But you specifically said cheap charlies, thats punters not WGs. Reminds me of a post by Lamorak now banned where he posted he would pay more in the hope the riff raff (like me) wouldnt punt with the WG. Unlike you i love real sluts who offer a good service.
No answer to what rates you are prepared to pay, minimum and maximum i note, up to you of course. Mine are i have no lower limit as i am happy to be a cheap charlie as you posted, and my maximum in the last 5 years has been £180 an hour, i am very unlikely to ever go over £200 an hour again.
Imo there are some punters who really don't care who they see or what they get up to, and go for the cheapest option, their choice.
Also there are those WG's who offer a service to who have been referred to as 'Cheap Charlies' and these girls imo are sluts, meaning, anything goes!
It's my choice to keep clear of these girls!
When I saw the phrase 'Cheap Charlie' it's how I see that title... I'm not inferring that a punter who searches for a bargain is what I consider as a true 'Cheap Charlie'. As I mentioned, I will go for a WG who has a cheap rate if she satisfies my criteria...
Hope that explains how I see it?