I will bow to your obvious superior knowledge.
Although it appears quite a few readers had a view on this issue I guess we are all wrong.
You are clearly the authoritative figure on here about what is relevant and what is not in regards to this forum.
In light of your definitive authority and influence perhaps I should check with you before I start any new thread or even post on an existing thread. Should I do this by pm ?
That way you can advise me whether to make the post on this forum, auto-censored or any other forum you deem appropriate.
Thank you for your help in advance. I don't know how I would manage without your guiding hand and advice.
Not at all. The authoritative figures are Nik who is a mod, and Adam who is the owner. People have indulged you.
The ethos of this forum is to put punters first, to help punters. Anything else generally goes in off-topic. You are posting fuck all to help punters. You are banging on - by your own admission your main reason for joining - about a theoretical dilemma. It's a common tactic of abolitionists on punting forums and whether or not you are at heart a punter or someone opposed to prostitution posing as a punter, your thread airs a theme that is popular with tabloids trying to ban prostitution.
Any normal punter would probably have mentioned it in passing and let it go to post about other punts.
As far as I can see, you are a person with a mission, and it is not a mission that helps punters. Neither can anything useful really come of it for the alleged mother and child.
The subtext is this:
Many prostitutes are unmarried mothers. Some of them have children in the house. This is disgusting. Prostitution is evil.
Please don't pm me with your sarcastic crap. Ask yourself why you are on UKP. There are agencies for this sort of stuff. You don't want to inform them. You just want to keep your agenda going.
It says it at the top: UKP where the punter comes first.