Indigo Rose Plymouth

[luv2tung]

External Link/Members Only

 So Ive wanted to see Indigo for a while now. I sent her a very polite text just asking if she had any cancellations this evening. As after reading her profile, it mentions she requires four hours notice. I got a somewhat  polite but curt response claiming that I had insinuated something which clearly wasn't my intention. After reading some comments about this lovely young lady, I do agree with most, that she perhaps thinks she is better than all of us Genteman.  We, my love, are the reason you do this work. You are no better than us, maybe because you feel intellectually superior it gives you the right to act the way you do. Basically it doesn't, get over yourself,  you are not that special.

[indigorose]

Alright, I'm going to take the bait just this once. Fully understand getting banned as I did from UKE so it would make sense from here as well, I don't really intend to be posting much beyond this so no worries...

Luv2tung, as I've texted you saying already, I think you slightly misinterpreted me... I wasn't angry or offended at all, I get a few clients thinking I take numerous bookings a day (there is absolutely nothing wrong with that of course, and I've had to do it on tour days!) and I just wanted to correct you in case you thought I operated a slot system. I didn't reject you as a client, I said apologies for confusion and even ended the text with a "x". By your own admission, I was polite.

Now the rules may have changed since I last checked them but it is my understanding that you can't post a review if you didn't arrange a booking? You didn't arrange a booking. Our entire text exchange was you asking me if I can fit you in place of a cancellation, me explaining that's not the system I operate, you saying you didn't intend to offend, me saying "No worries at all! x" (would have thought that would have shown I wasn't bothered...), and then you saying "Thank you" and putting a kiss emoji! All that's left is the two texts I just sent you regarding this thread which is basically saying the same as what I've put in this post here.

Now I'm sorry that after that "curt but polite" exchange that you seem to have used it as fuel to then post a review based on other punter's words... As I've said, I didn't know that that was allowed on this site and if reviews of text exchanges and perceived slights against punters are allowed on here then... Well, I'll let you make your own judgements about that. I am truly sorry for coming across as believing myself to be superior to punters, I sincerely don't believe that and have done everything in my power to humanise myself following what happened on UKE almost two years ago. I honestly do get why I'm not everyone's cup of tea and it's something that I wish I could change, but I can't change how I talk or type or how I'm comfortable marketing myself.

What I can change, I have attempted to - I have made appropriate amendments to my profile and service in response to every criticism I have received from punters that have met me, I have written blog posts detailing my own thinking regarding how I work and being completely upfront and honest about my own anxiety, anyone that has seen me since I got my new incall space will be very well aware of how meticulous I am these days regarding the client's pleasure - I am near enough obsessed with catering well to my clients and doing everything I can, and I routinely turn down bookings if I fear that I might not be what they're looking for - willingly giving up thousands worth of £££ because I don't know if I'm right for that client. My priority is ensuring that I'm doing the best job I can. I realise that many won't believe me and that is entirely your own prerogative, I can't please everyone, but I can only tolerate these kinds of comments counting as reviews from people that have actually met me. Those of you that have met me, paid for my services, and had a bad time have every right to post about it even if I disagree with some of what you've said, and according to these site rules those of you that have booked me do as well - Neither of those circumstances apply here.

I am trying my very hardest, I made my profile on my 18th birthday and I have made lots of mistakes in this business that I fully wish I could take back, but no matter what you all may think of me, surely you should abide by your own site rules and not allow a review to go through based on a bloody text exchange?

Alright, that'll be it now - I understand that this is a punter's space and as I said I don't intend to be sticking around. If anyone wants to question me on my claims or whatever you're probably better making a throwaway email and contacting me through that rather than on here. That's all I have to say.

[Brazilian Martian]

She did not waste anytime at all 

[cueball]

Pheew.... that's one hell of a reply. To be honest, I can't be arsed reading it 

Is she angry?

Shame if she is, she's got belting nipples 

[Jake.mackie]

What an excellent response

Alright, I'm going to take the bait just this once. Fully understand getting banned as I did from UKE so it would make sense from here as well, I don't really intend to be posting much beyond this so no worries...

Luv2tung, as I've texted you saying already, I think you slightly misinterpreted me... I wasn't angry or offended at all, I get a few clients thinking I take numerous bookings a day (there is absolutely nothing wrong with that of course, and I've had to do it on tour days!) and I just wanted to correct you in case you thought I operated a slot system. I didn't reject you as a client, I said apologies for confusion and even ended the text with a "x". By your own admission, I was polite.

