Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: Child in the house whilst working - just seemed wrong  (Read 31318 times)

Offline hornylad

I am not suggesting she would have involved the child. If that was the case I wouldn't have posted here but gone straight to the police.

This is not a hoax. This really happened and looking at her profile I believe still is happening. She has been on here to accuse me of being her ex - ignoring that a child is present when she sees guys, but admitting it to one poster in a PM. Another of her old regulars has been on here again he admits he saw her knowing a child was in the house. Clearly not a hoax.

I was a long time lurker on here and never registered. I registered specifically to discuss this situation. Since then I have contributed to a number of threads, including posting a review on a different woman I saw. I admit most of my posts have been on this thread, that is because I am very concerned about the situation and at times felt the need to address some of the crap that both she and her old regular was spouting.

I am not sure what to say about my posting style. That is just how I write  :unknown:

Online finn5555

To be fair she didn't last long to put her side of the story  :hi:

Online Marmalade

I just think it's starting to sound a bit obsessive (even though I know hornylad you have posted a review of another woman). And as the thread progresses there's all this additional information introduced against her. For all you know there could have been a relative or babysitter with the child upstairs. Why this banging on and on over one prossie.

I'm pleased she's had a chance on here - obviously an idiot if she got banned quickly. But a large proportion of prossies are idiots. The thread therefore, while in the punting section, is a theoretical exercise about an unverifiable prostitute. Who fucking cares? I say it is excellent material for the abolitionists and of no value whatsoever to punters.

Offline Melb


Offline hornylad

I am not sure I can agree with you about unverifiable.  Finn knew enough about her because he had had contact with her before this thread was started and never met her because she told him a child would be present.

She herself admitted in pm to one poster she saw men with the child in the house.
Her old regular black confirmed  he had seen her more than once with a child in the house.

I can see why you think I am obsessive.  I hate being called a liar even in an anonymous forum. 
Plus I don't like the idea of a child being put in danger and standing by and doing nothing.

Online Marmalade

I am not sure I can agree with you about unverifiable.  Finn knew enough about her because he had had contact with her before this thread was started and never met her because she told him a child would be present.

She herself admitted in pm to one poster she saw men with the child in the house.
Her old regular black confirmed  he had seen her more than once with a child in the house.

I can see why you think I am obsessive.  I hate being called a liar even in an anonymous forum. 
Plus I don't like the idea of a child being put in danger and standing by and doing nothing.

I didn't call you a liar but I did flag up what I saw as problems as far as this forum is concerned. Furthermore you admit yousspecifically joined to air this issue. You've aired it. You've got replies. It doesn't really help punters. As Melb said, your horse is dead. Unless you have something to contribute of benefit to punters could I politely suggest you try your luck back on auto-censored?

 :hi:

Offline ladyofthemansion

To be fair she didn't last long to put her side of the story  :hi:


If it really was her.

Offline Melb

My God lady... is that avatar you?
Hmm obviously heavily photoshopped to slim you down.

Online finn5555

I am not sure I can agree with you about unverifiable.  Finn knew enough about her because he had had contact with her before this thread was started and never met her because she told him a child would be present.

She herself admitted in pm to one poster she saw men with the child in the house.
Her old regular black confirmed  he had seen her more than once with a child in the house.

I can see why you think I am obsessive.  I hate being called a liar even in an anonymous forum. 
Plus I don't like the idea of a child being put in danger and standing by and doing nothing.

The reason I didn't see her was due to snow and she lived in a rural location  :hi:

Online Marmalade


If it really was her.

This is the sort of thread that would do very well on Mumsnet.

It's already aired on Netmums but Mumsnet would be best to get the full horror and outrage which is clearly what the story is designed to elicit.
 :rolleyes:

There are fuck knows how many prossies it could apply to, real and imaginary. Since when has UKP been the social workers' Agony Aunt
 :rolleyes:
« Last Edit: August 12, 2013, 05:54:00 PM by Marmalade »


Offline hornylad

Marmalade.
I will bow to your obvious superior knowledge.
Although it appears quite a few readers had a view on this issue I guess we are all wrong.

You are clearly the authoritative figure on here about what is relevant and what is not in regards to this forum.
In light of your definitive authority and influence perhaps I should check with you before I start any new thread or even post on an existing thread. Should I do this by pm ?

That way you can advise me whether to make the post on this forum,  auto-censored or any other forum you deem appropriate.

Thank you for your help in advance.  I don't know how I would manage without your guiding hand and advice.

Online Marmalade

Marmalade.
I will bow to your obvious superior knowledge.
Although it appears quite a few readers had a view on this issue I guess we are all wrong.

You are clearly the authoritative figure on here about what is relevant and what is not in regards to this forum.
In light of your definitive authority and influence perhaps I should check with you before I start any new thread or even post on an existing thread. Should I do this by pm ?

That way you can advise me whether to make the post on this forum,  auto-censored or any other forum you deem appropriate.

Thank you for your help in advance.  I don't know how I would manage without your guiding hand and advice.
Not at all. The authoritative figures are Nik who is a mod, and Adam who is the owner. People have indulged you.

The ethos of this forum is to put punters first, to help punters. Anything else generally goes in off-topic. You are posting fuck all to help punters. You are banging on - by your own admission your main reason for joining - about a theoretical dilemma. It's a common tactic of abolitionists on punting forums and whether or not you are at heart a punter or someone opposed to prostitution posing as a punter, your thread airs a theme that is popular with tabloids trying to ban prostitution.

Any normal punter would probably have mentioned it in passing and let it go to post about other punts.

As far as I can see, you are a person with a mission, and it is not a mission that helps punters. Neither can anything useful really come of it for the alleged mother and child.

The subtext is this:

Quote
Many prostitutes are unmarried mothers. Some of them have children in the house. This is disgusting. Prostitution is evil.

Please don't pm me with your sarcastic crap. Ask yourself why you are on UKP. There are agencies for this sort of stuff. You don't want to inform them. You just want to keep your agenda going.

It says it at the top: UKP where the punter comes first.
« Last Edit: August 12, 2013, 06:49:46 PM by Marmalade »

Offline hornylad

As you have said you don't decide what is appropriate and what is not. If adam or nik want to delete this thread or ban me from posting they will.

This is an appropriate forum. I am a punter and found myself in an uncomfortable situation. I couldn't exactly discuss this with my friends.

How can I be anti prostitution.  I met this woman and as you know posted a review on another  :dash:
I have also posted on various other threads.

I believe this is a forum where punters come first. As such they should be informed if all is not as it seems so they are in a position to make an informed decision on whether to see this woman or not.

I have no hidden agenda. Care to expand on this ?

Offline NIK

The topic has indeed had a serious airing. Time  to close.


Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)