Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: £60 ph Prossies. Skanks or Bargains?  (Read 25966 times)

Offline Jimmyredcab

I havent the insight to know what you have posted here. Most are controlled by enforcers and the woman only gets a fraction of the fee. How does a punter know what the WG actually gets in such circumstances.

I have absolutely no idea ------------------- but if you were a Romanian pimp how much would you want out of £60, I would want at least half because I would be supplying the premises, the maid and the advertising.

Offline Jimmyredcab

I think you know Jimmy these brothels do not have fancy things like website, so you can either take my word or go through the local papers

I have no reason to suspect you are telling lies ------------------ however I dread to think what type of girls would work in these very downmarket brothels, probably on a par with druggy street girls.    :thumbsdown:

I have no reason to suspect you are telling lies ------------------ however I dread to think what type of girls would work in these very downmarket brothels, probably on a par with druggy street girls.    :thumbsdown:

Actually, like any parlour the quality varies, but some of them are good decent lookers. Here is one that has worked Lady Marmalade parties, (but was a shit shag).

http://www.ladymarmaladeparties.com/hostesses/details/andreea1

Offline smiths

I have absolutely no idea ------------------- but if you were a Romanian pimp how much would you want out of £60, I would want at least half because I would be supplying the premises, the maid and the advertising.

If a WG is working of her own free will what she agrees to give her pimp in exchange for the above is her business in my view. As its not provable to me anyway a WG could say a figure which is a lie and i have no way of knowing the truth.

HOD used to take a third of a WGs fee by agreement for the above you mention, Belle/Dr Magnanti said she used to pay a third to her Agency, who knows if the cut given is the same or more than that, not me.

I do know some party WGs cant be getting more than £150-200 at LAPC Parties for 3 hours, including English WGs, yet they party their on a regular basis. So some WGs will work for £50-66 an hour. Its all punting.

Offline smiths

I have no reason to suspect you are telling lies ------------------ however I dread to think what type of girls would work in these very downmarket brothels, probably on a par with druggy street girls.    :thumbsdown:

Cute Ann used to work from an EE group flat in Golders Green and was an excellent WG in my experience as were many of her colleagues over the years. Charging from £80-110 an hour. She had a number of good FRs, including one from me.

Offline philboi

More expensive girls would see anyone too...just charge them more :D Flawed logic there.

Not too sure it's that flawed although I understand what you're saying!

I'm just assuming more expensive girls would care more about who they see... it's just a feeling..  :unknown:

Offline skittish

I paid £60 for half hour last night and wished I'd got on the train and come down to Canary Wharf instead.
To be honest it doesn't really matter what price we pay here you can almost guarantee a shit service if it's £60 or £160. I've seen recent positive reports for my area, some punters are either easily pleased or just used to mediocre.

I'm sure Jimmy is right about the 'enforcers' in London. The girls round here appear to be largely independent they're just lazy miserable fuckers. 

Offline Mark76

I has an hour the other week for £70. It included a levels and cim. The lady works in a parlour with a poor reputation. However the 'parlour' also has a private apartment which is in fact quite nice. The service overall was very good, a nice, young and pretty girl who gave a good service. Incidentally the girl is happy to charge £70 as in her own words "I think that is enough" and I was not going to argue with her!

I've also had hour appointments costing £40 and £50 per hour which have been better than those costing £120. So no, just because an appointment is cheap does not mean it will necessarily be bad.
Banning reason: White-knight

Offline Mark76

Not too sure it's that flawed although I understand what you're saying!

I'm just assuming more expensive girls would care more about who they see... it's just a feeling..  :unknown:

Assumption is deadly. You can't treat all "more expensive girls" the same. Some are just downright money grabbers and really will see as many people as possible, some are genuinely more discerning, but don't make the mistake of assuming they are all the same. They really are not!
Banning reason: White-knight

Offline smiths

Assumption is deadly. You can't treat all "more expensive girls" the same. Some are just downright money grabbers and really will see as many people as possible, some are genuinely more discerning, but don't make the mistake of assuming they are all the same. They really are not!

Spot on, as ever how good a WG is depends on her own attitude, what she happens to charge is neither her nor there to that. I have for years been reading about WGs who offer good service and work out of Soho Walk-Ups from about £25 for a quicky. I have punted with WGs from £70 an hour who offered me good service and WGs at parties who offered the same who were getting no more than £200 for 3 hours.

Equating price with how good a WG is is a big mistake which could cost a punter dear.

Offline Jimmyredcab



I'm just assuming more expensive girls would care more about who they see... it's just a feeling..  :unknown:

As long as you have £200 in your wallet they will see you, when they say "exclusive" they simply mean they are not available to Cheap Charlies.    :hi:

As long as you have £200 in your wallet they will see you, when they say "exclusive" they simply mean they are not available to Cheap Charlies.    :hi:

Alternatively, when they say "exclusive" they mean only available to fluffies, which equates to less physical work for more money. :hi:

Offline philboi

when they say "exclusive" they simply mean they are not available to Cheap Charlies.    :hi:

Great!
It's the 'Cheap Charlie's' who worry me, so if a WG doesn't see them, I a little happier  :)

Offline smiths

Great!
It's the 'Cheap Charlie's' who worry me, so if a WG doesn't see them, I a little happier  :)

Really, so punters who choose to pay what they view as VFM rates worry you. Why is that?

So what do you pay rate wise, whats your minimum and maximum for half hour and hour punts?

Offline Jimmyredcab

Great!
It's the 'Cheap Charlie's' who worry me, so if a WG doesn't see them, I a little happier  :)

Sorry, I don't understand your logic.     :unknown: :unknown:

Offline philboi

Really, so punters who choose to pay what they view as VFM rates worry you. Why is that?