Now the rules may have changed since I last checked them but it is my understanding that you can't post a review if you didn't arrange a booking? You didn't arrange a booking. Our entire text exchange was you asking me if I can fit you in place of a cancellation, me explaining that's not the system I operate, you saying you didn't intend to offend, me saying "No worries at all! x" (would have thought that would have shown I wasn't bothered...), and then you saying "Thank you" and putting a kiss emoji! All that's left is the two texts I just sent you regarding this thread which is basically saying the same as what I've put in this post here.

Now I'm sorry that after that "curt but polite" exchange that you seem to have used it as fuel to then post a review based on other punter's words... As I've said, I didn't know that that was allowed on this site and if reviews of text exchanges and perceived slights against punters are allowed on here then... Well, I'll let you make your own judgements about that. I am truly sorry for coming across as believing myself to be superior to punters, I sincerely don't believe that and have done everything in my power to humanise myself following what happened on UKE almost two years ago. I honestly do get why I'm not everyone's cup of tea and it's something that I wish I could change, but I can't change how I talk or type or how I'm comfortable marketing myself.

What I can change, I have attempted to - I have made appropriate amendments to my profile and service in response to every criticism I have received from punters that have met me, I have written blog posts detailing my own thinking regarding how I work and being completely upfront and honest about my own anxiety, anyone that has seen me since I got my new incall space will be very well aware of how meticulous I am these days regarding the client's pleasure - I am near enough obsessed with catering well to my clients and doing everything I can, and I routinely turn down bookings if I fear that I might not be what they're looking for - willingly giving up thousands worth of £££ because I don't know if I'm right for that client. My priority is ensuring that I'm doing the best job I can. I realise that many won't believe me and that is entirely your own prerogative, I can't please everyone, but I can only tolerate these kinds of comments counting as reviews from people that have actually met me. Those of you that have met me, paid for my services, and had a bad time have every right to post about it even if I disagree with some of what you've said, and according to these site rules those of you that have booked me do as well - Neither of those circumstances apply here.

I am trying my very hardest, I made my profile on my 18th birthday and I have made lots of mistakes in this business that I fully wish I could take back, but no matter what you all may think of me, surely you should abide by your own site rules and not allow a review to go through based on a bloody text exchange?

Alright, that'll be it now - I understand that this is a punter's space and as I said I don't intend to be sticking around. If anyone wants to question me on my claims or whatever you're probably better making a throwaway email and contacting me through that rather than on here. That's all I have to say.

[bristolqwerty]

1. Is this a review?
2. "in case you thought I operated a slot system" made me laugh 

[insignia]

thats not a review stupid girl

[Leveve]

I think this was posted as a review originally and got moved after a post report

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=147666.0

[bristolqwerty]

Been stuck on 31 AW reviews for yonks.  Perhaps reviews are not welcomed?  Screening test failure rate must be high.   I did very much enjoy my first visit.  She had a innocence about her but was very willing and able.  Unfortunately I was less satisfied the second time on a number of issues.  A little uptight and perhaps not at her best that time.
Hidden Image/Members Only

[seeto]

At least you received a reply. I obviously failed at the first hurdle, not even the courtesy of a "fuck off" reply to my (I thought) very courteous request for a booking. Oh well.

[seeto]

So tried a second time and quite frankly, it's obvious the girl has some serious issues. Without going into details, after speaking to her it's quite clear that as Admin says, she is a "man hater". I can just imagine the experience would be a painful event. In 30 years of punting, literately hundreds and hundreds of punts, I have never experienced such obvious disdain for a client. The OP is correct, she does come across as having a superiority complex that somewhat clouds her judgement of people. Glad I saved my money. If you book her, good luck, you're going to need it.

[Placebo88]

 I have booked her so feel I have something worth contributing here to counterbalance or rather provide a fuller, more complete picture. I did find her communications to be awkward, bordering on terse at points. The screening call and even the call outside before the booking felt quite stressful and I sensed she was uncertain. It left me doubting how well the booking was to go. Her explanation that she wants to make sure punters are booking the right escort for them does match my screening conversation with her; she was concerned about being able to provide exactly what I wanted. I found being asked what I want awkward, not how I generally make bookings, but I passed her screening without any real difficulties or having to come up with any great answers. Her phone manner is not great, and it shows in comments and assumptions made by punters who have not gone beyond that stage. Within the booking her manner was completely different, right from the get go. She appeared relaxed and was eager to please, no negative attitude whatsoever, and her service levels were higher than I was expecting too. I was very pleased with it.   

