Pru (asked for paris) - Amour - Walker

[Thomasjackson]

Link: External Link/Members Only

Pre-punt: Texted amour to check when paris starts working, then they replied with time and location and I texted back to confirm the meeting time. Five minutes later, received a message saying if i can wait about half hour for Paris, but i insisted on the agreed time, as i got plans for later, and they texted back saying no problem.

Location: Somewhere in Walker, the place have street parking and some people walking around.

Looking: This is where the punt when wrong. I knocked on the door and two minutes later, someone opened the door and welcomed me in. The first impression is horrible, THE GIRL LOOKS NOTHING LIKE HER PROFILE PICTURE AND DESCRIPTIONS, she had blonde hair (her picture shows long dark), around size 10-12 due to big belly (profile shows 8). so I felt I've been bait and switched. I asked her if she is Paris, and why she looks different from her picture (her hair colour, dress size, etc), she replies she changed her hair colour and pics are old. As i walked up the stairs, she told me her real name (if its real), and asked for my real name, lol, had to play the game. Her cup size is somewhere in B, her butt is loose. Overall, its a big let down.

Service: OWO was sloppy and lack of enthusiastic, then moved to doggy, but she showed no interest of moving and tried to get a way with little work, got to the point where i thought fuck it time to leave. so I just wrapped up and left.

Overall: I suspect it is the girl I seen is Pru, as she looks like pru from pics of Amour's UKE post and website. the service is negative, not worth the price and feel like been bait and switched, so will not return.

[The Outsider]

That's all a bit odd! It would be interesting to hear what Amour had to say. 

[MasterChief]

Fuck me thats dreadfull, agency B&S now?

[daviemac]

That's all a bit odd! It would be interesting to hear what Amour had to say.

Have to say Stacey's  quite good at solving problems if you lets her know. She'll have to reply by proxy here though.     

[Thomasjackson]

Fuck me thats dreadfull, agency B&S now?

The profile says Paris is 23, but the girl told me she's 25

[johnny34]

Link: External Link/Members Only

Overall: I suspect it is the girl I seen is Pru, as she looks like pru from pics of Amour's UKE post and website. the service is negative, not worth the price and feel like been bait and switched, so will not return.

Not sure who you saw but probably not Pru as i'm sure she is only outcalls? Have you spoken to the agency for an explanation?

[daviemac]

Not sure who you saw but probably not Pru as i'm sure she is only outcalls? Have you spoken to the agency for an explanation?

Just had a look and Pru's got bigger tits than Paris, there is a review on here for her and it was incall in Ashington but as you say she's down as outcall only now, can't find anything for Paris though.

Op you really need to contact the agency and get some sort of explanation and let us know what they say.

I remember something quite similar to this a while back, hope this doesn't end up being the same.     

[LydiaAmour]

Stacey is banned so can't comment. So I'm here to say she would like you to get in touch and let her know the details of what happened so she can look into it. If its easier you can message me the details on here. Details being the date, time, address you went to and the last 4 digits of the phone number you booked with. That way she can get to the bottom of it for you. Cause somethings fucked up somewhere, but she needs more detail before she can make up for it.

Speaking as someone that has done the phones, Pru is outcall only, when she was incall she was up in ashington. Neither Pru or Paris have worked in walker and the only girl we have who works from walker is Milly, who's not only a good escort, but has tits far far bigger than B cups the OP describes and far bigger than Pru's too.

As for photos, they are about 6 months old. Milly's are the oldest being taken at the end of 2016, Paris was around jan the same time, maybe early Jan and Pru had her shoot in march as we had ours on the same day.

[Kev3773]

This is getting interesting 

[johnny34]

This is getting interesting 

I'll get the popcorn 

[daviemac]

This is getting interesting 

Anybody remember this  -   https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=124382.msg1410507#msg1410507  - it's the only other time I can remember an agency being accused of bait and switch. That guy was told to contact the agency but wouldn't and the op here was online when he was told the same and he hasn't.

I'm keeping an open mind on this for now but something doesn't seem right.   

Just to clarify there was a time when 2 agency girls switched  off their own bat without the agency knowing.     

[Kev3773]

Anybody remember this  -   https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=124382.msg1410507#msg1410507  - it's the only other time I can remember an agency being accused of bait and switch. That guy was told to contact the agency but wouldn't and the op here was online when he was told the same and he hasn't.

