a cuddle then a good rub down in the shower.

Diana was lovely. Very genuine. We spoke about life outside work and it's obvious she's worked hard here. Agency sent a text just after she arrived to say "extend yourself, he's a regular" which is total bollocks. Was also really surprised to find out how little she makes for her hour, the agency take nearly two thirds! All her reviews on their site date from before Diana arrived in the UK, i guess her near doppelganger moved on. Past reviews also indicated A was on the cards, not so. A tooth pick would be a tight fit I should think!

Kept Diana's number and would love to see her again independently. Agency didn't play a straight game but if their other girls are in Diana's league I'd consider them again.

The honest (mostly positive review) I left hasn't been published, perhaps because I pointed out the photo switch?

Bryanval, how can bait & switch not be a bad thing?

I appreciate you had a nice time but B&S is a major sin in punting. If punters allow that to happen scumbags like this agency will get away with it time and time again. Also "Diana's" pics are photoshopped. I doubt very much even the 'real' Diana looks like her.

And the receptionist being vague about cost of extras?  Seriously?

Thanks for your review but this reinforces why I never book with agencies... they not only screw us with B&S but also screw the WGs by taking too much 'commission'.

I'll take your review as positive (ish) for the WG and a BIG negative for the scumbag agency playful-escorts.


Offline what-a man

I thought I would give outcall a go for the first time on Thursday night / Friday early hours and in absence of adult work at the time I ended up looking at playful escorts.

Some here have said the agency receptionist there is rubbish but she seemed fine. Helped me out with the who is actually available now from those available today. She was vague on the cost of any extras but I thought I would give Diana a try.

Wow! She's not the girl in the pictures at http://www.playful-escorts.co.uk/portfolio/diana/ but that's no bad thing. 25 in real life and far more natural. Diana was similar in her figure to the current photo 3/4 but not a lot like the first couple of pictures.

Diana was shy in a cute way. We shared a shower together and without her heels and leopard skin bra and panties is a tiny little unit.

Once in bed and Diana having dealt discretely with a call and a text to her phone we chatted for a few minutes before getting down to a really gfe experience. Ro given first, proper dfk (apparently the agency tell her to charge another 40 for that and owo) followed by covered oral (I didn't want to take the piss having had a nice minty kiss). Great sex, kiss and a cuddle then a good rub down in the shower.

Diana was lovely. Very genuine. We spoke about life outside work and it's obvious she's worked hard here. Agency sent a text just after she arrived to say "extend yourself, he's a regular" which is total bollocks. Was also really surprised to find out how little she makes for her hour, the agency take nearly two thirds! All her reviews on their site date from before Diana arrived in the UK, i guess her near doppelganger moved on. Past reviews also indicated A was on the cards, not so. A tooth pick would be a tight fit I should think!

Kept Diana's number and would love to see her again independently. Agency didn't play a straight game but if their other girls are in Diana's league I'd consider them again.

The honest (mostly positive review) I left hasn't been published, perhaps because I pointed out the photo switch?

Statements like this make me want to puke  :dash:

Offline leekang

I thought I would give outcall a go for the first time on Thursday night / Friday early hours and in absence of adult work at the time I ended up looking at playful escorts.

Some here have said the agency receptionist there is rubbish but she seemed fine. Helped me out with the who is actually available now from those available today. She was vague on the cost of any extras but I thought I would give Diana a try.

Wow! She's not the girl in the pictures at http://www.playful-escorts.co.uk/portfolio/diana/ but that's no bad thing. 25 in real life and far more natural. Diana was similar in her figure to the current photo 3/4 but not a lot like the first couple of pictures.

Diana was shy in a cute way. We shared a shower together and without her heels and leopard skin bra and panties is a tiny little unit.

Once in bed and Diana having dealt discretely with a call and a text to her phone we chatted for a few minutes before getting down to a really gfe experience. Ro given first, proper dfk (apparently the agency tell her to charge another 40 for that and owo) followed by covered oral (I didn't want to take the piss having had a nice minty kiss). Great sex, kiss and a cuddle then a good rub down in the shower.

Diana was lovely. Very genuine. We spoke about life outside work and it's obvious she's worked hard here. Agency sent a text just after she arrived to say "extend yourself, he's a regular" which is total bollocks. Was also really surprised to find out how little she makes for her hour, the agency take nearly two thirds! All her reviews on their site date from before Diana arrived in the UK, i guess her near doppelganger moved on. Past reviews also indicated A was on the cards, not so. A tooth pick would be a tight fit I should think!

