Author Topic: GuiltyHannah | Peacehaven | Half way time wasted | Double Negative!!!  (Read 4096 times)

mcgee121

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Escort Name: GuiltyHannah aka InnocentHannah aka Natasha69xxx
Final Destination: Peacehaven  (Got as far as Lewes before heading back)
Potential Duration: 1.5 hours
When: 2017
Potential Damage: £200
InnocentHannah/Natasha69xxx's AW Link:  External Link/Members Only


Her profile has been down with the name changed for a week which I thought was a bit strange.  She sent me a text claiming she had been hacked.  I was going to ask some members if they had seen something like this before but didn't bother to ask.  There could be a legitimate reason for it.  I don't know.

I gave her a negative before because of her extremely bad comms.  Shortly after my review was up, she txted me about it and wrote some long drivel.  I read the first 2 paragraphs and responded to it.  I didn't bother to read the rest and told her she could write responses in the review if she wanted.  She then further txted me, I think 1am in the morning pleading for me to remove the review as it was making her unsure about the work she was doing (something along those lines).  I informed her that once up a review can't be removed and told her I didn't want to remove it anyway because it was justified and it will stop her mucking others about.  She writes in a very manipulative style to try and butter you up ( :lol: started off by asking if I enjoyed watching the FA Cup final) to do her bidding but she's tactful enough not to be blatantly rude and I presumed she had read my responses though she didn't reply.  Shortly, afterwards, 2 positive reviews popped up and they both seemed genuine.  One was from her regular that took offence about me criticizing him inadvertently with regards to him leaving at least 10 positive feedbacks for Hannah.  I took it to the PMs.  I thought he was okayish but then he asked me something weird and I didn't give him a response.  The answer is none of your business.

Somehow I ended looking at her profile again  :dash: and got lured in by pic-bait (she was in white lingerie not those hard faced ones with her in red).  I chanced it by contacting her again using the same sim and asked her if she was free.  I avoided all talk of the UKP negative  :D.  So we scheduled a date but I had to cancel because I wasn't feeling well but she had due notice and we scheduled it for the following week.  I apologized to her for any inconvenience caused.  Her comms was great, almost too good because she replied quickly to everything.  I told her I would contact her a day before the meet.  When that day came I asked for the address.  I specifically get it when I’m travelling outside of London and would never approach an incall until a SP says it’s okay.  I explained that I had been mucked about before and it's risky to travel so far with no info..  I explained it puts my mind at ease when I get the address rather than fearing that I will arrive to a location and the escort doesn’t pick up at all.  She txted, “I have never mucked anyone around never!...it is fine for you to come tomorrow at 11 it's not a problem”.  She explained, she works in her home address and promised to txt the address details in the morning.  My attitude is that “scaredy cat” ladies really turn me off.  If you don’t trust me enough to complete the transaction then don’t bother to meet me.

So anyway, I txted thanks and that I’m looking forward to the meet and I will txt her the next day.  She did not respond which I thought was odd because she had replied to all my txts before and lo and behold from then on the comms went weird (just like in my past review she played up).

On the day of the meet:
Txted at 7:48: Fair enough, she was probably asleep so it was fine she didn't respond.
Txted at 8:50: I had a funny feeling right here and waited almost an hour to send another txt.
Txted at 9:40: I asked her if the meet is still on and I’m waiting for her to confirm.

Hannah: “Morning yes that is fine can you make it 11:30 please Hannah”

I replied, that’s okay but I won’t be waiting longer than that.  I usually only wait a max of 15 mins.

Hannah: "Do you want to cancel then?"

Hannah: "Iv only just woke up because I feel a little crap"

She was just so blasé about it.  It's like she was incapable of empathy  :wackogirl:.  I’m sure this could be proven medically if her brain was scanned...

I explained, she should have told me earlier since I wasted time and money travelling.

Hannah: “I was asleep so how could I tell you and Iv just woken up so I told you straight away”

I basically told her whatever I've heard it all before and pulled a Avogadrosnumber like move and told her I would double neg her on here.