I'm keeping an open mind on this for now but something doesn't seem right.   

Just to clarify there was a time when 2 agency girls switched  off their own bat without the agency knowing.     

I remember it well and it had crossed my mind re similarities, That guy was the the soon to be discredited Utter Bollocks.
Watching with baited breath 

[daviemac]

I remember it well and it had crossed my mind re similarities, That guy was the the soon to be discredited Utter Bollocks.
Watching with baited breath 

Me too mate.   

[Thomasjackson]

Stacey is banned so can't comment. So I'm here to say she would like you to get in touch and let her know the details of what happened so she can look into it. If its easier you can message me the details on here. Details being the date, time, address you went to and the last 4 digits of the phone number you booked with. That way she can get to the bottom of it for you. Cause somethings fucked up somewhere, but she needs more detail before she can make up for it.

Speaking as someone that has done the phones, Pru is outcall only, when she was incall she was up in ashington. Neither Pru or Paris have worked in walker and the only girl we have who works from walker is Milly, who's not only a good escort, but has tits far far bigger than B cups the OP describes and far bigger than Pru's too.

As for photos, they are about 6 months old. Milly's are the oldest being taken at the end of 2016, Paris was around jan the same time, maybe early Jan and Pru had her shoot in march as we had ours on the same day.

Ok, i will text u the details

[Thomasjackson]

Just had a look and Pru's got bigger tits than Paris, there is a review on here for her and it was incall in Ashington but as you say she's down as outcall only now, can't find anything for Paris though.

Op you really need to contact the agency and get some sort of explanation and let us know what they say.

Thanks, just sent a PM to Lydia, waiting for a reply.

I could be wrong about the name of the girl that I saw, but the girl is extremely different from the profile from the Amours website

[Thomasjackson]

Anybody remember this  -   https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=124382.msg1410507#msg1410507  - it's the only other time I can remember an agency being accused of bait and switch. That guy was told to contact the agency but wouldn't and the op here was online when he was told the same and he hasn't.

Keep in mind that I didn't accus the agency bait and switched

[Mr blue]

Keep in mind that I didn't accus the agency bait and switched

Apart from the 2 times you mention it in your review .

[Thomasjackson]

Apart from the 2 times you mention it in your review .

It could be the girl's issue, not the agency, as i dont know what actually happened between them, that is why I said been bait and switched without mentioning the agency. simple logic, lol.

[LydiaAmour]

I've requested some more information from the OP to clarify a few things. Once we have this information, we'll be able to clarify whats happened and deal with it accordingly.

L xx

[LydiaAmour]

Link: External Link/Members Only


Pre-punt: Texted amour to check when paris starts working, then they replied with time and location and I texted back to confirm the meeting time. Five minutes later, received a message saying if i can wait about half hour for Paris, but i insisted on the agreed time, as i got plans for later, and they texted back saying no problem.

OP has told me the booking was for 12pm on June 4th. June 4th was last Sunday. Paris wasn’t working last Sunday as she cancelled her shift on the Saturday, but site admin didn’t take it down. Pru was  working but she was only on outcalls.

I’ve spoken to the girl that was on the phone who has confirmed not only that Paris was not working, but that she didn’t take a booking for anyone at 12pm and sent me a photo of the booking sheets to prove it.

Over the last week or so, there has been one booking with Paris where the agency asked the client to wait half an hour and explained why, he was happy to and saw her at the later time with no problem.



Location: Somewhere in Walker, the place have street parking and some people walking around.

The location is another sticking point that doesn’t make sense. Paris works in the center of wallsend. For those that have seen me in 2017 and know how central I am, Paris is less than 2mins walk from me and a minute walk from wallsend metro. Really not walker. Not even in the awkward boarders of wallsend and walker. Its also Paris’ place, not an agency provide flat so its not like it would just have a random amour girl working from there.



Looking: This is where the punt when wrong. I knocked on the door and two minutes later, someone opened the door and welcomed me in. The first impression is horrible, THE GIRL LOOKS NOTHING LIKE HER PROFILE PICTURE AND DESCRIPTIONS, she had blonde hair (her picture shows long dark), around size 10-12 due to big belly (profile shows 8). so I felt I've been bait and switched. I asked her if she is Paris, and why she looks different from her picture (her hair colour, dress size, etc), she replies she changed her hair colour and pics are old. As i walked up the stairs, she told me her real name (if its real), and asked for my real name, lol, had to play the game. Her cup size is somewhere in B, her butt is loose. Overall, its a big let down.