So what do you pay rate wise, whats your minimum and maximum for half hour and hour punts?

It really has to do with the WG and how she portrays herself.
It's not just one single thing like her rate, but if imo she portrays herself as a real slut and her rate is cheap, I won't go anywhere near her!

On the other hand, the girl could portray herself as the type I go for and after a chat on the phone I'm convinced she's what I call a decent girl, if her rate is cheaper then it's a result :)

We all have our own ways to filter WG's, mine works for me  :thumbsup:
« Last Edit: June 22, 2013, 04:05:57 PM by philboi »

Offline smiths

It really has to do with the WG and how she portrays herself.
It's not just one single thing like her rate, but if imo she portrays herself as a real slut and her rate is cheap, I won't go anywhere near her!

On the other hand, the girl could portray herself as the type I go for and after a chat on the phone I'm convinced she's what I call a decent girl, if her rate is cheaper then it's a result :)

We all have our own ways to filter WG's, mine works for me  :thumbsup:

But you specifically said cheap charlies, thats punters not WGs. Reminds me of a post by Lamorak now banned where he posted he would pay more in the hope the riff raff (like me) wouldnt punt with the WG. Unlike you i love real sluts who offer a good service.

No answer to what rates you are prepared to pay, minimum and maximum i note, up to you of course. Mine are i have no lower limit as i am happy to be a cheap charlie as you posted, and my maximum in the last 5 years has been £180 an hour, i am very unlikely to ever go over £200 an hour again.

Offline Jimmyredcab



On the other hand, the girl could portray herself as the type I go for and after a chat on the phone I'm convinced she's what I call a decent girl, if her rate is cheaper then it's a result

"Decent" girls don't rent out their pussy to all and sundry, the price is irrelevant.    :hi:

Offline philboi

But you specifically said cheap charlies, thats punters not WGs. Reminds me of a post by Lamorak now banned where he posted he would pay more in the hope the riff raff (like me) wouldnt punt with the WG. Unlike you i love real sluts who offer a good service.

No answer to what rates you are prepared to pay, minimum and maximum i note, up to you of course. Mine are i have no lower limit as i am happy to be a cheap charlie as you posted, and my maximum in the last 5 years has been £180 an hour, i am very unlikely to ever go over £200 an hour again.

Imo there are some punters who really don't care who they see or what they get up to, and go for the cheapest option, their choice.
Also there are those WG's who offer a service to who have been referred to as 'Cheap Charlies' and these girls imo are sluts, meaning, anything goes!

It's my choice to keep clear of these girls!

When I saw the phrase 'Cheap Charlie' it's how I see that title... I'm not inferring that a punter who searches for a bargain is what I consider as a true 'Cheap Charlie'. As I mentioned, I will go for a WG who has a cheap rate if she satisfies my criteria...

Hope that explains how I see it?

Offline philboi

"Decent" girls don't rent out their pussy to all and sundry, the price is irrelevant.    :hi:

That's the point 'Decent' girls..... yes, the price is irrelevant as long as she's decent!

Offline smiths

Imo there are some punters who really don't care who they see or what they get up to, and go for the cheapest option, their choice.
Also there are those WG's who offer a service to who have been referred to as 'Cheap Charlies' and these girls imo are sluts, meaning, anything goes!

It's my choice to keep clear of these girls!

When I saw the phrase 'Cheap Charlie' it's how I see that title... I'm not inferring that a punter who searches for a bargain is what I consider as a true 'Cheap Charlie'. As I mentioned, I will go for a WG who has a cheap rate if she satisfies my criteria...

Hope that explains how I see it?

Its up to you who you punt with, just as its up to others who they do obviously. No answer again regarding what min and max rates you pay, i will put that down to it being your business, and not mine. I might ask you again though if you post on topics about rates, after all to give an opinion about what others pay but not be prepared to say what you pay is hardly fair, in my view.

Offline philboi

Its up to you who you punt with, just as its up to others who they do obviously. No answer again regarding what min and max rates you pay, i will put that down to it being your business, and not mine. I might ask you again though if you post on topics about rates, after all to give an opinion about what others pay but not be prepared to say what you pay is hardly fair, in my view.

Point taken, but the topic was also about 'skanks', thats what I've been discussing and in my opinion a skank is not worth any money to me at all.

I don't mind mentioning how much I pay..

As a rule I'll mostly go for an hour or two but if I'm not sure about the WG on a first visit, then 30 mins to test the water!

For 1 hour the min I've ever paid is £80, and I've not seen them for £60 per hour in my area.
The max I've ever paid is £160 per hour. Not that I can't afford it but I feel anything much more than that is excessive..
« Last Edit: June 22, 2013, 05:07:09 PM by philboi »

Offline smiths

Point taken, but the topic was also about 'skanks', thats what I've been discussing and in my opinion a skank is not worth any money to me at all.

I don't mind mentioning how much I pay..

As a rule I'll mostly go for an hour or two but if I'm not sure about the WG on a first visit, then 30 mins to test the water!

For 1 hour the min I've ever paid is £80, and I've not seen them for £60 per hour in my area.
The max I've ever paid is £160 per hour. Not that I can't afford it but I feel anything much more than that is excessive..

Thanks, like pulling teeth but we got there in the end.

panel999

Hi just got back from an amazing 1 hour punt with Busty Lara-90 based in Ilford -  as per previous punt report

https://www.adultwork.com/2013759 or https://www.adultwork.com/Busty+Lara%2D90

All for £60 ph - + £10 extra for swallow - We did all as per her profile twice - Review to follow later tonight..



3 review(s) found for the service provider linked to in above post (3 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative)

panel999

As agreed the review link here -https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=14496.0


Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)