She went full burn a bra mode… :manhater:  "Another Iv never had you before, do you know what I don't care about that is mainly full of disrespectful guys who's think it's ok to talk down to women jd treat us like a bloody toy Iv had enough of guys trying to talk down and disrespect me because I tell them I can still see them but can we make it a little later it's not like I'm texting you at 11 to change it Iv given you an hour and half notice but that's fine you put a bad review on there Iv gone past the point of caring I'm spent most of my like being bad mouthed by guys for no reason so another one to add to the list don't bother me"

"And also if you look back through our messages you was the one who kept changing the day and time etc"

I was sick so I cancelled, she did not have her time wasted.  I wanted the followed week on the same day but she couldn’t do it because she was getting her hair done so we both agreed the next day was good so this was just a lame attempt to spin things.

My last reply:  "Anyway it's pointless trying to understand prossie logic  :D.  You live in your own dream world."
Her last reply, I didn't even bother reading.  I see escorts for fun and convenience not some emotional nagging shit, she needs to save that bs for her bf.

I know some of you thought, I was probably a bit harsh with my first review of her and I was even doubting myself a bit because she seemed like a cool chick leading up to my second attempt to meet her but my perception was right all along.  She's unprofessional and very selfish so she doesn't take any responsibility at all.  Thankfully the journey was only Tarzan’s kiss test money.  I woke up at 6:20am to get to her location and she couldn't even roll out of bed (she lives in her incall) to honour the booking at a reasonable time.  Even if she was sick; she was not comatose.  If you can't make it to work you give HR (or whoever) a call to say you can't make it.  There was no way I was going to wait around in the sun like an idiot; being half way time wasted always feels better than being fully time wasted i.e. ending up in your final destination in vain (you know, being left with that feeling of WTF just happened).  If it wasn't for my experience in this game this booking with this prossie could have ended up a complete disaster.  She's guilty as charged  :thumbsdown:.


Aside

She demands that you take a shower if you want her to perform OWO.  You being clean beforehand is not enough for her.

God this was boring to write.  I hope it helps somebody though.

mcgee121

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
 :lol: this is definitely negative.  I made a mistake on the rating.

Offline budz

Re: AW Feedback« Sent to: budz on: June 10, 2017, 08:47:35 AM » 

My review pretty much summed it up.  I have nothing against her and we have got past it.

Re: AW Feedback« Sent to: mcgee121 on: June 10, 2017,  09:42:44 AM »

That's good news, a meet on the cards soon then?

(End of my message)

Don't think that's a weird question in response to your message!

Offline Steely Dan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,546
  • Likes: 81
  •  
  • Reviews: 154
So you never met her, but gave her a negative.  Then you booked her again and didn't meet her again and gave her another negative.

Custom for positives is to only do one every 2 years or so.  If small things change, to add a comment to your old review. Not a rule, just the norm.

I don't know of anyone else that has ever ignored their own negative and booked again. So I am not aware of precedence. But as an aside - you set an example of how we should treat your negative indeed - if you don't respect them, why should we?  But in any case I do not think another negative makes sense - bumping your previous 'never met her' review seems more appropriate.  Because nothing has changed from your previous review.

Offline Link7

Have to agree with Steely Dan here.

You advised people not to bother with this girl, then went against that advice and tried to book her again? By doing this, you made your first review worthless (although the girl didn't comment when you booked again, I can assure you, you looked very silly). You should've updated the first review to say - I will continue trying to book this SP, because I trust the opinion of other people who have actually met the girl (and gave her a positive) more than the opinion I have offered here, which is not based on any substantive knowledge of her service level. The poor comms were clearly irrelevant, or at least you treated them as such.

Sorry if that sounds harsh, but you must see the glaring contradiction between your words and your actions. The review system is not about revenge, it's about indicating to fellow punters whether the girl is worth a punt. You still thought she was, so what was the negative supposed to achieve?

Paying for a shag shouldn't be this difficult to organise. After all this conversation, texting, to-ing nd fro-ing, you still haven't had a shag. I suggest simplifying the process and punting a little closer to home. Nothing wrong with travelling miles out for someone special, but I don't think this girl is that. She let you down yes, but she had a track record of having done so, and you let her do it again.

Offline scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,777
  • Likes: 547
  •  
  • Reviews: 126
Interesting, her profile is down: "No longer active on this site"
I wonder if the OP has pissed her off so badly she's pulled the plug?