Paris has recently changed her hair so her hair is now blonde. However she hasn’t changed physically. I had a duo with her a week or so ago and have known her for quite a while, and she hasn’t gained weight or changed dress size. Paris’ 
Stats on amour show her as a size 8-10 with a 34B cup, which is accurate.
Pru’s stats are size 12 with a 34D and long blonde hair.

The description the OP gives is a weird mix of the two girls. I know agencies cop a load of stick for dress sizing but suggesting that Paris is bigger than an 8-10 is crazy.

On occasion, Paris does flat share with another girl (not Pru) but Natalia. Her stats are Very similar to Paris and was also not working so its not possible that you saw her instead.

The OP has also said that the girl he saw was half Romanian half English.
Paris is mixed race but not at all Romanian. She is full on Geordie. Obviously I don’t want to specify as it may be quite identifying. Pru is super pale, like myself, and again English and from the north east. Neither girl even looks like they could be Romanian. 



 Service: OWO was sloppy and lack of enthusiastic, then moved to doggy, but she showed no interest of moving and tried to get a way with little work, got to the point where i thought fuck it time to leave. so I just wrapped up and left.


Obviously I can’t comment on skill with regards to services, as I cannot receive a blowjob. However from feedback from clients and from seeing her in duo bookings Paris is top notch, she’s very enthusiastic and clients love her when I’ve been on the phone. I can’t speak for Pru at all as I’ve only met her at our photoshoot and she hasn’t been working while I’ve done the phones, however she has had good feedback, especially when she was doing incalls, which are on her profile.

Overall: I suspect it is the girl I seen is Pru, as she looks like pru from pics of Amour's UKE post and website. the service is negative, not worth the price and feel like been bait and switched, so will not return.


Due to the inconsistencies in the OP’s review, the information I’ve received from him and the office girl and my knowledge of and personal friendship with the girls in question, I’m ready to call bullshit on this review. From the outset the review was fishy and after speaking to everyone involved its pretty clear that the OP is making general comments that are almost believable. 

To cut a long story short – No amour girl had a booking at 12pm on 4th June, Neither Paris or Pru were working that day.  So logically the booking that has been reviewed cannot have gone ahead.

I know some sceptics will just say I’m covering the agencies arse and being stacey’s mouth piece but I’m not, again logically why would I get involved with something that doesn’t concern me and risk damaging my reputation? False and misleading reviews are not fair on both SS and SP and personally I think there has been enough issues regarding the sanctity of reviews and reviewers (Made man, Bruni, denhamhoop to name a few) that its only fair to question a review when it is so blatantly off.

[Kev3773]

As I said earlier it would be interesting, Ultimately Bullshit is being spouted by someone 

[daviemac]

As I said earlier it would be interesting, Ultimately Bullshit is being spouted by someone 

Have to agree mate, op claims the lass he saw said she was 25 yet both Paris and Pru are down as 23 he's also changed from accusing the agency of bait and switch to him saying it was the girls. Bit of a coincidence him saying that just after I posted it had happened before.   

Good, bad or indifferent reviews are what make this site but they have to be an honest reflection of what actually happened.   

[Thomasjackson]

Have to agree mate, op claims the lass he saw said she was 25 yet both Paris and Pru are down as 23 he's also changed from accusing the agency of bait and switch to him saying it was the girls. Bit of a coincidence him saying that just after I posted it had happened before.   

Good, bad or indifferent reviews are what make this site but they have to be an honest reflection of what actually happened.   

lol, I checked the Amour website and Paris's profile before I texted them. And the fact is that the girl told me she is 25 after i sorted out the paper work and took the cloth off, I would like walked off if i know she is not paris. 

[Thomasjackson]

Link: External Link/Members Only


Pre-punt: Texted amour to check when paris starts working, then they replied with time and location and I texted back to confirm the meeting time. Five minutes later, received a message saying if i can wait about half hour for Paris, but i insisted on the agreed time, as i got plans for later, and they texted back saying no problem.