[bristolqwerty]

It wasn't the phone call I objected to it was the lacklustre service 2nd time around.  I still paid my £120 but would've rather she said let's do it another time.  Most escorts would seek to mprove or maintain their levels of service.  That's why we're not doing business. To presume to others everything will he hey ok is a little odd ..... I doubt her knockers really care about the call as it's free.  You didn't seem fit to leave a review at the time....  I've nothing against her, wished her all the best but not for me anymore.

[Cunning Punt]

Bloody hell she goes on. I fell asleep after the first paragraph and was jolted upright by Admin's hilarious banning note at the bottom! 

No, not met her or spoken to her but in my experience, WGs who come across as up themselves in their comms and on their profile, don't have a great attitude when it comes to the punt. And from her posts, blog and several comments on here, she seems to think she is better than anyone else and the job.

I have booked her so feel I have something worth contributing here to counterbalance or rather provide a fuller, more complete picture. I did find her communications to be awkward, bordering on terse at points. The screening call and even the call outside before the booking felt quite stressful and I sensed she was uncertain. It left me doubting how well the booking was to go. Her explanation that she wants to make sure punters are booking the right escort for them does match my screening conversation with her; she was concerned about being able to provide exactly what I wanted. I found being asked what I want awkward, not how I generally make bookings, but I passed her screening without any real difficulties or having to come up with any great answers. Her phone manner is not great, and it shows in comments and assumptions made by punters who have not gone beyond that stage. Within the booking her manner was completely different, right from the get go. She appeared relaxed and was eager to please, no negative attitude whatsoever, and her service levels were higher than I was expecting too. I was very pleased with it.

Shame you didn't do a review.

[cueball]

 WGs who come across as up themselves in their comms and on their profile, don't have a great attitude when it comes to the punt. And from her posts, blog and several comments on here, she seems to think she is better than anyone else and the job.

You make a good point there.

Others have said she's a different lass face to face but having a stinking attitude during comms/blogs invariably means for me there will be no face to face meeting.

[bristolqwerty]

Why did she get banned from UKE? It's fluffier than Jessica rabbit's muff!
Did she exceed the word limlit in her messages? 

[vw]

You make a good point there.

Others have said she's a different lass face to face but having a stinking attitude during comms/blogs invariably means for me there will be no face to face meeting.

I'm tempted, her argumentative nature turns me on, would be like taming a wild horse.   

Its shame she is the wrong end of the southwest and doubt she would travel this far, maybe if i told her the exact route she would come.

[pking_paul]

I'm tempted, her argumentative nature turns me on, would be like taming a wild horse.   

I'm getting bored with punting nowadays, but this one does have something of a spirit that appeals to me too.

[bristolqwerty]

My 2nd and final visit = wouldn't consider a change of stockings mid punt (this was determined beforehand via comms as it takes her up to 40 45 mins to do so) complained about tightness of pussy so poor penetration, didn't taste that fresh downstairs, took ages to make me cum in fact we went over by a song, didn't like her demeanour, took exception to a few honest comments on here when I was asked my opinion, apparently copied some part of our comms on twitter, great discretion then especially when not everything goes her way.  Good luck if you're expecting a cheery and welcoming disposition.  I'd have to add it was the exact opposite first time around but possibly such a young & immature girl was feeling frazzled by her other gentlemen callers.  I politely suggested she should go back to her studies and leave this for other more suitable ladies.  I've moved on to better, there's far better out there student wise for the money.

[vw]

immature girl was feeling frazzled by her other gentlemen callers.

Maybe unclesweetheart left his bottle of absinthe, i wonder if there is any left?

Sounds like a mixed experience i wonder if first meets are better than 2nd ones, they do say familiarity breeds contempt.

glad you have moved on anyway andy. 

[bristolqwerty]

Yep cheers VW, a glaring difference. My thoughts exactly. Prices are quite steep at the moment so I'm making sure I'm getting my moneys worth.  Touring escorts have been superb.