Offline Link7

Interesting, her profile is down: "No longer active on this site"
I wonder if the OP has pissed her off so badly she's pulled the plug?

Hmm. Given that she begged him not to leave negatives, it does seem she was quite concerned about the effect on business. Probably going to reinvent herself under a new profile? Would be an over-reaction to give up altogether.

Offline budz

Interesting, her profile is down: "No longer active on this site"
I wonder if the OP has pissed her off so badly she's pulled the plug?

Hannah's AW account got hacked and changed to another name.  AW has now taken it down completely and she is in the process of making a new one.

Offline scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,777
  • Likes: 547
  •  
  • Reviews: 126
Whats disturbing is his comment ".....pulled a Avogadrosnumber like move"
I hope he's reporting more accurately than Avogadrosnumber.....

Also he says
"She demands that you take a shower if you want her to perform OWO.  You being clean beforehand is not enough for her."
If he's not met her, how does he know that?

Offline scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,777
  • Likes: 547
  •  
  • Reviews: 126
Hannah's AW account got hacked and changed to another name.  AW has now taken it down completely and she is in the process of making a new one.

Highly convenient timing.
But how did you know that - are you her agent? Your review reads very hagiographically.
One of you two is lying and I'm not sure who

FWIW his review of her is at https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=146499.0
I can't help thinking that the girl wrote it for him (Its his ONLY review)
« Last Edit: June 18, 2017, 09:27:04 pm by scutty brown »

Offline budz

Highly convenient timing.
But how did you know that - are you her agent? Your review reads very hagiographically.
One of you two is lying and I'm not sure who

FWIW his review of her is at https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=146499.0
I can't help thinking that the girl wrote it for him

I'm not her agent, bf or anything like that. I see Hannah at least once a week, sometimes more. That's my choice as I'm the paying client. She lives local to me so is very convenient to pop in on the way home if she is available.

With regard to her AW account being hacked,  I know it looks convenient but can assure you that she stupidly replied to a text message which she thought came from AW to verify her password etc.  This text message can be easily found online by googling hacked aw account. She did what it asked of her and then her account got changed to Natasha69xxx. I know this as all the feedback she had left me on AW got changed to the new name and since AW took it down it now says not active.

Offline budz

I also think that the OP should expect to shower before OWO if he has been on a train and bus journey from London to Peacehaven in this heat.  If not he is fucking gross and sure any escort he saw and wanted to perform RO or rimming on would expect her to be freshly showered and clean.

Offline scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,777
  • Likes: 547
  •  
  • Reviews: 126
well........actually if you google "hacked aw account" the primary hits are all for Call of Duty:Advanced Warfare.
If you google "hacked adultwork account" then the primary hits are for non-substantial discussions on this forum, with a few irrelevant dregs elsewhere.
You're going to have to do better than that to make us believe. And I still think your review looks like the girl wrote it herself

Offline scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,777
  • Likes: 547
  •  
  • Reviews: 126
I also think that the OP should expect to shower before OWO if he has been on a train and bus journey from London to Peacehaven in this heat.  If not he is fucking gross and sure any escort he saw and wanted to perform RO or rimming on would expect her to be freshly showered and clean.

I don't disagree with you there

Offline budz

This is what I found when I googled it, it's the same message she said she replied to

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline budz

well........actually if you google "hacked aw account" the primary hits are all for Call of Duty:Advanced Warfare.
If you google "hacked adultwork account" then the primary hits are for non-substantial discussions on this forum, with a few irrelevant dregs elsewhere.
You're going to have to do better than that to make us believe. And I still think your review looks like the girl wrote it herself

Your entitled to your opinion but I can assure you I'm not Hannah. Look back through the posts I've made since I joined this site. Not really the kind of things an escort would comment on are they especially seeing as she only started working earlier this year.

Offline scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,777
  • Likes: 547
  •  
  • Reviews: 126
This is what I found when I googled it, it's the same message she said she replied to

Hidden Image/Members Only

to me that looks like a message on your phone, not a web search hit........have you got a web address for that?