OP has told me the booking was for 12pm on June 4th. June 4th was last Sunday. Paris wasn’t working last Sunday as she cancelled her shift on the Saturday, but site admin didn’t take it down. Pru was  working but she was only on outcalls.

I’ve spoken to the girl that was on the phone who has confirmed not only that Paris was not working, but that she didn’t take a booking for anyone at 12pm and sent me a photo of the booking sheets to prove it.

Over the last week or so, there has been one booking with Paris where the agency asked the client to wait half an hour and explained why, he was happy to and saw her at the later time with no problem.



Location: Somewhere in Walker, the place have street parking and some people walking around.

The location is another sticking point that doesn’t make sense. Paris works in the center of wallsend. For those that have seen me in 2017 and know how central I am, Paris is less than 2mins walk from me and a minute walk from wallsend metro. Really not walker. Not even in the awkward boarders of wallsend and walker. Its also Paris’ place, not an agency provide flat so its not like it would just have a random amour girl working from there.


Looking: This is where the punt when wrong. I knocked on the door and two minutes later, someone opened the door and welcomed me in. The first impression is horrible, THE GIRL LOOKS NOTHING LIKE HER PROFILE PICTURE AND DESCRIPTIONS, she had blonde hair (her picture shows long dark), around size 10-12 due to big belly (profile shows 8). so I felt I've been bait and switched. I asked her if she is Paris, and why she looks different from her picture (her hair colour, dress size, etc), she replies she changed her hair colour and pics are old. As i walked up the stairs, she told me her real name (if its real), and asked for my real name, lol, had to play the game. Her cup size is somewhere in B, her butt is loose. Overall, its a big let down.

Paris has recently changed her hair so her hair is now blonde. However she hasn’t changed physically. I had a duo with her a week or so ago and have known her for quite a while, and she hasn’t gained weight or changed dress size. Paris’ 
Stats on amour show her as a size 8-10 with a 34B cup, which is accurate.
Pru’s stats are size 12 with a 34D and long blonde hair.

The description the OP gives is a weird mix of the two girls. I know agencies cop a load of stick for dress sizing but suggesting that Paris is bigger than an 8-10 is crazy.

On occasion, Paris does flat share with another girl (not Pru) but Natalia. Her stats are Very similar to Paris and was also not working so its not possible that you saw her instead.

The OP has also said that the girl he saw was half Romanian half English.
Paris is mixed race but not at all Romanian. She is full on Geordie. Obviously I don’t want to specify as it may be quite identifying. Pru is super pale, like myself, and again English and from the north east. Neither girl even looks like they could be Romanian. 



 Service: OWO was sloppy and lack of enthusiastic, then moved to doggy, but she showed no interest of moving and tried to get a way with little work, got to the point where i thought fuck it time to leave. so I just wrapped up and left.


Obviously I can’t comment on skill with regards to services, as I cannot receive a blowjob. However from feedback from clients and from seeing her in duo bookings Paris is top notch, she’s very enthusiastic and clients love her when I’ve been on the phone. I can’t speak for Pru at all as I’ve only met her at our photoshoot and she hasn’t been working while I’ve done the phones, however she has had good feedback, especially when she was doing incalls, which are on her profile.

Overall: I suspect it is the girl I seen is Pru, as she looks like pru from pics of Amour's UKE post and website. the service is negative, not worth the price and feel like been bait and switched, so will not return.


Due to the inconsistencies in the OP’s review, the information I’ve received from him and the office girl and my knowledge of and personal friendship with the girls in question, I’m ready to call bullshit on this review. From the outset the review was fishy and after speaking to everyone involved its pretty clear that the OP is making general comments that are almost believable. 

To cut a long story short – No amour girl had a booking at 12pm on 4th June, Neither Paris or Pru were working that day.  So logically the booking that has been reviewed cannot have gone ahead.

I know some sceptics will just say I’m covering the agencies arse and being stacey’s mouth piece but I’m not, again logically why would I get involved with something that doesn’t concern me and risk damaging my reputation? False and misleading reviews are not fair on both SS and SP and personally I think there has been enough issues regarding the sanctity of reviews and reviewers (Made man, Bruni, denhamhoop to name a few) that its only fair to question a review when it is so blatantly off.

lol, I put Paris's name on there is because I asked to see Paris, but saw a different girl instead. and I did say I put Pru, because the girl I saw looks like her from the profile picture. and if Paris and Pru were not working at that time in that location, then should be so easy to find out who worked there right? but no, it is hard, lol.

