I have noticed that no sauna girl in the Scottish capital has had so many raving review than Shia.
So off I went to NTS. Let me get to the point and ask this: Those who wrote she was a stunner, or at least a good looking girl,
are you yourselves one of those scary and intimidating bulldog-looking type (often a bouncer or a cab driver or a builder)
with tattoos and mini-sausage pack at the back of your neck? this woman's look scared me as she looks too "pro-sex worker" in your face, to me.
Eat you alive, type, but maybe that is the attraction for some men. I can see she was into S&M and DOM and anal all, but you have to be into that sort of stuff to enjoy time with her, I presume.
Does she do normal as well?
Chloe, who used to be at BSS, is a good looking girl, and I personally like that sort of awkward and distant look so I chose her. I don't regret it, but IF you thought, looking at her at NTS, 'She looks alright, and she might, just might, give me an amazing BJ, she might be sizzling hot in bed..'
Don't... because that is not on the card. what you see is what you get, there is not much extra. In fact, the manager had told me so, 'She is a looker but... you know... don't expect much else. Customers leave saying she was ... ok.... while after Shia, punters leave with smiles... well, its up to u..' but as I said, she looked scary to me. Would people still recommend her if you only look for normal missionary position sex?
She looked great , nice legs and I normally go for looks so no complain, but IF I was one of those bulldozer sex seeker who wants to go mad and screm in bed, then after repeated request from her such as 'you have to pay me now' 'you can't do this, you can't do that, don't go there' I would be shouting,
'Another own goaaaal!!' Let me repeat, if you go for appearance and liked the way she looked, go for it, she have nice beasts, too. but don't expect much in bed.