Offline scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,777
  • Likes: 547
  •  
  • Reviews: 126
Your entitled to your opinion but I can assure you I'm not Hannah. Look back through the posts I've made since I joined this site. Not really the kind of things an escort would comment on are they especially seeing as she only started working earlier this year.

I don't think you're Hannah. I just think there's a high probability that your only review was posted at her behest and probably written / dictated by her in response to the OPs first negative


Offline budz

I don't think you're Hannah. I just think there's a high probability that your only review was posted at her behest and probably written / dictated by her in response to the OPs first negative

I wrote it myself same as I'm doing this now. I don't have time to do reviews and usually only stick to aw feedback. In 18 months of punting I've only ever done 1 field report and my positive review for Hannah

Offline scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,777
  • Likes: 547
  •  
  • Reviews: 126
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=94913.0

An apology would be nice!

No chance
That's a screenshot of an e-mail provided by a tout who was discredited and banned from this site. As proof it doesn't count: we've been round this before and never been able to establish a genuine case. I don't doubt it does happen occasionally, but in this case the explanation is too timely for your friend

Offline budz

No chance
That's a screenshot of an e-mail provided by a tout who was discredited and banned from this site. As proof it doesn't count: we've been round this before and never been able to establish a genuine case. I don't doubt it does happen occasionally, but in this case the explanation is too timely for your friend

Up to you. Think what you like.  I'm not Hannah,  I see her regularly and am more than happy with the service she provides me so don't really care what other ukp members think.  Who says you are all who you are anyway!

Offline scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,777
  • Likes: 547
  •  
  • Reviews: 126
Up to you. Think what you like.  I'm not Hannah,  I see her regularly and am more than happy with the service she provides me so don't really care what other ukp members think.  Who says you are all who you are anyway!
But did Hannah write your review? Or did you write it at her request or guidance?

Offline scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,777
  • Likes: 547
  •  
  • Reviews: 126
So we have one dodgy reviewer who seems to be in love with the girl he "reviewed", and an even dodgier one who writes two negatives without even meeting her. Which one is talking bollox? Or are both?

Offline mrfishyfoo

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 12,834
  • Likes: 11
  •  
  • Reviews: 203
Have to agree with Steely Dan here.

You advised people not to bother with this girl, then went against that advice and tried to book her again? By doing this, you made your first review worthless (although the girl didn't comment when you booked again, I can assure you, you looked very silly). You should've updated the first review to say - I will continue trying to book this SP, because I trust the opinion of other people who have actually met the girl (and gave her a positive) more than the opinion I have offered here, which is not based on any substantive knowledge of her service level. The poor comms were clearly irrelevant, or at least you treated them as such.

Sorry if that sounds harsh, but you must see the glaring contradiction between your words and your actions. The review system is not about revenge, it's about indicating to fellow punters whether the girl is worth a punt. You still thought she was, so what was the negative supposed to achieve?

Paying for a shag shouldn't be this difficult to organise. After all this conversation, texting, to-ing nd fro-ing, you still haven't had a shag. I suggest simplifying the process and punting a little closer to home. Nothing wrong with travelling miles out for someone special, but I don't think this girl is that. She let you down yes, but she had a track record of having done so, and you let her do it again.

+1

Paying for a shag is fucking easy. Ring the pro$$ie up, agree a time a fee and what services are to be delivered then...

arrive
pay
podge
leave

Fucking simple.

OP is IMHO his own worst enemy and the architect of his own downfall.

Offline budz

But did Hannah write your review? Or did you write it at her request or guidance?


I wrote it, all my own words and no guidance from Hannah whatsoever.  She didn't ask me to do it for her but following the negative from the OP and the neutral she has on here already I thought it fair to show she isn't all bad. Another happy client of hers wrote a review at a very similar time to me as well

mcgee121

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Steely Dan

So you never met her, but gave her a negative.  Then you booked her again and didn't meet her again and gave her another negative.

You know fully well reviews can be left once a booking is made.  The circumstances for each negative is different with the second (time wasting) one being worst than the first (bad comms).  Others have rated SPs in quick succession given exceptional circumstances.

I don't know of anyone else that has ever ignored their own negative and booked again.