I remembered the location and post code as it is in my sat nav, lol. Through the review I only mention THE GIRL cause I don't know if she is Paris, Pru or other WG, so that's why I didn't mention "Paris looks like this, or Pru did that", so don't talk as if I'm spreading shit about Paris or Pru (I apologies to got them involved in this).

its funny that ur saying i'm talking shit and giving fake review, but somehow i still remember the post code and address of the location. lol, so shall i repeat myself again to make it clearer? I asked for Paris and later realised it is not her but someone else instead, i didnt really mind but the service was not good enough to make it up for it, which is why i was not too happy about. concise and precise enough?

[LydiaAmour]

lol, I put Paris's name on there is because I asked to see Paris, but saw a different girl instead. and I did say I put Pru, because the girl I saw looks like her from the profile picture. and if Paris and Pru were not working at that time in that location, then should be so easy to find out who worked there right? but no, it is hard, lol.

I remembered the location and post code as it is in my sat nav, lol. Through the review I only mention THE GIRL cause I don't know if she is Paris, Pru or other WG, so that's why I didn't mention "Paris looks like this, or Pru did that", so don't talk as if I'm spreading shit about Paris or Pru (I apologies to got them involved in this).

its funny that ur saying i'm talking shit and giving fake review, but somehow i still remember the post code and address of the location. lol, so shall i repeat myself again to make it clearer? I asked for Paris and later realised it is not her but someone else instead, i didnt really mind but the service was not good enough to make it up for it, which is why i was not too happy about. concise and precise enough?

Thats because no one worked there that day, its paris' place not an agency flat. And if you had asked for paris you would have been told she's not working. Not only that but neither Paris nor Pru are actually 25. Both girls are younger than me. So ignoring the fact that Pru and Paris are the girls you've names and accused of switching as neither of them were working, and ignoring the fact that it was paris' address you told me and the fact that no one was working there that day. Who else could it have been? If it was another amour girl, your description doesn't match anyone? 

its also funny that while you remember the postcode and address, you completely get the location wrong. If you had actually been to the location its very clear thats its wallsend not walker. Its not that difficult to find out an address without actually going through with an appointment.

I don't know why someone would write a fake review but to me its very obvious this is one and not a very well thought out one. I'm sure I'm not the only one that, if i thought i had been bait and switched, by the agency or the girls, I'd get in touch with the agency straight after the booking.

[daviemac]

lol, I checked the Amour website and Paris's profile before I texted them. And the fact is that the girl told me she is 25 after i sorted out the paper work and took the cloth off, I would like walked off if i know she is not paris.

You said in your review you didn't think it was Paris   

THE GIRL LOOKS NOTHING LIKE HER PROFILE PICTURE AND DESCRIPTIONS,

     and she even gave you a different name so why didn't you walk then.       

As i walked up the stairs, she told me her real name (if its real), and asked for my real name, lol, had to play the game.

The name she gave you should be a bit of a clue to who you saw, why have you not said what that was        I have to say though I've been punting off and on for a lot of years and I've never been asked my real name nor am I aware of being told a prossies real name, or age for that matter unless I've commented on it and she's confirmed it. Normal procedure for me has been when the door's opened I'm asked if I'm the punting name I've used then she's introduce herself as whoever I booked.

For reviews here to be credible and not attract scepticism they have to be an honest and accurate account of what happened, you are (according to the heading) reviewing Pru and you don't even know if it was her you saw.

If you book a particular escort and she's not as per her description just state the differences, if she tells you she's called a different name state what that name was, if you think there's been a bait and switch describe the girl you saw and how she's different to who you booked but don't speculate on anything.

Connecting a false negative review to some lass who you couldn't have seen and who you now don't think you saw  is out of order and the actions of someone with a grudge.          

   

[walking dead]

Not saying the ops review is accurate or not.
I have seen most of the girls mentioned in this thread Paris and Natalia are both slim girls. Least they were a few months back.
On top of that a couple of the girls mentioned in this thread have told me their real name, so it does happen.

[Thomasjackson]

You said in your review you didn't think it was Paris         and she even gave you a different name so why didn't you walk then.       