Kept Diana's number and would love to see her again independently. Agency didn't play a straight game but if their other girls are in Diana's league I'd consider them again.

The honest (mostly positive review) I left hasn't been published, perhaps because I pointed out the photo switch?


your review angered me. ( nothing personal). 2 years ago ,i used this playful-escort website 2 and both experience was absolutely crap!!!!!!
1st one was B&S. she looked nothing like the picture. but it was 1st time ever, i knew nothing, no experience. so i was very shy to even say a thing, She did not allow even touch her boobs, let alone kissing or pu..sy.  it was a horrible experience.

2nd one was the one in picture but added 10 years.  i stilled carried on because i wanted to gambled with £120.  I completely lost that money without much fun or satisfaction.  She complained she was tired  as soon as we started about 10 minutes( including her time in bathroom getting changed and refresh). She did not like FK, She laughed at me when i was shy and couldnt get my boy up, She even asked: are u joking ( in a very very bad manner and sacarsstic way). i could not finish . i couldnt get him up any more after that statement, let alone fuking her. it was so bad that i didnt even want to see her face after 40 minutes. I told her she could leave and i avoided a good bye kissing from her at the end. Pathatic really. !!!  I was really polite and nice when they both came to my house. Red wine+ candles+ chocolate.  I Really wanted an amazing experence but this agency girls did NOT offer it.

The receptionist of 2 both experience was also very rude and cold on the phone. She sounded like she did not  wanna help or she just couldnt give a damn about answering the phone call. I still remember those girls because they gave me bad time and NEVER EVER i Give them my hard earned money AGAIN!



panel999

1st ever post with a Positive review on a B&S situation - Would always be a negative in my book and I would have asked the girl to walk as it was not the girl as per the picture..

Offline bryanval

Fair comment all, baptism of fire it is. Justified me thinks.

I should clarify - she wasn't the girl in the picture but as it turns out that was no bad thing. She was so close to photos 3 / 4 that it was only checking my laptop afterwards I noticed the lack of a butterfly tatoo. Pics 1 / 2 are photoshop'd and I knew that was never going to arrive at the hotel.

I have read other reviews here before registering to put my own up and as a review of the WG it's still a positive. Appreciate the lottery that is B&S and if I asked for Diana again I couldn't predict who'd turn up.

If I were reviewing Playful Escorts (or 24 Carat) it's not.

Anyway, replies appreciated. Noted... not trying to cause a shit storm, will (really) try harder in future. Nuff said?

Offline NightKid

1st ever post with a Positive review on a B&S situation - Would always be a negative in my book and I would have asked the girl to walk as it was not the girl as per the picture..

Naw there's been a couple of positive B&S reviews lying around I believe, can't seem to find them though.
But yeah, B&S + extra charge for DFK & OWO + whatever this line meant - Agency sent a text just after she arrived to say "extend yourself, he's a regular" is a big no no  :thumbsdown:

I should clarify - she wasn't the girl in the picture but as it turns out that was no bad thing. She was so close to photos 3 / 4 that it was only checking my laptop afterwards I noticed the lack of a butterfly tatoo. Pics 1 / 2 are photoshop'd and I knew that was never going to arrive at the hotel.

Wait, so did she look like the girl in the photos or not?
« Last Edit: July 14, 2013, 02:05:25 PM by NightKid »

Offline bryanval


your review angered me. ( nothing personal). 2 years ago ,i used this playful-escort website 2 and both experience was absolutely crap!!!!!!
1st one was B&S. she looked nothing like the picture. but it was 1st time ever, i knew nothing, no experience. so i was very shy to even say a thing, She did not allow even touch her boobs, let alone kissing or pu..sy.  it was a horrible experience.


@leekang - I was in the same boat. Didn't know the protocol (or turning away for instance). I have seen an incall before, shit experience, but when this one turned up my brain played second brain. This was a very GFE with lots of intimate contact, no taboos, nothing a girlfriend wouldn't offer (apart from OWO).

Offline bryanval

Wait, so did she look like the girl in the photos or not?

Check her pics on Playful... I don't think pics 1/2 are the same girl as 3/4 with the hindsight of complete sobriety and a good night's sleep. She was not like pics 1/2 but (squint) and her body was just the same shape as 3/4 with similar features. I was expecting a cute brunette to arrive and one did, I thought it would appear rude if I still had her profile open on my laptop (perhaps I shouldn't care).

I can feel a roasting coming on if I put a word wrong (didn't mean you @NightKid :) )

It was my first outcall, it was as it turned out a B&S, I got lucky, lovely girl. Different but not disappointing.