The negative was about bad comms with regards to her doing a disappearing act.  I stated that this had put me off her but I did also note some positive things about her.  Once I had engaged with people that had seen her, I decided to try her again.  Of course, I was sceptical but she confirmed all services that I wanted and was acting "normal" compared to other SPs in txt exchanges.  There have been punters that have been timewasted by a SP (which was negative) then later saw them and had a good experience (if they got timewasted again then it would be a double negative).  If I had written another second review about bad comms then I could see how that would be useless and could simply have been added on as a post in the first review. 

But as an aside - you set an example of how we should treat your negative indeed - if you don't respect them, why should we?

Any review I write is just sharing my experience based on who I am and my interactions with the prossie.  It's always YMMV with a prossie whether the review is good or bad.  Just because I have drawn the conclusion that I would avoid a prossie doesn't mean she can't work for someone else.

But in any case I do not think another negative makes sense - bumping your previous 'never met her' review seems more appropriate.  Because nothing has changed from your previous review.

You are entitled to your opinion.  I was the one that had my time wasted and it was very real for me.  It's completely different than someone just doing a disappearing act.


Quote


Link7


You advised people not to bother with this girl, then went against that advice and tried to book her again?

False.  Pull up a quote where I stated that.

...By doing this, you made your first review worthless…

Nope it was accurate at the time and she did fail again at crucial times for the second meet which was explained in this review.  Obviously, she had good comms for me to go to her incall.

...(although the girl didn't comment when you booked again, I can assure you, you looked very silly).

I don't care how I look  :lol:.  What the fuck do I care about what anyone thinks about me because I had a negative experience with a prossie?  I just charge that to the game.  You’re the one that looks silly making that comment.

You should've updated the first review to say - I will continue trying to book this SP, because I trust the opinion of other people who have actually met the girl (and gave her a positive) more than the opinion I have offered here, which is not based on any substantive knowledge of her service level.

I didn’t have to do anything.  On my review, it mentioned her price rise but she had reduced them back to her old prices shortly afterwards.  A review is just a snapshot in time.  There are members that have reviewed a girl negatively and gone on to have a good experience with the girl.  I don’t need to update the forum about every move I make with a prossie.

The poor comms were clearly irrelevant, or at least you treated them as such.

She did no disappearing acts until the day of the actual meet.

Sorry if that sounds harsh,

 :lol: okay thanks for going easy on me.  Don't hurt me... :sarcastic:

… but you must see the glaring contradiction between your words and your actions.

No your false premise led to a false conclusion.

The review system is not about revenge, it's about indicating to fellow punters whether the girl is worth a punt. You still thought she was, so what was the negative supposed to achieve?

The review system is about revenge for some members.  Negative/Neutral reviews are often written in very harsh tones by some members.  At the time of writing the review I didn’t think she would be someone I would try to punt again.  Two of the SPs that are next on my HL are away on holiday so Hannah was one of the best options for me.  A review captures a snapshot in time.  The first negative review was self explanatory to everyone that read it.  I'm glad someone with your stature on here is giving me a lecture about it though  :sarcastic:.

Paying for a shag shouldn't be this difficult to organise. After all this conversation, texting, to-ing nd fro-ing, you still haven't had a shag.

So I’ll arrange another meet; it’s not the end of world.  When did I suggest it was difficult to organize?

I suggest simplifying the process and punting a little closer to home.

Timewasting can happen anywhere and I never asked for anyone’s advice.  The travel in this case wasn't that far at all by the way.

Nothing wrong with travelling miles out for someone special, but I don't think this girl is that.

I see Prossies that meet my requirements.  It’s not about them being special  :lol:.  Of course, I would like a stunner like the next man but we all know the difficulty in finding those kind of SPs.

She let you down yes, but she had a track record of having done so,…

I had a bad experience with her doing a disappearing act on the comms but I wasn't aware of her doing this with anyone else.  As I have stated before this wasn't an issue when booking her the second time.  She never gave me any hints that she would be a time waster.  I've met SPs for a second time that have told me white lies (and will do so again because they do services well).  I visit SPs to fuck not for their virtuous ways.  I explained clearly the reasons why I thought it was a risk worth taking.

… and you let her do it again.