The name she gave you should be a bit of a clue to who you saw, why have you not said what that was        I have to say though I've been punting off and on for a lot of years and I've never been asked my real name nor am I aware of being told a prossies real name, or age for that matter unless I've commented on it and she's confirmed it. Normal procedure for me has been when the door's opened I'm asked if I'm the punting name I've used then she's introduce herself as whoever I booked.

For reviews here to be credible and not attract scepticism they have to be an honest and accurate account of what happened, you are (according to the heading) reviewing Pru and you don't even know if it was her you saw.

If you book a particular escort and she's not as per her description just state the differences, if she tells you she's called a different name state what that name was, if you think there's been a bait and switch describe the girl you saw and how she's different to who you booked but don't speculate on anything.

Connecting a false negative review to some lass who you couldn't have seen and who you now don't think you saw  is out of order and the actions of someone with a grudge.          

 

It's shouldn't be a different girl in the first place, lol, but I sticked with it cause I don't have plan B and thought might as well TOFTT and her service might make up for it.

I confirmed with her if she's Paris after she opened the door and letted me in, and she says yes. And she goes Sophie or Sophia is my real name though.

Its the first time a girl asked for my real name. I didn't give a shit when she gave me her real name, as there is no way fucking way I will give her my real name and detail, fucking simple.

[Kev3773]

It's shouldn't be a different girl in the first place, lol, but I sticked with it cause I don't have plan B and thought might as well TOFTT and her service might make up for it.

I confirmed with her if she's Paris after she opened the door and letted me in, and she says yes. And she goes Sophie or Sophia is my real name though.

Over to you Lydia !! 

[daviemac]

It's shouldn't be a different girl in the first place, simple.

None of this alters the fact you've given someone you haven't seen a negative review.     

[Thomasjackson]

None of this alters the fact you've given someone you haven't seen a negative review.     

It's the fact that I asked for Paris but replaced with other girl got to this review. And ur point is I should have just keep quiet and not give out review? 

[LydiaAmour]

Bare with me as I am on my phone and usually on the laptop

My point is that neither girl you've named was working so you couldn't have seen someone when you said you did. No other girls except Paris and Natalia work from Paris' place. Paris wasn't working on Sunday so you wouldn't have booked an appointment with her.

Of course you should say something if you've seen the wrong girl, but my point is that you didn't contact the agency about it. I personally would have contacted the agency as well as reviewing.

The fact is no amour girl had a booking at 12pm on Sunday. Paris wasn't working. Pru doesn't do incalls. You couldn't have booked Paris and saw pru. It's not fair on pru to have a negative review when you didn't see her.

If you are certain that you went to the address you told me on June 4th at 12pm you would have been faced with an unanswered door and no option of getting ya dick wet.

Personally I just think you are a trol, maybe someone with a grudge against the agency? Or maybe a personal problem with Paris?

As for Paris telling you her real name, she's very open about it and a lot of clients know her real name.

Nothing you've stated makes any sense.


Now to be clear, guys when you have a shit punt or an agency messed you around, then yes a negative review is totally justified. But at least let the agency know when there's an issue.

[daviemac]

It's the fact that I asked for Paris but replaced with other girl got to this review. And ur point is I should have just keep quiet and not give out review? 

My point is you've given a negative review for someone you haven't seen. Your review title states it's about Pru you criticise Pru's performance but it seems you haven't seen Pru so how can you judge her. Unless you're sure of the name it shouldn't be mentioned.

Can you confirm you saw Pru or are you guessing it was her, if you're guessing or you know you haven't seen Pru then you review, as it is, is not right. 

I can sympathise with anyone who feels they've been ripped off or subjected to a bait and switch but that doesn't give that person the right to give negative reviews to someone they haven't seen.

[johnny34]

For reviews here to be credible and not attract scepticism they have to be an honest and accurate account of what happened, you are (according to the heading) reviewing Pru and you don't even know if it was her you saw.

Connecting a false negative review to some lass who you couldn't have seen and who you now don't think you saw  is out of order and the actions of someone with a grudge.          

+1 something not right about this review.

If you don't even know who you saw how can you review? If he saw anyone that is?

[jarrovian]

Bare with me as I am on my phone and usually on the laptop

My point is that neither girl you've named was working so you couldn't have seen someone when you said you did. No other girls except Paris and Natalia work from Paris' place. Paris wasn't working on Sunday so you wouldn't have booked an appointment with her.

