Pru (asked for paris) - Amour - Walker

[baresi]

As a man I would have no idea of the difference   

tbf she's put up a good defence if Lydia was in goal for us earlier we'd have won 2-0

[walking dead]

He knows the name she gives punters , real or not.
He's likely to have met her in my view.

I think if he had an issue with Paris , because he knew her for example,  he wouldn't have brought pru into it.
It maybe he was just disappointed with the photos vs reality and assumed it was someone else.

For the record I have seen Paris and didn't have an issue

[LydiaAmour]

He knows the name she gives punters , real or not.
He's likely to have met her in my view.

I think if he had an issue with Paris , because he knew her for example,  he wouldn't have brought pru into it.
It maybe he was just disappointed with the photos vs reality and assumed it was someone else.

For the record I have seen Paris and didn't have an issue

See this is the thing, if he has seen her and had issues then fine, the agency will deal with it appropriately. However he can't have seen he when he says he did. If Stacey took all comments paints at face value without finding the full story, there would be nothing stopping someone who hasn't had a booking complaining to get a reduced/free booking. If the information given doesn't add up then you can't know what's gone on. and it's completely out of order to leave a negative for a girl you haven't even seen.

reviews are useful for both parties, but only when they are factual and can be trusted.

[MasterChief]

Her name was Magill, and she called herself Lil
But everyone knew her as Nancy

FFS lets talk about the Beatles instead, this is boring now

[Thomasjackson]

His review's topic heading states Pru therefore the review regarding services is for who he thought was Pru. She has nothing to do with this and should not have a negative against her.

The OP even states in his review he asked if she was Paris when he arrived and she confirmed she was but he decided she was Pru and incorrectly gave her a negative.

A review is only valid if it refers to the girl you had the booking with and he did not have a booking with or even see Pru.

lol, I said it loads time, its because the pic and info were different from real person, which caused me a doubt in her. Answering to your dumbass questions its like talking to a fucking brick wall. 

and yes, I would change the name of this review if I can, cause now i know its actually Paris not Pru and its not fair on Pru.

[Kev3773]

lol, I said it loads time, its because the pic and info were different from real person, which caused me a doubt in her. Answering to your dumbass questions its like talking to a fucking brick wall. 

and yes, I would change the name of this review if I can, cause now i know its actually Paris not Pru and its not fair on Pru.

So is the Agency lying when they say Paris wasn't working at the time you say you had a booking ?
Oh and looking forward to "dumbass" replying 

[daviemac]

So is the Agency lying when they say Paris wasn't working at the time you say you had a booking ?
Oh and looking forward to "dumbass" replying 

One 'dumbass' over here hasn't got time he's off to get ready for more important things, with magnifying glass.     

[LydiaAmour]

The nop could settle all this wothnscreen shots showing the date and time of his booking, the agency phone gets everything erased unless there is a problem.

Everyone is bored of this now.

[Kev3773]

The nop could settle all this wothnscreen shots showing the date and time of his booking, the agency phone gets everything erased unless there is a problem.

Everyone is bored of this now.

My response was to hopefully get the op to come up with evidence thus bringing an end to the matter 

[daviemac]

lol, I said it loads time, its because the pic and info were different from real person, which caused me a doubt in her. Answering to your dumbass questions its like talking to a fucking brick wall. 

and yes, I would change the name of this review if I can, cause now i know its actually Paris not Pru and its not fair on Pru.

The post of mine you quoted was not a question, it was a statement. 

Have I got this right
You made an appointment to see Paris for an incall on a day she wasn't working.
You arrived at the flat and didn't recognise the person from the photo's on the site, asked if she was Paris and she said yes.
You didn't believe her and decided, judging by the photo's, that  she was Pru but went ahead with the booking anyway.
You then post a negative review for Pru despite the fact she only does outcalls.
In that review you claim a case of 'bait and switch'
You then change your mind and decide there wasn't any 'bait and switch' and it was Paris you saw.
You're told repeatedly to contact the agency to get it resolved but when you do you can't provide factual details of what happened.

Was it the fact she had a head when you saw her and not a burst of light on her shoulders that got you confused.Hidden Image/Members Only