I didn’t let her do anything.  She chose to behave the way she did.  No one can predict whether an SP will honour a meet.  The booking was made, the comms was fine, I travelled and then she played up.

Quote


Budz   


I also think that the OP should expect to shower before OWO if he has been on a train and bus journey from London to Peacehaven in this heat.  If not he is fucking gross and sure any escort he saw and wanted to perform RO or rimming on would expect her to be freshly showered and clean.

She would have done it regardless of the weather.  The train was air conditioned so I was not sweating.  Most SPs would have been fine with me using wipes even in the summer.  I'm always hygienic and very clean for meets.  Some may not like showering because like me they would have to bring their own towels and toiletries because they wouldn't want to use the Prossie's ones.

Quote


Scutty Brown I see you.  You got my attention man.  That's what you wanted, right?


Interesting, her profile is down: "No longer active on this site"
I wonder if the OP has pissed her off so badly she's pulled the plug?

Nope and that was addressed in the review.

Whats disturbing is his comment ".....pulled a Avogadrosnumber like move"
I hope he's reporting more accurately than Avogadrosnumber.....

 :thumbsdown: Yeah I like how you take a partial quote out of context.  No one has ever questioned the accuracy of my reviews.


Also he says
"She demands that you take a shower if you want her to perform OWO.  You being clean beforehand is not enough for her."
If he's not met her, how does he know that?

I requested OWO.

...and an even dodgier one who writes two negatives without even meeting her. Which one is talking bollox? Or are both?

There was nothing dodgy about any of my reviews.  Reviews can be left once a booking is confirmed so I don't know why this point keeps being brought up.

I think I have addressed all the comments regarding the critique of this review and it’s validity in being composed.  I will not add anything further.  Steely Dan is the only one I respect out of you members and I only replied to all of you because it was on my review (hope I'm not being too harsh   :sarcastic:).





« Last Edit: June 19, 2017, 08:25:58 am by mcgee121 »

Offline Link7

The negative review was pointless mcgee. But you aren't interested in what anyone has to say, it seems you are just here to dump really long stories on everyone's head, with no conclusions to be made from them.  :unknown:

If your reviews only amount to a snapshot in time, with no actual opinion on a girl's puntworthiness, then the review is nothing more than a random story. It had no impact on what you intended to do thereafter, no impact on your desire to punt the girl again, and you apparently did not expect other punters to depend on the review in forming in an opinion of the SP. It was just a random and irrelevant story, in which you may as well have told us what you had to eat that day. Steely Dan has made this point just the same as I have - so if you come up with an answer to it, feel free to address him rather than me (he being your favoured stranger on the internet).

You seem to admit that you posted the review as revenge, and view this as acceptable because you have seen others doing the same thing. As I said, you should've made this clear in the review itself, because the implicit indication was that the girl was not worth bothering with - NOT that you make no comment on her, but just wanted to annoy her. Ironically you claim you don't have to update us on your every move with a prossie, having done precisely that in posting two negatives about someone you haven't met.

You are no doubt currently arranging your next booking with her though  :D (you may not care how you look, but it's never advisable to act foolish. My point was that you were acting like an obsessed fool. The fact that the girl didn't call you out on it shouldn't lead you to think that you were not).

Note the unanimous negative reception this review has revieved thus far. You have tried to shut down literally every comment made so far. Unfortunately for you, UKP is not your personal dictatorship. If you aren't interested in interacting with other members, then don't bother subjecting us to your ramblings about prostitutes? It's a forum for all members, not a stage for you to get things off your chest without being spoken back to. Given your attitude, you would've been better off writing these reviews in your diary, only to be read by you and never to be questioned by anyone.

« Last Edit: June 19, 2017, 10:55:20 am by Link7 »

Offline mrfishyfoo

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 12,834
  • Likes: 11
  •  
  • Reviews: 203
The negative review was pointless mcgee. But you aren't interested in what anyone has to say, it seems you are just here to dump really long stories on everyone's head, with no conclusions to be made from them.  :unknown:

If your reviews only amount to a snapshot in time, with no actual opinion on a girl's puntworthiness, then the review is nothing more than a random story. It had no impact on what you intended to do thereafter, no impact on your desire to punt the girl again, and you apparently did not expect other punters to depend on the review in forming in an opinion of the SP. It was just a random and irrelevant story, in which you may as well have told us what you had to eat that day. Steely Dan has made this point just the same as I have - so if you come up with an answer to it, feel free to address him rather than me (he being your favoured stranger on the internet).