Of course you should say something if you've seen the wrong girl, but my point is that you didn't contact the agency about it. I personally would have contacted the agency as well as reviewing.

The fact is no amour girl had a booking at 12pm on Sunday. Paris wasn't working. Pru doesn't do incalls. You couldn't have booked Paris and saw pru. It's not fair on pru to have a negative review when you didn't see her.

If you are certain that you went to the address you told me on June 4th at 12pm you would have been faced with an unanswered door and no option of getting ya dick wet.

Personally I just think you are a trol, maybe someone with a grudge against the agency? Or maybe a personal problem with Paris?

As for Paris telling you her real name, she's very open about it and a lot of clients know her real name.

Nothing you've stated makes any sense.


Now to be clear, guys when you have a shit punt or an agency messed you around, then yes a negative review is totally justified. But at least let the agency know when there's an issue.

But he didn't see Paris so how could she give him her real name? Or have I read this wrong, it happens in my old age

[daviemac]

But he didn't see Paris so how could she give him her real name? Or have I read this wrong, it happens in my old age

Not sure but he didn't see Pru either but that didn't stop him giving her a neg.   

[LydiaAmour]

But he didn't see Paris so how could she give him her real name? Or have I read this wrong, it happens in my old age

This is my point. Walking dead has said he's seen her and she told him her real name so he could leave a neg saying he saw her yesterday. Just because you can give certain bits of information doesn't mean for sure that you've seen someone.

[Thomasjackson]

Bare with me as I am on my phone and usually on the laptop

My point is that neither girl you've named was working so you couldn't have seen someone when you said you did. No other girls except Paris and Natalia work from Paris' place. Paris wasn't working on Sunday so you wouldn't have booked an appointment with her.

Of course you should say something if you've seen the wrong girl, but my point is that you didn't contact the agency about it. I personally would have contacted the agency as well as reviewing.

The fact is no amour girl had a booking at 12pm on Sunday. Paris wasn't working. Pru doesn't do incalls. You couldn't have booked Paris and saw pru. It's not fair on pru to have a negative review when you didn't see her.

If you are certain that you went to the address you told me on June 4th at 12pm you would have been faced with an unanswered door and no option of getting ya dick wet.

Personally I just think you are a trol, maybe someone with a grudge against the agency? Or maybe a personal problem with Paris?

As for Paris telling you her real name, she's very open about it and a lot of clients know her real name.

Nothing you've stated makes any sense.


Now to be clear, guys when you have a shit punt or an agency messed you around, then yes a negative review is totally justified. But at least let the agency know when there's an issue.

Lol, just got confirmed that the girl is actually Paris.

But now your saying i didn't get answered by Paris, or been in the property when i was there; btw how the fuck would i be there when the agency haven't texted me her address.

 I made the mistake of putting wrong location (walker), cause i drove past there on the way to the punting location, The punt location is in Wallsend and the post code is NE28.

plus when u said she recently changed hair colour, then you could amend that information on the website can't you? nope, u didnt, but the website can update the working hour. lol, calling me bullshit. 

[LydiaAmour]

Lol, just got confirmed that the girl is actually Paris.

But now your saying i didn't get answered by Paris, or been in the property when i was there; btw how the fuck would i be there when the agency haven't texted me her address.

 I made the mistake of putting wrong location (walker), cause i drove past there on the way to the punting location, The punt location is in Wallsend and the post code is NE28.

plus when u said she recently changed hair colour, then you could amend that information on the website can't you? nope, u didnt, but the website can update the working hour. lol, calling me bullshit. 

Someone could text the agency, make a booking get the address and cancel? It's not rocket science. I could text premium, make a booking Delilah get her address and cancel the booking. I would still know the address.

Just accept that your review is bullshit and you've been caught out.

[walking dead]

Via pm he has confirmed he knows her name , or at least the one she tells punters.
He either knows her or has met her....

[LydiaAmour]

Via pm he has confirmed he knows her name , or at least the one she tells punters.
He either knows her or has met her....

Which is all well and good, but he hasn't seen her in the circumstances that he says he has. Like I said, you know her real name, you know her address, you could say you saw her last sunday when she wasn't working. Just because you know this information doesn't mean the booking the review is of actually went ahead. And if he knows her personally then its poor form completely.