[Placebo88]

My 2nd and final visit = wouldn't consider a change of stockings mid punt (this was determined beforehand via comms as it takes her up to 40 45 mins to do so) complained about tightness of pussy so poor penetration, didn't taste that fresh downstairs, took ages to make me cum in fact we went over by a song, didn't like her demeanour, took exception to a few honest comments on here when I was asked my opinion, apparently copied some part of our comms on twitter, great discretion then especially when not everything goes her way.  Good luck if you're expecting a cheery and welcoming disposition.  I'd have to add it was the exact opposite first time around but possibly such a young & immature girl was feeling frazzled by her other gentlemen callers.  I politely suggested she should go back to her studies and leave this for other more suitable ladies.  I've moved on to better, there's far better out there student wise for the money.

Respect for daring to tell an escort to her face that you don't think she is fit to do the job, there have been a couple of occasions I wish I'd done the same. After that I am not surprised that she declined your further 3 attempts to book her, based on her reply to this thread that was deleted. I am at a loss why you tried booking again so persistently, what were you expecting?

Her giving you extra time to come in seems generous. And a tip if you are unlucky enough to find someone else who doesn't like putting tights on; you put them on her instead, get a prosthetic leg to practice on.

[vw]

Respect for daring to tell an escort to her face that you don't think she is fit to do the job, there have been a couple of occasions I wish I'd done the same. After that I am not surprised that she declined your further 3 attempts to book her, based on her reply to this thread that was deleted. I am at a loss why you tried booking again so persistently, what were you expecting?

Her giving you extra time to come in seems generous. And a tip if you are unlucky enough to find someone else who doesn't like putting tights on; you put them on her instead, get a prosthetic leg to practice on.

this whole stockings thing is confusing, just got a pair from a  neighbours washing line put them on took them off and returned in less than 5 mins.

[bristolqwerty]

It was done via msg.  I don't know placebo? It does seem odd looking back.  Maybe just seeing if I could enjoy another visit as she was notoriously difficult / poorly viewed  (even more so) back then.   Would I have pissed £120 away again, no I wouldn't.    Maybe she has issues popping on tights etc but it was the total lack of customer care and and courtesy that sealed the deal for me.  Whereas JBJolie disembarked mid CG and delighted in popping on a pair of fishnets, did her wiggly dance before jumping on again to conclude business.  The difference? One was a friendly and giving escort the other a over-opinionated girl playing at being something.  It's some kind of psychology research about men and sexworkers.  Not an escort in my opinion.   I felt I visited due to her age which made me quickly reevaluate my position and who I'd see in future. Not someone I'd visit again. Plus this forum is for honest reviews.  Not  a place to be held to ransom regarding if an escort will see you again depending on what you write in reply to a question. If it makes her question herself or lowers her confidence  then maybe she should take stock herself.

[bristolqwerty]

Back on AW briefly, then gone again....    This time encouraging punters wholehearted albeit whilst admitting shes a bit of a porker now.  So there is such thing as Karma!  Strange as the last comments I manged to read from "her majesty" mentioned disliking smelling guys dicks, good choice of job then!  Strange girl this. Certainly divides opinion.  One for the connoisseurs.   I think she must miss the money. 
 "

[squigmcdig]

My opinion after 3 meets over 3 years is that she is a nice well meaning lass who is trying her best. However she has issues which make it difficult for her to do this work without pissing people off, she is not jbjolie, who is!!!!  I don't think it is all about psychology research, and I don't think she is as clever as everyone thinks, she is studying psychology at Plymouth, she is in my opinion a skint student with little support and doing what she needs to do to get by.

She is definitely not the nubile young lass she once was and I wouldn't book again because I don't like punting with bigger women, she is quite large now.

My only real criticism of her is her own intimate hygiene, especially given her comments regarding stinky dicks, on the last 2 punts she has been a little too wiffy to go down on.

[vw]

My opinion after 3 meets over 3 years is that she is a nice well meaning lass who is trying her best. However she has issues which make it difficult for her to do this work without pissing people off, she is not jbjolie, who is!!!!  I don't think it is all about psychology research, and I don't think she is as clever as everyone thinks, she is studying psychology at Plymouth, she is in my opinion a skint student with little support and doing what she needs to do to get by.

She is definitely not the nubile young lass she once was and I wouldn't book again because I don't like punting with bigger women, she is quite large now.

My only real criticism of her is her own intimate hygiene, especially given her comments regarding stinky dicks, on the last 2 punts she has been a little too wiffy to go down on.

a review would be handy if you have time, shame to hear she has gone down hill. 

[vw]

Looks like she has been enjoying the pasties, u from size 6/8 nd now size 14 now and called GabrielaXira   .