You seem to admit that you posted the review as revenge, and view this as acceptable because you have seen others doing the same thing. As I said, you should've made this clear in the review itself, because the implicit indication was that the girl was not worth bothering with - NOT that you make no comment on her, but just wanted to annoy her. Ironically you claim you don't have to update us on your every move with a prossie, having done precisely that in posting two negatives about someone you haven't met.

You are no doubt currently arranging your next booking with her though  :D (you may not care how you look, but it's never advisable to act foolish. My point was that you were acting like an obsessed fool. The fact that the girl didn't call you out on it shouldn't lead you to think that you were not).

Note the unanimous negative reception this review has revieved thus far. You have tried to shut down literally every comment made so far. Unfortunately for you, UKP is not your personal dictatorship. If you aren't interested in interacting with other members, then don't bother subjecting us to your ramblings about prostitutes? It's a forum for all members, not a stage for you to get things off your chest without being spoken back to. Given your attitude, you would've been better off writing these reviews in your diary, only to be read by you and never to be questioned by anyone.

My word that's rather well written sir.  :hi: :hi: :hi:

Offline Steely Dan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,546
  • Likes: 81
  •  
  • Reviews: 154
Thanks for reading my comments in detail, and taking the time to respond.  I am flattered. 'Grown-up' discussion too.

So you basically agree with the comments from me and others.  Your response is you are allowed to review.  True.  And that a small number of others have posted silly crap.  True.  But it is still way outside the norm.  The board consensus is we don't like double positives.  Fluffy.  This is similar in being excessive. So several posters have called you out.  As we are allowed to.

And you admit we are right in our factual comments.  End of.  Hope your next punt is better. Really I do.

But I must say, you are still the only one, after some 18,000 reviews, to ever post a double negative without meeting the girl.  Must be some sort of prize you have earned. Like the UKP version of a Darwin award....

mcgee121

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
So you basically agree with the comments from me and others.

No I don't.

And that a small number of others have posted silly crap.

Why is this review silly crap?  It's a time wasting review.

But it is still way outside the norm.

No it's not way outside the norm.

So several posters have called you out.

It was only 2 posters and one was very disrespectful to me so his posts have been ignored by me.

And you admit we are right in our factual comments.  End of.

No I don't.

Hope your next punt is better. Really I do.

I don't need your wishes  :D.  I'm not down on my luck  :lol:.  You seem to care more about my punting activities than I do.  :unknown:

But I must say, you are still the only one, after some 18,000 reviews, to ever post a double negative without meeting the girl.  Must be some sort of prize you have earned. Like the UKP version of a Darwin award....

There's always a first for everything and I don't care to be honest.


Offline scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,777
  • Likes: 547
  •  
  • Reviews: 126
Quote
and I don't care to be honest.

I'm glad you said that. You judged yourself

Offline Link7

I'm glad you said that. You judged yourself
I really don't know why he posted these reviews lol.

TLDR version:

-Punter negged girl
-Didn't intend for other punters to rely on that neg
-Took no notice of it himself and booked again.
-Travelled miles out
-Girl didn't really want his custom (shock) and treated him as such
-Negged girl again
-Didn't listen to feedback pointing out his irrational behaviour
-Doesn't care

Thanks for wasting everybody's time mcgee. I'm devastated not to have your respect, but then again, it's hard to respect others when you don't respect yourself - and you proved that you don't by booking the girl again.



« Last Edit: June 20, 2017, 01:52:34 am by Link7 »

Offline Link7


Offline Steely Dan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,546
  • Likes: 81
  •  
  • Reviews: 154
I don't need your wishes  :D.  I'm not down on my luck  :lol:.  You seem to care more about my punting activities than I do.  :unknown:
Sorry for being polite and respectful.  Won't do it again, you seem not to like it.

mcgee121

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Update: Her new active AW link: External Link/Members Only ; Name swap: sweetcandyhannah

Offline scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,777
  • Likes: 547
  •  
  • Reviews: 126
Update: Her new active AW link: External Link/Members Only ; Name swap: sweetcandyhannah

And I see some dumb lovestruck prat has given her her first feedback already.
Now I wonder who that saddo was....?