Offline NightKid

Check her pics on Playful... I don't think pics 1/2 are the same girl as 3/4 with the hindsight of complete sobriety and a good night's sleep. She was not like pics 1/2 but (squint) and her body was just the same shape as 3/4 with similar features. I was expecting a cute brunette to arrive and one did, I thought it would appear rude if I still had her profile open on my laptop (perhaps I shouldn't care).

I can feel a roasting coming on if I put a word wrong (didn't mean you @NightKid :) )

It was my first outcall, it was as it turned out a B&S, I got lucky, lovely girl. Different but not disappointing.

That's the thing see, I didn't really notice that much of a difference between pics 1/2 and pics 3/4 so I was confused. Maybe I should've gone to specsavers.  :D
As for roasting, don't you worry about that. I prefer grilling  :lol:  (read: reasonable debate)

Offline akauya

Fair comment all, baptism of fire it is. Justified me thinks.

[snip]

Anyway, replies appreciated. Noted... not trying to cause a shit storm, will (really) try harder in future. Nuff said?

Bryanval, don't be discouraged by the responses to your review. Yes are critical but it's good you are taking it as constructive criticism, which is what it is.

Your review is indeed helpful to other punters as it warns them never to book playful-escorts ever!

Welcome to the forum by the way and keep posting! :)


« Last Edit: July 15, 2013, 01:26:19 AM by akauya »


Fair comment all, baptism of fire it is. Justified me thinks.

I should clarify - she wasn't the girl in the picture but as it turns out that was no bad thing. She was so close to photos 3 / 4 that it was only checking my laptop afterwards I noticed the lack of a butterfly tatoo. Pics 1 / 2 are photoshop'd and I knew that was never going to arrive at the hotel.

I have read other reviews here before registering to put my own up and as a review of the WG it's still a positive. Appreciate the lottery that is B&S and if I asked for Diana again I couldn't predict who'd turn up.

If I were reviewing Playful Escorts (or 24 Carat) it's not.

Anyway, replies appreciated. Noted... not trying to cause a shit storm, will (really) try harder in future. Nuff said?

Dude. You may well have had a good time, and that's great.

The problem is that no-one, including you, knows who the fuck you saw. So there is zero point in writing a review, good or bad.

Reviews here are supposed to be about real, actual girls whom the rest of us can read about and make a decision as to whether we want to book them or not. This is why the B and S thing is so aggravating. And at the very core, this forum is against it.



Offline James999


Wow! She's not the girl in the pictures

The fact that it was a bait and switch makes it a Negative  :hi:

Offline Tailpipe

B&s has to be neg

Why those agencies do this along with the WG been up to 10 years older when they turn up.


They have been getting away with it far to long.

Answer is don,t use them.

Offline leekang

B&s has to be neg

Why those agencies do this along with the WG been up to 10 years older when they turn up.


They have been getting away with it far to long.

Answer is don,t use them.

I actually thought we couldnt tell them to leave because they might still charge money and make a scene thats y i cartied on. But it was only 2 times stupid. Everytime when people say agency is good, i think 85% of it is crap. They charge for everything and have very bad attitute. U cant leave them feedback so ...they get away with it easy. Never trust their feedback either.

Offline Tailpipe

I actually thought we couldnt tell them to leave because they might still charge money and make a scene thats y i cartied on. But it was only 2 times stupid. Everytime when people say agency is good, i think 85% of it is crap. They charge for everything and have very bad attitute. U cant leave them feedback so ...they get away with it easy. Never trust their feedback either.


You can say this is not the girl and they should send you another or pay £50 towards cost but why should you when its there problem
and not yours.

Think is easy to turn them away when its a hotel not so easy when its your own house.

This is the only one I trust but look at the prices , it is the top rated by far


http://www.hamiltonsescorts.com/


Offline bryanval

All taken positively, thanks guys, and for the welcome.

Offline Conwy

I did have a sort of positive B & S once, with an Indie:

I had booked Stella

http://www.cherrygirls.co.uk/london-escort/stella-1206

over the phone directly and was met by:

http://www.yourmademoiselle.com/escort/lexi

I ended up sharing the bed common to both portfolios with the two of them.



Offline DH

1st time I ever used escorts* was from this agency saw a girl called Ramona seems she retired looked like the girl in the pics had some nice big tits she was hot enthusiastic mid 20ish chatty good english she was ok but killed me with all the extras ended paying up like 190£ for 1h outcall with all the extras. Later I found her on another 4 escorts sites.
Using agency like this is like playing Russian roulette I'm glad I got lucky!




Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)