However, I've had clients ask if i know certain girls and they'll be like 'oh do you know mildred? her working name is martha' so there is the possibility that he has been told the name by someone else.

I know another former working girl told a mutual client of ours my real name. And I know this particular girl has done this with other girls too. Its not beyond the realms of possibility.

[walking dead]

Which is all well and good, but he hasn't seen her in the circumstances that he says he has. Like I said, you know her real name, you know her address, you could say you saw her last sunday when she wasn't working. Just because you know this information doesn't mean the booking the review is of actually went ahead. And if he knows her personally then its poor form completely.

However, I've had clients ask if i know certain girls and they'll be like 'oh do you know mildred? her working name is martha' so there is the possibility that he has been told the name by someone else.

I know another former working girl told a mutual client of ours my real name. And I know this particular girl has done this with other girls too. Its not beyond the realms of possibility.

No its not. For what it's worth I think he has seen Paris.  Maybe the new blonde hair you mentioned caused him to think is pru?

Is it a negative because he thought it was b&s or because of the meeting ?

[Thomasjackson]

Which is all well and good, but he hasn't seen her in the circumstances that he says he has. Like I said, you know her real name, you know her address, you could say you saw her last sunday when she wasn't working. Just because you know this information doesn't mean the booking the review is of actually went ahead. And if he knows her personally then its poor form completely.

However, I've had clients ask if i know certain girls and they'll be like 'oh do you know mildred? her working name is martha' so there is the possibility that he has been told the name by someone else.

I know another former working girl told a mutual client of ours my real name. And I know this particular girl has done this with other girls too. Its not beyond the realms of possibility.

like i said in the above, that is the first time i been asked about real name and been told of WG's real name. U know a former WG do that shit, dont mean others does that as well. and the thing is that i give u my punt phone number, so u can actually check those information, but did u? by adapting your perspective and logic i would say fuck no, lol.

the review is just my fucking opinion, and if ur attitude was good, i would fucking return and try different lass, but no, poor as fuck. 

[baresi]

Her name was Magill, and she called herself Lil
But everyone knew her as Nancy

[daviemac]

Is it a negative because he thought it was b&s or because of the meeting ?

His review's topic heading states Pru therefore the review regarding services is for who he thought was Pru. She has nothing to do with this and should not have a negative against her.

The OP even states in his review he asked if she was Paris when he arrived and she confirmed she was but he decided she was Pru and incorrectly gave her a negative.

A review is only valid if it refers to the girl you had the booking with and he did not have a booking with or even see Pru.

[LydiaAmour]

like i said in the above, that is the first time i been asked about real name and been told of WG's real name. U know a former WG do that shit, dont mean others does that as well. and the thing is that i give u my punt phone number, so u can actually check those information, but did u? by adapting your perspective and logic i would say fuck no, lol.

the review is just my fucking opinion, and if ur attitude was good, i would fucking return and try different lass, but no, poor as fuck.

you gave me the last 4 numbers. I've checked as best I can and as I've repeatedly said, no amour girl had a booking at 12pm on sunday 4th june. I cant check things that aren't there.

You are of course entitled to your opinion, but you've given a negative review to a girl you haven't seen which isn't fair.

If you have seen paris think she's a shit punt then thats your opinion and you are more than entitled to it. But you told me you saw her on a day that she wasn't working. How could you have seen her on that day if she wasn't working? I asked you for the details and have investigated as best i can from the details you've given me.

If you've fudged the date, how would I know? and what you have given me supports the fact that the booking didn't take place. it may have been sometime in may that this has happened and the texts wouldn't be on the phone anymore. And I would have no choice but to take your word for it. 

[LydiaAmour]

No its not. For what it's worth I think he has seen Paris.  Maybe the new blonde hair you mentioned caused him to think is pru?

Is it a negative because he thought it was b&s or because of the meeting ?

Possibly, however the difference in their hair colour is stark. Paris is sandy blonde and pru is white blonde.

[walking dead]

Possibly, however the difference in their hair colour is stark. Paris is sandy blonde and pru is white blonde.

As a man I would have no idea of the difference   

[LydiaAmour]

As a man I would have no idea of the difference   

you would if you saw them.
obviously not the actual girls.

Hidden Image/Members Only

[LydiaAmour]

Theres a massive difference in the hair for one.





Hidden Image/Members Only