Offline DrConners

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,309
  • Likes: 4
  •  
  • Reviews: 33
That AW FB has been followed by this :

"TIME WASTER: Flaked on me more than once. The last time wasting my time and money travelling. SEE REVIEW: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=147877.0"

I wonder who that can be ? Fucking hell get over it man !!

kamu

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Whats with the whacking great plaster under her arm?

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline DrConners

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,309
  • Likes: 4
  •  
  • Reviews: 33
Whats with the whacking great plaster under her arm?

Well spotted, probably had the tattoo of "mcgee121" changed to "Budz"  :D



« Last Edit: June 21, 2017, 12:13:55 pm by DrConners »

JamesFD

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I think I have addressed all the comments regarding the critique of this review and it’s validity in being composed.  I will not add anything further.

And yet you've been unable to resist doing so, not once but twice. You do seem somewhat obsessed & your posting on her new profile smacks of being vindictive.

Offline budz

Well spotted, probably had the tattoo of "mcgee121" changed to "Budz"  :D

I find your comment quite funny and did chuckle to myself  :D

Offline budz

And yet you've been unable to resist doing so, not once but twice. You do seem somewhat obsessed & your posting on her new profile smacks of being vindictive.

For some reason OP does seem to be out to destroy her reputation and it's starting to look like he is out for revenge! I've been messed about by escorts in the past but I've got over it and moved on.  He's made his point (twice) now let sleeping dogs lie. The bad feedback on her new profile was just unnecessary.  She fucked up and she knows it
« Last Edit: June 21, 2017, 01:43:36 pm by budz »

SeekingtheTruth

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
For some reason OP does seem to be out to destroy her reputation and it's starting to look like he is out for revenge! I've been messed about by escorts in the past but I've got over it and moved on.  He's made his point (twice) now let sleeping dogs lie. The bad feedback on her new profile was just unnecessary.  She fucked up and she knows it!

As for the plaster on her arm she had minor surgery and that was there to keep the wound clean. It's gone now

Seriously, stop white knighting, it will not end well.......

Offline Link7

Yeah, leave it budz. People can see for themselves what's happened here. You don't need to be the girl's spokesperson,  and it's not even helping her. You're a regular/friend which means you aren't impartial - the more you defend her, the less people are listening.
 
I dont feel like this thread was really for the benefit of UKPunters. Feels like we're just a pawn in a personal argument between the OP and the SP. We know that she pissed him off once, and then tried to put the next meet back half an hour. We know how upset he is about that.

Other than that not much of any use to the rest of us has emerged? I don't live anywhere near and personally wouldn't travel. But she's a nice looking lass and always interested to hear, plus so many of these girls turn up in London eventually. Will check back if somebody (who isn't budz) actually meets her and reviews...

mediumjoe

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
 Have read all of this, I thought she was quite pleasant in her reply and request for a half hour change of time  after the first time he had neg'd her,  and then he went off on one .  Mr Magoo I think you're a bit strange.

Offline The_Don

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 12,503
  • Likes: 68
  •  
  • Reviews: 250
Well spotted, probably had the tattoo of "mcgee121" changed to "Budz"  :D


Got a screen shot  :unknown:  of the finish item  :lol:

Offline budz

Yeah, leave it budz. People can see for themselves what's happened here. You don't need to be the girl's spokesperson,  and it's not even helping her. You're a regular/friend which means you aren't impartial - the more you defend her, the less people are listening.
 
I dont feel like this thread was really for the benefit of UKPunters. Feels like we're just a pawn in a personal argument between the OP and the SP. We know that she pissed him off once, and then tried to put the next meet back half an hour. We know how upset he is about that.

Other than that not much of any use to the rest of us has emerged? I don't live anywhere near and personally wouldn't travel. But she's a nice looking lass and always interested to hear, plus so many of these girls turn up in London eventually. Will check back if somebody (who isn't budz) actually meets her and reviews...

No worries,  I'm out!

bigmanbigman

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
What a boring thread all about nothing !!